Psychological distress after COVID-19 recovery and subsequent prolonged post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: A longitudinal study with 1-year follow-up in Japan ============================================================================================================================================================ * Megumi Hazumi * Mayumi Kataoka * Zui Narita * Kentaro Usuda * Emi Okazaki * Daisuke Nishi ## Abstract **Background** This study investigated the longitudinal association between psychological distress in the post-acute phase and the subsequent prolonged post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) among individuals with PASC. **Methods** An online longitudinal survey with 1-year interval was conducted from July to September 2021 (T1) and July to September 2022 (T2). Individuals who were 20-years-old or older, had a positive Polymerase Chain Reaction test, were one month post-infection, and did not select “Nothing” to a question regarding PASC presence were included. The primary outcome was the presence of PASC at T2. The presence of general, respiratory, muscular, neurological, gastrointestinal, dermatological, and cardiac symptoms at T2 was also used as an outcome among patients with relevant symptoms at time 1 (T1). Exposure was measured using the Kessler distress scale (K6) at T1, and those whose K6 was 13 or higher were identified as having psychological distress. Marginal structure models with robust standard errors were used to examine the association between psychological distress at T1 and any PASC symptoms at T2, and the associations between psychological distress and each symptom at T2 among participants with relevant symptoms at T1. **Results** A total of 1674 patients were analyzed; 17%had psychological distress. ; In total, 818 (48.9%), 523 (31.2%), and 672 (40.1%) patients reported general, respiratory, and neurological symptoms at T1, respectively. Individuals with psychological distress had higher odds of any symptoms at T2 (Odds Ratio [OR] =1.81, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]= 1.08 – 3.03) and general and respiratory symptoms at T2 among participants with relevant symptoms at T1 (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.02 – 3.76; OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.03 – 5.80). **Conclusion** Psychological distress in the post-acute phase may lead to prolonged PASC symptoms, mainly general and respiratory symptoms, at the 1-year follow-up in individuals with PASC. **Key Messages** Psychological distress before infection and during the acute phase predicts prolonged Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC); however, in individuals with PASC, it is unclear whether psychological distress during the post-acute phase predicts prolonged PASC. This longitudinal survey indicated that psychological distress in the post-acute phase led to prolonged any levels of PASC, especially general and respiratory symptoms, at the 1-year follow-up. Therefore, mental health care for individuals with PASC may help to improve or mitigate prolonged PASC. Keywords * Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome * Psychological Distress ## Introduction Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) are symptoms that persist or appear after the acute phase, that is, after four weeks of COVID-19 infection[1]. PASC symptoms vary, but may include dyspnea, cough, fatigue, fever, anosmia, ageusia, arthralgia, myalgia, hair loss, chest pain, palpitations, throat pain, and others[2,3]. PASC can last more than several months and is as severe as other infectious diseases. According to a systematic review, 54%, 55%, and 54% of COVID-19 survivors had at least one PASC at one month, two to five months, and six or more months, respectively[1], and 50.1% continued to suffer from PASC for more than one year[4]. Abnormal pulmonary function (45.6%), fatigue (28.7%), and neurological symptoms (18.7%) were mainly observed[4]. The prevalence of symptoms was significantly higher in individuals infected with COVID-19 than in those without after one year had passed[5], and such symptoms were not significantly reduced between one year and two years after infection[6]. The prevalence of sequelae in patients with COVID-19 is comparable to that in other respiratory infectious diseases[7]. Considering that persistent symptoms not only affect these individuals’ quality of life[8,9] but are also costly from an economic perspective[10–12], it is important to identify factors that cause PASC to persist so that it can be alleviated and prevented. Having mental health problems before COVID-19 infection and in the acute phase is suggested to be one factor that can cause prolonged PASC. The association between preexisting mental health problems and PASC has been reported in several cross-sectional surveys[13–17]. According to several longitudinal studies, preexisting mental health problems predict PASC at 3, 12, and 15 months after infection[15,18–20]. An extensive cohort study reported that pre-existing depression predicted prolonged PASC after 6, 12, and 18 months passed[21]. Mental health problems in the acute phase have also been suggested to influence PASC. A prospective cohort study indicated that depressive symptoms in the acute phase predicted the presence of PASC at one and three months after infection [22]. Another prospective cohort study revealed that depression in the acute phase predicted prolonged PASC at 12 months after infection[23]. Considering these factors, mental health problems before the