Altered Brain Glucose Metabolism in COVID-19 disease: An activation likelihood estimation Meta-analysis ======================================================================================================= * Dongju Kang * Hyunji Jung * Kyoungjune Pak ## ABSTRACT **Purpose** COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has significantly altered modern society and lifestyles. We investigated its impact on brain glucose metabolism by meta-analyzing existing studies that utilized 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scans of the brain. **Methods** We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to August 2023 for English-language publications using the keywords “positron emission tomography,” “single-photon emission computed tomography,” and “COVID-19.” We included original research articles that reported changes in brain glucose metabolism following COVID-19 infection. ALE values from these studies were aggregated and tested against a null hypothesis that anticipated a random distribution of ALE values, which proved to be significantly higher than chance. **Results** We identified eight papers that met our inclusion criteria. Significant increases in brain glucose metabolism were noted in the left anterior cingulate gyrus, right thalamus, and brainstem. In children with COVID-19, decreased glucose metabolism was observed in the right and left cerebellum, left amygdala/hippocampus, left anterior cingulate gyrus, and right amygdala. In adults with COVID-19, decreased metabolism was seen in the right temporal lobe, brainstem (acute phase), left posterior cingulate gyrus, left precuneus, right cerebellum, right insula, right anterior cingulate gyrus, left occipital lobe, and left globus pallidus (chronic phase). **Conclusion** COVID-19 impacts brain glucose metabolism, typically manifesting as areas of decreased metabolism in 18F-FDG PET scans, though increases are also observed. These changes in metabolism vary with the patient’s age and the time elapsed between the diagnosis of COVID-19 and the PET scan. KEYWORDS * COVID-19 * 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose * Brain * Positron emission tomography ## INTRODUCTION COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has reshaped societal norms and presented significant public health challenges worldwide. Its rapid spread prompted global interventions, including social distancing and mask mandates, to curb transmission. By April 2024, the disease had resulted in over 700 million cases and 7 million deaths worldwide 1. The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from common symptoms like fever and cough 2 to severe complications affecting various organ systems, including the nervous system, circulatory system, and kidneys 3. Neurological complications are not rare among COVID-19 patients, with disruptions in olfactory and gustatory functions being especially prevalent. In severe instances, patients may suffer from seizures and altered consciousness 4. These neurological complications often persist well beyond the acute phase of the illness and can be studied using neuroimaging techniques. Various brain imaging modalities have been utilized to examine changes in patients with COVID-19. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revealed extensive confluent or multifocal white matter lesions, microhemorrhages, diffusion restriction, and enhancement in COVID-19 patients5. Additionally, multiple white matter lesions have been documented6. Beyond structural changes, blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI (BOLD-fMRI) has demonstrated enhanced signals in the right piriform cortex and right anterior cingulate gyrus7. Given that the human brain primarily uses glucose as its energy source8, 9, 18F-FDG PET scans were performed to assess neuronal activity by comparing brain glucose metabolism in COVID-19 patients with that of healthy controls. Two studies reported increased brain glucose metabolism in COVID-19 patients 10, 11 while others noted a decrease10-17. Consequently, it is pertinent to meta-analyze previous studies on changes in brain glucose metabolism in COVID-19. In this study, we categorized the existing publications into two groups based on the metabolic changes: 1) hypermetabolism and 2) hypometabolism in COVID-19 patients. We then conducted a meta-analysis on studies of hypometabolism, focusing on 1) the patient’s age and 2) the time interval between the diagnosis of COVID-19 and the PET scan. ## MATERIALS AND METHODS ### Data Search, Study Selection, and Data Extraction We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, from their inception to August 2023, for English-language publications using the keywords “positron emission tomography”, “single-photon emission computed tomography”, and “COVID-19.” The inclusion criteria were limited to original research articles that reported changes in brain glucose metabolism following COVID-19 infection. The results were reported as coordinates in a normalized standard stereotactic space (either Talairach or Montreal Neurological Institute space). Studies that focused solely on regions of interest were excluded. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers from the publications, and the following information was recorded: year of publication, country of affiliation of the corresponding authors, name of the journal, number of studies included, database search, radiopharmaceuticals used, coordinates, and number of subjects included. ### Meta-analysis Algorithm The software GingerALE ver 3.0.2 (Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX, USA) was used to transform all reported coordinates into stereotactic Montreal Neurological Institute space. The method employed in this study was a variation of the original ALE by Turkeltaub et al. 18, which was later modified by Eickhoff et al. 19, 20. For each experiment, the modeled activation map was calculated by determining the maximum value across each Gaussian focus. The width of the Gaussian probability distribution was determined individually for each experiment based on empirical estimates of between-subject variability derived from the number of subjects in each study. For each voxel, the ALE value was calculated from the union of the modeled activation maps. ALE values were combined across studies and tested against a null hypothesis of a random distribution of ALE values, which were higher than expected by chance. A threshold of FWE 0.05 was applied for both cluster-level forming thresholds and for cluster-level inference on the resulting ALE map. ## RESULTS ### Literature Search and Study Characteristics A total of 1,078 records were identified from electronic (n=1,075) and manual (n=3) searches. Of these, 417 were excluded prior to screening. To assess the eligibility of the remaining 661 studies, we screened them based on their titles and abstracts. A total of 44 papers were selected for full-text review to further evaluate their suitability. Consequently, eight papers were deemed suitable for inclusion in the study 10-17. The detailed procedure is illustrated in Figure 1, and the characteristics of the studies are summarized in Table 1. ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F1) Figure 1. Flowchart for the identification of eligible studies ### Anatomical Likelihood Estimate analysis #### A. Increased Brain Glucose Metabolism in COVID-19 disease Two studies reported increased brain glucose metabolism in 19 COVID-19 patients compared to 58 controls 10, 11. A significant increase in brain glucose metabolism was observed in the left anterior cingulate gyrus (cluster size:13,176 mm3, x -30; y 38; z 0, maximum ALE value of 0.0095), right thalamus (cluster size:13,176 mm3, x 24; y -18; z 8, maximum ALE value of 0.0095), and brainstem (cluster size:11,704 mm3, x 12; y -25; z -37, maximum ALE value of 0.0089) (Figure 2). ![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F2) Figure 2. ALE analysis of increased brain glucose metabolism in COVID-19 disease #### B. Decreased Brain Glucose Metabolism in COVID-19 disease Studies on hypometabolism in COVID-19 were categorized into subgroups according to 1) patient age and 2) the time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and PET scanning. ##### B1. COVID-19 disease in Children and Adults We analyzed eight studies, comprising six studies on adults 10-15, and two studies on children16, 17. Children were defined as those aged < 18 years old. In children with COVID-19 disease, decreased glucose metabolism was observed in five regions, including the right cerebellum (cluster size:35,928 mm3, x 20; y -70; z -42, maximum ALE value of 0.0089), left cerebellum (cluster size:18,960 mm3, x -30; y -52; z -44, maximum ALE value of 0.0088), left amygdala/hippocampus (cluster size:16,224 mm3, x -26; y -4; z -24, maximum ALE value of 0.0088), left anterior cingulate gyrus (cluster size:9,896 mm3, x -18; y 46; z -4, maximum ALE value of 0.0086), right amygdala (cluster size:9,536 mm3, x 36; y 0; z -28, maximum ALE value of 0.0088). In adults with COVID-19, one hypometabolic cluster was found in the right temporal lobe (cluster size:13,648 mm3, × 50; y -24; z -18, maximum ALE value of 0.0173) (Figure 3). ![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F3.medium.gif) [Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F3) Figure 3. ALE analysis of decreased brain glucose metabolism in COVID-19 disease (blue: child, orange: adult) ##### B2. COVID-19 disease in acute and chronic phases We categorized the studies into two groups based on the time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and PET scanning. PET scans conducted within three months of infection were classified as the acute phase, while those performed after three months were considered the chronic phase. In the acute phase of COVID-19, hypometabolism was observed in the right temporal lobe (cluster size:26,344 mm3, x 50; y -24; z -18, maximum ALE value of 0.0173) and brainstem (cluster size:11,200 mm3, x 8; y -22; z -24, maximum ALE value of 0.010). In the chronic phase of COVID-19 disease, hypometabolism was observed in 7 clusters: left posterior cingulate gyrus (cluster size: 33,728 mm3, x -6; y -70.3; z 12, maximum ALE value of 0.0030), left precuneus (cluster size: 15,784 mm3, x -34; y -78; z 40.3, maximum ALE value of 0.0010), right cerebellum (cluster size: 6,776 mm3, x 42; y -50; z -46, maximum ALE value of 0.0096), right insula (cluster size:6,776 mm3, x 46; y 14; z -2, maximum ALE value of 0.0096), right anterior cingulate gyrus (cluster size:6,560 mm3, x 4; y 13; z -16, maximum ALE value of 0.0092), left occipital lobe (cluster size:6,560 mm3, x -18; y -46; z -3, maximum ALE value of 0.0097), left globus pallidus (cluster size:6,392 mm3, x -22; y -12; z 4, maximum ALE value of 0.0100) (Figure 4). ![Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F4.medium.gif) [Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/05/01/2024.04.30.24306508/F4) Figure 4. ALE analysis of decreased brain glucose metabolism of adults in COVID-19 disease (blue: acute disease, orange: chronic disease) ## DISCUSSION COVID-19 has altered not only our lifestyle but also our brain glucose metabolism. It typically appears on 18F-FDG PET scans as areas of decreased brain glucose metabolism, although there may also be areas of increased metabolism. Decreases in brain glucose metabolism