Intermittent low-intensity far-UVC irradiation inhibits growth of common mold below threshold limit value
=========================================================================================================

* Emilie Hage Mogensen
* Christian Kanstrup Holm

## Abstract

Mold infestations in buildings pose significant challenges to human health, affecting both private residences and hospitals. While molds commonly trigger asthma and allergies in the immunocompetent, they can cause life-threatening diseases in the immunocompromised. Currently, there is an unmet need for new strategies to reduce or prevent mold infestations. Far-UVC technology can inactivate microorganisms while remaining safe for humans. This study investigates the inhibitory efficacy of far-UVC light at 222 nm on the growth of common mold-producing fungi, specifically *Penicillium candidum*, when delivered in low-dose on-off duty cycles, a configuration consistent with its use in real-world settings. The inhibitory effect of the low-dose duty cycles was assessed on growth induced by i) an adjacent spore-producing *P. candidum* donor and ii) *P. candidum* spores seeded directly onto agar plates. In both setups, the far-UVC light significantly inhibited both vertical and horizontal growth of *P. candidum*, even when the UV doses were below the Threshold Value Limit of 23 mJ/cm2. These results suggest that far-UVC light holds the potential to improve indoor air quality by reducing or preventing mold growth, also when people are present.

## Introduction

Fungi can be found both indoors and outdoors, and they thrive in a broad range of conditions, spanning diverse temperatures. High humidity and water activity are prerequisites for their optimal growth [1]. Filamentous fungi can form spore-producing molds, and typically, outdoor levels of fungal spores exceed indoor levels [2], unless there is a source such as wall or floor mold patches [3]. A study conducted on buildings exposed to prolonged water leaks and increased humidity showed that *Penicillium* species were the most common species isolated from water-damaged materials, followed by *Aspergillus* and *Chaetomium* as the subsequent most commonly identified species [4]. Mold growth can lead to significant structural damage to buildings when it decomposes organic matter such as wood, wallpaper, cardboard, and linoleum [4].

When considering air quality, indoor mold or fungal growth can pose a significant challenge. The sick building syndrome encompasses various symptoms such as headaches, a blocked or runny nose, dry and itchy skin, as well as coughing. These symptoms manifest when susceptible individuals are inside specific buildings but tend to decrease after spending time outside of them. Different fungal species, including *Penicillium* [5, 6], have been associated with sick building syndrome symptoms. *Penicillium* is classified as Deuteromycetes, the same class as most other molds found in sick buildings [7], and exposure to *Penicillium* spp. in indoor environments can increase the susceptibility to asthma [8] and allergies [6, 9] in certain populations. In hospitals, mold outbreaks can cause increased morbidity and mortality, particularly for immunocompromised patients [10]. To protect public health and avoid these adverse health effects, the World Health Organization recommends preventing or limiting microbial growth on indoor surfaces [11].

UVC light has been recognized for its germicidal efficacy for a century. Typically, mercury vapor light sources emitting light at 254 nm are used, but several precautions must be taken, as this light can damage skin and eyes. Within the UVC spectrum, far-UVC is defined to be within the 200-230 nm wavelength range, which includes krypton chloride excimer lamps that emit light at 222 nm. The KrCl lamps often contain filters to ensure that harmful wavelengths outside 222 nm are inhibited. Despite having a wavelength only 32 nm from conventional UV light at 254 nm, the properties of 222 nm are fundamentally different because of its high absorption in proteins [12]. Studies have demonstrated that far-UVC light can effectively inactivate microorganisms, including bacteria and viruses [12-15], while remaining safe for human and rodent skin [16-23] and eyes [24, 25]. The Threshold Limit Value (TLV) set by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection is 23 mJ/cm2, which represents the maximum allowable irradiation to which a worker can be exposed during an 8-hour working day. However, safety studies have led the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists to recommend a new TLV of 161 mJ/cm2 for the eyes and of 479 mJ/cm2 for the skin.

Studies have also demonstrated the ability of far-UVC light at 222 nm to inactivate various fungal species [12, 13, 26, 27], typically by using a single high dose for inactivation. However, in real-world settings, far-UVC lamps are often configurated to cycle on and off, delivering intermittent low-intensity doses throughout the day. This approach keeps the UV dose, to which individuals are exposed, below the TLV. As a result, microorganisms experience intermittent low doses of far-UVC light instead of one large dose. Here we report how cycling low doses of far-UVC light inhibits the growth of *Penicillium candidum* on agar plates, both when it stems from airborne spores and when seeded directly onto agar plates.