appearance of PASC may determine whether PASC will persist for more than 12 months. However, it remains unclear whether mental health problems after the appearance of PASC predict prolonged PASC. Several studies suggest that mental health problems may develop or continue after the acute phase among those with PASC. Individuals who recover from COVID-19 are at risk of developing new mental health problems[4,24–27]. COVID-19-related experiences, such as perceived discrimination and negative thoughts about the infection, were reported to be associated with mental health problems, independent of pre-existing mental health problems[28,29]. Several cross-sectional studies also suggest that preceding PASC affects mental health after recovery[30–34], and longitudinal studies have suggested that presence of PASC predicts mental health problems[35,36]. On the other hand, mental health problems after acute illness are suspected to predict subsequent prolonged PASC, considering that mental health problems generally exacerbate the severity or progression of various physical diseases[37]. Psychological distress after the appearance of to contribute to prolonged PASC as it is possible for mental health to develop after the acute phase of infection, and the possibility of mental health problems exacerbating physical health problems. Various PASC symptoms, both general symptoms, such as fatigue and fever, and respiratory symptoms, including dyspnea and shortness of breath, may be influenced by mental health problems. The association between respiratory symptoms and mental health problems is well known[38,39] because negative feelings generally promote the perception of dyspnea, airway obstruction, and airway reactivity through the CNS and autonomic pathways[40,41]. General symptoms, such as fatigue and fever, are generally affected by mental health problems[42–44] through the elevation of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6, which induce fatigue and fever[45,46]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether psychological distress after the acute phase predicts subsequent prolonged PASC at a one year follow-up afting forunder adjusted pre-existing mental health problems in individuals with PASC. This study is believed to help elucidate the significance of providing mental health care to individuals with PASC with the aim of alleviating their symptoms. ## Materials and Methods ### Participants and Setting The two-point longitudinal survey for COVID-19 was performed at 1-year intervals through the Rakuten Insight Corporation, which is the company that delivering the most mass panels in Japan for online surveys[47]. The panelists received information about study recruitment, and those interested in the study accessed an online survey form. If the individuals agreed to participate in the study by clicking the consent declaration button on the website after reading the informed consent document, they were considered to have responded to the questionnaire. Those who completed the questionnaire received rewards points that could can be used for online shopping. The data at Time 1 (T1) and Time 2 (T2) were collected from July to September 2021 and July to September 2022, respectively. Individuals who met the following criteria were included: 1) Over 20 years old, 2) answered “yes” to the screening question “Have you been infected with COVID-19?”, 3) selected an option other than “Nothing” to the question “What kind of PASC symptoms do you have now?”, and 4) more than a month after infection, based on the definition of PASC[48]. In addition, data that met the following criteria were excluded from the analysis: duplication, incorrect answers to the dummy question, statement that they had not been infected, inconsistent answers, and outlier answers according to their demographic information responses. ### Measurements #### Outcome The answer options to the question “What kind of physical PASC symptoms do you have now?” at T2 were used as the outcomes. Options were generated based on the symptoms list by the World Health Organization[49] and the detailed answers of “Others” symptoms at T1: “Nothing,” “Fever,” “Cough,” “Fatigue,” “muscle or body pain,” “Sore throat,” “Headache,” “Diarrhea,” “Red or irritated eyes,” “Altered taste,” “Altered smell,” “A rash on skin, or discoloration of fingers or toes,” “Difficulty breathing or shortness of breath,” “Chest pain or pressure,” “Loss of speech or mobility,” “Menstrual problems,” “Blurred vision,” “Dizziness,” “Constipation or acid reflux” “Convulsion,” “Neuralagia,” “Tachysystole and palpitation,” “Tinnitus and ear problems,” “New Allergy” and “Others.” Unless the respondent selected the “nothing” option, they were able to select multiple options. Those who selected “Others” were additionally asked to fill in the details in the free text field, and authors categorized the described complaint by compiling similar symptoms. Furthermore, these symptoms were classified into the following symptom groups based on a previous study[50]: “General,” “Respiratory,” “Musculoskeletal,” “Neurologic,” “Gastrointestinal,” “Eye,” “Dermatologic,” “Cardiac,” “Urinary,” and “Others.” Details regarding the symptoms and classifications are provided in Appendix 1. To confirm whether any physical PASC was maintained, the option “Nothing” at T2 was used as a primary outcome. Those who selected “Nothing” were identified as having no PASC, and those who didn’t were identified as having some PASC. The presence of each symptom group at T2 was also used as an outcome measure. These