Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully uncovered numerous associations between genetic variants and disease traits to date. Yet, identifying significantly associated loci remains a considerable challenge due to the concomitant multiple-testing burden of performing such analyses genome-wide. Here, we leverage the genetic associations of molecular traits – DNA CpG-site methylation status and RNA expression – to mitigate this problem. We encode their co-association across the genome using PinSage, a graph convolutional neural network-based recommender system previously deployed at Pinterest. We demonstrate, using this framework, that a model trained only on methylation quantitative trait locus (QTL) data could recapitulate over half (554,209/1,021,052) of possible SNP-RNA associations identified in a large expression QTL meta-analysis. Taking advantage of a recent ‘saturated’ map of height associations, we then show that height-associated loci predicted by a model trained on molecular-QTL data replicated comparably, following Bonferroni correction, to those that were genome-wide significant in UK Biobank (88% compared to 91%). On a set of 64 disease outcomes in UK Biobank, the same model identified 143 independent novel disease associations, with at least one additional association for 64% (41/64) of the disease outcomes examined. Excluding associations involving the MHC region, we achieve a total uplift of over 8% (128/1,548). We successfully replicated 38% (39/103) of the novel disease associations in an independent sample, with suggestive evidence for six additional associations from GWAS Catalog. Replicated associations included for instance that between rs10774625 (nearest gene: SH2B3/ATXN2) and coeliac disease, and that between rs12350420 (nearest gene: MVB12B) and glaucoma. For many GWAS, attaining such an enhancement by simply increasing sample size may be prohibitively expensive, or impossible depending on disease prevalence.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
ADB would like to acknowledge funding from the Wellcome PhD training fellowship for clinicians (204979/Z/16/Z), the Edinburgh Clinical Academic Track (ECAT) programme.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical review and approval was provided by the Edinburgh Medical School Research Ethics Committee (REC Reference: 23-EMREC-052).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All training/test and replication data used in this study are publicly available. The ‘standard’ and ‘pseudo-independent’ embeddings (meQTL only, and meQTL plus eQTL) – from which SNP similarity can be computed – are available at: https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/7689.