## Material and methods

### Far-UVC light source

The far-UVC source used in this study was a krypton chloride excimer lamp (UV222™, UV Medico, Denmark), equipped with a filtered light source emitting light at 222 nm (Care222, Ushio, Japan). The filter blocked emissions outside the 222 nm peak. The lamp had an output of 120 mW, an emission angle of 60 degrees, and an intensity of 13.7 μW/cm2 at a 1-meter distance from the lamp. The lamp was equipped with software (UV Medico, Denmark) that allowed for duty cycling configuration.

### Inhibition of *P. candidum* growth from airborne spores by far-UVC light

Two identical boxes (80 × 120 × 185 cm) were constructed, each equipped with a far-UVC lamp affixed to the ceiling. Air movement was ensured by the installation of a ventilation fan in one corner of each box. To maintain a constant humidity level of 80%, humidifiers (Camry CR 7952) were employed. Preparation of donor plates was done by inoculating Dichloran-Glycerol 18% (DG18) agar plates with *P. candidum* and letting them incubate at room temperature until the mycelium completely covered the agar surface. Subsequently, the donor plates were transferred to the boxes, one donor plate in each box, accompanied by three to four sterile DG18 plates placed adjacent to each donor plate. The plates were left in the box for one to two weeks to allow the spores to induce growth on the adjacent agar plates.

The far-UVC lamp was positioned 178 cm away from the agar plates. At this distance, it delivered an intensity of 4.4 μW/cm2 to the agar plates and was programmed to cycle on and off. The total accumulated UV doses and corresponding on/off cycles per 24 hours were as follows: 25 mJ/cm2 (1 minute on and 14 minutes off), 50 mJ/cm2 (2 minutes on and 12 minutes off), and 100 mJ/cm2 (4 minutes on and 11 minutes off). In one box, the lamp remained turned off all the time to serve as a control condition, and the control and far-UVC boxes were swapped each time the experiment was repeated. Multiple UV doses were screened, and the minimum dose (25 mJ/cm2) was selected for additional repetitions, totaling four technical replicates at this low dose. The growth was monitored by measuring the covered area on the agar plates on the fourth day after the initial colony appeared.

### Inhibition of *P. candidum* growth from seeded spores by far-UVC light

To further investigate the impact of cycling low doses of far-UVC light on mold growth, four identical boxes (63 × 125 × 140 cm) were built with a far-UVC lamp installed in the ceiling of each box. Humidifiers (Camry CR 7964) maintained the humidity at 80-90% within the boxes. *P. candidum* spores were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline with a concentration of 2 mg/mL and transferred to DG18 agar plates in 8 μL droplets, with six droplets on each plate. A seeded agar plate was positioned at the bottom of each box, directly under the far-UVC lamp. The distance between the lamp and the agar plate was 130 cm, resulting in an intensity of 8.16 μW/cm2 being delivered to the agar plate. The accumulated UV doses and corresponding cycles per 24 hours were as follows: 10 mJ/cm2 (13 seconds on and 14 minutes and 47 seconds off), 15 mJ/cm2 (19 seconds on and 14 minutes and 41 seconds off), and 20 mJ/cm2 (26 seconds on and 14 minutes and 34 seconds off). The agar plates were incubated in the boxes for seven days, and four technical replicates were conducted. The growth was monitored daily by capturing pictures for visual assessment and by measuring the increase in diameter of all seeded droplets.

### Statistical analysis

Unpaired Welch’s t-tests were performed, assuming parametric data distribution. The tests were conducted to evaluate the difference in growth of *P. candidum* under control conditions versus far-UVC irradiated conditions, with the growth stemming both from airborne spores and spores seeded directly onto an agar plate. The statistical level of significance was set to 5%, and data was analyzed in GraphPad Prism version 10.0.3.

## Results

### Far-UVC light at 222 nm inhibits growth of *P. candidum*

In the initial experiment, donor agar plates covered with *P. candidum* mycelium were placed in boxes with 80% humidity, and air movement was ensured by a fan to spread airborne spores. Sterile receiver agar plates were positioned adjacently to the donor plates, a far-UVC lamp was installed in the ceiling of each box, as depicted in Fig 1A. The total UV doses accumulated over 24-hour periods during each of three duty cycles were 100, 50, and 25 mJ/cm2, respectively. As a control, the far-UVC lamp was turned off in one of the boxes. Fig 1B displays representative images of the growth on the plates, both under far-UVC irradiation (lower plates) and non-irradiated control plates (upper plates). In total, 74% of the control plates showed visible growth, with an average of 21.7% of the agar surface being covered by mycelium (Fig 1C) four days after the initial colony appeared. In contrast, none of the plates in the 100 or 50 mJ/cm2 conditions showed any growth. As the lowest dose of 25 mJ/cm2 exhibited a comparable inhibitory effect to the higher doses, we conducted this condition four times for verification. A third of the far-UVC-irradiated plates showed growth, but only as minor colonies, and the total surface area covered on any of the plates never exceeded 1%. This result suggests that applying far-UVC light in duty cycles can effectively inhibit the growth of *P. candidum*.

![Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/02/13/2024.02.12.24302727/F1.medium.gif)

[Fig 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/13/2024.02.12.24302727/F1)

Fig 1. Far-UVC inhibits *P. candidum* growth induced by airborne spores.
A donor plate covered with *P. candidum* was placed in a box with 80% humidity, air movement, and a far-UVC lamp, and recipient plates were positioned adjacently to the donor plate (A). Accumulated doses of cycling far-UVC light were 25, 50, and 100 mJ/cm2 per 24 hours. Representative pictures show fungal growth on the recipient agar plates with and without far-UVC light (B). The growth was monitored by measuring the percentage of the agar surface covered by mycelium (C). The mean percentage values for surface coverage were 21.7% (control), <1% (25 mJ/cm2), 0% (50 mJ/cm2), and 0% (100 mJ/cm2). Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Welch’s t-test, with the asterisks indicating a p-value of 0.0005. The p-values for 50, and 100 mJ/cm2 conditions versus control were both 0.0005 (not shown in the figure). Columns indicate mean values with standard deviation, and each dot represents a recipient agar plate. The results indicate that cycling far-UVC light can inhibit mold growth, even when the dose is only 25 mJ/cm2 per 24 hours.

### Growth inhibition can be achieved by using doses below the current TLV

In the second experiment, we proceeded to assess the effect of duty cycles with low doses of far-UVC light below the TLV. Agar plates seeded with droplets of *P. candidum* spores in solution were placed in boxes with 80-90% humidity and with far-UVC lamps in the ceiling as depicted in Fig 2A. The growth was monitored for one week. The total accumulated UV doses for 24-hour periods were 20, 15, 10, and 0 (control) mJ/cm2, respectively. Under non-irradiated control conditions, the spots increased their diameter by 3.28 ± 0.96 mm after seven days (Fig 2B). In contrast, the lowest UV dose duty cycles (10 and 15 mJ/cm2) showed only 0.53 ± 0.42 mm and 0.25 ± 0.30 mm increases in diameter after seven days, respectively. For 20 mJ/cm2, no growth was observed.

![Fig 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2024/02/13/2024.02.12.24302727/F2.medium.gif)

[Fig 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/13/2024.02.12.24302727/F2)

Fig 2. Far-UVC inhibits both vertical and horizontal growth of *P. candidum*.
*P. candidum* spores were seeded onto agar plates and left to grow in 80-90% humidity for seven days while being exposed to far-UVC light (A). Growth was monitored daily by measuring diameter increases (B, C) and through visual assessment (C). After seven days, the mean diameter increases were 3.28 ± 0.96, 0.53 ± 0.42, 0.25 ± 0.30 and 0.0 mm for control, 10, 15, and 20 mJ/cm2, respectively. Growth in the non-irradiated control condition was significantly higher (Welch’s unpaired t-test p-value <0.001) compared to any of the irradiated samples. The representative images (C) show hyphal growth starting after three days in the control box, in contrast to all the far-UVC irradiated samples. The results suggest that cycling doses below the TLV inhibit mold growth of *P. candidum*.

The most rapid growth increase occurred during the first five days, and representative pictures of the growth development are presented in Fig 2C. In the non-irradiated control condition, hyphae stretched out around the seeded spot, along with vertical growth and a denser mycelium after three to five days. Although there was a slight increase in diameter during the 10 and 15 mJ/cm2 conditions, the growth appeared markedly different, lacking both a hyphae circle around the spot and visible vertical growth. No change was observed in the 20 mJ/cm2 condition. This result suggests that the growth of *P. candidum* is inhibited by far-UVC light at doses below the TLV of 23 mJ/cm2.

## Discussion

This study aimed to assess the inhibiting effect of far-UVC light applied in low-dose duty cycles on growing mold, and we found that the light significantly inhibited the growth of *P. candidum*.

UVC light emitted from conventional mercury lamps is well-known for its antimicrobial properties, but its use is limited to areas without people present due to health hazards, including the risk of causing skin and eye damage [28]. Consequently, the conventional UVC light is typically administered in one large dose while no people are present or used for upper-room decontamination. Most knowledge of UVC light applied for decontamination is based on a century of use of this method. The development of excimer lamps emitting far-UVC light at 222 nm, which is safe for human exposure as described in the introduction, has opened doors to a range of new applications. Currently, we are learning how to use far-UVC light for decontamination while people are present, ensuring that the TLV is never exceeded. This involves delivering the light in intermittent low doses throughout the day. However, most studies are based on applying single large doses [12], as was customary when applying conventional UVC light, typically at 254 nm.

