Summer heat, historic redlining, and neighborhood walking among older adults: 2017 National Household Travel Survey =================================================================================================================== * Diana Mitsova * Lilah M. Besser * Elaine T. Le ## Abstract No known studies have examined the relationships between urban heat islands, historic redlining, and neighborhood walking in older adults. We assessed whether: 1) individual and neighborhood characteristics (including redlining score) differ by neighborhood summer land surface temperature (LST); 2) higher LST is associated with less neighborhood walking, and whether associations differ by historic redlining score; and 3) neighborhoods with discriminatory redlining scores have greater LSTs. We used data on 3,982 ≥65-year olds from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey. Multivariable negative binomial and linear regressions tested associations between LST z-score (comparing participant’s neighborhood LST to surrounding region’s LST) and self-reported neighborhood walking, and the association between living in neighborhoods redlined as “definitely declining” or “hazardous” (versus “still desirable”/“best”) and LST z-score. LSTs were higher for those in neighborhoods with higher area deprivation scores and more African American/Black residents. Older adults living in neighborhoods with higher summer LST z-scores had fewer minutes of neighborhood walking/day. This association seemed limited to individuals with neighborhood redlining scores of “still desirable”/“best”. Neighborhood redlining scores of “definitely declining” or “hazardous” (versus “still desirable” and “best”) were associated with greater neighborhood summer LSTs. Overall, these findings suggest that historically redlined neighborhoods may more often experience urban heat island effects, and older adults living in hotter neighborhoods may less often engage in neighborhood walking. Future work is needed to elucidate the impact of extreme heat on health promoting behaviors such as walking and the types of interventions that can successfully counteract negative impacts to historically disadvantaged communities. ## Introduction Engaging in regular low-intensity physical activity, including walking, offers numerous health benefits for older adults.1 A vast range of observational and interventional studies consistently have documented that regular exercise helps improve cardiovascular and respiratory system function, reducing the risk of heart disease and high blood pressure.2 Regular moderate-intensity exercise improves the functioning of the immune system and can enhance bone density, reducing the risk of osteoporosis.3 Studies also suggest an association between physical activity and cell physiology linked to the genesis of cognitive decline.1 Exercise is also associated with mental health benefits.4,5 Recent meta-analyses provided evidence that walking can effectively reduce the symptoms of anxiety and depression and improve sleep health.1 In addition, exercise in a group setting can provide opportunities for social interaction, easing feelings of isolation and loneliness commonly associated with aging.6 The walkability of a neighborhood is determined by several factors, including street connectivity and density7,8, access to destinations and aesthetics9,10, investment in walking and biking infrastructure11, and the presence/absence of urban natural features, specifically tree cover.12 Several recent studies have investigated the effects of greenspace on physical activity, providing consistent evidence of the beneficial effects of urban nature-based infrastructure on health outcomes.13,14 Tree canopy strongly influences urban air temperature12 and can reduce land surface temperature by as much as 2.9°F.15 Despite the growing evidence of the cooling effect of vegetation and tree cover in urbanized areas, many neighborhoods in impoverished and minority communities have been found to lack access to these ecosystem services.12 The patterns of inequality in greenspace distribution and associations with hotter microclimates emerge in multiple incorporated and unincorporated urban areas across the United States.12,16–21 These patterns contribute to the urban heat island effect first described by Oke *et al.* in a study of sensible heat storage in the urban core of Mexico City.22 In essence, the urban heat island effect is the persistence of higher temperatures in urban centers compared to the surrounding rural or natural areas.23 Land surface temperature (LST) derived from Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensors (TIRS) has been extensively used to demarcate the spatial boundaries of the urban heat island effect.24–26 Various studies have assessed the associations between urban heat island effects and exposure of vulnerable populations to heat-related health risks.16,27–29 For instance, an in-depth analysis of the causes of the high mortality rates of the 1995 Chicago heat wave study found that disproportionate exposure of socially vulnerable groups, social isolation of seniors, and institutional neglect of poor and