Abstract
Background Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors have gained interest as a potential treatment for dementia. However, current evidence is limited to observational and pre-clinical studies. This drug- target Mendelian Randomisation (MR) study aims to elucidate the on-target effects of pharmacological PDE5 inhibition on dementia subtypes, cognitive traits, and neuro-imaging phenotypes.
Methods Two independent (r2 <0.001) blood pressure lowering variants from around the PDE5A locus were used in two-sample MR to assess the effect of genetically proxied PDE5 inhibition on risk of dementia subtypes, cognitive performance, and neuroimaging traits (cortical thickness, surface area and volume of white matter hyperintensities) in large-scale genomic consortia. The instrument’s predictive validity was assessed against erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as positive controls.
Results Following correction for multiple comparisons, genetically proxied PDE5 inhibition was associated with lower odds of erectile dysfunction (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.83-0.87) and PAH (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.55-0.61), and higher odds of Alzheimer’s disease (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10), Lewy body dementia (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.17-1.23) and vascular dementia (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07). Furthermore, genetically proxied PDE5 inhibition was associated with reduced cortical thickness (SD change -0.003, 95% CI -0.004, -0.002) and cognitive performance (SD change -0.010, 95% CI -0.013, -0.007), but not cortical surface area nor volume of white matter hyperintensities.
Conclusion In contrast to evidence from observational studies, our findings indicate that inhibition of PDE5 is associated with a higher risk of dementia and an unfavourable neurocognitive profile. This risk should be further investigated prior to clinical trials of pharmacological PDE5 inhibition for the treatment and prevention of dementia.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study utilises publicly available, summary-level GWAS data that can be accessed through the GWAS Catalogue (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/home) or specific cohort portals, including FinnGen (https://www.finngen.fi/en/access_results), the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium (https://www.thessgac.org/), and ENIGMA (https://enigma.ini.usc.edu/).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Corrections made to items added in erratum
