Epigenetic Mechanisms Regulating the Association between OR2L13 and Major Psychiatric Disorders
===============================================================================================

* Xiujuan Du
* Lingli Zhang
* Tai Ren
* Hua He
* Jian Zhao
* Fei Li

## Abstract

**Background** Previously, population-based cohort studies have identified the association between epigenetic modifications of *OR2L13* related to mental disorders and Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, the causal nature of these associations remains difficult to establish owing to confounding.

**Aims** The purpose of the study was to investigate the causal effect of methylation of *OR2L13* and offspring mental health outcomes.

**Method** We performed two-sample mendelian randomisation to assess the effect of methylation of *OR2L13* on mental disorders. Methylation of 7 CpG sites within *OR2L13* related to GDM from two previous studies were used as exposure. Genome wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms for methylation of *OR2L13* retrieved from published data were used as instrumental variables. Their causal impact on major psychiatric disorders was assessed using summary-level data mostly from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium.

**Results** Lower *OR2L13* methylation was casually associated with a higher risk of PD in offspring [cg03748376: odds ratio (OR)=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.68–0.97, P =0.02]. However, little evidence was found for a causal relationship between the methylation levels of *OR2L13* and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia (SCZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

**Conclusions** Evidence from our study supported a causal effect of lower *OR2L13* methylation on PD risk.

Keywords
*   Epigenetic Mechanisms
*   mendelian randomization
*   OR2L13
*   major psychiatric disorders
*   genome-wide association studies

## Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance that begins during pregnancy and associated with adverse neurobehavioral outcomes in offspring, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and lower intelligence scores 1, 2. In the past decade, growing evidence has shown a link between epigenetic processes, and a range of mental health disorders 3–5. Previous population-based cohort studies demonstrated that epigenetic modifications induced by hyperglycemia in utero environment can contribute to adverse health outcomes in offspring 6–8. Howe et al. reported that CpG sites of the *OR2L13* promoter (7 probes: cg20433858, cg03748376, cg00785941, cg04028570, cg08260406, cg08944170, cg20507276) were lower hypomethylated in newborns exposed to GDM in utero compared to control subjects in the Pregnancy and Childhood Epigenetics Consortium (including 3,677 mother-neonate pairs from 7 pregnancy cohorts)6. The EWAS replication analysis in the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC, 9– to 16 – year-old offspring of women with GDM, n=188) further demonstrated that the association can last until at least pre-adolescent or adolescent age. Wong et al. found that one differentially methylated region (DMR) within the *OR2L13* putative gene promoter, contained the ASD-specific differentially methylated probes (DMPs) identified in the case-control analysis of peripheral blood8. However, causal evidence is still limited on the association between methylation of *OR2L13* induced by GDM and offspring mental health outcomes. Previous associations between early life molecular traits and major psychiatric disorders were commonly derived using multivariable regression analysis in observational studies, which is prone to confounding or reverse causation bias 9. Mendelian randomisation (MR), a cutting-edge causal inference approach using genetic variants associated with modifiable risk factors as instrumental variables to infer the causal relationship between risk factors and the outcome of interest, has been increasingly used in modern epidemiology research10, 11. Thus, in this study, we utilized MR to examine the causal effects of variations in *OR2L13* related methylation levels driven by maternal GDM on a range of major psychiatric disorders.

## Materials and methods

### Exposure

In most of MR studies, maternal genetic variants are used as IVs to test the effect of a pregnancy (intrauterine) exposure on offspring outcomes. Yet, offspring inherit 50% of their genotype from each parent, and offspring genetic variants strongly related to their outcome might be the same as variants used in their mother’s IV. Then the assumption known as InSIDE (instrument strength independent of direct effect) is like to be violated 12. Therefore, we used changes of cord blood DNA methylation levels to proxy for adverse intrauterine environment caused by GDM. Based on the findings replicated in independent cohorts mentioned before, we focused on the targeted CpG sites of the *OR2L13* promoter. Genetic variants associated with blood DNA methylation level changes were extracted from the largest DNA methylation-quantitative trait locus (mQTL) analyses, which combined data from 36 population-based cohorts 13. This dataset comprises 32,851 European samples, identifying genetic variants associated with DNAm at 420,509 DNAm sites in blood. A total of 248,607 independent cis-mQTL associations (p<1e-8, <1Mb from the DNAm site) were identified in the dataset. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with CpG sites of the *OR2L13* promoter (7 probes) were included in the MR analyses, which can be found in Supplementary Table S1.

