The mediating role of social network between social trust and life satisfaction of older people: A structural equation model analysis approach
==============================================================================================================================================

* Xinyu He
* Zhaoyong Yang
* Haimei Li
* Shihe Li
* Chuanxin Xu

## Abstract

**Background** Although studies have demonstrated the relationship between the social trust and life satisfaction of older people, but existing studies have rarely considered the fewer studies have investigated social network as a mediating variable between social trust and life satisfaction.

**Methods** In this study, 297 participants (age: ≥60 years) in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China, completed a questionnaire of social trust, social network, and life satisfaction. Structural equation model analysis and bootstrap methods were used to prove the mediating effect of social network.

**Results** Social trust was positively related to life satisfaction (*B* =0.410; p <0.01) and social network (*B* =0.472; p <0.01), social network was positively related to life satisfaction (*B* =0.433; p <0.01). and social network played an intermediary role in the relationship between social trust and life satisfaction (indirect effects = 0.321, bootstrap 95% CI = [0.051, 0.968]).

**Conclusion** These findings suggest the importance of social trust for life satisfaction, with social network acting as a positive mediator, particularly in China. In conclusion, this study exploring the mediating effect of social network provides knowledge essential for ensuring a happy old age. The study results can help advance psychological research on life satisfaction of older people and suggest new intervention strategies in this field. We encourage increasing the expansion of social networks through various means to enhance the impact of social trust on life satisfaction of older people.

Keywords
*   Older people
*   Social network
*   Social trust
*   Life satisfaction
*   Mediating effect

## Background

According to China’s seventh census, the number of people aged ≥ 60 years has reached 264 million, accounting for 18.3% of the total population in 2020.1 By 2050, Chinese older people are estimated to account for one-third of the country’s population [1]. With the increase in the aging population, the question is whether they can have a good quality of life and whether a more active social interaction (measured as social network) can translate into higher life satisfaction levels [2, 3]. Life satisfaction, a useful concept in the study of social psychology well-being which reflects the cognitive aspect of subjective well-being, is associated with physical and mental health of older adults [4], which refers to one’s self-evaluation of his/her life [5, 6]. For example, a self-evaluation in the past, present, and future [7–9]. Consequently, life satisfaction of the elderly people has recently received considerable attention [10]. Understanding factors that impact life satisfaction not only can help understanding happiness and quality of life but also have important implications, as higher life satisfaction is related to better physical and mental health outcomes, such as a reduced risk of disease, depression and loneliness [11–13].

To study the factors of life satisfaction, several theoretical models have been developed, including a bottom-up, top-down and comprehensive accounts, which means that life satisfaction is made up of demographics (e. g., health, income, job), satisfaction with aspects of life (e. g., satisfaction with family or friendship, social life), and personality traits [14, 15]. Nonetheless, life satisfaction must be understood in the context of each culture [15]. In the collectivist culture, such as in China, people lay more emphasis on social relationships and connectedness with others [16], and social relationships are related to life satisfaction of the older people [17, 18]. However, with age and retirement, people more likely lose original social roles, and according to social disengagement theory, older people rarely interact with society and are willing to withdraw from their social system [19, 20]. To take new social roles and maintain positive social interactions, building new social networks and relationships are important to older people [21]. Knowing the concept of social capital, and more broadly, the significance of social relationships as a cornerstone of a functional society is crucial, because they have significant positive effects on life satisfaction [22, 23].

Social capital, which can be viewed from an individual’s perspective and considered as crucial social resource embedded in a network of community social relations, through which people share memberships, values, and social norms [24]. We considered individual-level social capital as a multi-dimensional concept, that can be measured on the basis of structural and cognitive dimensions [25]. Structural social capital, mainly refers to the objective social structure, such as social network and social participation. While cognitive social capital, refers to trust, values, beliefs, reciprocity. and other psychological processes [26, 27]. Some studies have proven that a close relationship exists between structural, cognitive social capital, and life satisfaction among older people [28, 29]. For example, according to a survey, social network has positive effects on life satisfaction [30]. More specifically, older people connect with each other through social networking, social trust and establishment of social relationships, which is helpful for improving life satisfaction [31, 32].

Although these associations are well known, few studies have explored the relationship between structural social capital and cognitive social capital, and, in particular, the path from social trust to life satisfaction through social network in the elderly people has not been fully explored. To fill the research gap, this study explored the mediating role of social network between the social trust and life satisfaction of older people.

### Social trust and life satisfaction

Social trust is a major indicator of cognitive social capital, which has been considered a key determinant of happiness [33–37]. Studies have recognized two types of social trust: interpersonal trust and institutional trust [38]. Interpersonal trust refers to individual’s psychological state of believing that most people can be trusted, including positive expectations about others’ behaviors[39, 40]. Trust facilitates a safe and stable social environment in relationships by reducing feelings of worry or anxiety [41]. Using multiple linear regression and a mixed-design analysis of variance, a survey tested a sample of community dwelling participants (age: 55-89 years) in the New Zealand. The results showed that the neighborhood relationship was associated with older people’s subjective well-being [42]. The more you trust your neighbors, the higher your life satisfaction will be. Using a sample of Chinese older people from the rural area, a study research showed that interpersonal trust and family support were significantly positively associated with life satisfaction [28].

Institutional trust reflects people’s attitudes and satisfaction toward state institutions (e.g., government institutions, educational institutions, medical institutions and judicial branches). Compared with young people, the trustworthiness of public institutions affects elderly people’s evaluation of society and thus their well-being [43]. On measuring the levels of trust of participants in eight institutions, a researcher found that institutional trust was positively associated with life satisfaction [17], another researcher investigated the predictive effect of generalized trust on health, happiness, and life satisfaction among older adults who lived in six non-Western countries, they reported that generalized trust can predict greater health and life satisfaction [44]. Exploring cross-sectional data of 5000 older people (≥ 65 years), the results of a study showed that community trust can mitigate inequalities in well-being and maintain good mentality [45]. Older people, with higher levels of institutional trust tend to exhibit better adherence and acceptance of policy measures and better satisfaction with their life [46]. According to the above literature, we propose the following hypothesis.

**Hypothesis 1** Social trust is positively related to life satisfaction in older people.

### Social network and life satisfaction

Social network is a crucial indicator of structural social capital, which is-“the array of social connections that give access to instrumental and emotional supports” [47]. The results of a study exhibited that social network size and network contact frequency could allow older people access beneficial resources and support, thereby helping them sustain higher life satisfaction [48]. Meanwhile, formal and informal social networks are the base from which social capital is generated to influence people’s behaviors and values, including well-being [49, 50]. On the source of happiness, the researchers found that a strong informal social network was associated with individual’s happiness, including how many times they see friends and relatives [12, 51]. This is because, older people who had a wide range of social relationships, were the happiest [52]. But another study indicated that the number of close friends had the weakest relationship with life satisfaction among older people [6]. Moreover, older people participating in social activities can expand their formal social network, and thus improve their life satisfaction [53–55]. The findings of researcher suggested that group participation through formal social networks is linked to life satisfaction in later life [56]. Similarly, another researcher analyzed the association between social network and quality of life in older Chilean people and found that participating in formal social support networks is associated with high quality of life [57].