have been observed in the cerebellum, left amygdala/hippocampus, cingulate gyrus, right amygdala, right insula, and right temporal lobe. This reduction in metabolism varies depending on the patient’s age and the time elapsed between the COVID-19 diagnosis and the PET scan. Conversely, increased brain glucose metabolism has been noted in the left anterior cingulate gyrus, right thalamus, and brainstem. COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has significantly altered modern society and lifestyles. The first human infection was reported in Wuhan, China, in November 2019, and on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the outbreak a global pandemic21. The virus can be transmitted through small liquid particles, which come from when infected individuals cough, sneeze, talk, sing, or breathe 21. Due to the rapid transmission rate in the early stages, many countries adopted social distancing and mask mandates to prevent the collapse of healthcare systems and slow the spread 22. As of April 2024, there have been over 700 million reported cases and over 7 million deaths1. COVID-19 presents with various symptoms, including fever, fatigue, dry cough, anorexia, and dyspnea 23. A common in-hospital complication among critically ill patients is barotrauma, which can manifest as pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or subcutaneous emphysema 3. The virus is also associated with neurological symptoms such as dizziness, headaches, disturbances in olfactory function, impaired consciousness, and seizures4. Among these, disturbance in olfactory function was the most prevalent, with a reported prevalence of 31.4%, followed by taste disturbance at 28.1% 24. More severe cases, such as seizures, have a prevalence of 1.1% 24. These neurological complications can be severe, especially in critically ill patients 25. In patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome attributed to COVID-19 disease, neurological findings were documented in nearly 80% of cases 26. Non-negligible rates of neurological complications persist for months or years 27. Moreover, COVID-19 can change brain structures for a longer period 28. Therefore, we investigated how COVID-19 affects brain glucose metabolism by meta-analyzing studies on brain 18F-FDG PET scans. The human brain primarily uses glucose as its main energy source; therefore, brain glucose metabolism, as assessed by 18F-FDG PET, can be used to quantify neuronal activity8, 9. 18F-FDG PET plays a crucial role in diagnosing neurodegenerative disorders. For example, Alzheimer’s disease typically shows a distinct pattern of decreased glucose metabolism in the posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, and temporoparietal cortex29. 18F-FDG PET is also effective in diagnosing and evaluating neurological disorders in pediatric patients. In cases of pediatric epilepsy, 18F-FDG PET helps in identifying the focal epileptogenic zone, thus enabling more precise surgical interventions 30. By comparing the brain glucose metabolism of patients with COVID-19 to that of healthy controls, we identified the brain regions affected by COVID-19. Various brain imaging modalities have been employed to investigate changes in COVID-19 patients. Brain MRI has revealed extensive confluent or multifocal white matter lesions, microhemorrhages, diffusion restriction, and enhancement in these patients 5. More than 70% of patients exhibited multiple white matter lesions on brain MRI scans6. The application of Blood Oxygen Level Dependent-functional MRI indicated enhanced signals in the right piriform cortex and right anterior cingulate gyrus 7. Additionally, changes in brain volume have been reported. The bilateral olfactory cortex, hippocampus, insula, left Heschl’s gyrus, left Rolandic operculum, and right cingulate gyrus showed an increase in brain volume31, whereas an overall decrease in white matter was reported in COVID-19 32. Furthermore, an increase in cortical thickness has been observed 33. These diverse findings highlight the multifaceted impact of COVID-19 on the brain and underscore the importance of comprehensive neuroimaging approaches to uncover the complexities associated with post-infection neurological changes. In this study, hypermetabolism was observed in the left anterior cingulate gyrus, right thalamus, and brainstem. The anterior cingulate gyrus is involved in the dynamic control of attention and efficient response selection34, the thalamus is a relay center of both sensory and motor mechanisms 35, and the brainstem is involved in respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurological functions 36. SARS-CoV-2 can cross the blood-brain barrier, triggering inflammation that leads to increased brain glucose metabolism on 18F-FDG PET scans. Therefore, these areas of hypermetabolism may be associated with symptoms such as fatigue, brain fog, sensorimotor issues, and sleep disturbances in COVID-1937. Hypometabolism was observed in the cerebellum, left amygdala/hippocampus, cingulate gyrus, right amygdala, right insula, and right temporal lobe. We found that hypometabolism in COVID-19 depends on the patient’s age and the time interval between the COVID-19 diagnosis and PET scanning. In children, hypometabolism was primarily observed in the cerebellum, which is involved in motor control, sensory perception, and higher-level cognitive processes, potentially explaining the decreased functioning in these domains post-COVID infection 38. In adults, hypometabolism has been noted in the right temporal lobe, right parahippocampal gyrus, and right hippocampus, areas responsible for declarative memory, language production, cognition, and creative insight. This