### Outcomes

Major psychiatric disorders, including ASD, ADHD, schizophrenia (SCZ), major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder (PD) were examined in this study 14–20. Summary-level data of these outcomes were retrieved from several studies (Table 1), among which most were downloaded from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium ([https://pgc.unc.edu/for-researchers/download-results/](https://pgc.unc.edu/for-researchers/download-results/)).

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/T1)

Table 1. Characteristics of GWAS summary data on ASD, ADHD, SCZ, MDD, BD, OCD and PD.

### Instrumental Variables Selection

The flowchart of the study is presented in Figure 1. Briefly, cord blood DNA methylation levels of *OR2L13,* which was associated with maternal GDM during pregnancy, were used as the exposure, and ASD, ADHD, SCZ, MDD, BIP, OCD and PD served as the outcomes respectively. To meet the core assumptions of MR analysis (i.e., i. Genetic instruments must be robustly associated with exposures of interest; ii. There were confounding factors of IVs and exposures. iii. IVs affected the outcomes only through exposures.), we performed the following data process and harmonization before MR analysis 21. Firstly, we obtained SNPs strongly associated with exposures (p < 1e-8). Secondly, the minor allele frequency (MAF) threshold of the variants of interest was 0.01 and palindrome SNPs were not included in our study. Thirdly, LD clumping process (r2 < 0.01 and clumping distance =10,000 kb) was conducted to ensure statistical independence between genetic variants. Finally, we identified 9 SNPs associated with cg20433858, 13 SNPs associated with cg03748376, 12 SNPs associated with cg00785941, 11 SNPs associated with cg04028570, 8 SNPs associated with cg08260406, 14 SNPs associated with cg08944170, and 11 SNPs associated with cg20507276.

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/F1)

Figure 1. Study design overview for the two-sample MR analysis.

### Statistical analysis

The “TwoSampleMR” R package (version 0.5.6) was used to estimate the causal effect of cord blood DNA methylation on ASD, ADHD, SCZ, MDD, BIP, OCD and PD22. Inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method were applied as the main analysis methods. As our causal effect estimates might be affected by potential horizontal pleiotropic effects, we applied other MR methods (MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode) as sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the MR main analysis results 23–26. Additionally, Cochran’s Q statistic was adopted in the IVW analysis to assess the potential heterogeneity between SNP-specific causal effect estimates related to blood DNA methylation 27. The intercept term in the MR-Egger regression was used to test for potential pleiotropy 28. Leave-one-SNP-out analysis was conducted to identify any single influential SNP that impacted the average causal effect estimate29.

### Ethical approval

This study is based on publicly available summary statistics from studies that had already obtained ethical approval; therefore, a separate ethical approval was not required.

## Results

Applying the fixed-effects IVW MR analysis, we found a significant causal association of lower *OR2L13* methylation with a higher risk of PD in offspring [cg03748376: odds ratio (OR)=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.68-0.97, P =0.02; Figure 2]. However, for the remaining mental disorders, little evidence was found for a causal relationship between the methylation levels of *OR2L13* and these outcomes. (Figure 3, Supplementary Table S2).

![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/F2)

Figure 2. MR results of causal effects between *OR2L13* methylation (cg03748376) and panic disorder (PD).
Scatter plot of genetic correlations of methylation level of cg03748376 and PD using different MR methods.

![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/F3)

Figure 3. Two-sample Mendelian Randomization reveals little causal evidence for methylation of *OR2L13* on ASD, ADHD, SCZ, MDD, BIP and OCD.

Results of sensitivity analysis broadly support our main analysis results (Figure 2, Table 2). Cochrane Q statistics showed no evidence of heterogeneity for MR-Egger and IVW test in the causal relationship between *OR2L13* methylation (cg03748376) on risk of PD in offspring (p > 0.05) (Table 3). There was no horizontal pleiotropy in MR analysis results by using MR-Egger regression intercept approach (p > 0.05) (Table 3). The results of the leave-one-SNP-out analysis indicated that the IVW results were not driven by a single SNP (data not shown).

