Association between antihypertensive combinations and postoperative mortality and functional decline: a nationwide survey of Japanese adults undergoing major surgeries ======================================================================================================================================================================= * Rena Suzukawa * Shintaro Mandai * Yuta Nakano * Shunsuke Inaba * Hisazumi Matsuki * Yutaro Mori * Fumiaki Ando * Takayasu Mori * Koichiro Susa * Soichiro Iimori * Shotaro Naito * Eisei Sohara * Tatemitsu Rai * Kiyohide Fushimi * Shinichi Uchida ## Abstract **Background** Considering the limited information available regarding the impact of antihypertensive classes on mortality and physical function during hospitalization, we aimed to clarify the impact of six antihypertensive classes, namely thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics (TH), calcium receptor blockers (CCBs), renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RASis), mineral corticoid receptor antagonists, α-blockers, and β-blockers, on outcomes in adult patients undergoing major surgeries. **Methods** This study was a subanalysis of a nationwide observational cohort study involving Japanese adults undergoing major surgeries from 2018 to 2019 using an administrative claims database. We recruited 473,327 antihypertensive medication users and 376,583 nonusers aged ≥50 years who underwent six different types of surgeries, including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery, hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, gastrointestinal resection, and urological surgery. The risk for overall death or functional decline, defined as a ≥5-point decrease in the Barthel Index score during hospitalization, was determined using multivariable logistic regression models. **Results** All-cause inhospital deaths occurred in 5,777 (1.2%) users and 2,657 (0.7%) nonusers. Functional decline was observed in 42,930 (9.2%) users and 22,550 (6.0%) nonusers. Among single class users, RASi use had a multivariable odds ratio (OR) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63–0.93 vs. TH) for the composite of mortality and functional decline. β-Blocker use was associated with an increased risk for functional decline (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01–1.60 vs. TH). Among the recipients of the two medication classes, TH/RASi usage was associated with the lowest risk for composite outcome (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.60–0.77 vs. TH/CCB). Among the recipients of the three or more medication classes, TH/CCB/RASi or TH/CCB/RASi/other displayed the lowest odds for composite outcome (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.49–0.82 vs. TH/CCB/other; OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49–0.82 vs. TH/CCB/others). A stratified analysis revealed that RASi users had a lower OR for the composite outcome after major surgery categories except CABG than non-RASi users. **Conclusions** RASis were associated with decreased risk of postoperative mortality and functional decline regardless of the number of antihypertensive classes or surgery type. Managing hypertension through multidrug combinations, including RASis, may mitigate mortality and loss of physical function during the perioperative period. **Clinical Perspective** What is new? * This nationwide observational cohort study of Japanese adults undergoing major surgeries from 2018 to 2019 using an administrative claims database showed that all-cause inhospital deaths occurred in 5,777 (1.2%) antihypertensive users and 2,657 (0.7%) nonusers, whereas functional decline was observed in 42,930 (9.2%) antihypertensive users and 22,550 (6.0%) nonusers. * We found that an increase in the number of antihypertensive classes used, indicative of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension, was associated with a higher risk of mortality and loss of physical function, partly attributed to loop diuretic use for congestion. What are the clinical implications? * This study determined combinations of antihypertensive drugs that potentially improve the outcomes of antihypertensive users undergoing major surgeries, with the favorable regimens including RASis independent of the number of antihypertensive classes used. * After undergoing all major surgery categories except CABG, patients on RASis were at a lower risk of death and functional decline than those who were treated with other antihypertensive classes. Keywords * hypertension * antihypertensive class * surgery * physical function * renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor ## Introduction The proportion of patients with hypertension continues to increase globally. The number of adult patients with hypertension doubled from 1990 to 2019, affecting nearly 1,300 million people worldwide [1]. Although recent advances in antihypertensive medications and their widespread availability have improved hypertension control in this population, the prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension requiring a combination of multiple antihypertensive classes has continued to increase [2–5]. When caring for patients with hypertension, the prevention of chronic systemic organ dysfunction, hospitalization, acute kidney injuries (AKI), and death caused by acute hypertension (AHT) is of considerable importance [6]. We previously reported an increase in absolute death and urgent dialysis due to AHT from 2010 to 2019 among hospitalized Japanese patients [6]. Given the lack of comprehensive