Abstract
Background Increasing demands of COVID-19 on the healthcare system necessitated redeployment of HCWs outside their routine specialties. Previous studies, highlighting ethnic and occupational inequalities in redeployment, are limited by small cohorts with limited ethnic diversity.
Aims To assess how ethnicity, migration status, and occupation are associated with HCWs’ redeployment experiences during COVID-19 in a nationwide ethnically diverse sample.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the nationwide United Kingdom Research Study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes in Healthcare workers (UK-REACH) cohort study. We used logistic regression to examine associations of ethnicity, migration status, and occupation with redeployment experiences of HCWs, including provision of training and supervision, patient contact during redeployment and interaction with COVID-19 patients.
Results Of the 10,889 HCWs included, 20.4% reported being redeployed during the first UK national lockdown in March 2020. Those in nursing roles (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.22, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.04 – 1.42, p=0.009) (compared to medical roles) had higher likelihood of being redeployed as did migrants compared to those born in the UK (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06 - 1.49, p=0.01) (in a subcohort of HCWs on the agenda for change (AfC) pay scales). Asian HCWs were less likely to report receiving training (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50 – 0.88, p=0.005) and Black HCWs (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.14 – 3.57, p=0.02) were more likely to report receiving supervision, compared to White colleagues. Finally, redeployed Black (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.07 – 1.66, p=0.009) and Asian HCWs (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.14 – 1.48, p<0.001) were more likely to report face-to-face interaction with COVID-19 patients than White HCWs.
Conclusions Our findings highlight disparities in HCWs’ redeployment experiences by ethnicity, migration, and job role which are potentially related to structural inequities in healthcare. For future emergencies, redeployment should be contingent upon risk assessments, accompanied by training and supervision tailored to individual HCWs’ experience and skillset.
What is already known on this topic:
Ethnic minority healthcare workers (HCWs) were at an elevated risk of infection during COVID-19 due to occupational and socio-demographic factors. The strain on healthcare systems during the pandemic resulted in acute staffing shortages, prompting redeployment of HCWs to areas outside their professional training. However, recent research suggests inconsistent implementation of redeployment across ethnic groups, revealing structural disparities within the healthcare system.
What this study adds:
Our study, the largest of its kind, found no ethnic differences in the process of redeployment itself, but disparities emerged in the experiences of redeployment. Asian HCWs reported less likelihood of receiving training, while Black HCWs reported more likelihood of receiving supervision compared to their White counterparts. Ethnic minority HCWs were also more likely to report interaction with COVID-19 patients than their White colleagues. While there were no ethnic differences in the process of redeployment, occupational and migration differences reveal that those in nursing and midwifery roles (in comparison to medical roles), as well as migrant HCWs on the AfC payscale (in comparison to those born in the UK), were more likely to report being redeployed.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy:
This UK-wide study highlights inconsistencies in the redeployment process, training, supervision, and patient interactions based on occupation, ethnicity and migration status. Further investigation, incorporating qualitative and human resources data, is crucial to understand the complexities and address potential structural discrimination within the NHS. For future practice, redeployment should align with risk assessments and include training and supervision tailored to HCWs’ experience and skillset.
Teaser text This study explores how ethnicity, migration status, and occupation were associated with healthcare workers’ (HCWs) redeployment experiences during COVID-19. After adjustment of covariates, we found that nursing roles and migration to the UK increase redeployment likelihood. Asian HCWs reported lesser training and Black HCWs reported more supervision, compared to White colleagues. Redeployed Black and Asian HCWs were more likely to report interaction with COVID-19 patients. Findings highlight disparities in HCWs’ redeployment experiences in an ethnically diverse sample.
Competing Interest Statement
MP reports grants from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences and personal fees from QIAGEN, outside the submitted work.
Clinical Protocols
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/6/e046392
Funding Statement
UK-REACH is supported by a grant from the MRC-UK Research and Innovation (MR/V027549/1) and the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) rapid response panel to tackle COVID-19. Core funding was also provided by NIHR Biomedical Research Centres. KW is funded through an NIHR Development Skills Enhancement Award (NIHR302856). LBN is supported by an Academy of Medical Sciences Springboard Award (SBF005\1047). MP is supported by the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) and NIHR 1.National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Applied Health Collaboration (ARC) East Midlands. MP is funded by a NIHR Development and Skills Enhancement Award. This work is carried out with the support of BREATHE-The Health Data Research Hub for Respiratory Health [MC_PC_19004] in partnership with SAIL Databank. BREATHE is funded through the UK Research and Innovation Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund and delivered through Health Data Research UK.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Health Research Authority (Brighton and Sussex Research Ethics Committee; ethics reference: 20/HRA/4718).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
To access data or samples produced by the UK-REACH study, the working group representative must first submit a request to the Core Management Group by contacting the UK-REACH Project Manager in the first instance. For ancillary studies outside of the core deliverables, the Steering Committee will make final decisions once they have been approved by the Core Management Group. Decisions on granting the access to data/materials will be made within eight weeks.
