Abstract
Background Cesarean section (CS) rates have risen dramatically worldwide, with a majority of the countries exceeding the World Health Organization’s (WHO) preferred rate of 10-15%. However, disparities exist, with evidence suggesting that socioeconomic disadvantage and geographic location play significant roles. Despite this, comprehensive estimates, especially in Bangladesh, remain scarce. This study aims to determine trends, district-level variations, and socioeconomic disparities in CS rates in Bangladesh.
Methods Data from six rounds of Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys were analyzed. The considered outcome variables were the occurrence of CS delivery in relation to the mode of delivery and delivery place. Neonatal mortality was also assessed as another outcome variable. Explanatory variables included districts, wealth quintiles, and socio-demographic characteristics. Descriptive statistics were used to provide an over-the-year trend and variation in CS delivery in Bangladesh. Multilevel mixed-effects binary logistic regressions were used to explore predictors of CS delivery and the association between CS and neonatal mortality.
Results Between 1999/2000 and 2017/18, hospital births in Bangladesh increased by 42%, primarily driven by a substantial rise in CS delivery, from 30% to 66%. Private healthcare facilities played a significant role, contributing 80% of the country’s total CS delivery in 2017/18, a substantial increase from 45.5% in 1999/2000. In contrast, CS delivery rates in government healthcare facilities decreased from 49.7% to 15.5% during the same period. Deficient use of CS was reported by women in border and hilly districts, as well as those in the poorest wealth quintile. A clear link between a CS delivery and neonatal mortality was not found.
Conclusion The uneven distribution of CS delivery across districts and socioeconomic groups underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to childbirth. While government efforts to curb unnecessary use of CS have fallen short, this study suggests a one-size-fits-all strategy could worsen disparities. Instead, the focus should shift from mere accessibility to ensuring justified and appropriate utilization, with public healthcare facilities playing a key role in offering safe alternatives.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any specific grant from external or institutional sectors
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The datasets used and analysed in this study are freely available from the Measure DHS website: https://dhsprogram.com/. Interested persons are required to submit a research proposal to access the data for conducting this study, as we did.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Abbreviations
- CS
- Cesarean section
- LMICs
- Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- WHO
- World Health Organization
- DHS
- Demographic Health Survey
- BDHS
- Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey
- NIPORT
- National Institute of Population Research and Training
- PSU
- Primary Sampling Unit
- aOR
- adjusted Odds Ratio
- cOR
- crude Odds Ratio
- CI
- Confidence Interval
- NGO
- Non-Government Organizations
- STROBE
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology.