Chinese cultural values may also be a crucial player in explaining how social network can affect life satisfaction of older people. East Asian cultures tend to be more collectivist and communal [58, 59]. Collectivism, a unique cultural context in Chinese society, values connections with others and social relationships. In this context, social relationships, such as family and friend-focused network types, highly affect Chinese people’s life satisfaction, especially that of older people, who are deeply influenced by the Chinese traditional culture [60, 61].

According to the socioemotional selectivity theory [62], those who grow older tend to choose social networks that allow them to form close social relationships. Thus, compared with young people, older people are more likely to choose social networks on which they can trust and that provide opportunities for companionship. On the one hand, older people are embedded in “family-centered” and “friend-centered” social networks from where they receive social support [63]. The more frequent the face-to-face contact with other network members, the more social support people can obtain [48]. On the other hand, participating in formal social networks and meaningful community activities can bring a sense of belonging and self-identity, as well as provide opportunities for social engagement and sharing leisure and entertainment activities. This, thus, enhances life satisfaction among older people [64]. The following hypothesis can be established.

**Hypothesis 2** Social network is positively related to life satisfaction in older people.

### Social trust and social network

Social trust is linked to social network. Using data from the first Norwegian survey, the study demonstrated that in non-kin relationships, social networks were associated with higher levels of generalized trust [65]. Another related feature of networks and trust relationships is possibly the resources accessible to individuals through their interactions [66, 67]. Studies have found that the higher the frequency of contact of the elderly people with the outside world, the higher is the number of resources they can access. Individual’s resources (family relationship, and network resources) and social trust are positively correlated [68–69, 30]. A research’s findings showed that if the level of social trust is higher, an individual would more likely approach the social network actively, thereby gaining more material and emotional support [70]. According to the above literature, we posit the following hypothesis.

**Hypothesis 3** Social trust is positively related to social network in older people.

### Mediation effect of social network on the relations between social trust and life satisfaction

The social capital theory can explain how social network can mediate the relationship between social trust and life satisfaction. Social capital can be considered to stem from a social network, which provides resources such as social support, trust, and information. This network, different from the social cohesion concept of social capital, can be evaluated at the individual or collective level [71]. Broadly speaking, approaches used for studying social capital suggest that social capital can be measured by the level of collective or individual resources [8]. Some researches focused on the study of social capital as a level of collective resources, while Lin and colleagues mainly focused on the impact of social capital as a level individual resource [72, 73]. Considering that the goal of the present study is to explore the mediating effect of the social network on the relationship between social trust and life satisfaction of older people, we applied Lin’s definition of social capital, that is, the sum of individual-level resources [49] (e.g., social support and, information). Also, social capital is the social network among individuals that is based on trust [70]. It refers to the ability of individuals to access resources by being a member of a particular social network, that is, to extract value from social relationships that can be mobilized. In other words, social capital is a resource embedded in a social network [74]. The influence of powerful and ties in a network is related to social capital. These social networks and ties can be of numerous types like “functional support, emotional support, a sense of belonging, or shared values [72, 75]. People communicate and connect with each other through social networking and establishing social relationships which can improve life satisfaction [59, 60]. It should be noted that social network is based on social trust, a higher level of life satisfaction is reported by people who believed and trusted other people for social supports in need of help [76]. In this sense, social trust may affect life satisfaction through social networks.

As people age, they experience a decline in cognitive and physical abilities, as well as a decrease in social contact [77, 78]. In addition, their dependency on others increase [79], and they may be more exposed to social isolation and thus are likely to be lonely and depressed [80, 81]. Therefore, they require additional social supports, and social network is the carrier of gaining that social support, more stable instrumental and affective supports can be gained through social networks [82]. Social networks are established through human interactions or communications (e.g., social participation) to realize the exchange of information (e.g., health information). They provide immediate emotional benefits to older people and enhance their sense of social support [83], thereby shaping their identity and self-worth [84]. Trust facilitates the establishment of social networks [70], older people have different relational networks, including family, relatives, friends, and a broader community. All of these networks are important for older people, because they provide opportunities for maintaining good interpersonal relationships and offer a sense of belonging, and feeling of being needed, and are conducive to improving their life satisfaction [85–87]. Notably, all good relationships are built on trust [88, 89]. More specifically, social capital of older people, which is based on social trust, and the expansion of social networks to accumulate social resources and social support, thus enhancing older people’s life satisfaction. Therefore, we hypothesize the following:

**Hypothesis 4** Social network plays a mediating role in the relationship between social trust and life satisfaction in older people.

## Methods

### Data

This study was conducted between December 20, 2016, and January 25, 2017 in five districts in Chengdu, namely: Jinjiang, Wuhou, Qingyang, Chenghua, and Jinniu. The study included people from 15 communities, as participants (age: ≥60 years). The name of the community was obtained from the official website of the Chengdu government, and the communities in each administrative region were numbered in an alphabetical order, The communities numbered 01, 11, and 21 in each administrative region were selected. Then a random sample of 20 people in each community and 60 people in each administrative region were surveyed. In total, 300 people in five administrative regions were selected for the questionnaire survey, and 297 valid questionnaires were collected. Finally, 297 Chinese people with help and explanation as required from professional researchers, completed the survey that formed the basis of this study. The survey included questions on socio-demographic information, in addition to the variables social trust, social network, and life satisfaction. This survey was completely anonymous and approved by the Ethics Committee of Research Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics.

### Measures

#### Dependent variable: life satisfaction

Life satisfaction was measured following an approach to that of Cui [90], who developed 20 items based on Diener’s concept of life evaluation (past, present, and future) to measure the life satisfaction of older people. Six questions were used to measure past life satisfaction, for example, “There were few regrets in my life”; “Compared with my peers, I had done a lot of stupid things”; “Looking back on my life, I had done almost nothing right”; and “My life was very hard and lonely, I do not want to think about it”. Eight questions were used to measure present life satisfaction, for example, “Recently, I feel very happy in my life”; “I am happy with my lifestyle”; “Every day, life is very boring”; “Recently, I am prone to get angry”; “Recently, there are more sad things than happy things”. Six questions were used to measure future life satisfaction, such as “I am full of hope for the future”; “In the future, there will be many interesting and happy things around me”; “In the future, there is almost nothing that I will be able to do”; and “In the future, I will no longer be able to do anything of value”. Statements were responded to on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 denoting never, 2 denoting seldom, 3 denoting sometimes, 4 denoting regularly, to 5 denoting very frequently. Responses were partially reverse-coded, with higher score indicating greater life satisfaction. The reliability factor Cronbach’s alpha was 0.821.

#### Independent variable: social trust

Social trust was measured following an approach similar to that of Lin [91]. Social trust includes interpersonal trust and institutional trust. Five questions were used to measure interpersonal trust, such as, “Do you trust your family, relatives, friends, neighbors, and strangers?” Nine questions were used to measure institutional trust, such as, “Do you trust the central government institutions, local government institutions, national people’s congress, educational institutions, medical institutions, judicial branches, Public Security Bureau, news media organization and neighborhood committee?” Responses were recorded on a five-point Likert scale, that was divided into five levels: “completely distrust,” “distrust,” “neither trust nor distrust,” “trust,” and “completely trust.” The scores were then averaged. A higher score indicates higher social trust. The reliability factor Cronbach’s alpha was 0.814.