investigations on the effective combination of antihypertensive classes and the mostly empiric evidence available [4], understanding the effects of various antihypertensive medications and their management approaches for both in- and outpatients has been of notable interest among physicians. The decline in activities of daily living (ADLs) and frailty related to hospitalization have also been an enormous health concern for inpatients, given the exponential increase in the aging population globally. Previous studies have established that the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) has long-term effects on muscle strength [7,8]. The use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) promotes enhanced exercise capacity among patients with heart failure [9]. In contrast, our studies showed that patients taking loop diuretics were at an increased risk of developing sarcopenia [10,11], with subsequent studies reporting the same correlation among patients with heart failure and hepatopathy [12–14]. However, no study has focused on the effects of antihypertensive class or loop diuretics during hospitalization under acute care settings, i.e., in patients with severe diseases (e.g., cardiovascular diseases [CVDs], infectious diseases, or major surgeries). We evaluated the impact of continued empirical antihypertensive drug administration during hospitalization on postoperative outcomes, including mortality and physical function, after major surgeries. The current study aimed to determine the most effective monotherapy or combination therapy among six antihypertensive classes (i.e., thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics [TH], calcium receptor blockers [CCBs], renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors [RASis], mineral corticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs], α-blockers, and β-blockers) and loop diuretics, which helps lower the risk for postoperative mortality and functional decline among patients aged 50 and older who underwent major surgeries during hospitalization. We also aimed to investigate whether the type of major surgery (i.e., coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery, hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, gastrointestinal resection, and urological surgery) altered the association between antihypertensive class and postoperative outcomes. ## Methods ### Study design and participants This study was a *posthoc* subanalysis of a national survey on postoperative outcomes among Japanese adults undergoing major surgeries [15]. We used an administrative claims database, the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) inpatient database, to obtain data from 2018 to 2019 [6,15,16]. This dataset comprises information obtained from over 1000 hospitals, including all 82 teaching hospitals, and covers half or more of inpatient cases throughout Japan. The available information included diagnosis and comorbidities upon hospital admission coded according to the International Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision [14]. The datasets also included information on patients’ age, sex, body mass index (BMI), the Charlson comorbidity index [17], which was updated for risk adjustment [18], ADLs upon admission and discharge, and discharge status. A total of 15,422,773 eligible cases were identified. The criteria for study inclusion included age ≥50 years, hospitalization ≥24 h, and patients undergoing any of the defined major surgeries. Major surgeries were previously defined as invasive operative procedures, including CABG, thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery (hip or knee arthroplasty, laminectomy or spinal fusion, and surgery for hip fracture or dislocation), hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (hepatic lobectomy, cholecystectomy, and pancreatectomy), gastrointestinal resection (esophagectomy, gastrectomy, and colectomy), and urological surgery (cystectomy and nephrectomy) [15,19]. The exclusion criteria were as follows: second or later admissions; patients with incomplete information on BMI, the Barthel Index, and admission type (emergency admission or not); those who underwent multiple surgery types; and dependence on maintenance dialysis therapy. Dependence on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis was determined from the coding of patient care procedures (chronic maintenance hemodialysis with <4 h per session, ≥4 h but <5 h per session, ≥5 h per session or chronic maintenance hemodiafiltration or continuous peritoneal dialysis) [17]. Our study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University. The need for informed consent was waived because the data were anonymized. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The data used for the study analyses are available from the corresponding author S.M. upon reasonable request. ### Patient characteristics We calculated the Barthel Index scores upon admission and discharge based on 10 functional abilities, including feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, bowel control, bladder control, toileting, chair transfer, ambulation, and climbing stairs [20]. Barthel Index scores ranged from 0 to 100 at 5-point increments, with 0 indicating complete bed-ridden status and 100 indicating full independence of physical functions. Other patient information on admission included age, sex, BMI, dependence on urgent or maintenance kidney replacement therapy, updated Charlson comorbidity index, excluding renal disease [17,18], comorbidity, surgery type, admission