variables and classification procedures were also employed for the data at T1 in subgroup analyses. #### Exposure The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) at T1 was used to measure the severity of psychological distress over the past 30 days at T1[51–53]. The K6 comprises six items with 5-point Likert scales (0–4 points). A total score of 13 or higher indicates psychological distress[51]. #### Covariates The following variables reported at T1 were used as covariates: sex (male, female, others)[54,55], age group (20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, ≥ 60)[54,55], income level (< Japanese yen [JPY] 3,000,000, < JPY 10,000,000, ≥ JPY 10,000,000, unknown or refuse to respond)[56,57], the presence of psychiatric history (yes, no)[24,54,55], hospitalized (yes, no)[54,58], and the presence of acute symptoms (yes, no)[55,58]. We also adjusted for BMI[48,54,59] and pre-existing comorbidities, including respiratory diseases (COPD, asthma, bronchitis, and pneumonia)[54,55,60], hypertension[55,61,62], diabetes[48,59,63], and cardiac diseases (angina and myocardial infarction)[48,64]. These pre-existing comorbidities were identified as those who selected options other than “Nothing before” or “Never,” “Yes, in the past,” “Yes, currently (in hospitals),” and “Yes, currently (not in hospitals)” to the question about above comorbidities. ### Patent and Public Involvement From inception, our research team included COVID-19 survivors to leverage their first-hand experiences in developing the hypothesis and ensuring patient-centered perspectives were integral to our study design. ### Analyses After absolute risks and risk differences were calculated, marginal structure models with robust standard errors were performed to examine the association between the presence of psychological distress at T1 and the scprecense of PASC symptoms at T2[65]. Similar analyses were performed to examine the association between the presence of psychological distress at T1 and the presence of each symptom at T2, including “General,” “Respiratory,” and “Neurologic,” among those with relevant symptoms at T1, given that sample size at T1 was sufficient. covariates were controlled to use inverse probability weighting. Stabilized weights were calculated to determine the presence of psychological distress. We further accounted for the loss to follow-up using stabilized weights. The stabilized weights were multiplied to obtain the final stabilized weights. ### Ethics This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (A2021-034). ## Results ### Characteristics Figure 1 illustrates the data collection process. A total of 1674 eligible participants completed the questionnaire at T1, and their data were analyzed. At T2, 673 participants completed the questionnaire. Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of the participants. Of all participants, 57.6% were male, and the age group of 40–49 years was the largest (29.2%). The proportion of those whose have psychological distress was 17%. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/24/2024.03.21.24304702/T1) Table 1. Characteristics ### Relationships between psychological distress and subsequent prolonged PASC Table 2 shows the absolute risks and risk differences of the presence of prolonged PASC between those with psycological distress and those without. View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/24/2024.03.21.24304702/T2) Table 2. Absolute risks and risk differences of PASC at 1-year follow-up As table 3 shows, psychological distress at T1 was significantly associated with the presence of any symptoms, general symptoms, and respiratory symptoms at T2 among those with the relevant symptoms at T1 (OR=1.80 [1.08 – 3.01]; OR=1.92[1.002 – 3.67]; OR=2.44[1.03 – 5.80]). View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/24/2024.03.21.24304702/T3) Table 3. Psychological distress as a predictor of prolonged PASC at 1-year follow-up ## Discussion This study investigated the association between psychological distress after recovery from COVID-19 and PASC at one-year follow-up in individuals with PASC after COVID-19 infection. Psychological distress after recovery was significantly associated with subsequent proalonged PASC, both general and respiratory symptoms, at one year among those with relevant symptoms, independent of pre-existing psychiatric problems. These results suggested that psychological distress at the post-acute phase wasassociated with prolonged PASC of any type. Inaddition to the mental health problems observed before the post-acute phase[15,18–20,22,23,66], psychological distress after PASC becomes apparent may lead to prolonged PASC. COVID-19 survivors often face discrimination, negative thoughts about COVID-19, and experience unemployment after recovery, which can exacerbate mental health problems [28,29][67][68]. These factors may, in turn, lead to prolonged PASC due to resultant mental health problems. Psychological distress after the acute phase is associated with prolonged general symptoms, such as fatigue and fever, in individuals with PASC. This result is consistent with general symptoms not induced by COVID-19 infection[42–44]. The depressive conditions are known to elevate IL-1β and IL-6, which cause fever and fatigue[45,46]. Mental health problems related to PASC and COVID-19 are believed to activate inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6 that can prolong general symptoms. Psychological distress after the acute phase is associated with prolonged respiratory symptoms, such as dyspnea