#### Mediating variable: social network

Social network was measured following an approach to that of Lin [91]. Social network includes informal and formal social networks. The informal social network was measured on the basis of six questions, for instance, “How many children would like to give you money or gifts?” “How many relatives or friends would like to give you money or gifts?” “How many times do you contact your children in a month (meeting or by phone)?” “How many times do you contact your relatives or friends in a month (meeting or by phone)?” “How many friends or neighbors might be able to help you in a time of trouble?” and “How many neighbors are willing to treat you to a meal or do you a small favor (pick up your package, lend you a chair or supplies, etc.)?” Two questions were used to measure the formal social network, namely, “How many group activities have you participated in (community meetings, interest activities, etc.)?” and, “How many times do you meet members of the group in a month?” The scores were then averaged. A higher score indicates a wider social network. The reliability factor Cronbach’s alpha was 0.538.

#### Control variable*s:* gender, age, educational attainment, and marital status

In this study, we controlled for the following variables: gender, age, educational attainment, and marital status. We collected data of the demographic variables of gender (0 = male; 1 = female), educational attainment (0 = no formal education; 1= primary school; 2 = middle school; 3= high school; 4= vocational school; 5= college education), and marital status (0= married; 1= separated or divorced; 3= widowed). Age was a continuous variable.

### Statistical analysis

SPSS 22.0 and Amos 22.0 were used for statistical analysis. First, we used SPSS 22.0 for descriptive and correlational analyses. Second, we used Amos 22.0 for Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. SEM represents a comprehensive multiple regression method for explaining the relationship between observed and latent variables. SEM is a combination of measurement models, including confirmatory factor analysis models and structural models [92]. Moreover, Amos 22.0 was used to test the fitness of the entire model and the relationship between the variables. Moreover, to examine the relationship between social trust, social network, and life satisfaction, a path analysis was performed, including χ2 verification, and four fitness indices, namely TLI, CFI, RMSEA, and SRMR, were used to evaluate the model. Finally, the bootstrap method was used to confirm the mediating effects of social networks. The bootstrap confidence interval (CI) was set to 95%, if the CI of the indirect effect did not include zero, the mediation effect was proved to be significant.

## Results

### Descriptive results

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics of the socio-demographic characteristics. The respondents’ average age was 72.535 years. Among 297 participants, 133 (44.1%) were men and 166 (55.9%) were women. In terms of educational attainment, 106 (35.7%) respondents had completed primary school and below, 111(37.4%), had middle and high school education and 80 (26.9%) had vocational education or above. Regarding marital status, 293 respondents were married (98.7%), 3 were separated or divorced respondents 1.0%, and 1 was widowed 0.3%.

View this table:
[Table 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/T1)

Table 1 Characteristics of the study sample (n=297)

### Correlation among social trust, social network, and life satisfaction

The results of correlation analysis between the confirmed variables are shown in Table 2. The results were statistically significant (*p* < 0.01). First, social trust was significantly positively correlated with social network (*r* = 0.173). Second, social trust was significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction (*r* = 0.285). Third, social network was significantly positively correlated with life satisfaction (*r* = 0.281).

View this table:
[Table 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/T2)

Table 2 Correlations between social trust, social network, and life satisfaction of older people.

### Descriptive statistics of major variables, and reliability and validity tests

Major variables were life satisfaction, social trust, and social network. All variables were composed of latent variables. Before the SEM analysis, the standard error, Z value, *p* value, reliability, and validity of each variable were examined. All results of the regression analyses were statistically significant (*p* < 0.01). The CR (composite reliability) value is a combination of all measured variables and indicates dimensional reliability of the dimensional metrics. The higher the CR value, the higher the internal reliability. A combined reliability of 0.7 was the threshold for acceptable reliability [93] Average variance extraction (AVE) is the average ratio of the explanatory power of the latent variable to that of the measured variable. A higher AVE value represents higher convergence validity of dimensions. The AVE value should be > 0.5, and 0.36–0.5 was the threshold for acceptable validity [94]. According to Table 3, a CR value of > 0.7, and an AVE value of > 0.48 were observed. The CR and AVE values were within the acceptable numerical range.

View this table:
[Table 3](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/T3)

Table 3 Descriptive statistics of key variables, reliability and validity test of measurement items.

### Confirmatory factor analysis model results

#### The fitness of the model

Table 4 shows the results of the test of fitness of the model for the three latent variables, and the χ2 value was 24.721 (*df* = 17; *p* = 0.000). TLI, CFI, and SRMR values were used to evaluate fitness. TLI value of = 0.922, and CFI value of = 0.977, that is, both values ≥ 0.90, showed a suitable fit. RMSEA value = 0.065, and RMR value = 0.0375, which were considered acceptable.

View this table:
[Table 4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/T4)

Table 4 The fitness of the model

#### Structural model results

##### Research model regression and path analysis results

According to Table 5 and Figure. 1, the regression and all path coefficients were statistically significant (*p* <0.01). Specifically, social trust was positively related to social network. The stronger the social trust, the more beneficial it is to expand the social network (*B* =0.472; *p* <0.01). In addition, social network was positively related to life satisfaction. The more extensive the social network, the higher is the life satisfaction (*B* =0.433; *p* <0.01). Moreover, social trust positively affected life satisfaction. The stronger is the social trust, the higher is the life satisfaction (*B* =0.410; *p* <0.01).

![Fig. 1](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/F1.medium.gif)

[Fig. 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/F1)

Fig. 1 
Research model. PB= social trust, SN= social network, LF= life satisfaction.

View this table:
[Table 5](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/T5)

Table 5 Research model path analysis.

### Mediating effect

Bootstrapping, was performed to verify the mediating effect. The mediation analysis found that the relationship between social trust and life satisfaction was partially mediated by social network in older people (Table 6). The total influence of positive social trust on life satisfaction was 1.030. The direct effect of social trust on life satisfaction remained significant in older people (the direct effect = 0.709), and the indirect effects of social trust on life satisfaction through social network were also significant (indirect effects = 0.321; bootstrap 95% CI = [0.051, 0.968]).

View this table:
[Table 6](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/06/10/2024.06.09.24308669/T6)

Table 6 Summary of mediating results.

## Discussion

### Social trust and life satisfaction

Our study used self-evaluation to assess life satisfaction among older people. The results suggest that older people with stronger social trust have higher life satisfaction and more extensive social network. Yet our findings are consistent with previous observations, which showed that high levels of interpersonal trust and institutional trust not only reflect good-quality social relationships, but also promote meaning in life. These in turn affect one’s subjective life satisfaction evaluation [95, 88]. A researcher used Statistics Canada’s 2003 General Social Survey data, which were obtained by interviewing 24,951 people aged 15-80 years. The results revealed that both institutional trust and interpersonal trust are related to life satisfaction [12].