type (emergency or elective admission), and fiscal year. We used the following age strata for the analyses: 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and ≥80 years [21]. On the basis of previous studies, antihypertensive medications were classified into six groups, including TH, CCBs, RASis, MRAs, α-blockers, and β-blockers [22, 23]. Thiazide-like diuretics without a benzothiadiazide structure, such as indapamide and metolazone, were also categorized under TH. Only dihydropyridines were included as CCBs in this study. RASis included ACEis and ARBs. Notably, α/β-blockers were included under β-blockers. Loop diuretics were recognized when used both orally and intravenously. ### Outcomes The primary outcome was the composite of overall inhospital death and decline in physical function, which was defined as a 5-point lower Barthel Index score [24] at discharge than at admission. Patients were followed up until discharge, transfer, or inhospital death. ### Data analyses Data were presented as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range [IQR]). Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between antihypertensive medication and loop diuretics and the risk for mortality or functional decline, adjusting for potential confounding measurements, including age, sex, type of major surgeries, BMI, Barthel Index score upon admission, diabetes mellitus (DM), CVD, chronic kidney disease (CKD), emergency admission, and year of admission. We conducted subgroup analyses using logistic regression models to determine the association between antihypertensive class and outcomes according to major surgery type. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 15.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, United States), with *P* < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. ## Results ### Patient characteristics We identified 15,422,773 patients from a Japanese national inpatient database between 2018 and 2019 (Fig. S1). Subjects aged 50 years and older who underwent major operations during hospitalization lasting for at least 24 h were included (n = 1,283,540). Subsequently, those on their second or later admissions; those without complete information on BMI, Barthel Index score, or emergency admission; and those who underwent multiple surgeries or received maintenance dialysis were excluded. In total, 849,910 subjects were included in the analysis. Table 1 summarizes the demographics and characteristics of the study cohort. Among the 849,910 patients, 473,327 (56%) were taking at least one class of antihypertensive medication. Antihypertensive users and nonusers had a median age (IQR) of 76 (69–82) years and 70 (63–78) years, female percentage of 49% and 50%, and median BMI of 23.4 (20.9–26.0) kg/m2 and 22.5 (20.2–24.9) kg/m2, respectively. A larger proportion of antihypertensive users than nonusers had a low Barthel Index score. The prevalence of comorbidities, including CVD, DM, and CKD, was higher among antihypertensive users than among nonusers. Patients were also stratified according to the type of major surgery that they underwent during hospitalization. Among the six types of major surgeries (CABG, thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery, hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, gastrointestinal resection, and urological surgery), orthopedic surgery was the most common in both groups (45% and 37%, respectively), followed by gastrointestinal resection and esophagectomy (20% and 25%, respectively). View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/16/2024.03.14.24304265/T1) Table 1. Characteristics of patients aged 50 years and older undergoing major Data are presented as number (percentage) or median (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CCB, calcium channel blocker; MRA, mineral corticoid receptor antagonist; RASi, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor; NA, not applicable. ### Effects of the number of antihypertensive classes on postoperative outcomes After a median follow-up of 17 (IQR, 10–27) days, all-cause inhospital deaths were observed in 5,777 patients (1.2%) out of 473,327 antihypertensive users and 2,657 patients (0.7%) out of 376,583 nonusers. Functional decline was observed in 22,550 (6.0%) nonusers and 42,930 (9.2%) users. Figure 1 displays the prevalence of all-cause inhospital death and functional decline after survival according to age category. The proportions of mortality and functional decline were higher among patients on more antihypertensive classes than among those on no or fewer antihypertensive classes. This indicates a significant association between resistance and antihypertensive treatment and the crude mortality rate and decline in ADLs (Figure 1) ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/03/16/2024.03.14.24304265/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/16/2024.03.14.24304265/F1) Figure 1. Antihypertensive classes and prevalence of postoperative death or functional decline after survival among patients undergoing major surgeries. **a, b.