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/T2)

Table 2. Mendelian randomization (MR) results of causal effects between methylation of 7 targeted CpG sites and PD.

View this table:
[Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/04/2024.03.04.24303702/T3)

Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of the Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis results of cg03748376 and PD.

## Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first MR analysis to investigate whether methylation used as proxy for GDM is causally associated with ASD and related mental disorders. Using genetic instruments from the largest available mQTL summary statistics of 32,851 participants, we found genetic liability to the lower *OR2L13* methylation serving as proxy for GDM causally associated with PD in offspring. This is consistent with previous population-based cohort studies, which have found that children born to mothers with diabetes during pregnancy were at increased risk of developing anxiety disorders1, 30. And two studies showed that GDM were associated with anxiety only in combination with maternal obesity, possibly triggering the inflammatory processes in the uterus and leading to damages to brain31,32.On the other hand, olfactory receptor 2L13 encoded by *OR2L13* in humans could interact with odorant molecules in the nose, initiating a neuronal response that triggers the perception of a smell 33. And experiments in vivo have showed that olfactory deficits cause anxiety-like behaviors in mice34.

However, we found little evidence to support a causal association of maternal GDM related *OR2L13* methylation levels change with other psychiatric disorders including ASD, ADHD and SCZ et al., which was inconsistent with previous association findings in conventional observational studies 35–37. It is possible that the previously observed positive association between GDM and these psychiatric disorders is coincidental or is confounded by unknown factors and not directly caused by GDM or methylation derived from GDM. Furthermore, while multiple studies have reported that methylation of several risk genes related mental disorders, including *BDNF*, *MAOA* and *SLC6A* and so on 5. Only *OR2L13* related to ASD was identified by Howe et al. using cord blood samples, which however, may not mirror methylation of different prenatal stages stems from hyperglycemia in utero. Deeper and more extensive research is needed to investigate these possible links.

## Limitations

This study has some limitations worth noting. First of all, due to the original data of cord blood related to GDM was not public, we used the indirect summary data of methylation as exposure instead. To avoid errors, further studies should use genetic markers of cord blood related to GDM. Additionally, the subjects included in this study are European descents, thus it should be cautious to generalize the findings in this study to population of other ancestry.

## Implications

Our study suggests that genetic predisposition to GDM is associated with the risk of PD in offspring. There was no evidence for a causal effect of GDM and a series of major psychiatric disorders (ASD, ADHD, SCZ, MDD, BD and OCD). And future studies are needed to clarify the putative causal mechanisms.

## Supplemental Materials

Data file S1. Supplemental tables (a single excel including 2 sheets as 2 Supplemental Tables).

Table S1: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with CpG sites of the *OR2L13* promoter (7 probes).

Table S2: Association between the methylation of *OR2L13* on ASD, ADHD, SCZ, MDD, OCD and BIP in offspring based on IVW method.

## Data availability

This study is based on publicly available summary statistics.

## Author contributions

FL and JZ conceptualized the study; XD, FL and JZ performed the analysis. FL, JZ, XD, LL, TR wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

## Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82125032, 81930095, 81761128035 and 82373588), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19410713500, 2018SHZDZX01 and 23YF1425700), the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (GWV-10.1-XK07, 2020CXJQ01, 2018YJRC03), the Shanghai Clinical Key Subject Construction Project (shslczdzk02902), Innovative research team of high-level local universities in Shanghai (SHSMU-ZDCX20211100), the Guangdong Key Project (2018B030335001).

## Declaration of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

## Supporting information

Supplementary_tables [[supplements/303702_file02.xlsx]](pending:yes)

*   Received March 4, 2024.
*   Revision received March 4, 2024.
*   Accepted March 4, 2024.


*   © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), CC BY-NC 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

## References

1.  Nogueira Avelar ESR, Yu Y, Liew Z, Vested A, Sorensen HT, Li J. Associations of Maternal Diabetes During Pregnancy With Psychiatric Disorders in Offspring During the First 4 Decades of Life in a Population-Based Danish Birth Cohort. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e2128005.
    