### Social network and life satisfaction

As hypothesized, we also found that social network was positively related to life satisfaction in older people. This is similar to the results of previous studies, which showed that social resources embedded in social networks play a crucial role in the life of older people living in rural areas of China [96, 97]. In China, social interaction has developed over thousands of years, staring with an agricultural civilization rooted in the small-scale, local peasant economy. It emphasizes human relationships among family members, relatives, and neighbors [16]. In particular, after retirement, older people face a loss of major organizational networks and rely more on individual social networks [63]. Among U.S. residents aged 65 years and older, friendship-centered social networks were related to better well-being than family-centered social networks [52]. The difference is a researcher highlighted the significance importance of family support and cognitive community social capital in improving the life satisfaction of Chinese urban older adults [98]. With age, older people become more dependent on social relationships to maintain their well-being, and the trust is the basis and prerequisite for building these social relationships [99]. Society is networked, and in China, those well-connected are happier than those who are not [50]. In summary, good interpersonal relationships led to attainment of life satisfaction [100–102]. This is, because, social relationships can enhance social identity, thereby providing instrumental and affective supports for members of social groups who share resources. This could be explained in the context of the socioemotional selectivity theory [62], that is, older people are likely to choose social networks with strong social trust and interactive relationships. They regard the social network as a means to improve life satisfaction [30]. It is the perception of the quality of social networks rather than the perception of the quantity of social networks that is relevant to reporting better well-being [103, 104]. Moreover, in China, older people are expected to play valuable social roles, and social networks offer opportunities to the elderly people to realize their self-worth, which are conducive to maintaining good interpersonal relationships, thus increasing the sense of happiness [17, 31].

### Social trust and social network

We also found that social trust was positively correlated with the social network in older people. This result is similar to those of previous studies. Social ties and interactions are strengthened by the accumulation of social trust [73]. Frequent social interactions are conducive to the expansion of social networks [105]. Good social relationships are crucial for older people as they constantly require support in the form of positive social interactions. These interactions also act as a means to satisfy their instrumental and affective needs, such as obtaining help, and the feeling of being needed and appreciated [106, 82]. A stronger social trust, is more conducive to the strengthening of social ties and improving social participation [107]. If social participation of older people is higher, they receive more opportunities to strengthen their social interactions because they may have more chances to interact face-to-face with others. All of these interactions could contribute to the development of older people’s social networks [108,109].

### Mediation effect of social network on the relations between social trust and life satisfaction

As hypothesized, this study revealed that social network mediates the effect of social trust on life satisfaction in older people. This finding is in agreement with that of Kawachi’s study [71]. Accordingly, higher social trust is more conducive to the construction of the social network, and more social support can be gained and requirements are met in a better way if the social network is broad, which in turn can increase, life satisfaction of older people. Moreover, this result could be explained by social capital theory. Although many researchers have defined social capital, this paper adopts Lin’s and Adler and Kwon’s definition of social capital: “Social capital is an aggregation in a specific network composed of mutual understanding and mutual trust, and through social interaction, resources embedded in a social network are captured [110, 111].” Different from other capital, social capital exists in social relations that promote the formation of social trust and networks, thus improving the life satisfaction of the elderly people [112, 113]. Social trust enhances people’s interaction and expands their social network, which is the basis for the premise of interpersonal communication of elderly people. Regarding why social trust is related to health, researchers have reached consensus that trust is a key indicator of social ties and social network [114]. In turn, social network benefits health through obtainment of social resources and social support, which are closely associated with individuals’ health behaviors and well-being [97, 115]. Webster et al. (2015) predicted that social trust could affect the health of the elderly people through social networks [116]. In addition to the mediating roles of social networks in social trust and life satisfaction, political interest plays mediating role in social trust and well-being in older adults [117]. Another review of studies with older adults suggested that more recreational participation and social trust were associated with health in China, and good health predicts high life satisfaction [118, 119].

Additionally, social trust belongs to the category of cognitive social capital. By contrast, social network belongs to the category of structural social capital [120]. At the level of structural social capital, a strong link exists between social capital and happiness. Because structural social capital relies on social interactions, older people are encouraged to form social networks and, over time, to strengthen social relationships, which could enhance the sense of belonging and social inclusion, and thus improve their quality of life [121]. This study has demonstrated that social network plays a mediating role in the relationship between social trust and life satisfaction. In other words, structural social capital mediates the effect of cognitive social capital on life satisfaction in older people in China. The relationships between cognitive capital, structural capital and life satisfaction have been previously documented [23, 122]. Kim et al (2020) reported that social participation and both cognitive social capital (feelings of trust) and structural social capital (neighborhood connections) could predict one’s happiness [123]. However, different from the conclusion of this paper, using a sample of Chinese urban older adults, Sun and Lu (2020) confirmed that cognitive social capital had a mediation effect on the association between structural social capital and life satisfaction [95].

## Strengths and limitations

Our study had several strengths. First, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to reveal the mediating effect of social network on the relationship between social trust and life satisfaction of older people in China. Our findings provide a new perspective for enhance the life satisfaction of older people. Second, this study used social capital theory to explain the relationship among social trust, social network, and life satisfaction. We found that structural social capital mediates the relationship between cognitive social capital and life satisfaction. Our findings extended the practical application of social capital theory. The findings proved new empirical evidence to the social capital theory from the Chinese perspective. This paper sheds some light on this topic with reference to Chinese older people, thereby enriching the empirical research on social trust, social network, and life satisfaction. However, the study some limitations. First, the data were cross-sectional, exploring causal relationships between variables was difficult. Therefore, a future study could collect long-term data and examine longitudinal changes and causality. Second, data in this study were limited to the surveyed older people residing in Chengdu, Sichuan Province. Given the vast size of China, and the unique demographic characteristics of each region, the differences between rural and urban areas, and between different provinces need to be investigated.

## Conclusion

This study examined the associations between social trust and life satisfaction and the mediation effect of social network on these associations among older Chinese people. Our study findings confirmed all the hypotheses made in the paper. We found that social trust is the premise and basis for building social network. Social network is a carrier for older people to interact and communicate with others. Older people with strong social trust can obtain more instrumental and emotional support to improve their life satisfaction through different social networks. In conclusion, this study exploring the mediating effect of social network provides knowledge essential for ensuring a happy old age. The study results can help advance psychological research on life satisfaction of older people and suggest new intervention strategies in this field.

## Author’s contributions

HXY conceived and designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the initial draft. LHM and YZY designed the research framework, methodology, data analysis and writing-review. LSH and XCX helped to obtain funding. LSH were involved in the research for the study and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

## Funding

This research was funded by the Key Project of the National Social Science Foundation (No.21ASH006), Western Project of the National Social Science Foundation (No.23XRK004).

## Availability of data and materials

Data are available from the authors. Any interests, please contact the author of correspondence.

## Declarations

### Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Humanities and Law School, Chengdu University of Technology (No.20230116). All older participants received written informed consent before participating in this study, anonymity was maintained throughout the study and all data collected was securely stored to protect the privacy of participants. In addition, all the methods used in our research were implemented in accordance with the guidelines for Human research of the Helsinki Declaration.

### Consent for publication

Not applicable

### Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

## Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the older people who participated in this study.

## Footnotes

*   1 Besides the definition stated above, an alternative definition of an ageing society is one with the population above the age of 65 accounted for 7% of the total population. This particular portion of population in China reached 13.5% in 2020 (The Seventh Census, National Bureau of Statistics of China)

## Abbreviations

PB
:   Social trust
SN
:   Social network
LF
:   life satisfaction

*   Received June 9, 2024.
*   Revision received June 9, 2024.
*   Accepted June 10, 2024.


*   © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.Dong XB, Meng SJ, Chen DB. How does the internet enhance the subjective well-being of elderly individuals in China? Front. Psychol. 2022;13:1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036169.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896339&link_type=DOI) 

2.  2.Ponce MSH, Rosas RPE, Lorca MBF. Social capital, social participation and life satisfaction among Chilean older adults. Rev. Saude Publica. 2014;48:739–749. doi:10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004759.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004759&link_type=DOI) 

3.  3.Yao J, Yang LP, Hang XX, Li, YY. Perceived discrimination and life satisfaction of elderly Chinese people: The chain mediating effects of national identity and sense of community. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:1–8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02572.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00424&link_type=DOI) 

4.  4.Nguyen AW, Chatters LM, Taylor RJ, Mouzon DM. Social support from family and friends and subjective well-being of older African Americans. J. Happiness Stud. 2016;17:959–979. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9626-8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10902-015-9626-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

5.  5.Banerjee S, Boro, B. Analysing the role of sleep quality, functional limitation and depressive symptoms in determining life satisfaction among the older Population in India: a moderated mediation approach. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22:1933. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14329-9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-022-14329-9&link_type=DOI) 

6.  6.Kang WX. Understanding the associations between the number of close friends and life satisfaction: Considering age differences. Front. Psychol. 2023;14:1105771. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105771.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105771&link_type=DOI) 

7.  7.Diener E, Eunkook MS, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychol. Bull. 1999;125:276–302. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000078980900007&link_type=ISI) 

8.  8.Nyqvist F, Forsman AK, Giuntoli G, Cattan M. Social capital as a resource for mental wellbeing in older people: A systematic review. Aging Ment. Health 2013;17:394–410. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.742490.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13607863.2012.742490&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23186534&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000317738100001&link_type=ISI) 

9.  9.Wang SQ, Ying J, Zhang ML, Shi Y, Li Y, Xing ZJ, Li HH, Sun J. Health-related life satisfaction and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study in China. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 2018;15:285–297. doi:10.1111/jjns.12201.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/jjns.12201&link_type=DOI) 

10. 10.Jiang S, Li C, Wang Z, Fang X. The mediating effect of neighbor relationship between community social support and elderly’s subjective well-being in China. J. Health Psychol. 2020;25:780–790. doi:10.1177/1359105317733535.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1359105317733535&link_type=DOI) 

11. 11.Dolan P, Peasgood, T, White M. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J. Econ. Psychol. 2008;29:94–122. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000254446700006&link_type=ISI) 

12. 12.Leung A, Kier C, Fung T, Fung L, Sproule R. Searching for happiness: The importance of social capital. J. Happiness Stud. 2011;12:443–462. [https://doi.org/07/s10902-010-9208-8](https://doi.org/07/s10902-010-9208-8).
    
    

13. 13.Ozben S. Social skills, life satisfaction, and loneliness in Turkish university students. Soc. Behav Pers. 2013;41:203–213. doi:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.2.203.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2224/sbp.2013.41.2.203&link_type=DOI) 

14. 14.Lachmann B, Sariyska, Kannen C, Blaszkiewicz BT, Andone L, Eibes M, Markowetz A, Li M, Kendrick KM, Montag C. Contributing to overall life satisfaction: Personality traits versus life satisfaction variables revisited—Is replication impossible? Behav. Sci. 2017;8:1–23. doi:10.3390/bs8010001.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/bs8010001&link_type=DOI) 

15. 15.Malvaso A, Kang WX. The relationship between areas of life satisfaction, personality, and overall life satisfaction: An integrated account. Front. Psychol. 2022;13:894610. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894610.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894610&link_type=DOI) 

16. 16.Ye D, Ng YK, Lian Y. Culture and happiness. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015;123:519–547. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0747-y.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11205-014-0747-y&link_type=DOI) 

17. 17.Zhang Z, Zhang J. Social participation and subjective well-being among retirees in China. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015;123:143–160. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0728-1.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11205-014-0728-1&link_type=DOI) 

18. 18.Malvaso Massey B, Edwards AV, Musikanki L. Life satisfaction, affect, and belonging in older adults. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2021;16:1205–1219. doi:10.1007/s11482-019-09804-2.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-019-09804-2&link_type=DOI) 

19. 19.Bai ZL, Xu, ZW, Xu XR, Qin X, Hu WB, H Z. Association between social capital and depression among older people: evidence rom Anhui Province, China. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1560. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09657-7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-020-09657-7&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

20. 20.Ibrahim AF, Tan MP, Teoh GK, Muda SM, Chong MC. Health benefits of social participation interventions among community-dwelling older persons: A review article. Exp. Aging Res. 2022;48:234–260. doi:10.1080/0361073X.2021.1939563.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/0361073X.2021.1939563&link_type=DOI) 

21. 21.Bauman D, Ruch W, Margelisch K, Gander F, Wagner L. Character strengths and life satisfaction in later life: An analysis of different living conditions. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2020;15:329–347. doi:10.1007/s11482-018-9689.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-018-9689&link_type=DOI) 

22. 22.Adam F, Roncevic B. Social capital: Recent debates and research trends. Soc. Sci. Inf. 2003;42:155–183. doi:10.1177/0539018403042002001.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0539018403042002001&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000183129300001&link_type=ISI) 

23. 23.Reyes-Martinez J, Takeuchi D, Martinez-Martinez OA, Lombe M. The role of cultural participation on subjective well-being in Mexico. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2021;16:1321–1341. doi:10.1007/s11482-020-09811-8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-020-09811-8&link_type=DOI) 

24. 24.1.  Richardson JG
    
    Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Richardson JG. Greenwood Press: New York NY USA; 1986.
    
    

25. 25.Agampodi TC, Agampodi SB, Glozier N, Siribaddana S. Measurement ofsocial capital in relation to health in low and middle income countries (LMIC): A systematic review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2015;128:95–104. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.005.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.005&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25596373&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

26. 26.Islam MK, Merlo J, Kawachi I, Lindstrom M, Gerdtham UG. Social capital and health: does egalitarianism matter? A literature review. Int. J. Equity Health. 2006;5:1–28. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-5-3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1475-9276-5-1&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16522204&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

27. 27.Wang HH, Zhang JN, Yu ZF, Hu NF, Du YR, He XX, Pan DG, Pu LN, Zhang X, Li JP. Association between changes in social capital and mental well-being among older people in China. PeerJ. 2022;10: e13938. doi:10.7717/peerj.13938.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.7717/peerj.13938&link_type=DOI) 

28. 28.Pan HM. Social capital and life satisfaction across older rural Chinese groups: Does age matter? Soc. Work. 2018; 63:75–82. doi:10.1093/sw/swx051.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/sw/swx051&link_type=DOI) 

29. 29.Rodgers J, Valuev AV, Hswen Y, Subramanian SV. Social capital and physical health: An updated review of the literature for 2007-2018. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019;236: 112360. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112360.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112360&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31352315&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

30. 30.Rey L, Extremera N, Sánchez-Álvarez N. Clarifying the links between perceived emotional intelligence and well-being in older people: Pathways through perceived social support from family and friends. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2019;14:221–235. doi:10.1007/s11482-017-9588-6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-017-9588-6&link_type=DOI) 