** prevalence of all-cause inhospital deaths (a) and functional decline (b) among nonusers and users of one, two, three, or four or more antihypertensive classes according to age category. Functional decline was defined as a ≥5-point decreased in the Barthel Index score between admission and discharge. Each spot represents a mean, whereas the solid lines represent the corresponding 95% CI. CI, confidence interval; n/N, number of events/number of participants. Thereafter, multivariable logistic regression models were created to determine the aggregate risk for all-cause inhospital death and functional decline after survival. In the age- and sex-adjusted model, the odds ratios (ORs) for a composite outcome of mortality and functional decline were 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18–1.23), 1.23 (95% CI, 1.20–1.25), 1.42 (95% CI, 1.38–1.47), and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.49–1.65) for users receiving one, two, three, and four or more classes of antihypertensives when compared with nonusers (Table 2). Similarly, in Models 2 and 3, which adjusted for DM, CVD, CKD, emergency admission, and admission year, the use of more antihypertensive classes was associated with a higher risk for the composite outcome. After additionally adjusting for the use of loop diuretics (Model 4), the odds for the composite outcome were comparable between users receiving one, two, three, and four or more classes of antihypertensives. These findings indicate that congestion requiring the use of loop diuretics is a major confounding factor for the association between resistant hypertension and unfavorable postoperative outcomes. View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/16/2024.03.14.24304265/T2) Table 2. Number of antihypertensive classes and risk for mortality or functional decline after survival in patients undergoing major surgeries. Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex, and type of major surgeries (CABG, thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery, hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, gastrointestinal resection, and urological surgery) Model 2: Model 1 plus BMI and Barthel Index score on admission. Model 3: Model 2 plus DM, CVD, CKD, emergency admission, and admission year. Model 4: Model 3 plus loop diuretics. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. ### Combinations of antihypertensive classes and postoperative outcomes We then investigated whether differences in postoperative outcomes following major surgeries were present according to different combinations of antihypertensive classes among the patients. Among those who used only one of the six antihypertensive classes and loop diuretics, RASis showed the lowest OR for composite outcome, mortality, and functional decline (Table 3). With TH as the reference, RASi showed 0.77-, 0.58-, and 0.79-times lower odds for the composite outcome (95% CI, 0.63–0.93; *P* = 0.008), mortality (95% CI, 0.34–0.99; *P* = 0.045), and functional decline (95% CI, 0.64–0.96; *P* = 0.020), respectively, whereas β-blockers showed a 1.27-times higher odds for functional decline (95% CI, 1.01–1.60; *P* = 0.040; Table 3). Among those who used two antihypertensive classes, the combination of THs and RASi showed the lowest OR for each outcome. Compared with TH/CCB, TH and RASi had an OR of 0.68 for the composite outcome (95% CI, 0.60–0.77; *P* < 0.001; Table 3). Among those who used three or more classes of antihypertensive, combinations including CCB and RASi showed the lowest OR for each outcome. In comparison, using the combination of TH, CCB, and other as the reference, the combination of TH, CCB, and RASi showed odds of 0.72-, 0.43-, and 0.79-times lower for the composite outcome (95% CI, 0.49–0.82; *P* < 0.001), mortality (95% CI, 0.31–0.60; *P* < 0.001), and functional decline (95% CI,0.70–0.89; *P* < 0.001; Table 3), respectively. The use of RASis was significantly associated with a lower OR for postoperative outcomes regardless of the number of antihypertensive classes used for treatment. A comparison of those who did and did not use loop diuretics showed that loop diuretic use consistently resulted in significantly higher ORs for the composite outcome, mortality, and functional decline regardless of the number of other antihypertensive medications used (Table S1). View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/16/2024.03.14.24304265/T3) Table 3. Combinations of antihypertensive classes and perioperative outcomes following major surgeries in Japanese adults. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, type of major surgeries (CABG, thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery, hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, gastrointestinal resection, and urological surgery), BMI, Barthel Index score on admission, DM, CVD, CKD, emergency admission, admission year, and loop diuretics. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; CCB, calcium channel blocker; MRA, mineral corticoid receptor antagonist; RASi, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor; TH, thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics. ### Impact of each antihypertensive class on postoperative outcomes according to the type of major surgery We performed a stratified analysis on the impact of each antihypertensive class on postoperative outcomes according to six types of major surgeries (CABG, thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery, hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, gastrointestinal resection, and urological surgery). Notably, RASis were associated with lower ORs for the composite outcome of death and functional decline, all-cause inhospital death, and survival with functional decline among those who underwent five types of major surgeries except CABG (Figure 2). Only β-blocker use was associated with better outcomes among patients who underwent CABG (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67–0.89). ![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/03/16/2024.03.14.24304265/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/16/2024.03.14.24304265/F2) Figure 2. Association between surgery type and effects of antihypertensive classes on postoperative outcomes among patients with hypertension. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, number of antihypertensive classes, BMI, Barthel Index score on admission, DM, CVD, CKD, emergency admission, year, and loop diuretics according to surgery type. The type of major surgeries included CABG, thoracic lobectomy, orthopedic surgery, hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, gastrointestinal resection, and urological surgery. CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes mellitus; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; CCB, calcium channel blocker; MRA, mineral corticoid receptor antagonist; RASi, renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor. ## Discussion The current large-scale epidemiologic cohort study using the Japanese administrative claims database clarified the effects of antihypertensive drugs on postoperative mortality and functional decline in patients aged 50 and older. First, we found that an increase in the number of antihypertensive classes, which indicated treatment-resistant hypertension, was associated with a higher risk of mortality and loss of physical function, partly attributed to loop diuretic use needed for congestion. Second, we determined combinations of antihypertensives that potentially improve the outcomes of antihypertensive users undergoing major surgeries. The favorable regimens included RASis independent of the number of antihypertensive classes used. Third, among patients who underwent any type of major surgery, excluding CABG, those on RASis were at a lower risk of death and functional decline than those not treated with other antihypertensive classes. The primary finding of the current study was that patients who received RAS inhibition had a lower risk for the composite outcome of all-cause inhospital death and functional decline after surviving major surgeries than those without RAS inhibition, independent of the number of antihypertensive classes used. RAS inhibition in patients treated with ACEi and ARB is known to help decrease skeletal muscle loss [7–9]. A plausible explanation for its underlying pathological mechanism is the suppression of angiotensin II-induced impairment in protein synthesis, acceleration of protein breakdown, and loss of appetite. Angiotensin II increases the levels of cytokines and systemic hormones, including reactive oxygen species, insulin-like growth factor 1, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, and transforming growth factor beta [7–9, 24–28]. The current study showed that among patients who used a single class of antihypertensive, those who used RASi had lower odds for the composite outcome of mortality and functional decline than those who used TH. Among those who received two classes of antihypertensives, those who received a combination of TH/RASi had an OR of 0.68 for the composite outcome compared with those on TH/CCB. The favorable effects of RASis on mortality and functional decline were also observed among those who used three or more antihypertensive classes. Our data clearly showed that RAS interfered with functional decline, although pathological analysis at the molecular level was not conducted. Our findings showed that β-blocker users had a 1.27-fold higher OR for functional decline than TH users, which is consistent with previous findings on the association between β-blocker and functional decline in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [29], CVD, and heart failure [30, 31]. In our previous study on a cohort with ESKD, β-blocker users had 2.5-fold higher odds of annual skeletal muscle mass loss, whereas the use of RASi in combination with other medications minimized the adverse effects [29]. Notably, only the use of β-blockers was markedly associated with a lower risk for postoperative composite outcome in patients who underwent CABG. Therefore, the current study reaffirms the positive effects of RASi on skeletal muscle mass in acute care settings among patients undergoing major surgeries [29]. Nonetheless, further investigations are needed to uncover the mechanism underlying the association between RAS inhibition and favorable outcomes after major surgeries, excluding CABG. Our findings showed that outcomes following major surgeries could be further improved by combining empirically antihypertensive drugs prescribed. Frailty, often defined as unintentional weight loss, has been shown to be associated with mortality among inhospital patients [32], as well as postdischarge patients or outpatients [33–35]. Newly acquired functional decline among older persons owing to hospital admissions is especially serious given the already high prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling people in the aging Japanese society [36] and its association with higher mortality and economic burden. Our findings showed that 9.2% of antihypertensive drug users and 6.0% of nonusers experienced a decrease in their Barthel Index score during hospitalization, a figure even higher than the 7.4% overall pooled prevalence of frailty among Japanese community-dwelling people aged 65 and older reported in a previous review [36]. This suggests that the probability of functional decline is primarily higher among inpatients and that patients with hypertension are at substantially higher risk. Thus, combinations of antihypertensive drugs, including