Abstract
Aims To determine the suspected adverse drug reaction (ADR) profile of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs: montelukast and zafirlukast) relative to first-line asthma medications short-acting beta agonists (SABA: salbutamol) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICH: beclomethasone) in the United Kingdom. To determine chemical and pharmacological rationale for the suspected ADR signals.
Methods Properties of the asthma medications (pharmacokinetics and pharmacology) were datamined from the chemical database of bioactive molecules with drug-like properties, European molecular Biology laboratory (ChEMBL). Suspected ADR profiles of the asthma medications was curated from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) Yellow Card interactive drug analysis profiles (iDAP) and concatenated to the standardised prescribing levels (Open Prescribing) between 2018-2023.
Results Total ADRs per 100,000 Rx (P < .001) and psychiatric system organ class (SOC) ADRs (P < .001) reached statistical significance. Montelukast exhibited the greatest ADR rate at 15.64 per 100,000 Rx. The low lipophilic ligand efficiency (LLE = 0.15) of montelukast relative to the controls may explain the promiscuity of interactions with off-target G-coupled protein receptors (GPCRs). This included the dopamine signalling axis, which in combination with bioaccumulation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to achieve Cmax beyond a typical dose can be ascribed to the psychiatric side effects observed. Cardiac ADRs did not reach statistical significance but inhibitory interaction of montelukast with the MAP kinase p38 alpha (a cardiac protective pathway) was identified as a potential rationale for montelukast withdrawal cardiac effects.
Conclusion Relative to the controls, montelukast displays a range of suspected system organ class level ADRs. For psychiatric ADR, montelukast is statistically significant (P < .001). A mechanistic hypothesis is proposed based on polypharmacological interactions in combination with CSF levels attained. This work further supports the close monitoring of montelukast for neuropsychiatric side effects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and supporting materials.