Abstract
Background The Boston Cognitive Assessment (BOCA) is a self-administered online test developed for cognitive screening and longitudinal monitoring of brain health in an aging population. The study aimed to validate BOCA in an Italian population and to investigate the convergent validity with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) in normal controls and subjects within the Alzheimer Disease spectrum.
Methods BOCA was administered to 150 participants, including cognitively healthy controls (HC, n=50), patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n=50), and dementia (DEM, n=50). The BOCA reliability was assessed using i) Spearman’s correlation analysis between subscales; ii) Cronbach’s alpha calculation, and iii) Principal Component Analysis. Repeated-measures ANOVA was employed to assess the impact of the sequence of test administrations between the groups. BOCA performance between HS, MCI and DEM were compared using Kruskall Wallis test. Furthermore, a comparison was conducted between MCI patients who tested positive for amyloid and those who tested negative, utilizing Mann Whitney’s U-test.
Results Test scores were significantly different between patients and controls (p<0.001) suggesting good discriminative ability. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.82 indicating a good internal consistency of the BOCA subscales and strong-to-moderate Spearman’s correlation coefficients between them. BOCA demonstrated strong correlation with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (rho=0.790, p<0.001).
Conclusions The Italian version of the BOCA test exhibited validity, feasibility, and accurate discrimination.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