RASis, may improve the clinical outcomes of patients with hypertension by minimizing functional decline through internal treatment during the acute phase of hospitalization. A substantial proportion of patients worldwide remain resistant to hypertension treatment and are usually treated with more antihypertensive medication classes. However, the optimal combinations of antihypertensives are yet to be fully understood. As expected, our findings showed that the number of antihypertensive classes was positively correlated with the risk of mortality and functional decline. Indeed, we found that patients on multiple antihypertensive medications were at a greater risk for the composite outcome, even after adjusting for potential confounders. Notably, after adjusting for the use of loop diuretics, the odds for the risk of the composite outcome were similar regardless of the number of antihypertensive classes used, suggesting that loop diuretic usage was a powerful confounding factor associated with mortality and functional decline. Loop diuretics are indispensable in addressing fluid retention among patients with renal and heart failure. One possible side effect of loop diuretics is sarcopenia, as discussed in previous studies [10–14]. Na+-K+-2Cl-cotransporter 1, which is highly expressed in mammalian skeletal muscle and inhibited by furosemide, might help prevent muscle loss based on its background pharmacological mechanism [10]; however, the pathological pathway has yet to be not fully elucidated. One strength of the current study is that we used well-validated Japanese administrative data representing a sample of the general population. The validity of the diagnoses and procedural records in the Japanese DPC database was corroborated in a previous study [37]. However, several limitations need to be acknowledged. First, this study was exclusively conducted on a single race or ethnicity. Evidence suggests that Asian populations have a higher prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension [38]. Hence, our findings may not be generalizable to other ethnicities. Second, the use of more than one antihypertensive drug within the same antihypertensive class was under-represented in this study. Third, given the nature of the datasets used herein, we were unable to determine changes in blood pressure and antihypertensive drug use during hospitalization potentially caused by poor control, complications, or side effects. The number of antihypertensive classes may have been overestimated. Finally, the database lacked biochemical data and longitudinal outcomes after discharge. Our study focused only on the effects of antihypertensive medication on postoperative mortality and functional decline during the acute phase of hospitalization following major surgeries. A previous multicenter retrospective cohort study showed that the postoperative initiation of RASis even at discharge was associated with reduced long-term mortality rate in patients undergoing cardiac surgery [39]. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether perioperative RASi initiation could improve outcomes following cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. In conclusion, the current study highlights the effects of antihypertensive classes and their combinations on the risk of postoperative mortality and functional decline. Our findings showed that RASis usage had a positive prognostic impact on postoperative inhospital death and functional decline regardless of the number of antihypertensive medication classes used. Thus, RASi use may mitigate negative postoperative outcomes after major noncardiac surgeries. ## Supporting information Figure S1 and Table S1 [[supplements/304265_file04.pdf]](pending:yes) ## Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. ## Sources of Funding This study was supported by the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant (Grant No. Seisaku-Sitei-22AA2003 to KF) of the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. ## Disclosures ### Conflict of interest None. ## Acknowledgments We would like to thank all study participants. ## Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms ACEi : angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor AKI : acute kidney injury ADL : activities of daily living AHT : acute hypertension ARB : angiotensin II receptor blocker BMI : body mass index CABG : coronary artery bypass grafting CCB : calcium channel blocker CI : confidence intervals CKD : chronic kidney disease CVD : cardiovascular disease DM : diabetes mellitus DPC : diagnosis procedure combination ESKD : end-stage kidney disease ICD-10 : International Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision IQR : interquartile range MRA : mineral corticoid receptor antagonist OR : odds ratio RAS : renin–angiotensin system RASi : renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor ROS : reactive oxygen species TH : thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics * Received March 14, 2024. * Revision received March 14, 2024. * Accepted March 16, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, Gregg EW, Bennett JE, Solomon B, Singleton RK, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398:957–980. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 2. 2.Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, Brook RD, Daugherty SL, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR, Egan BM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Judd E, et al. Resistant hypertension: detection, evaluation, and management: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2018;72:e53–e90. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/HYP.0000000000000084&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 3. 3.Persell SD. Prevalence of resistant hypertension in the United States, 2003–2008. Hypertension. 2011;57:1076–1080. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.170308&link_type=DOI) 4. 4.Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD, White A, Cushman WC, White W, Sica D, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood pressure research. Hypertension. 2008;51:1403–1419. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.189141&link_type=DOI) 5. 5.Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:223–237. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 6. 6.Matsuki H, Genma T, Mandai S, Fujiki T, Mori Y, Ando F, Mori T, Susa K, Iimori S, Naito S, et al. National trends in mortality and urgent dialysis after acute hypertension in Japan from 2010 through 2019. Hypertension. 2023;80:2591–2600. 7. 7. Dr Onder G, Penninx BWJH, Balkrishnan R, Fried LP, Chaves PH, Williamson J, Carter C, Di Bari M, Guralnik JM, Pahor M. Relation between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and muscle strength and physical function in older women: an observational study. Lancet. 2002;359:926–930. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08024-8&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11918911&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000174391700011&link_type=ISI) 8. 8.Di Bari M, van de Poll-Franse LV, Onder G, Kritchevsky SB, Newman A, Harris TB, Williamson JD, Marchionni N, Pahor M, Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Antihypertensive medications and differences in muscle mass in older persons: the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:961–966. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52265.x&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15161462&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000221534900016&link_type=ISI) 9. 9.Hamroff G, Katz SD, Mancini D, Blaufarb I, Bijou R, Patel R, Jondeau G, Olivari MT, Thomas S, Le Jemtel TH. Addition of angiotensin II receptor blockade to maximal angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition improves exercise capacity in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1999;99:990–992. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6Ijk5LzgvOTkwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDMvMTYvMjAyNC4wMy4xNC4yNDMwNDI2NS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 10. 10.Mandai S, Furukawa S, Kodaka M, Hata Y, Mori T, Nomura N, Ando F, Mori Y, Takahashi D, Yoshizaki Y, et al. Loop diuretics affect skeletal myoblast differentiation and exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46369. 11. 11.Ishikawa S, Naito S, Iimori S, Takahashi D, Zeniya M, Sato H, Nomura N, Sohara E, Okado T, Uchida S, et al. Loop diuretics are associated with greater risk of sarcopenia in patients with nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0192990. 12. 12.Hanai T, Shiraki M, Miwa T, Watanabe S, Imai K, Suetsugu A, Takai K, Moriwaki H, Shimizu M. Effect of loop diuretics on skeletal muscle depletion in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2019;49:82–95. 13. 13.Felker GM, O’Connor CM, Braunwald E, Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Investigators. Loop diuretics in acute decompensated heart failure: necessary? Evil? A necessary evil? Circ Heart Fail. 2009;2:56–62. 14. 14.Nakano I, Tsuda M, Kinugawa S, Fukushima A, Kakutani N, Takada S, Yokota T. Loop diuretic use is associated with skeletal muscle wasting in patients with heart failure. J Cardiol. 2020;76:109–114. 15. 15.Nakano Y, Mandai S, Genma T, Akagi Y, Fujiki T, Ando F, Susa K, Mori T, Iimori S, Naito S, et al. Nationwide mortality associated with perioperative acute dialysis requirement in major surgeries. Int J Surg. 2022;104:106816. 16. 16.Isogai T, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Tanaka H, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K. Effectiveness of inferior vena cava filters on mortality as an adjuvant to antithrombotic therapy. Am J Med. 2015;128:312.e23–312.e31. 17. 17.Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40:373–383. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3558716&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1987G855900002&link_type=ISI) 18. 18.Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, Januel JM, Sundararajan V. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:676–682. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/aje/kwq433&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21330339&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000288274800009&link_type=ISI) 19. 19.Bykov K, Bateman BT, Franklin JM, Vine SM, Patorno E. Association of gabapentinoids with the risk of opioid-related adverse events in surgical patients in the United States. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2031647. 20. 20.Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index, Md Stat. Med J. 1965;14:61–65. 21. 21.Kessler M, Frimat L, Panescu V, Briançon S. Impact of nephrology referral on early and midterm outcomes in ESRD: EPidemiologie de l’insuffisance REnale chronique terminale en Lorraine (EPIREL): results of a 2-year, prospective, community-based study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;42:474–485. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00805-9&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12955675&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000185518500005&link_type=ISI) 22. 