may contribute to common COVID-19 symptoms such as brain fog, memory problems, and fatigue. This study had several limitations. First, it was based on a limited number of studies. Additionally, the overall number of participants included in this analysis was relatively small. Moreover, the inclusion criteria were restricted to studies that presented findings in the form of coordinates within a standardized stereotactic space, while studies utilizing region-of-interest analysis were excluded. This selection criterion could potentially impact the study outcomes. Finally, COVID-19 is a relatively new disease, and its long-term effects on brain glucose metabolism have not yet been thoroughly investigated. In conclusion, COVID-19 alters glucose metabolism in the brain. It typically appears on 18F-FDG PET scans as areas of decreased brain glucose metabolism; however, there may also be areas of increased metabolism. This variation in brain glucose metabolism is dependent on the patient’s age and the time interval between the COVID-19 diagnosis and PET scanning. ## Supporting information table [[supplements/306508_file06.docx]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors ## Footnotes * Dongju Kang, olsguri{at}pusan.ac.kr * Hyunji Jung, hgi0629{at}pusan.ac.kr * Received April 30, 2024. * Revision received April 30, 2024. * Accepted May 1, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) ## REFERENCES 1. 1.Worldometer. Coronavirus. 2024. 2. 2.da Rosa Mesquita R, Francelino Silva Junior LC, Santos Santana FM, et al. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in the general population: systematic review. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021;133:377–382. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00508-020-01760-4&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 3. 3.John KJ, Nayar J, Mishra AK, et al. In-hospital clinical complications of COVID-19: a brief overview. Future Virol. 2021. 4. 4.Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, et al. Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:683–690. 5. 5.Freeman CW, Masur J, Hassankhani A, et al. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)-Related Disseminated Leukoencephalopathy: A Retrospective Study of Findings on Brain MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;216:1046–1047. 6. 6.Hellgren L, Birberg Thornberg U, Samuelsson K, et al. Brain MRI and neuropsychological findings at long-term follow-up after COVID-19 hospitalisation: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e055164. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYm1qb3BlbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMzoiMTEvMTAvZTA1NTE2NCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA1LzAxLzIwMjQuMDQuMzAuMjQzMDY1MDguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 7. 7.Ismail, II, Gad KA. Absent Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activation of the Orbitofrontal Cortex in a Patient With Persistent Cacosmia and Cacogeusia After COVID-19 Infection. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78:609–610. 8. 8.Phelps ME, Huang SC, Hoffman EJ, et al. Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F-18)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: validation of method. Ann Neurol. 1979;6:371–388. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ana.410060502&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=117743&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1979HU53700001&link_type=ISI) 9. 9.Sibson NR, Dhankhar A, Mason GF, et al. Stoichiometric coupling of brain glucose metabolism and glutamatergic neuronal activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:316–321. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI5NS8xLzMxNiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA1LzAxLzIwMjQuMDQuMzAuMjQzMDY1MDguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 10. 10.Kas A, Soret M, Pyatigoskaya N, et al. The cerebral network of COVID-19-related encephalopathy: a longitudinal voxel-based 18F-FDG-PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2543–2557. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00259-020-05178-y&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33452633&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 11. 11.Niesen M, Trotta N, Noel A, et al. Structural and metabolic brain abnormalities in COVID-19 patients with sudden loss of smell. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:1890–1901. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00259-020-05154-6&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33398411&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 12. 12.Debs P, Khalili N, Solnes L, et al. Post-COVID-19 Brain [(18)F] FDG-PET Findings: A Retrospective Single-Center Study in the United States. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023;44:517–522. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWpuciI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI0NC81LzUxNyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzA1LzAxLzIwMjQuMDQuMzAuMjQzMDY1MDguYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 13. 13.Goehringer F, Bruyere A, Doyen M, et al. Brain (18)F-FDG PET imaging in outpatients with post-COVID-19 conditions: findings and associations with clinical characteristics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:1084–1089. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00259-022-06013-2&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=36322190&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 14. 14.Guedj E, Campion JY, Dudouet P, et al. (18)F-FDG brain PET hypometabolism in patients with long COVID. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2823–2833. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 15. 15.Donegani MI, Miceli A, Pardini M, et al. Brain Metabolic Correlates of Persistent Olfactory Dysfunction after SARS-Cov2 Infection. Biomedicines. 2021;9. 16. 16.Cocciolillo F, Di Giuda D, Morello R, et al. Orbito-Frontal Cortex Hypometabolism in Children With Post-COVID Condition (Long COVID): A Preliminary Experience. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2022;41:663–665. 17. 17.Morand A, Campion JY, Lepine A, et al. Similar patterns of [(18)F]-FDG brain PET hypometabolism in paediatric and adult patients with long COVID: a paediatric case series. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:913–920. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 18. 18.Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF, Jones KM, et al. Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage. 2002;16:765–780. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1006/nimg.2002.1131&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12169260&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000176767800019&link_type=ISI) 19. 19.Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR, et al. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2349–2361. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21963913&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000299494000037&link_type=ISI) 20. 20.Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C, et al. Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:2907–2926. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/hbm.20718&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19172646&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000269510200018&link_type=ISI) 21. 21.Organization WH. WHO Timeline - COVID-19. 2024. 22. 22.Haug N, Geyrhofer L, Londei A, et al. Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4:1303–1312. 23. 23.Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323:1061–1069. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2020.1585&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 24. 24.Favas TT, Dev P, Chaurasia RN, et al. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions. Neurol Sci. 2020;41:3437–3470. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10072-020-04801-y&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 25. 25.Ahmad I, Rathore FA. Neurological manifestations and complications of COVID-19: A literature review. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;77:8–12. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 26. 26.Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, et al. Neurologic Features in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2268–2270. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMc2008597&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 27. 27.Xu E, Xie Y, Al-Aly Z. Long-term neurologic outcomes of COVID-19. Nat Med. 2022;28:2406–2415. 28. 28.Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank. Nature. 2022;604:697–707. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41586-022-04569-5 3&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 29. 29.Bouter C, Henniges P, Franke TN, et al. (18)F-FDG-PET Detects Drastic Changes in Brain Metabolism in the Tg4-42 Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:425. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2018.00425&link_type=DOI) 30. 30.Stanescu L, Ishak GE, Khanna PC, et al. FDG PET of the brain in pediatric patients: imaging spectrum with MR imaging correlation. Radiographics. 2013;33:1279–1303. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1148/rg.335125152&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24025925&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 31. 31.Lu Y, Li X, Geng D, et al. Cerebral Micro-Structural Changes in COVID-19 Patients - An MRI-based 3-month Follow-up Study. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;25:100484. 32. 32.Kamasak B, Ulcay T, Nisari M, et al. Effects of COVID-19 on brain and cerebellum: a voxel based morphometrical analysis. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2023;124:442–448. 33. 33.Besteher B, Rocktaschel T, Garza AP, et al. Cortical thickness alterations and systemic inflammation define long-COVID patients with cognitive impairment. Brain Behav Immun. 2024;116:175–184. 34. 34.Johnson BP, Pinar A, Fornito A, et al. Left anterior cingulate activity predicts intra-individual reaction time variability in healthy adults. Neuropsychologia. 2015;72:22–26. 35. 35.Herrero MT, Barcia C, Navarro JM. Functional anatomy of thalamus and basal ganglia. Childs Nerv Syst. 2002;18:386–404. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00381-002-0604-1&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12192499&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177891800006&link_type=ISI) 36. 36.Yong SJ. Persistent Brainstem Dysfunction in Long-COVID: A Hypothesis. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2021;12:573–580. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00793&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) 37. 37.Reiss AB, Greene C, Dayaramani C, et al. Long COVID, the Brain, Nerves, and Cognitive Function. Neurol Int. 2023;15:821–841. 38. 38.Callan DE, Kawato M, Parsons L, et al. Speech and song: the role of the cerebellum. Cerebellum. 2007;6:321–327. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/14734220601187733&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17853077&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F05%2F01%2F2024.04.30.24306508.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000251885200005&link_type=ISI)