31. 31.Liu JY, Beaujot R, Ravanera Z. Measuring the effects of stress and social networks on the health of Canadians. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2018;13:891–908. doi:10.1007/s11482-017-9565-0.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-017-9565-0&link_type=DOI) 

32. 32.Chen HS, Zhu ZJ. Social trust and emotional health in rural older adults in China: the mediating and moderating role of subjective well-being and subjective social status. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:556. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10617-y.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-021-10617-y&link_type=DOI) 

33. 33.Kim JJ, Nam M, Kim I. The effect of trust on value on travel websites: Enhancing well-being and word-of-mouth among the elderly. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2019;36:76–89. doi:10.1080/10548408.2018.1494086.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/10548408.2018.1494086&link_type=DOI) 

34. 34.Zhu JH, Liang CY, Lucas J, Cheng WJ, Zhao ZY. The influence of income and social capital on the subjective well-being of elderly Chinese people, based on a panel survey. Sustainability. 2020;12:1–22. doi:10.3390/su12114786.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/su12114786&link_type=DOI) 

35. 35.Benvenuti M, Giovagnoli S, Mazzoni E, Cipresso P, Pedroli E, Riva G. The relevance of online social relationships among the elderly: How using the web could enhance quality of life? Front. Psychol. 2020;11:1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.551862.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00260&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

36. 36.Yang Y, Zeng D, Yang F. Internet use and subjective well-being of the elderly: An analysis of the mediating effect based on social capital. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19, 1–20. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912087.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph191912087&link_type=DOI) 

37. 37.Shiroka-Pula J, Bartlett W, Krasniqi BA. Can the government make us appier? Institutional quality and subjective well-being across Europe a multilevel analysis using eurobarometer survey 2019. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2023;18:677–696. doi:10.1007/s11482-022-10099-z.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-022-10099-z&link_type=DOI) 

38. 38.Paldam M. Social capital: one or many? Definition and measurement. J. Econ. Surv. 2000;14:629–653. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00127.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/1467-6419.00127&link_type=DOI) 

39. 39.De Jong BA, Elfring T. How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Acad. Manage. J.2010; 53:535–549. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYW1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjUzLzMvNTM1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDYvMTAvMjAyNC4wNi4wOS4yNDMwODY2OS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

40. 40.Jovanović V. Trust and subjective well-being: The case of Serbia. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2016;98:284–288. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.061.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.061&link_type=DOI) 

41. 41.Schneider IK, Konijn EA, Righetti F, Rusbult CE. A healthy dose of trust: The relationship between interpersonal trust and health. Pers. Relat. 2011;18: 668–676. doi:10.1111/J.1475-6811.2010.01338.X.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/J.1475-6811.2010.01338.X&link_type=DOI) 

42. 42.Stephens C, Allen J. (2022). Older people as active agents in their neighborhood environments: Moving house can improve quality of life. Gerontologist 2022;62:56–65. doi:10.1093/geront/gnab065.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/geront/gnab065&link_type=DOI) 

43. 43.Cramm JM, Hartgerink JM, De Vreede PL, Bakker TJ, Steyerberg EW, Mackenbach JP, Nieboer AP. The relationship between older adults’ self-management abilities, well-being and depression. Eur. J. Ageing. 2012;9:353–360. doi:10.1007/s10433-012-0237-5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10433-012-0237-5&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23125820&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

44. 44.Chan D, Hamamura T, Li LMW, Zhang X. Is trusting others related to better health? An investigation of older adults across six non-western countries. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2017;48:1288–1301. doi:10.1177/0022022117722632.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0022022117722632&link_type=DOI) 

45. 45.Choi B, Jun HJ. The buffering effects of social capital on inequalities in subjective well-being among older people. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020;160:565–583. doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02352-5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11205-020-02352-5&link_type=DOI) 

46. 46.Lee S. Subjective well-being and mental health during the pandemic outbreak: Exploring the role of institutional trust. Res. Aging 2020;44:10–21. doi:10.1177/0164027520975145.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0164027520975145&link_type=DOI) 

47. 47.Gray A. The social capital of older people. Ageing and Society. 2009;29:5–31. doi:10.1017/s0144686x08007617.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0144686X08007617&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000262543400002&link_type=ISI) 

48. 48.Rafnsson SB, Shankar A, Steptoe A. Longitudinal influences of social network characteristics on subjective well-being of older adults: Findings from the ELSA study. J. Aging Health. 2015;27:919–934. doi:10.1177/0898264315572111.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0898264315572111&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25804898&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

49. 49.Lin, N. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 2001.
    
    

50. 50.Bian Y, Zhang L, Yang J, Guo X, Lei M. Subjective well-being of Chinese people: A multifaceted view. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015;121:75–92. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0626-6.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11205-014-0626-6&link_type=DOI) 

51. 51.Ding S, Liu GQ, Xu FQ, JI K, Zhao LL, Zheng X, Benjamin O, Wang ZS, Yang SF, Chen R. The satisfaction of elderly people with elderly caring social organizations and its relationship with social support and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:1206. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15951-x.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-023-15951-x&link_type=DOI) 

52. 52.Litwin H, Shiovitz-Ezra S. Social network type and subjective well-being in a national sample of older Americans. Gerontologist. 2011;51:379–388. doi:10.1093/geront/gnq094.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/geront/gnq094&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21097553&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

53. 53.Thomas PA. Gender, social engagement, and limitations in late life. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011;73:1428–1435. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.035.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.035&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21906863&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

54. 54.Donder DL, Witte DN, Buffel T, Dury S. Social capital and feelings of unsafety in later life: A study on the influence of social networks, place attachment, and civic participation on perceived safety in Belgium. Res. Aging. 2012;34:425–448. doi:10.1177/0164027511433879.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0164027511433879&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000304047900002&link_type=ISI) 

55. 55.Won D, Bae JS, Byun H, Seo KB. Enhancing subjective well-being through physical activity for the elderly in Korea: A meta-analysis approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.2020;17:262. doi:10.3390/ijerph17010262.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph17010262&link_type=DOI) 

56. 56.Yuasa M, Ukawa S, Ikeno T, Kawabata T. Multilevel, cross-sectional study on social capital with psychogeriatric health among older Japanese people dwelling in rural areas. Australas. Ageing. 2014;33:13–19. doi:10.1111/ajag.12024.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/ajag.12024&link_type=DOI) 

57. 57.Gallardo-Peralta LP, de Roda ABL, Molina-Martinez MA, del Moral RS. Family and community support among older Chilean adults: the importance of heterogeneous social support sources for quality of life. J. Gerontol. Soc. Work. 2018; 61:584–604. doi:10.1080/01634372.2018.1489928.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/01634372.2018.1489928&link_type=DOI) 

58. 58.Bakkeli NZ. Older adults’ mental health in China: Examining the relationship between income inequality and subjective well-being using panel data analysis. J. Happiness Stud. 2020;21:1349–1383. doi:10.1007/s10902-019-00130-w.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10902-019-00130-w&link_type=DOI) 

59. 59.Appau S, Churchill SA, Smyth R, Zhang QD. Social capital inequality and subjective wellbeing of older Chinese. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020;160:541–563. doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02340-9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11205-020-02340-9&link_type=DOI) 