racialized neighborhoods have contributed to the observed disastrous outcomes.27 A study of the urban heat island effect in 25 cities around the world observed that low-income neighborhoods consistently exhibit lower vegetation density and are more likely to experience higher levels of heat exposure.18 Mitchell & Chakraborty16 developed a composite “urban heat risk index” based on the physical characteristics of the urban environment, such as LST, urban form and building density, and amount of greenspace. The index was applied to the cities of Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York in conjunction with indicators of social vulnerability. The study found that census tracts with higher percentages of racial and ethnic minorities had a strong positive correlation with heat exposure, but did not establish consistent evidence of an association between the urban heat risk index and disproportionate exposure of older adults.16 Similarly, another study23 observed a nonsignificant statistical association between heat exposure and isolation of older adults (percent 65 and older who live alone) in Portland, Oregon. A study that analyzed urban heat islands in 175 large US cities observed that racial and ethnic minorities (versus white) experience higher temperatures in 97% of the studied cases, but found no evidence of higher UHI intensities for older adults.21 Using remote sensing and census data, another study established widespread urban heat disparities in 1000 counties in the continental US.20 Lastly, a study that explored the association between tree cover, land surface temperatures, and income in 5,723 US communities found that poorer neighborhoods have, on average, 15% less vegetative cover and are more likely to experience higher temperatures (as much as 1.5°C hotter) than more affluent subdivisions.12 Moreover, the study established a strong correlation between a higher percentage of tree cover and higher income in 92% of the urbanized areas.12 Research suggests that historic policies of housing discrimination, such as redlining, have contributed to the disproportionate exposure of low-income urban populations to extreme heat.14,28–30 Redlining, instituted in the US in the 1930s, was a lending practice that discriminated against individuals living in minority, low-income, and migrant communities.28–31 These neighborhoods were redlined or color-coded red (“hazardous”) on maps used for mortgage/insurance considerations by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), resulting in the denial of mortgage and property insurance applications.28–30 One potential impact of historic redlining policies is the lasting impact on the built environment31, including less greenspace/tree canopy and more pavement, leading to an increased chance of urban heat island effects. A study examining intra-urban LST anomalies in 108 urbanized areas in the US found that historically redlined neighborhoods, which remain predominantly communities of color, are experiencing higher levels of intra-urban heat than their more affluent counterparts.28 Another study examined LST derived from remote sensing (as a measure of heat exposure) and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (as a measure of vegetative cover) in formerly redlined neighborhoods in Baltimore, Dallas, and Kansas City.29 The findings suggest that mean NDVI was lower while mean LST was higher in nearly all historically redlined neighborhoods compared to higher-income communities. An investigation of heat-related emergency room visits in 11 Texas cities found a significant association between a greater percentage of redlined areas, elevated levels of heat exposure, and higher rates of outpatient visits and inpatient admissions.30 Lastly, individuals ≥65 years old in the 2017 National Household Travel Survey who lived in historically redlined communities reported spending less time walking in their neighborhoods. Despite prior evidence suggesting that various health outcomes are affected by historic redlining and heat exposure, few studies have examined how redlining and urban heat islands may impact neighborhood walking in older adults. To address these gaps, in this study we assessed: 1) how individual and neighborhood characteristics differ (including historic redlining score) depending on neighborhood maximum summer LST; 2) whether higher LST is associated with less neighborhood walking among older adults, and whether these associations differ by historic redlining score; and 3) whether neighborhoods with discriminatory historic redlining scores have greater LSTs. ## Methods We used data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), a cross-sectional survey of travel behavior (e.g., travel modes and destinations) completed by 264,234 individuals from 129,696 households. NHTS respondents completed online/phone surveys and recorded trip details during a single travel diary day (Monday-Sunday). The study was deemed not human subjects research by University of Miami’s Institutional Review Board. We restricted it to ≥ 65-year-olds living in US Census tracts with data available on historical redlining scores and summer