Abstract
Importance Identifying individuals in the earliest stages of synucleinopathy is essential to evaluate drugs aimed to slow progression or prevent manifest disease. Remote identification of hyposmic individuals may enable scalable recruitment of participants with underlying alpha-synuclein pathology.
Objective To evaluate the performance of a staged screening paradigm using smell testing to enrich for deficit on dopaminergic transporter (DAT) imaging and pathologic alpha-synuclein aggregation.
Design Cross-sectional analysis of data from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI).
Setting Screening activities were completed both at home and local PPMI sites.
Participants Individuals aged 60 and older without a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease Interventions or Exposures: Participants were asked to complete a University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) remotely. Participants with hyposmia were invited to complete DAT imaging, which determined eligibility for enrollment in longitudinal assessments and further biomarker evaluation including cerebrospinal fluid synuclein seed amplification assay (synSAA).
Main Outcomes and Measures We determined the proportion of people with hyposmia, impaired DAT binding, and positive synSAA and explored determinants of these biomarkers.
Results As of January 29, 2024, 49,843 participants were sent an UPSIT and 31,293 (63%) completed it. Of UPSIT completers, 8,301 (27%) scored <15th %ile. Of 1,546 who completed DAT, 19% had DAT binding < 65% expected for age and sex. Self-reported features were independently associated with severe hyposmia (UPSIT <10th %ile), such as REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) or dream enactment behavior (DEB) (aOR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.7–2.1) and subjective smell loss (aOR: 15.0, 95% CI 13.7–16.3). Participants with an UPSIT <10th %ile (N=1,221) had greater likelihood of low DAT binding compared to participants with an UPSIT in the 10th – 15th %ile (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.85–4.91). Among remotely recruited participants with synSAA results obtained, 198/363 (55%) had positive synSAA at baseline. This proportion increased when the cohort was limited to an UPSIT<10th %ile (182/257, 71%).
Conclusion and Relevance Remote screening for severe hyposmia identifies participants with a high proportion of positive synSAA and reduced DAT binding. This staged screening protocol is an effective approach to identify cohorts for therapeutic trials aiming to slow progression in alpha-synucleinopathy.
Competing Interest Statement
EB has received research funding through his institution from MJFF, the NIH, and Gateway LLC and consulting fees from Guidepoint Inc and Rune Labs. LC declares research funding through her institution from Biogen, MJFF, the NIH, the University of Pittsburgh, and the UPMC Competitive Medical Research Fund, travel support from MJFF, and authorship royalties from Wolters Kluwel. AS receives research funding through his institution from MJFF and the NIH, consulting fees from SPARC Therapeutics, Capsida Therapeutics, and the Parkinson Study Group, and honoraria for lectures from Bial and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Wave Life Sciencies, Inhibikase, Prevail, the Huntington Study Group, and Massachusetts General Hospital. CG, CCG, and CSt declare research funding paid through their institution from MJFF. MB, TF, LH, and MKo receives research funding through their institution from MJFF and reimbursement for travel from MJFF. CC declares research funding through his institution from MJFF and the NIH. SC and MKu is an employee of MJFF. KF declares research funding through her institution from MJFF and consulting fees from Ontarget Labs and OncoNano. LC declares employment at Amprion, research funding through his employer from MJFF and the NIH, employee stock options at Amprion, and US Patents or patent application numbers 11959927, 11970520, 11254718, 20210164998, 20210223268, 20190353669, 20230084155, and 20240085435, all assigned to Amprion. CS is the Founder, Chief Scientific Officer, Consultant, shareholder and member of the Board of Directors of Amprion Inc, a biotech company focusing on the commercialization of the SAA technology for diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. TS has received research funding from the MJFF, Parkinson′s Foundation, NINDS, Amneal, Biogen, Roche, Neuroderm, Sanofi, Prevail, and UCB, and consulting fees from AcureX, Adamas, AskBio, Amneal, Blue Rock Therapeutics, Critical Path for Parkinson′s Consortium, Denali, MJFF, Neuroderm, Sanoif, Sinopia, Roche, Takeda, and Vanqua Bio, and participated on Advisory Board for AcureX, Adamas, AskBio, Biohaven, Denali, GAIN, Neuron23, and Roche, and a Scientific Advisory Board for Koneksa, Neuroderm, Sanofi, and UCB. KM declares research funding through his institution from MJFF, consulting fees for Invicro, MJFF, Roche, Calico, Coave, Neuron23, Orbimed, Biohaven, Sanofi, Koneksa, Merck, Lilly, Inhibikase, XingIMaging, IRLabs, Prothena. CT reports research funding through her institution from MJFF, NIH, Gateway LLC, Department of Defense, Roche Genentech, Biogen, Parkinson Foundation, Marcus Program in Precision Medicine, and consulting fees from CNS Ratings, Australian Parkinson′s Mission, Biogen, Evidera, Supernus, Neurocrine, WebMD/Medscape, and fees from Cadent (DSMB), Adamas (Steering Committee), Biogen (Steering Committee), Kyowa Kirin (Advisory Board), Lundbeck (Advisory Board), Jazz/Cavion (Steering Committee), Acorda (Advisory Board), Bial (DMC), and Genentech.
Clinical Protocols
https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.n92ldmw6ol5b/v2
https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.q26g718y9gwz/v1
Funding Statement
PPMI - a public-private partnership - is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research and funding partners, including 4D Pharma, Abbvie, AcureX, Allergan, Amathus Therapeutics, Aligning Science Across Parkinson's, AskBio, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, BIAL, BioArctic, Biogen, Biohaven, BioLegend, BlueRock Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calico Labs, Capsida Biotherapeutics, Celgene, Cerevel Therapeutics, Coave Therapeutics, DaCapo Brainscience, Denali, Edmond J. Safra Foundation, Eli Lilly, Gain Therapeutics, GE HealthCare, Genentech, GSK, Golub Capital, Handl Therapeutics, Insitro, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery, Mission Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Neuron23, Neuropore, Pfizer, Piramal, Prevail Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company, Takeda, Teva, UCB, Vanqua Bio, Verily, Voyager Therapeutics, the Weston Family Foundation and Yumanity Therapeutics.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The WIRB-Copernicus Group (WCG) IRB has approved this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Sharing
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained on January 29, 2024 from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data), RRID:SCR 006431. For up-to-date information on the study, visit www.ppmi-info.org. This analysis was conducted by the PPMI Statistics Core and used actual dates of activity for participants, a restricted data element not available to public users of PPMI data. Statistical analysis codes used to perform the analyses in this article are shared on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.11391274). This analysis used DaTscan and αSyn-SAA results for prodromal participants, obtained from PPMI upon request after approval by the PPMI Data Access Committee.