60. 60.Hori M, Kamo Y. Gender differences in happiness: The effects of marriage, social roles, and social support in East Asia. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2018;13:839–857. doi:10.1007/s11482-017-9559-y.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-017-9559-y&link_type=DOI) 

61. 61.He XY, Shek DTL, Du WB, Pan YG, Ma Y. The relationship between social participation and subjective well-being among older people in the Chinese Culture Context: The mediating effect of reciprocity beliefs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:1–14. doi:10.3390/ijerph192316367.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph191912087&link_type=DOI) 

62. 62.Carstensen L. Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychol. Aging. 1992;7:331–338. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1388852&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1992JN08600001&link_type=ISI) 

63. 63.Djundeva M, Dykstra PA, Fokkema T. Is living alone “aging alone”? Solitary living, network types, and well-being. J. Gerontol. Ser. B-Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2019;74: 1406–1415. doi:10.1093/geronb/gby119.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/geronb/gby119&link_type=DOI) 

64. 64.Victor CR, Scambler SJ, Bowling ANN, Bond J. The prevalence of, and risk factors for, loneliness in later life: a survey of older people in Great Britain. Ageing Soc. 2005;25:357–375. doi:10.1017/S0144686X04003332.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0144686X04003332&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000229260300004&link_type=ISI) 

65. 65.Alecu AI. Exploring the role of network diversity and resources in relationship to generalized trust in Norway. Soc. Networks. 2021;66:91–99. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2021.02.002.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socnet.2021.02.002&link_type=DOI) 

66. 66.Delhey J, Newton K. Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2005;21:311–327. doi:10.1093/esr/jci022.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/esr/jci022&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000231761500001&link_type=ISI) 

67. 67.Mewes J. Gen(d)eralized trust: Women, Work, and trust in strangers. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2014;30:373–386. doi:10.1093/esr/jcu049.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/esr/jcu049&link_type=DOI) 

68. 68.Van Lange PA, Rockenbach B, Yamagishi T. Trust in Social Dilemmas, Oxford University Press; 2017.
    
    

69. 69.Schmiedeberg C, Schröder J. Leisure activities and life satisfaction: An analysis with German panel data. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2017;12:137–151. doi:10.1007/s11482-016-9458-7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-016-9458-7&link_type=DOI) 

70. 70.Lin N. A theory of social structure and action, 3st Edn. China. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing; 2022.
    
    

71. 71.Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Kim D. The measurement of community social capital through surveys. In social capital and health; Springer: New York, NY USA; 2008.
    
    

72. 72.Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 1988;94:95–120. doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1086/228943&link_type=DOI) 

73. 73.Putnam RD. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks; 2000.
    
    

74. 74.Thomas A, Cillo V, Caggiano V, Vrontis D. Drivers of social capital in enhancing team knowledge sharing and team performance: moderator role of manager’s cultural intelligence. Int. J.Manag. Financial Account. 2020;12:284–303. doi:10.1504/IJMFA.2020.112358.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1504/IJMFA.2020.112358&link_type=DOI) 

75. 75.Fukuyama F. Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Q. 2001;22:7–20. doi:10.1080/713701144.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/713701144&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000166527100001&link_type=ISI) 

76. 76.Thomas A, Gupta V. Social capital theory, social exchange theory, social cognitive theory, financial literacy, and the role of knowledge sharing as a moderator in enhancing financial well-being: from bibliometric analysis to a conceptual framework model. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:664638. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664638.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664638&link_type=DOI) 

77. 77.Farriol-Baroni V, González-García L, Luque-García A, Postigo-Zegarra S, Pérez-Ruiz S. Influence of social support and subjective well-being on the perceived overall health of the elderly. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021;18:5438. doi:10.3390/ijerph18105438.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph18105438&link_type=DOI) 

78. 78.Van-loon AM, Depla MFIA, Hertogh CMPM, Huisman M, Kok AAL. The disability paradox? Trajectories of well-being in older adults with functional decline. J. Aging Health. 2022;35:125–137. doi:10.1177/08982643221108660.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/08982643221108660&link_type=DOI) 

79. 79.Zhou K, Tan J, Watanabe K. How does perceived residential environment quality influence life satisfaction? Evidence from urban China. J. Community Psychol. 2021;49:2454–2471. doi:10.1002/jcop.22545.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/jcop.22545&link_type=DOI) 

80. 80.Chen Y, While AE. Older people living alone in Shanghai: A questionnaire survey of their life experience. Health Soc. Care Community 2019;27:260–269. doi:10.1111/hsc.12648.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/hsc.12648&link_type=DOI) 

81. 81.Shao L, Yu GL, Zhang DH. The mechanisms underlying the negative effect of depression on life satisfaction among the elderly: The roles of ostracism and economic income. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2022;34:715–724. doi:10.1017/S1041610221001162.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S1041610221001162&link_type=DOI) 

82. 82.Forsman AK, Herberts C, Nyqvist F, Wahlbeck K, Schierenbeck I. Understanding the role of social capital for mental wellbeing among older adults. Ageing Soc. 2013;33:804–825. doi:10.1017/S0144686X12000256.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0144686X12000256&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000319606600005&link_type=ISI) 

83. 83.Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc. Sci. Med. 2000;125:843–857. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.045.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.045&link_type=DOI) 

84. 84.Borgonovi F. Doing well by doing good. The relationship between formal volunteering and self-reported health and happiness. Soc. Sci. Med. 2008;66:2321–2334. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.011.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.011&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18321629&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000256334400012&link_type=ISI) 

85. 85.Melchiorre MG, Chiatti C, Lamura G, Torres-Gonzales F, Stankunas M, Lindert J, Ioannidi-Kapolou E, Barros H, Macassa G, Soares JFJ. Social support, socio-economic status, health and abuse among older people in seven European countries. PLoS One 2013;8:e54856. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054856.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0054856&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23382989&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

86. 86.Li H, Ji Y, Chen T. The roles of different sources of social support on emotional well-being among chinese elderly. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90051. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090051.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0090051&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24594546&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

87. 87.Wilson A, Wissing MP, Schutte L. “We help each other”: Relational patterns among older individuals in South African samples. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2019;14:1373–1392. doi:10.1007/s11482-018-9657-5.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11482-018-9657-5&link_type=DOI) 

88. 88.Gao S, Zhao JL. The influence of perception of social equality and social trust on subjective well-being among rural Chinese people: The moderator role of education. Front. Psychol. 2022;12:731982. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731982.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731982&link_type=DOI) 

89. 89.Zheng WB, Huang YN, Wu L. Community and social correlates of leisure activity participation among older adults. Leis. Stud. 2022;41:688–702. doi:10.1080/02614367.2022.2043417.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/02614367.2022.2043417&link_type=DOI) 

90. 90.Cui CZ. Development of measuring scales for life satisfaction of the elderly. Essays Inst. Korean Cult. 1986;49:233–256. (In Korea)
    
    

91. 91.Lin YS. A study on the relationship between social capital and life satisfaction of elderly: Focused on Seoul City. Seoul, Korea: Doctor, Korean-English University of Theology; 2009.
    
    

92. 92.Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3st ed. The Guilford Press; 2011.
    