LSTs. ### Land surface temperature Aggregated daytime maximum LST data for a 40-day timespan from July to August 2013 were downloaded from the Center for International Earth Science Information Network. Descriptive statistics, including mean, min, max, range and standard deviation (SD) for LST, were derived for both census tracts and core-based statistical areas (CBSA) using the zonal statistics algorithm in ESRI’s ArcMap 10.8.1. Standardized scores were used to compare LST values at the respondent’s Census tract level to the surrounding region/CBSA and represented the standardized peak summertime LST. The LST z-scores used in our analyses were calculated by dividing the difference between the mean LSTs at the census tract and CBSA levels by the SD of the LST for the CBSA. More positive z-scores indicate that the participant’s neighborhood (Census tract) had a higher maximum LST than the surrounding region. ### Neighborhood walking Self-reported time on walking trips was obtained from travel diaries that were completed by NHTS participants on their assigned diary day. Any walking trip that began, ended, or originated and terminated at the respondent’s residence was included in the calculation of total minutes spent walking in the neighborhood for that day. ### Neighborhood characteristics We linked data on social and built environment characteristics, including redlining scores using the respondents’ US Census tract IDs provided by Federal Highway Administration. HOLC map mortgage investment risk scores were downloaded from a publicly available website (scores: 1=” best”, 2=” still desirable”, 3=” definitely declining”, and 4=” hazardous”). Meier et al32 previously derived these scores using equal intervals to assign the four redlining score categories to each US Census tract. Population density (people/mi2) and percentage of African American/Black and Hispanic/LatinX residents at the census tract level were obtained from the NHTS dataset and the American Community Survey (ACS, 2017 5-year estimates). The area deprivation index (ADI), downloaded from University of Wisconsin’s Neighborhood Atlas, ranks census block groups by neighborhood disadvantage based on 2011-2015 ACS estimates of income, education, employment, and housing (1%-lowest to 100%-highest disadvantage).33 We derived a tract-level measure by averaging the block-group ADI values within respondents’ Census tracts. We downloaded 2011 National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) data from the National Historic GIS website (NHGIS).34 NHGIS processed NLCD data to determine the proportion of each tract covered by 16 land cover types (e.g., high intensity development, developed open space, forest). For this study, we calculated the percentage of the respondent’s census tract composed of any greenspace (i.e., developed open space, forest, shrub/scrub; grassland/herbaceous, farmland, and wetlands). Further information on the NLCD classifications is published elsewhere 35,36. We also report the participants’ Census regions as walking differences have been observed among older adults based on Census region.37 ### Covariates The respondent demographics included age (years), sex, education ($125,000/year were less frequently living in neighborhoods with higher peak summer LSTs. View this table: [Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/21/2024.02.20.24303082/T1) Table 1. Sample demographics by neighborhood land surface temperature Figure 1 depicts the variation in peak summer LST across the US in 2013. Individuals living in the South and West but not the Northeast and Midwest were more likely to live in neighborhoods with lower peak summer LSTs (Table 2). Individuals in neighborhoods with higher area deprivation index scores and greater neighborhood percentage of African American/Black residents were more likely to experience higher peak summer LSTs. Individuals living in neighborhoods with redlining scores of “best” were more likely to live in areas with lower peak summer LSTs. ![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/02/21/2024.02.20.24303082/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/21/2024.02.20.24303082/F1) Figure 1. Averages Land Surface temperature for a 40-day timespan from July to August 2013 (*Data Source*: Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) View this table: [Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/21/2024.02.20.24303082/T2) Table 2. Sample neighborhood characteristics by neighborhood land surface temperature Older adults living in neighborhoods with historic redlining scores of “still desirable”, “definitely declining” or “hazardous” reported fewer minutes of neighborhood walking/day compared to those in neighborhoods with historic redlining scores of “best” (Table 3). Compared to individuals living in neighborhoods at the bottom quartile of peak summer LSTs, those in the top quartile walked significantly fewer minutes in the neighborhood per day. View this table: [Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/21/2024.02.20.24303082/T3) Table 3. Minutes of neighborhood walking by redlining score and neighborhood summer peak land