and shortness of breath. As respiratory symptoms are unrelated to COVID-19 infection[38,39], respiratory symptoms, such as PASC, may be affected by mental health problems. Respiratory symptoms, such as dyspnea, obstruction, and airway sensations, are sensitive to negative emotions[40,41]. Therefore, mental health problems may promote the perception of respiratory symptoms and delay improvements in PASC. Psychological distress was not associated with prolong neurological symptoms, supporting previous findings that the oresence of psychological distress did not differ significantly between those with edaltering smell or taste after COVID-19 infection and those without [13]. These findings underscore the need to routinely assess mental health as a critical aspect of PASC care. Early identification and support for psychological distress may reduce the risk of prolonged PASC. These implications are not limited to the clinical realm for medical professionals but also extended to larger scales, such as regional and societal levels, indicating significant public health implications. This study had some limitations. PASC symptoms were self-reported by the participants. Thus, they were not as subtle as diagnoses made by physicians or determined using validated measurements. Instead, our findings reflect individuals with PASC who are not connected to medical care. We failed to follow-up with over half of the participants, although missing values were complemented by a statistical procedure to minimize missing bias. It cannot be denied that the mental health problems measured in this study emerged prior to the PASC, although mental health problems before the infection were adjusted. The results for several symptoms derived from the small sample size should be interpreted carefully. There are also some strengths to this study. Our data included individuals who were and were not seeing doctors. As some individuals with PASC find it challenging to access healthcare[69,70], collecting participants from both groups is believed to reflect comprehensive PASC characteristics. In conclusion, this study revealed the relationship between mental health problems in the post-acute phase and subsequent prolonged PASC at the 1-year follow-up in individuals with PASC. General and respiratory symptoms were associated with mental health problems. Mental care may reduce the incidence of PASC, especially general and respiratory symptoms. Future intervention studies targeting mental health problems related to PASC should be conducted. ## Data Availability Data produced in the present study are not available. ## Funding This work was supported by an Intramural Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (grant number 1-6 and 4-3). ## Contributorship statement Conceptualization: all. Data collection: MH, MK, KU, EO, and DN. Formal analysis: MH. Interpretation of data: MH, MK, ZN and DN. Original Draft preparation; MH. Review and editing: all. Super vision: ZN and DN. ## Competing interests statement DN reports personal fees from Startia, Inc., en-Power, Inc., MD.net, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. outside of the submitted work. MH, MK, ZN, EO, and KU have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose concerning the study. ## Figure Captions Figure 1. Flow chart ## Appendix 1. The symptom classification View this table: [Table4](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/24/2024.03.21.24304702/T4) The categories “Ear,” “Metabolic,” and “Reproductive” were not developed because the responses equivalent to these categories were not collected. * Received March 21, 2024. * Revision received March 21, 2024. * Accepted March 24, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## Reference 1. Groff D, Sun A, Ssentongo AE, et al. Short-term and long-term rates of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2128568. 2. Jennings G, Monaghan A, Xue F, et al. A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: Ongoing symptomatic phase vs. Post-COVID-19 syndrome. J Clin Med 2021;10:5913. 3. Nasserie T, Hittle M, Goodman SN. Assessment of the frequency and variety of persistent symptoms among patients with COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2111417. 4. Zeng N, Zhao Y-M, Yan W, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long term physical and mental sequelae of COVID-19 pandemic: call for research priority and action. Mol Psychiatry 2023;28:423–33. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41380-022-01614-7&link_type=DOI) 5. Heidemann C, Sarganas G, Du Y, et al. Long-term health consequences among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to individuals without infection: results of the population-based cohort study CoMoLo Follow-up. BMC Public Health 2023;23. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16524-8 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-023-16524-8&link_type=DOI) 6. Kim Y, Bae S, Chang H-H, et al. Long COVID prevalence and impact on quality of life 2 years after acute COVID-19. Sci Rep 2023;13:11207. 7. Grønkjær CS, Christensen RHB, Kondziella D, et al. Long-term neurological outcome after COVID-19 using all SARS-CoV-2 test results and hospitalisations in Denmark with 22-month follow-up. Nat Commun 2023;14. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39973-6 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-023-39973-6&link_type=DOI) 8. Tsuzuki S, Miyazato Y, Terada M, et al. Impact of long-COVID on health-related quality of life in Japanese COVID-19 patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022;20. doi:10.1186/s12955-022-02033-6 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12955-022-02033-6&link_type=DOI) 9. Tabacof L, Tosto-Mancuso J, Wood J, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome negatively impacts physical function, cognitive function, health-related quality of life, and participation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2022;101:48–52. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/phm.0000000000001910&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 10. Wolff Sagy Y, Feldhamer I, Brammli-Greenberg S, et al. Estimating the economic burden of long-Covid: the additive cost of healthcare utilisation among COVID-19 recoverees in Israel. BMJ Glob Health 2023;8:e012588. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToiYm1qZ2giO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTE6IjgvNy9lMDEyNTg4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDMvMjQvMjAyNC4wMy4yMS4yNDMwNDcwMi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 11. Gandjour A. Long COVID: Costs for the German economy and health care and pension system. BMC Health Serv Res 2023;23. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09601-6 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12913-023-09601-6&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=37316880&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 12. Cutler DM. The costs of long COVID. JAMA Health Forum 2022;3:e221809. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1809&link_type=DOI) 13. Wang S, Quan L, Chavarro JE, et al. Associations of depression, anxiety, worry, perceived stress, and loneliness prior to infection with risk of post–COVID-19 conditions. JAMA Psychiatry 2022;79:1081. 14. Kataoka M, Hazumi M, Usuda K, et al. Association of preexisting psychiatric disorders with post-COVID-19 prevalence: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2023;13:346. 15. Sansone D, Tassinari A, Valentinotti R, et al. Persistence of symptoms 15 months since COVID-19 diagnosis: Prevalence, risk factors and residual work ability. Life (Basel) 2022;13:97. 16. Change to open access status. JAMA Psychiatry 2022;79:1141. 17. Margalit I, Yelin D, Sagi M, et al. Risk factors and multidimensional assessment of long Coronavirus disease fatigue: A nested case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 2022;75:1688–97. 18. Benoit-Piau J, Tremblay K, Piché A, et al. Long-term consequences of COVID-19 in predominantly immunonaive patients: A Canadian prospective population-based study. J Clin Med 2023;12:5939. 19. Aguayo GA, Fischer A, Elbéji A, et al. Association between use of psychotropic medications prior to SARS-COV-2 infection and trajectories of COVID-19 recovery: Findings from the prospective Predi-COVID cohort study. Front Public Health 2023;11. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1055440 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpubh.2023.1055440&link_type=DOI) 20. Durstenfeld MS, Peluso MJ, Peyser ND, et al. Factors associated with Long COVID symptoms in an online cohort study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023;10. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad047 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ofid/ofad047&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=36846611&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 21. Hastie CE, Lowe DJ, McAuley A, et al. Outcomes among confirmed cases and a matched comparison group in the Long-COVID in Scotland study. Nat Commun 2022;13. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33415-5 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-022-33415-5&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=36224173&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 22. Bottemanne H, Gouraud C, Hulot J-S, et al. Do anxiety and depression predict persistent physical symptoms after a severe COVID-19 episode? A prospective study. Front Psychiatry 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.757685 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyt.2021.757685&link_type=DOI) 23. Fancourt D, Steptoe A, Bu F. Psychological consequences of long COVID: comparing trajectories of depressive and anxiety symptoms before and after contracting SARS-CoV-2 between matched long- and short-COVID groups. Br J Psychiatry 2023;222:74–81. 24. Subramanian A, Nirantharakumar K, Hughes S, et al. Symptoms and risk factors for long COVID in non-hospitalized adults. Nat Med 2022;28:1706–14. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/S41591-022-01909-W&link_type=DOI) 25. Nersesjan V, Christensen RHB, Kondziella D, et al. COVID-19 and risk for mental disorders among adults in Denmark. JAMA Psychiatry 2023;80:778. 26. Thye AY-K, Law JW-F, Tan LT-H, et al. Psychological Symptoms in COVID-19 Patients: Insights into Pathophysiology and Risk Factors of Long COVID-19. Biology 2022;11. doi:10.3390/biology11010061 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/biology11010061&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35053059&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 27. Taquet M, Sillett R, Zhu L, et al. Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1 284 437 patients. Lancet Psychiatry 2022;9:815–27. 28. Hazumi M, Kataoka M, Usuda K, et al. Difference in the risk of discrimination on psychological distress experienced by early wave infected and late wave infected COVID-19 survivors in Japan. Sci Rep 2023;13:13139. 