22.Rethy LB, Feinstein MJ, Achenbach CJ, Townsend RR, Bress AP, Shah SJ, Cohen JB. Antihypertensive class and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HIV and hypertension. Hypertension. 2021;77:2023–2033. 23. 23.Copland E, Canoy D, Nazarzadeh M, Bidel Z, Ramakrishnan R, Woodward M, Chalmers J, Teo KK, Pepine CJ, Davis BR, et al. Antihypertensive treatment and risk of cancer: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:558–570. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00033-4&link_type=DOI) 24. 24.Tasheva P, Vollenweider P, Kraege V, Roulet G, Lamy O, Marques-Vidal P, Méan M. Association between physical activity levels in the hospital setting and hospital-acquired functional decline in elderly patients. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e1920185. 25. 25.Zhao W, Swanson SA, Ye J, Li X, Shelton JM, Zhang W, Thomas GD. Reactive oxygen species impair sympathetic vasoregulation in skeletal muscle in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Hypertension. 2006;48:637–643. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/01.HYP.0000240347.51386.ea&link_type=DOI) 26. 26.Brink M, Wellen J, Delafontaine P. Angiotensin II causes weight loss and decreases circulating insulin-like growth factor I in rats through a pressor-independent mechanism. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2509–2516. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1172/JCI118698&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8647943&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1996UQ23800015&link_type=ISI) 27. 27. Dalla Libera L, Ravara B, Angelini A, Rossini K, Sandri M, Thiene G, Battista Ambrosio G, Vescovo G. Beneficial effects on skeletal muscle of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker irbesartan in experimental heart failure. Circulation. 2001;103:2195–2200. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIxMDMvMTcvMjE5NSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzAzLzE2LzIwMjQuMDMuMTQuMjQzMDQyNjUuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 28. 28.Burks TN, Andres-Mateos E, Marx R, Mejias R, Van Erp C, Simmers JL, Walston JD, Ward CW, Cohn RD. Losartan restores skeletal muscle remodeling and protects against disuse atrophy in sarcopenia. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:82ra37. 29. 29.Hashimoto H, Mandai S, Shikuma S, Kimura M, Toma H, Sakaguchi Y, Shiraishi S, Toshima N, Hoshino M, Kimura M, et al. The effect of antihypertensive therapy on skeletal muscle mass and bone mineral density in patients with end-stage kidney disease. J Ren Nutr. 2023. doi:10.1053/j.jrn.2023.10.008. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/j.jrn.2023.10.008&link_type=DOI) 30. 30.Steinman MA, Zullo AR, Lee Y, Daiello LA, Boscardin WJ, Dore DD, Gan S, Fung K, Lee SJ, Komaiko KD, et al. Association of β-blockers with functional outcomes, death, and rehospitalization in older nursing home residents after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:254–262. 31. 31.Palau P, Seller J, Domínguez E, Sastre C, Ramón JM, de La Espriella R, Santas E, Miñana G, Bodí V, Sanchis J, et al. Effect of β-blocker withdrawal on functional capacity in heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:2042–2056. 32. 32.Mandai S, Koide T, Fujiki T, Mori Y, Ando F, Susa K, Mori T, Iimori S, Naito S, Sohara E, et al. Association of Admission functional status and body mass index with mortality in patients receiving chronic dialysis: A nationwide observational cohort study. JMA J. 2023;6:404–413. 33. 33.Pandey, A, Kitzman, D, Reeves, G. Frailty is intertwined with heart failure: mechanisms, prevalence, prognosis, assessment, and management. J Am Coll Cardiol HF. 2019;7:1001–1011. 34. 34.Kulmala J, Nykänen I, Hartikainen S. Frailty as a predictor of all-cause mortality in older men and women. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014;14:899–905. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24666801&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 35. 35.Brummel NE, Bell SP, Girard TD, Pandharipande PP, Jackson JC, Morandi A, Thompson JL, Chandrasekhar R, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, et al. Frailty and Subsequent Disability and Mortality among Patients with Critical Illness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:64–72. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 36. 36.Kojima G, Iliffe S, Taniguchi Y, Shimada H, Rakugi H, Walters K. Prevalence of frailty in Japan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol. 2017;27:347–353. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 37. 37.Yamana H, Moriwaki M, Horiguchi H, Kodan M, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Validity of diagnoses, procedures, and laboratory data in Japanese administrative data. J Epidemiol. 2017;27:476–482. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.je.2016.09.009&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 38. 38.Park JB, Kario K, Wang JG. Systolic hypertension: an increasing clinical challenge in Asia. Hypertens Res. 2015;38:227–236. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/hr.2014.169&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25503845&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F16%2F2024.03.14.24304265.atom) 39. 39.Ding Q, Zhang Z, Liu H, Nie H, Berguson M, Goldhammer JE, Young N, Boyd D, Morris R, Sun J. Perioperative use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4202.