surface temperature In multivariable regression analyses, older adults living in neighborhoods with higher peak summer LST z-scores reported fewer minutes of neighborhood walking/day (Table 4) (PR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98). Stratifying by redlining score showed no significant associations between LST z-score and neighborhood walking in separately for those living in neighborhoods with redlining scores of “definitely declining” or “hazardous” (PR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.82-1.21) or for those living in neighborhoods scored as “still desirable” and “best” (PR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.58-1.01). However, the latter association was borderline significant at p=0.059. Lastly, neighborhood redlining scores of “definitely declining” or “hazardous” (versus “still desirable” and “best”) were associated with greater neighborhood peak LSTs (Table 5) (estimate: 0.103, 95% CI: 0.009-0.198). View this table: [Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/21/2024.02.20.24303082/T4) Table 4. Association between neighborhood summer peak land surface temperature and minutes of neighborhood walking per day View this table: [Table 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/21/2024.02.20.24303082/T5) Table 5. Association between dichotomous neighborhood redlining score and Neighborhood peak summer land surface temperature ## Discussion The number of empirical studies on the relationship between the historical policies of housing discrimination, urban greenspace availability, and exposure to urban heat anomalies in economically disadvantaged communities of color continues to grow, revealing consistent patterns of inequality.28–31 However, despite the attention given to the urban heat island effect and its implications for human health and well-being in recent years, relatively few studies have specifically addressed the exposure of older adults to peak summer LSTs in historically redlined neighborhoods and the extent to which this exposure affects daily physical activity. This study attempts to fill these knowledge gaps by leveraging data from travel diaries on daily walking trips, peak summer LSTs, neighborhood characteristics, and the historical legacy of residential segregation to assess the physical activity patterns of 3,982 adults 65 years and older. We found evidence of significant peak summer warming in census tracts with higher area deprivation index scores. Heat exposure variation was also observed in relation to the neighborhoods’ racial and ethnic composition. A higher heat risk burden was associated with communities characterized by a larger percentage of African American/Black residents. We found that lower-income, Asian, and Hispanic individuals were more likely to live in neighborhoods with higher peak summertime LST compared to White and higher-income residents. These outcomes corroborate the results of previous studies, which consistently found evidence of urban heat exposure disparities associated with income and race/ethnicity.20,28 Several recent studies highlighted the legacy of institutionalized residential segregation after the Great Depression and the impact of systematic targeting of communities of color, which ultimately led to disinvestment and profound socio-economic inequalities.29,30 We observed a greater neighborhood peak summertime LSTs in neighborhoods with redlining scores of “definitely declining” or “hazardous” (versus “still desirable” and “best”). Our findings confirm the results from previous studies. For example, Li et al. observed that the proportion of redlined areas is a significant predictor of both daytime and nighttime LST.30 We also found that older adults reported fewer minutes of walking in historically redlined neighborhoods with Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC) scores of “definitely declining” and “hazardous.” Several limitations of this study warrant further consideration. Landsat data has a repeat interval of approximately two weeks (with no more than two observations in any given month). Extensive cloud cover, typical for wet summer months in certain regions, may obstruct the usability of Landsat data for extended periods of time.29 To address this limitation, this study used aggregated daytime maximum LST data for a 40-day timespan from July to August 2013. Previous studies have also highlighted the fact that LST, as a proxy of thermal exposure, may not fully capture the heat stress experienced by individuals.18,30 These limitations suggest that more complex modeling of urban microclimates that takes into account both LST and air temperature, as well as the cooling effects of urban blue-green infrastructure, may improve our understanding of urban heat exposure. Our results suggest that the association between higher neighborhood LSTs and less neighborhood walking might be restricted to older adults living in neighborhoods with historic redlining scores of “still desirable” or “best” (i.e., advantaged communities). Prior work has demonstrated that historically redlined neighborhoods remain more economically deprived, less walkable, have more