ABSTRACT
Objectives To develop a core outcome set (COS) to capture and measure the well-being of doctors working in the NHS.
Design An online Delphi study.
Setting United Kingdom National Health Service.
Participants Participants from four stakeholder groups: i) those who might use the COS in research, ii) organisations that measure/capture NHS staff wellbeing, iii) professionals with experience managing NHS staff wellbeing, and iv) NHS doctors, were identified through authorship of relevant publications, attendee lists of doctor well-being conferences and meetings, professional bodies, participation in a previous study and recommendations from others. They were recruited via email.
Method A two-stage process: 1) creating a list of 43 wellbeing outcomes informed by a systematic review of wellbeing measurement instruments, a survey of UK doctors and 2 doctor engagement workshops, and 2) an online modified Delphi study (with two rounds) to reach consensus. Outcomes were rated on a 9-point Likert scale; ‘consensus’ was reached when <75% agreed that an outcome was critical for inclusion in the COS.
Results Fifty-two participants completed both Delphi rounds. Seven wellbeing outcomes met the threshold for inclusion in the COS: General wellbeing, Health, Personal safety, Job satisfaction, Morale, Life work balance, and Good clinical practice.
Conclusion Use of the COS has the potential to reduce heterogeneity and standardise the capture and measurement of doctor well-being and ensure outcomes important to all stakeholders are reported.
Trial registration This study was prospectively registered with the COMET initiative www.comet-initiative.org (Registration: 1577)
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Health Education England (HEE) South provided financial support for this research in the form of a postgraduate fellowship awarded to GS. NK is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration Wessex (ARC Wessex). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY NC public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript arising from this submission.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee (ERGO 55747). Approved on 31/12/2021.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and supplementary materials files.
