Abstract
Gait disturbances are the clinical hallmark of ataxia disorders, fundamentally impairing the mobility of ataxia patients. In clinical routine and research the severity of the gait disturbances is assessed within a well-established clinical scale and graded into categorial levels. Sensor-free motion registration and subsequent movement analysis allowed to overcome the obvious shortcoming of such coarse grading: Using time series models (tsfresh, ROCKET) we were not only able to successfully reproduce the categorial scaling (Human performance: 44.88% F1-score; our model: 80.28% F1-score). Particularly subtle, early gait disturbances and longitudinal progression below the perception threshold of the human examiner could be captured (Pearson’s correlation coefficient human performance -0.060, not significant; our model: -0.626, p < 0.01). Furthermore, SHAP analysis allowed to identify the most important features for each clinical level of gait deterioration. This could further improve the sensitivity to capture longitudinal changes tailored to the pre-existing level of gait disturbances (Pearson’s correlation coefficients up to -0.988, p < 0.01). In conclusion, the ML-based analysis could significantly improve the sensitivity in the assessment of gait disturbances in ataxia patients. Thus, it qualifies as a potential digital outcome parameter for early interventions, therapy monitoring, and home recordings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the iBehave Network, sponsored by the Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
8 Abbreviations and introduced terms
- RMSE
- Root mean squared error
- MAE
- Mean absolute error
- X-pos
- Multivariate time series constructed from the x positions of single body joints, namely left and right wrist, ankle, and hip (Supplementary Figure S6)
- Dist
- Multivariate time series constructed from the pairwise distance between the ankles, left hip and left wrist, right hip and right wrist, as well as neck and hips (Supplementary Figure S7)
- Upper
- Multivariate time series constructed from the angles of the triangles formed by the shoulder, wrist, and hip, each left and right respectively (Supplementary Figure S8).
- Lower
- Multivariate time series constructed from the angles of the triangles formed by (left and right) hip and both ankles (Supplementary Figure S9)
