Abstract
Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP), as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and efficient adjunctive circulatory technique, has found increasingly widespread applications in the cardiovascular field. Numerous basic research and clinical observations have extensively confirmed the significant advantages of EECP in promoting blood flow perfusion to vital organs such as the heart, brain, and kidneys. However, many potential mechanisms of EECP remain insufficiently validated, necessitating researchers to dedicate substantial time and effort to in-depth investigations. In this work, we attempted to use large language models (such as ChatGPT and Ernie Bot) to identify top research priorities in five key topics in the field of EECP: mechanisms, device improvements, cardiovascular applications, neurological applications, and other applications. After generating specific research priorities in each domain through language models, we invited a panel of nine experienced EECP experts to independently evaluate and score them based on four parameters: relevance, originality, clarity, and specificity. Notably, average and median scores for these evaluation parameters were high, indicating a strong endorsement from experts in the EECP field. Although further validation and refinement are required, this study preliminarily suggests that large language models like ChatGPT and Ernie Bot could serve as powerful tools for identifying and prioritizing research priorities in the EECP domain.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This experiment does not require ethical approval
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.