29. Hazumi M, Okazaki E, Usuda K, et al. Relationship between attitudes toward COVID-19 infection, depression and anxiety: a cross-sectional survey in Japan. BMC Psychiatry 2022;22:798. 30. Rastogi R, Cerda IH, Ibrahim A, et al. Long COVID and psychological distress in young adults: Potential protective effect of a prior mental health diagnosis. J Affect Disord 2023;340:639–48. 31. Sugiyama A, Miwata K, Kitahara Y, et al. Long COVID occurrence in COVID-19 survivors. Sci Rep 2022;12. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10051-z [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-022-10051-z&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35411017&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 32. Rudenstine S, Schulder T, Bhatt KJ, et al. Long-COVID and comorbid depression and anxiety two years into the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Res 2022;317:114924. 33. Sirotiak Z, Thomas EBK, Brellenthin AG. Stress, anxiety, and depression severity among individuals with no history, previous history, or current history of long COVID. J Psychosom Res 2023;175:111519. 34. Terai H, Ishii M, Takemura R, et al. Comprehensive analysis of long COVID in a Japanese nationwide prospective cohort study. Respir Investig 2023;61:802–14. 35. Righi E, Mirandola M, Mazzaferri F, et al. Determinants of persistence of symptoms and impact on physical and mental wellbeing in Long COVID: A prospective cohort study. J Infect 2022;84:566–72. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jinf.2022.02.003&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 36. Shi Y, Strobl R, Apfelbacher C, et al. Persistent symptoms and risk factors predicting prolonged time to symptom-free after SARS\_CoV\_2 infection: an analysis of the baseline examination of the German COVIDOM/NAPKON-POP cohort. Infection Published Online First: 25 May 2023. doi:10.1007/s15010-023-02043-6 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s15010-023-02043-6&link_type=DOI) 37. Dragioti E, Radua J, Solmi M, et al. Impact of mental disorders on clinical outcomes of physical diseases: an umbrella review assessing population attributable fraction and generalized impact fraction. World Psychiatry 2023;22:86–104. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/WPS.21068&link_type=DOI) 38. Leander M, Lampa E, Rask-Andersen A, et al. Impact of anxiety and depression on respiratory symptoms. Respir Med 2014;108:1594–600. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rmed.2014.09.007&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25282543&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 39. Quint JK, Baghai-Ravary R, Donaldson GC, et al. Relationship between depression and exacerbations in COPD. Eur Respir J 2008;32:53–60. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiZXJqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjMyLzEvNTMiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wMy8yNC8yMDI0LjAzLjIxLjI0MzA0NzAyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 40. De Peuter S, Van Diest I, Lemaigre V, et al. Dyspnea: the role of psychological processes. Clin Psychol Rev 2004;24:557–81. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cpr.2004.05.001&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15325745&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000223839100004&link_type=ISI) 41. Ritz T. Airway responsiveness to psychological processes in asthma and health. Front Physiol 2012;3. doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00343 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fphys.2012.00343&link_type=DOI) 42. Kato K, Sullivan PF, Evengård B, et al. Premorbid predictors of chronic fatigue. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:1267. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpsyc.63.11.1267&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17088507&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000241802000013&link_type=ISI) 43. Harvey SB, Wadsworth M, Wessely S, et al. The relationship between prior psychiatric disorder and chronic fatigue: evidence from a national birth cohort study. Psychol Med 2008;38:933–40. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0033291707001900&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17976252&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000257506100005&link_type=ISI) 44. Roy-Byrne P, Afari N, Ashton S, et al. Chronic fatigue and anxiety/depression: A twin study. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:29–34. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6ImJqcHJjcHN5Y2giO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMTgwLzEvMjkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wMy8yNC8yMDI0LjAzLjIxLjI0MzA0NzAyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 45. Lee C-H, Giuliani F. The role of inflammation in depression and fatigue. Front Immunol 2019;10. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01696 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fimmu.2019.01696&link_type=DOI) 46. Beurel E, Toups M, Nemeroff CB. The bidirectional relationship of depression and inflammation: Double Trouble. Neuron 2020;107:234–56. 47. Rakuten insight, Inc. About us: Rakuten insight. [https://insight.rakuten.co.jp/en/aboutus.html](https://insight.rakuten.co.jp/en/aboutus.html) (accessed 16 Oct 2023). 48. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med 2021;27:601– 15. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33753937&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 49. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). [https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus](https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus) (accessed 31 Oct 2023). 