Abstract
Background Hematoma expansion is an independent predictor of poor neurological outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and a promising quantifiable and modifiable therapeutic target. Practical tools to identify patients at risk of hematoma expansion are lacking, limiting early preventative intervention. We hypothesized that three-dimensional transport-based morphometry (3D-TBM), could automatically predict future hematoma expansion from non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) images at the time of hospital presentation.
Methods One hundred and seventy spontaneous ICH patients enrolled in the multi-center international Virtual International Trials of Stroke Archive (VISTA-ICH), were separated into training (60%) and testing (40%) cohorts for model derivation and validation, respectively. A unique transport-based representation was produced from each presentation NCCT hematoma image for statistical analysis. The 3D-TBM model was interrogated to visualize the physical hematoma characteristics predictive of future expansion.
Results 3D-TBM outperformed each of the existing clinician-based BAT, Brain, Heavn, NAG and 10-point NCCT hematoma expansion prediction scores in the testing dataset. 3D-TBM adjusted for location and clinical information predicted hematoma expansion in the testing dataset with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.698 (95% CI 0.695-0.702), while the AUROC for the best performing clinician method, the Heavn score, was 0.663 (95% CI 0.660–0.666). The predominant hematoma characteristics predicting future expansion were larger size, textural heterogeneity, shape irregularity and peripheral intensity distribution.
Discussion We present a quantitative method that outperformed clinicians and permitted visualization of the morphometric features for predicting hematoma expansion from NCCT in ICH patients. Our study contributes insight into the underlying mechanisms driving hematoma expansion and suggests that it can be identified at a reversible stage.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable. This study uses data that were not collected specifically for this study and no one on our study team had access to the subject identifiers linked to the specimens or data. Therefore, this study is not considered human subjects research. Because it is not considered human subjects research, an IRB exemption was not required to conduct this study. T
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
3
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos