Abstract
We search for correlations in the preferences for seasonal time arrangements across different countries. With this purpose we analyze the public consultation on summertime arrangements (Daylight Saving Time) launched by the European Commission in 2018 (the largest sample size study of this kind, 4.55 million replies, median shares of population per Member State 0.366%). We also analyze the starting point of human activity in Europe from the Harmonized European Time Use Survey, also the largest scale survey to assess the budget of time in modern societies.
We find that the shares of population willing to abolish the seasonal regulations of time increases with increasing latitudes and with delayed winter sunrise times. Notably the distance of the winter sunrise to the starting point of human activity plays a determining role in predicting the preferences (R2 = 0.7; p = 5 × 10−5; N = 17 Member States). We provide a simple physiological rationale for this finding.
Our results challenge the current prevailing point of view on clock regulations that associates them to energy saving only, and unveil the physiological roots of these regulations.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵† jorge.mira{at}usc.es; https://ror.org/030eybx10
We rescaled the population basis and recomputed the correlations. Two figures were added to Supplemental Information. We added a data-set.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. A data-set is accesible at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13301201
