Abstract
Background For low TB incidence settings, disease elimination is a long-term goal. We investigated pathways to TB pre-elimination and elimination (incidence <1.0 and <0.1 per 100,000, respectively) in the United States.
Methods Using a mathematical modelling framework, we simulated how U.S. TB incidence could be affected by changes in TB services in the countries of origin for future migrants to the United States, as well as changes in TB services inside the United States. We constructed intervention scenarios representing improvements in TB services internationally and within the United States, individually and in combination, plus a base-case scenario representing continuation of current services. We simulated health and economic outcomes until 2100.
Findings Under the base-case, U.S. TB incidence rates were projected to decline to 1.8 (95% uncertainty interval: 1.5, 2.1) per 100,000 by 2050. Intervention scenarios produced substantial reductions in TB incidence, with the combination of all domestic and international interventions projected to achieve pre-elimination by 2033 (2031, 2037). Compared to the base-case, this combination could avert 101 (84, 120) thousand U.S. TB cases and 13 (11, 16) thousand U.S. TB deaths over 2025-2050; the total economic value of these TB incidence reductions was estimated as US$68 (33, 112) billion. TB elimination was not projected before 2100.
Interpretation Strengthening TB services domestically, promoting the development of more effective technologies and interventions, and supporting TB programs in high-burden countries are key strategies for accelerating progress towards TB elimination in the United States.
Funding U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Evidence before this study A number of studies have investigated the potential health impacts of tuberculosis intervention options in individual countries, across high incidence and low incidence settings. Studies in high incidence settings have generally emphasized TB case detection as a high-impact strategy, while studies in low incidence settings have focused on preventive treatment among individuals with TB infection. Few studies have examined the combined effect of interventions choices in both high- and low-incidence settings, and how these choices can contribute to progress towards TB elimination goals in individual countries.
Added value of this study Using a mathematical modelling approach, this study assessed how interventions in high burden countries and interventions used within the United States could affect future TB trends within the United States. Dependencies between different TB epidemics were modelled explicitly through migration. The analysis examined the extent to which different intervention combinations could accelerate progress towards TB pre-elimination and elimination goals (incidence <1.0 and <0.1 per 100,000, respectively).
Implications of all the available evidence In this low-burden setting, actions to strengthen TB services domestically, promote the development of more effective technologies and interventions, and support TB programs in high-burden countries were all found to be complementary and impactful strategies for accelerating progress towards TB elimination.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of Harvard University determined this research to constitute non human subjects research (IRB22-1328).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Analytic code and most data inputs available upon request to the corresponding author (nmenzies{at}hsph.harvard.edu). Disaggregated TB notification data used for model fitting were obtained from the U.S. National TB Surveillance System (NTSS). The NTSS operates under an Assurance of Confidentiality issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under Sections 306 and 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC 242k and 242m(d)), which prohibits disclosure of information that could be used to directly or indirectly identify patients. More information is available in the data rerelease policy from the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/TB/DTBE-Data-ReRelease-Policy-2022-update-2022-05-09.pdf). A limited data set is available at https://wonder.cdc.gov/TB-v2021.html.