    

93. 93.Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black W. Multivariate data analysis with readings. 5rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
    
    

94. 94.Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981;18:382–388. doi:10.2307/3150980.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2307/3150980&link_type=DOI) 

95. 95.Sun Q, Lu N. Social Capital and Mental Health among Older Adults Living in Urban China in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:1–11. doi:10.3390/ijerph17217947.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph17186591&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

96. 96.Wei, P. Social capital of rural old adults on quality of life: The state of life of older persons in a poor community, Economic Science Press, Beijing; 2009.
    
    

97. 97.Sun XJ, Liu K, Webber M, Shi LZ. Individual social capital and health-related quality of life among older rural Chinese. Ageing Soc. 2017;37:221–242. doi:10.1017/S0144686X15001099.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0144686X15001099&link_type=DOI) 

98. 98.Lu N, Jiang N, Lou VWQ, Zeng Y, Liu M. Does gender moderate the relationship between social capital and life satisfaction? Evidence from urban China. Res. Aging 2018;40:740–761. doi:10.1177/0164027517739032.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0164027517739032&link_type=DOI) 

99. 99.Zhong YQ, Schön P, Burström B, Burström K. Association between social capital and health-related quality of life among left behind and not left behind older people in rural China. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:1–11. doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0679-x.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12877-017-0679-x&link_type=DOI) 

100.100.Portela M, Neira I, Salinas-Jiménez MDM. Social capital and subjective wellbeing in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Soc. Indic. Res. 2012;114:493–511. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11205-012-0158-x&link_type=DOI) 

101.101.Inaba Y, Wada Y, Ichida Y, Nishikawa M. Which part of community social capital is related to life satisfaction and self-rated health? A multilevel analysis based on a nationwide mail survey in Japan. Soc. Sci. Med. 2015;142:169–182. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.007.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.007&link_type=DOI) 

102.102.Yuan H. Structural social capital, household income and life satisfaction: The evidence from Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong-Province, China. J. Happiness Stud. 2016;17:569–586. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9622-z.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10902-015-9622-z&link_type=DOI) 

103.103.Lansford JE, Sherman AM, Antonucci TC. Satisfaction with social networks: An examination of socioemotional selectivity theory across cohorts. Psychol. Aging. 1998;13:544–552. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.544.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.544&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9883455&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000077707900002&link_type=ISI) 

104.104.Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Strough JN. Age differences in reported social networks and well-being. Psychol. Aging. 2020;35:159–168. doi:10.1037/pag0000415.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1037/pag0000415&link_type=DOI) 

105.105.Chipps J, Jarvis MA. Social capital and mental well-being of older people residing in a residential care facility in Durban, South Africa. Aging Ment. Health 2016;20:1264–1270. doi:10.1080/13607863.2015.1105196.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13607863.2015.1105196&link_type=DOI) 

106.106.Shiovitz-Ezra S, Leitsch SA (2010). The role of social relationships in predicting loneliness: The national social life, health, and aging project. Soc. Work Res. 34, 157–167. doi:10.1093/swr/34.3.157.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/swr/34.3.157&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000293691000004&link_type=ISI) 

107.107.Sanchez-Santos JM, Rungo P, Lera-Lopez F. Building social capital through sport engagement: Evidence for adults aged 50 years and older. Ageing Soc. 2022;1–26. doi:10.1017/S0144686X22000046.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0144686X22000046&link_type=DOI) 

108.108.Tobin MC, Drager KD, Richardson LF. A systematic review of social participation for adults with autism spectrum disorders: Support, social functioning, and quality of life. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2014;8:214–229. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.12.002.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rasd.2013.12.002&link_type=DOI) 

109.109.Wang RY, Feng ZX, Liu Y, Lu Y. Relationship between neighbourhood social participation and depression among older adults: A longitudinal study in China. Health Soc. Care Community. 2020;28:247–259. doi:10.1111/hsc.12859.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/hsc.12859&link_type=DOI) 

110.110.Lin N. Building a network theory of social capital. Connections. 1999;22:28–51.
    
    

111.111.Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2002;27:17–40. doi:10.2307/4134367.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2307/4134367&link_type=DOI) 

112.112.Kim JY, Steensma HK, Heidl RA (2021). Clustering and connectedness: How inventor network configurations within incumbent firms influence their assimilation and absorption of new venture technologies. Acad. Manag. J. 2021;64:1527–1552. doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0225.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5465/amj.2018.0225&link_type=DOI) 

113.113.Li XZ, Tang NX, Yu RH, Jiang HY, Xie HW. The effect of playing gateball sports on older Chinese people’s wellbeing in the context of active aging—based mediation of social capital. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19:1–17. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912254.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph191912087&link_type=DOI) 

114.114.Delhey J, Newton K, Welzel C. How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2011;76:786–807. doi:10.1177/0003122411420817.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/0003122411420817&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000295334500007&link_type=ISI) 

115.115.Shadi Y, Lotfi MH, Nedjiat S, Rarani MA, Morasae EK. Explaining unequal levels of social capital in Tehran. Soc. Indic. Res. 2018;140:243–265. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1773-3.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11205-017-1773-3&link_type=DOI) 

116.116.Webster NJ, Antonucci TC, Ajrouch KJ, Abdulrahim S. Social networks and health among older adults in Lebanon: The mediating role of support and trust. J. Gerontol. Ser. B-Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2015;70:155–166. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbu149.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/geronb/gbu149&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25324295&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

117.117.Piumatti G, Magistro D, Zecca M, Esliger DW. The mediation effect of political interest on the connection between social trust and wellbeing among older adults. Ageing Soc. 2018;38:2376–2395. doi:10.1017/S0144686X1700071X.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0144686X1700071X&link_type=DOI) 

118.118.Zhou JJ, Cao QL. Social trust and health of China’s older adults: Cultural and recreational participation as mediator. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2020;48:e9198. doi:10.2224/sbp.9198.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2224/sbp.9198&link_type=DOI) 

119.119.Huang J, Choi EPH, Chau PH. The impact of unmet needs for assistance with activities of daily living on the self-rated health and life satisfaction of Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Aging Ment. Health. 2023; 27:803–810. doi:10.1080/13607863.2022.2045563.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13607863.2022.2045563&link_type=DOI) 

120.120.Kim BJ, Auh E, Lee YJ, Ahn J. The impact of social capital on depression among older Chinese and Korean immigrants: Similarities and differences. Aging Ment. Health. 2013; 17:844–852. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13607863.2013.805399&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23767973&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F06%2F10%2F2024.06.09.24308669.atom) 

121.121.Rodriguez-Pose A, von Berlepsch V. Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. J. Happiness Stud. 2014;15:357–386. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9426-y.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10902-013-9426-y&link_type=DOI) 

122.122.Theurer K, Wister A. Altruistic behaviour and social capital as predictors of well-being among older Canadians. Ageing Soc. 2010;30:157–181. doi:10.1017/S0144686X09008848.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0144686X09008848&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000274160800008&link_type=ISI) 

123.123.Kim ACH, Ryu J, Lee CS, Kim KM, Heo J. Sport participation and happiness among older adults: A mediating role of social capital. J. Happiness Stud. 2020;22:1623–1641. doi:10.1007/s10902-020-00288-8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10902-020-00288-8&link_type=DOI)