less greenspace and tree canopy, and have greater concentrations of African American/Black and Hispanic/LatinX residents.31 Conversely, neighborhoods with historic redlining scores of “still desirable” and “best” have built and social environments today that are more conducive to neighborhood walking (i.e., higher SES, more greenspace, more pedestrian amenities and destinations). Yet, we found that individuals in those more affluent neighborhoods walk less if their neighborhoods experience higher LSTs. This may be explained by the lack of transportation options and other sources of recreational physical activity for older adults living in more disadvantaged communities that were historically redlined, and thus their neighborhood walking does not decrease with higher neighborhood LSTs. Older adults in more affluent communities are more likely to have alternative sources of transportation to nearby destinations other than walking, as well as other places and opportunities for exercise other than neighborhood walking 38, and thus may be more likely to decrease neighborhood walking with increasing temperatures. If these findings are replicated in other studies, this suggests an even more pressing need to address urban heat islands in historically disadvantaged communities because older adults (who are more susceptible to heat) in these communities are more likely to be exposed to extreme heat in their neighborhoods and experience negative health effects (e.g., heat stroke and cardiorespiratory symptoms).39 ## Conclusion Overall, this study suggests that historically redlined neighborhoods may more often experience urban heat island effects and that older adults living in hotter neighborhoods may less often engage in neighborhood walking. Discriminatory policies such as historic redlining have left indelible marks on neighborhoods across the US, leaving communities more vulnerable to detrimental environmental exposures, including extreme heat. Future work is needed to elucidate the impact of extreme heat on health-promoting behaviors such as neighborhood walking and the types of interventions and policies that can successfully counteract the negative health impacts of extreme heat on these historically disadvantaged communities. ## Data Availability Data are available from the original data source (US Department of Transportation) and publicly available data for download on the National Household Travel Survey website. [https://nhts.ornl.gov/](https://nhts.ornl.gov/) * Received February 20, 2024. * Revision received February 20, 2024. * Accepted February 21, 2024. * © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory The copyright holder for this pre-print is the author. All rights reserved. The material may not be redistributed, re-used or adapted without the author's permission. ## References 1. 1.Ungvari Z, Fazekas-Pongor V, Csiszar A, Kunutsor SK. The multifaceted benefits of walking for healthy aging: from Blue Zones to molecular mechanisms. Geroscience. Dec 2023;45(6):3211–3239. doi:10.1007/s11357-023-00873-8 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11357-023-00873-8&link_type=DOI) 2. 2.Lee LL, Mulvaney CA, Wong YKY, Chan ESY, Watson MC, Lin HH. Walking for hypertension. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2021;(2)doi:ARTN CD008823 10.1002/14651858.CD008823.pub2 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/14651858.CD008823.pub2&link_type=DOI) 3. 3.Ma D, Wu L, He Z. Effects of walking on the preservation of bone mineral density in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Menopause. Nov 2013;20(11):1216–26. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000000100 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/GME.0000000000000100&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24149921&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) 4. 4.Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Firth J, et al. Physical Activity and Incident Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Am J Psychiatry. Jul 1 2018;175(7):631–648. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17111194 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17111194&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29690792&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) 5. 5.Pearce M, Garcia L, Abbas A, et al. Association Between Physical Activity and Risk of Depression A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Jama Psychiat. Jun 2022;79(6):550–559. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.0609&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=35416941&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) 6. 6.Mehra S, Dadema T, Krose BJ, et al. Attitudes of Older Adults in a Group-Based Exercise Program Toward a Blended Intervention; A Focus-Group Study. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1827. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01827 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01827&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) 7. 7.Rodríguez DA, Evenson KR, Roux AVD, Brines SJ. Land Use, Residential Density, and Walking The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Prev Med. Nov 2009;37(5):397–404. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.008 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amepre.2009.07.008&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19840694&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000271532800003&link_type=ISI) 8. 8.Troped PJ, Wilson JS, Matthews CE, Cromley EK, Melly SJ. The built environment and location-based physical activity. Am J Prev Med. Apr 2010;38(4):429–38. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.032 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.032&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20307812&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) 9. 9.Lee IM, Ewing R, Sesso HD. The built environment and physical activity levels: the Harvard Alumni Health Study. Am J Prev Med. Oct 2009;37(4):293–8. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.007 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.007&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19765500&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) 10. 10.Chaix B, Simon C, Charreire H, et al. The environmental correlates of overall and neighborhood based recreational walking (a cross-sectional analysis of the RECORD Study). Int J Behav Nutr Phy. Feb 21 2014;11doi:Artn 20 10.1186/1479-5868-11-20 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1479-5868-11-20&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24555820&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) 11. 11.Tcymbal A, Demetriou Y, Kelso A, et al. Effects of the built environment on physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies taking sex/gender into account. Environ Health Prev. Dec 2020;25(1)doi:ARTN 75 10.1186/s12199-020-00915-z [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s12199-020-00915-z&link_type=DOI) 12. 12.McDonald RI, Biswas T, Sachar C, et al. The tree cover and temperature disparity in US urbanized areas: Quantifying the association with income across 5,723 communities. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0249715. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249715 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0249715&link_type=DOI) 13. 13.Besser LM, Mitsova DP. Neighborhood Green Land Cover and Neighborhood-Based Walking in U.S. Older Adults. Am J Prev Med. Jul 2021;61(1):e13–e20. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.013 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.013&link_type=DOI) 14. 14.Besser LM, Pescador Jimenez, M., Reimer, C., Adkins-Jackson, P.A.J., George, K.M., Meyer, O.L., Mitsova, D., and Galvin, J.E. Association between neighbohood greenspace and brain health by racialized/ ethnic group: A rapid review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(9)(5666)doi:10.3390/ijerph20095666 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph20095666&link_type=DOI) 15. 15.Knight T, Price S, Bowler D, et al. How effective is ‘greening’ of urban areas in reducing human exposure to ground-level ozone concentrations, UV exposure and the ‘urban heat island effect’? An updated systematic review. Environ Evid. Jun 5 2021;10(1)doi:ARTN 1210.1186/s13750-021-00226-y [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13750-021-00226-y&link_type=DOI) 16. 16.Mitchell BC, Chakraborty J. Landscapes of thermal inequity: disproportionate exposure to urban heat in the three largest US cities. Environ Res Lett. Nov 2015;10(11)doi:Artn 11500510.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115005 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115005&link_type=DOI) 17. 17.Nesbitt L, Meitner MJ, Girling C, Sheppard SRJ, Lu YH. Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities. Landscape Urban Plan. Jan 2019;181:51–79. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.007 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.007&link_type=DOI) 18. 18.Chakraborty T, Hsu A, Manya D, Sheriff G. Disproportionately higher exposure to urban heat in lower-income neighborhoods: a multi-city perspective. Environ Res Lett. Oct 2019;14(10)doi:ARTN 10500310.1088/1748-9326/ab3b99 19. 19.Eanes AM, Lookingbill TR, Hoffman JS, Saverino KC, Fong SS. Assessing Inequitable Urban Heat Islands and Air Pollution Disparities with Low-Cost Sensors in Richmond, Virginia. Sustainability-Basel. Dec 2020;12(23)doi:ARTN 1008910.3390/su122310089 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/su122310089&link_type=DOI) 20. 20.Benz SA, Burney JA. Widespread Race and Class Disparities in Surface Urban Heat Extremes Across the United States. Earths Future. Jul 2021;9(7)doi:ARTN2021EF00201610.1029/2021EF002016 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1029/2021EF002016&link_type=DOI) 21. 21.Hsu A, Sheriff G, Chakraborty T, Manya D. Publisher Correction: Disproportionate exposure to urban heat island intensity across major US cities. Nat Commun. Jun 28 2021;12(1):4104. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23972-6 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41467-021-23972-6&link_type=DOI) 22. 