    

2.  Chen S, Zhao S, Dalman C, Karlsson H, Gardner R. Association of maternal diabetes with neurodevelopmental disorders: autism spectrum disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and intellectual disability. Int J Epidemiol. 2021; 50: 459–74.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ije/dyaa212&link_type=DOI) 

3.  Srivastava A, Dada O, Qian J, Al-Chalabi N, Fatemi AB, Gerretsen P, et al. Epigenetics of Schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2021; 305: 114218.
    
    

4.  Yan L, Wei JA, Yang F, Wang M, Wang S, Cheng T, et al. Physical Exercise Prevented Stress-Induced Anxiety via Improving Brain RNA Methylation. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022; 9: e2105731.
    
    

5.  Alameda L, Trotta G, Quigley H, Rodriguez V, Gadelrab R, Dwir D, et al. Can epigenetics shine a light on the biological pathways underlying major mental disorders? Psychol Med. 2022; 52: 1645–65.
    
    

6.  Howe CG, Cox B, Fore R, Jungius J, Kvist T, Lent S, et al. Maternal Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Newborn DNA Methylation: Findings From the Pregnancy and Childhood Epigenetics Consortium. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43: 98–105.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo3OiI0My8xLzk4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDMvMDQvMjAyNC4wMy4wNC4yNDMwMzcwMi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

7.  Canouil M, Khamis A, Keikkala E, Hummel S, Lobbens S, Bonnefond A, et al. Epigenome-Wide Association Study Reveals Methylation Loci Associated With Offspring Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Exposure and Maternal Methylome. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44: 1992–9.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiI0NC85LzE5OTIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wMy8wNC8yMDI0LjAzLjA0LjI0MzAzNzAyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

8.  Hjort L, Grunnet LG, Saffery R, Olsen S, Vaag A. Replication of DNA Methylation Variation Reported in Cord Blood Samples From GDM-Affected Pregnancies in Preadolescent and Adolescent Offspring of Women With GDM. Diabetes Care. 2021; 44: e87–e8.
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiRlVMTCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI0NC81L2U4NyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzAzLzA0LzIwMjQuMDMuMDQuMjQzMDM3MDIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

9.  Davey Smith G, Phillips AN. Correlation without a cause: an epidemiological odyssey. Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 49: 4–14.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ije/dyaa016&link_type=DOI) 

10. Davey Smith G, Holmes MV, Davies NM, Ebrahim S. Mendel’s laws, Mendelian randomization and causal inference in observational data: substantive and nomenclatural issues. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020; 35: 99–111.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10654-020-00622-7&link_type=DOI) 

11. Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV, Kang H, Morrison J, Munafo MR, et al. Mendelian randomization. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2022; 2.
    
    

12. Lawlor D, Richmond R, Warrington N, McMahon G, Davey Smith G, Bowden J, et al. Using Mendelian randomization to determine causal effects of maternal pregnancy (intrauterine) exposures on offspring outcomes: Sources of bias and methods for assessing them. Wellcome Open Res. 2017; 2: 11.
    
    

13. Min JL, Hemani G, Hannon E, Dekkers KF, Castillo-Fernandez J, Luijk R, et al. Genomic and phenotypic insights from an atlas of genetic effects on DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2021; 53: 1311–21.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41588-021-00923-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

14. Matoba N, Liang D, Sun H, Aygun N, McAfee JC, Davis JE, et al. Common genetic risk variants identified in the SPARK cohort support DDHD2 as a candidate risk gene for autism. Transl Psychiatry. 2020; 10: 265.
    
    

15. Demontis D, Walters RK, Martin J, Mattheisen M, Als TD, Agerbo E, et al. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat Genet. 2019; 51: 63–75.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41588-018-0269-7&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30478444&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

16. Trubetskoy V, Pardinas AF, Qi T, Panagiotaropoulou G, Awasthi S, Bigdeli TB, et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature. 2022; 604: 502–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

17. Wray NR, Ripke S, Mattheisen M, Trzaskowski M, Byrne EM, Abdellaoui A, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 44 risk variants and refine the genetic architecture of major depression. Nat Genet. 2018; 50: 668–81.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41588-018-0090-3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29700475&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

18. Mullins N, Forstner AJ, O’Connell KS, Coombes B, Coleman JRI, Qiao Z, et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nat Genet. 2021; 53: 817–29.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41588-021-00857-4&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34002096&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

19. International Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Foundation Genetics C, Studies OCDCGA. Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder using meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2018; 23: 1181–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/MP.2017.154&link_type=DOI) 

20. Forstner AJ, Awasthi S, Wolf C, Maron E, Erhardt A, Czamara D, et al. Genome-wide association study of panic disorder reveals genetic overlap with neuroticism and depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2021; 26: 4179–90.
    
    

21. Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, Yarmolinsky J, Davies NM, Swanson SA, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement. JAMA. 2021; 326: 1614–21.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34698778&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

22. Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade KH, Haberland V, Baird D, et al. The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018; 7.
    
    

23. Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013; 37: 658–65.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/gepi.21758&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24114802&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

24. Staley JR, Burgess S. Semiparametric methods for estimation of a nonlinear exposure-outcome relationship using instrumental variables with application to Mendelian randomization. Genet Epidemiol. 2017; 41: 341–52.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/gepi.22041&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28317167&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

25. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015; 44: 512–25.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ije/dyv080&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26050253&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

26. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40: 304–14.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/gepi.21965&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27061298&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

27. Greco MF, Minelli C, Sheehan NA, Thompson JR. Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome. Stat Med. 2015; 34: 2926–40.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/sim.6522&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25950993&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

28. Hartwig FP, Davey Smith G, Bowden J. Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 46: 1985–98.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ije/dyx102&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29040600&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F03%2F04%2F2024.03.04.24303702.atom) 

29. Chen J, Chen R, Xiang S, Li N, Gao C, Wu C, et al. Cigarette smoking and schizophrenia: Mendelian randomisation study. Br J Psychiatry. 2021; 218: 98–103.
    
    

30. Alves JM, Yunker AG, DeFendis A, Xiang AH, Page KA. Prenatal exposure to gestational diabetes is associated with anxiety and physical inactivity in children during COVID-19. Clin Obes. 2021; 11: e12422.
    
    

31. Kong L, Nilsson IAK, Brismar K, Gissler M, Lavebratt C. Associations of Different Types of Maternal Diabetes and Body Mass Index With Offspring Psychiatric Disorders. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3: e1920787.
    
    

32. Kong L, Norstedt G, Schalling M, Gissler M, Lavebratt C. The Risk of Offspring Psychiatric Disorders in the Setting of Maternal Obesity and Diabetes. Pediatrics. 2018; 142.
    
    

33. Morrell CN, Mix D, Aggarwal A, Bhandari R, Godwin M, Owens P, 3rd, et al. Platelet olfactory receptor activation limits platelet reactivity and growth of aortic aneurysms. J Clin Invest. 2022; 132.
    
    

34. Glinka ME, Samuels BA, Diodato A, Teillon J, Feng Mei D, Shykind BM, et al. Olfactory deficits cause anxiety-like behaviors in mice. J Neurosci. 2012; 32: 6718–25.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Njoiam5ldXJvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzMi8xOS82NzE4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDMvMDQvMjAyNC4wMy4wNC4yNDMwMzcwMi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

35. Xiang AH. Association of Maternal Diabetes With Autism in Offspring. JAMA. 2017; 317: 537–8.
    
    

36. Xiang AH, Wang X, Martinez MP, Getahun D, Page KA, Buchanan TA, et al. Maternal Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Diabetes, and Type 2 Diabetes During Pregnancy and Risk of ADHD in Offspring. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41: 2502–8.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiNDEvMTIvMjUwMiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDI0LzAzLzA0LzIwMjQuMDMuMDQuMjQzMDM3MDIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

37. Van Lieshout RJ, Voruganti LP. Diabetes mellitus during pregnancy and increased risk of schizophrenia in offspring: a review of the evidence and putative mechanisms. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2008; 33: 395–404.