50. Thaweethai T, Jolley SE, Karlson EW, et al. Development of a Definition of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA 2023;329:1934–46. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2023.8823&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=37278994&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 51. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002;32:959–76. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0033291702006074&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12214795&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000177600500002&link_type=ISI) 52. Toshi A. Furukawa 1., Norito Kawakami 2 Mari Saitoh 3 Yutaka Ono 4., Yoshibumi Nakane 5., et al. The performance of the Japanese version of the K6 and K10 in the World Mental Health Survey Japan. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2015;18:69–83. 53. Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, et al. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:184–9. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12578436&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180873200009&link_type=ISI) 54. Hill EL, Mehta HB, Sharma S, et al. Risk factors associated with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: an N3C and NIH RECOVER study. BMC Public Health 2023;23:2103. 55. Moyo E, Chimene M, Moyo P, et al. Risk factors and clinical presentations of long COVID in Africa: A scoping review. J Infect Public Health 2023;16:1982–8. 56. Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, et al. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat Rev Microbiol 2023;21:133–46. 57. Sareen J, Afifi TO, McMillan KA, et al. Relationship between household income and mental disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011;68:419. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.15&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21464366&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000289165900012&link_type=ISI) 58. Schou TM, Joca S, Wegener G, et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 – A systematic review. Brain Behav Immun 2021;97:328–48. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bbi.2021.07.018&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34339806&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 59. Notarte KI, de Oliveira MHS, Peligro PJ, et al. Age, Sex and Previous Comorbidities as Risk Factors Not Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection for Long COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med Res 2022;11. doi:10.3390/jcm11247314 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/jcm11247314&link_type=DOI) 60. Hunter R, Barson E, Willis K, et al. Mental health illness in chronic respiratory disease is associated with worse respiratory health and low engagement with non-pharmacological psychological interventions. Intern Med J 2021;51:414–8. 61. Pazukhina E, Andreeva M, Spiridonova E, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of post-COVID-19 condition in adults and children at 6 and 12 months after hospital discharge: a prospective, cohort study in Moscow (StopCOVID). BMC Med 2022;20:244. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12916-022-02448-4&link_type=DOI) 62. Shahimi NH, Lim R, Mat S, et al. Association between mental illness and blood pressure variability: a systematic review. Biomed Eng Online 2022;21. doi:10.1186/s12938-022-00985-w [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12938-022-00985-w&link_type=DOI) 63. Knol MJ, Twisk JWR, Beekman ATF, et al. Depression as a risk factor for the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2006;49:837–45. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00125-006-0159-x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16520921&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000237182900004&link_type=ISI) 64. Gan Y, Gong Y, Tong X, et al. Depression and the risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14. doi:10.1186/s12888-014-0371-z [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12888-014-0371-z&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25540022&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom) 65. Hernán M, Robins J. Causal Inference: What If. 66. Zheng B, Vivaldi G, Daines L, et al. Determinants of recovery from post-COVID-19 dyspnoea: analysis of UK prospective cohorts of hospitalised COVID-19 patients and community-based controls. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023;29:100635. 67. Reuschke D, Houston D. The impact of Long COVID on the UK workforce. Appl Econ Lett 2023;30:2510–4. 68. Wörn J, Reme B-A, Skirbekk V. Job loss and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2023;23. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16303-5 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12889-023-16303-5&link_type=DOI) 69. Karpman M, Zuckerman S, Morriss S. Health care access and affordability among US adults aged 18 to 64 years with self-reported post-COVID-19 condition. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e237455. 70. Baz SA, Fang C, Carpentieri JD, et al. ‘I don’t know what to do or where to go’. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK. Health Expect 2023;26:542–54. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/hex.13687&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=36512382&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F24%2F2024.03.21.24304702.atom)