22.Oke TR, Zeuner G, Jauregui E. The Surface-Energy Balance in Mexico-City. Atmos Environ B-Urb. Dec 1992;26(4):433–444. doi:Doi 10.1016/0957-1272(92)90050-3 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0957-1272(92)90050-3&link_type=DOI) 23. 23.Voelkel J, Hellman D, Sakuma R, Shandas V. Assessing Vulnerability to Urban Heat: A Study of Disproportionate Heat Exposure and Access to Refuge by Socio-Demographic Status in Portland, Oregon. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Mar 30 2018;15(4)doi:10.3390/ijerph15040640 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/ijerph15040640&link_type=DOI) 24. 24.Voogt JA, Oke TR. Thermal remote sensing of urban climates. Remote Sensing of Environment. Aug 15 2003;86(3):370–384. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8&link_type=DOI) 25. 25.Ernest S, Nduganda, A. and Kashaigili, J. Urban Climate Analysis with Remote Sensing and Climate Observations: A Case of Morogoro Municipality in Tanzania. Advances in Remote Sensing. 2017;6:120–131. doi:10.4236/ars.2017.62009 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.4236/ars.2017.62009&link_type=DOI) 26. 26.Xu X, Pei H, Wang C, et al. Long-term analysis of the urban heat island effect using multisource Landsat images considering inter-class differences in land surface temperature products. Sci Total Environ. Feb 1 2023;858(Pt 1):159777. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159777 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159777&link_type=DOI) 27. 27.Klinenberg E. Review of heat wave: social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. N Engl J Med. Feb 13 2003;348(7):666–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM200302133480721 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJM200302133480721&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12584383&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F21%2F2024.02.20.24303082.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180912900032&link_type=ISI) 28. 28.Hoffman JS, Shandas V, Pendleton N. The Effects of Historical Housing Policies on Resident Exposure to Intra-Urban Heat: A Study of 108 US Urban Areas. Climate. Jan 2020;8(1):12. 29. 29.Wilson B. Urban Heat Management and the Legacy of Redlining. J Am Plann Assoc. Oct 1 2020;86(4):443–457. doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1759127 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/01944363.2020.1759127&link_type=DOI) 30. 30.Li DY, Newman GD, Wilson B, Zhang Y, Brown RD. Modeling the relationships between historical redlining, urban heat, and heat-related emergency department visits: An examination of 11 Texas cities. Environ Plan B-Urban. Mar 2022;49(3):933–952. 31. 31.Besser LM, Mitsova D, Williams CL, Wiese L. Redlining and Neighborhood Walking in Older Adults: The 2017 National Household Travel Survey. Am J Prev Med. Dec 2022;63(6):926–934. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.06.010 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amepre.2022.06.010&link_type=DOI) 32. 32. Meier Helen C.S. aMBC. Data from: Historic Redlining Scores for 2010 and 2020 US Census Tracts: Historic Redlining Score 2010B. 2021. doi:10.18128/D050.V14.0 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.18128/D050.V14.0&link_type=DOI) 33. 33.University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. 2015. Accessed 9/3/2020, [https://www.neighborhoodatlas.medicine.wisc.edu/](https://www.neighborhoodatlas.medicine.wisc.edu/) 34. 34.Manson S SJ, Van Riper D, Ruggles S. Data from: IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System. 2019;Version 14.0 doi:10.18128/D050.V14.0 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.18128/D050.V14.0&link_type=DOI) 35. 35.Wickham J, Homer C, Vogelmann J, et al. The Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium-20 Years of Development and Integration of USA National Land Cover Data. Remote Sens-Basel. Aug 2014;6(8):7424–7441. doi:10.3390/rs6087424 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/rs6087424&link_type=DOI) 36. 36.Wickham J, Stehman SV, Gass L, et al. Thematic accuracy assessment of the 2011 National Land Cover Database (NLCD). Remote Sens Environ. 2017;191:328–341. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.026 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.026&link_type=DOI) 37. 37.Besser L, Chang L-C, Kluttz J. Individual and neighborhood characteristics associated with neighborhood walking among US older adults. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2020; 38. 38.Procter-Gray E, Leveille SG, Hannan MT, Cheng J, Kane K, Li W. Variations in Community Prevalence and Determinants of Recreational and Utilitarian Walking in Older Age. J Aging Res. 2015;2015:382703. doi:10.1155/2015/382703 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1155/2015/382703&link_type=DOI) 39. 39.Faurie C, Varghese BM, Liu JW, Bi P. Association between high temperature and heatwaves with heat-related illnesses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment. Dec 15 2022;852doi:ARTN 15833210.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158332 [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158332&link_type=DOI)