ABSTRACT
Introduction The variability in the distribution and number of root canals in human permanent molars makes endodontic therapy difficult if the prevalence of these patterns is not well known.
Objective To synthesize scientific evidence on geographical variations in the number of root canals in permanent molars.
Methods A study conducted at the University of Medical Sciences of Havana analyzed the number of root canals in permanent molars. We searched for primary studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that reported the number of canals in each tooth. We excluded clinical case studies, editorials, and studies that did not provide specific information on duct anatomy. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of the methodological quality of the studies in the two groups. The findings were synthesized by grouping the studies by geographical region and describing the prevalence of different root canal configurations.
Results Data on permanent molars were collected from 93 studies that contributed 60402 molars studied. In Africa, the first and second upper molars commonly have three root canals (45.62% and 41.31%, respectively), similar to the first and second lower molars (59.79% and 67.55%, respectively). In America, the upper first molar most frequently has four root canals (56.66%). In Asia, it is more common to find that all molar groups have three canals (51.09%– 65.58%), except for the lower thirds, which may have two or three canals (42.88% and 57.12%). In Europe, all molars are frequently present with three canals, except for the lower third. In Oceania, the first upper molars commonly have six root canals (65%).
Conclusion Significant variations in the number of root canals in permanent molars according to geographic region were observed. Distinct patterns were observed in the Americas, Asia, Africa, Europe, and Oceania, with varying prevalences of different root canal configurations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email: alain.chaple{at}uautonoma.cl, Email: santiestebanm00{at}gmail.com, Email: kelvin.afrashtehfar{at}unibe.ch
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at Mendely Data.
