Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques such as deep learning hold tremendous potential for improving clinical practice. However, clinical data complexity and the need for extensive specialized knowledge represent major challenges in the current, human-driven model design. Moreover, as human interpretation of a clinical problem is inherently encoded in the model, the conventional single model paradigm is subjective and cannot fully capture the prediction uncertainty. Here, we present a fast and accurate framework for automated clinical deep learning, TEACUP (training-free assembly as clinical uncertainty predictor). The core of TEACUP is a newly developed metric that faithfully characterizes the quality of deep networks without incurring any cost for training of these networks. When compared to conventional, training-based approaches, TEACUP reduces computation costs by more than 50% while achieving improved performance across distinct clinical tasks. This efficiency allows TEACUP to create ensembles of expert AI models, contributing to recommendations in clinical practice by mimicking the approach of using multiple human experts when interpreting medical data. By combining multiple perspectives, TEACUP provides more robust predictions and uncertainty quantification, paving the way for more reliable clinical AI.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work is supported by a Winnick family foundation award, a PCF challenge award, and a Cedars-Sinai institutional start-up.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
A new benchmarking dataset on breast ultrasound imaging was added.
4 Data Availability
The benchmarking datasets are publicly available. ECG2017 is precompiled in https://nb360.ml.cmu.edu/. Both BreastMNIST CT scans and Lung nodule scan is part of the MedMNIST dataset in https://medmnist.com/.