In this study, we found that intermittent cycling doses can effectively inhibit growth, even at low doses below the TLV of 23 mJ/cm2. These results suggest that far-UVC light can be a valuable tool in environments prone to mold attacks and could be used as a chemical-free supplement to manual cleaning.

A study of 16,190 people in Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden revealed a prevalence of damp indoor environments of 18%, with a higher occurrence of respiratory symptoms and asthma among those living in damp housing [29]. Another study estimated that approximately 50% of residents of homes in the USA are at higher risk of experiencing respiratory symptoms due to exposure to dampness and/or mold in their homes [30]. The risk was not limited to homes but extended to schools, offices, and other institutional buildings. In hospitals, mold outbreaks can cause fungal infections in vulnerable and immunocompromised patients without legitimate clinical explanations [10, 31, 32]. Fungi-related health hazards primarily stem from airborne spores polluting the air. This study does not address the effect of far-UVC light on airborne spores directly, and there is a probability that the doses used here are too low to have a significant effect on the spores. Previously, the log 1 reduction dose for *Penicillium expansum* spores has been reported to be 11 mJ/cm2 [27], applied as a single large dose. However, as indoor mold growth increases the risk of high concentrations of airborne spores, preventing growth on indoor surfaces is crucial to securing indoor air quality [11]. When the TLV is increased from 23 mJ/cm2 to 161 and 479 mJ/cm2 for eyes and skin, respectively, an enhanced inactivating effect on fungi is most likely achievable. Further studies on far-UVC light in real-world settings should be pursued to investigate if the light can enhance indoor air quality and prevent some of the symptoms associated with poor air quality.

## Conclusion

Indoor damp environments are particularly susceptible to mold infestations, which can substantially decrease indoor air quality and trigger adverse health effects such as asthma and allergies, or cause life threatening diseases in vulnerable hospital patients. To protect public health, indoor mold outbreaks should be prevented. In this study, we investigated the inhibitory impact of far-UVC light on the growth of *P. candidum* mold. Our findings suggest that cycling far-UVC doses below the TLV of 23 mJ/cm2 can effectively inhibit mold growth. This result emphasizes the potential of far-UVC light at 222 nm in protecting indoor environments and public health by inhibiting mold growth on indoor surfaces.

## Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript

*   Received February 12, 2024.
*   Revision received February 12, 2024.
*   Accepted February 13, 2024.


*   © 2024, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.Horner WE, Helbling A, Salvaggio JE, Lehrer SB. Fungal allergens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(2):161–79.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiY21yIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjgvMi8xNjEiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyNC8wMi8xMy8yMDI0LjAyLjEyLjI0MzAyNzI3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

2.  2.Fairs A, Wardlaw AJ, Thompson, Jr., Pashley CH. Guidelines on ambient intramural airborne fungal spores. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(6):490–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21243933&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 

3.  3.Stern MA, Allitt U, Corden J, Millington W. The Investigation of Fungal Spores in Intramural Air Using a Burkard Continuous Recording Air Sampler. Indoor and Built Environment. 1999;8(1):40–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1420326X9900800104&link_type=DOI) 

4.  4.Gravesen S, Nielsen PA, Iversen R, Nielsen KF. Microfungal contamination of damp buildings--examples of risk constructions and risk materials. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):505–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1289/ehp.99107s3505&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10347000&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000080874400018&link_type=ISI) 

5.  5.Schwab CJ, Straus DC. The roles of Penicillium and Aspergillus in sick building syndrome. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2004;55:215–38.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0065-2164(04)55008-6&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15350796&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000225130700008&link_type=ISI) 

6.  6.Meyer HW, Larsen FO, Jacobi HH, Poulsen LK, Clementsen P, Gravesen S, et al. Sick building syndrome: association of symptoms with serum IgE specific to fungi. Inflamm Res. 1998;47 Suppl 1:S9–10.
    
    

7.  7.Kurup VP, Shen HD, Banerjee B. Respiratory fungal allergy. Microbes Infect. 2000;2(9):1101–10.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01264-8&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10967290&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000089284200013&link_type=ISI) 

8.  8.Sharpe RA, Bearman N, Thornton CR, Husk K, Osborne NJ. Indoor fungal diversity and asthma: a meta-analysis and systematic review of risk factors. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(1):110–22.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.002&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25159468&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 

9.  9.Lander F, Meyer HW, Norn S. Serum IgE specific to indoor moulds, measured by basophil histamine release, is associated with building-related symptoms in damp buildings. Inflamm Res. 2001;50(4):227–31.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s000110050748&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11392611&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000168703300006&link_type=ISI) 

10. 10.Denning DW. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2024.
    
    

11. 11.WHO. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould. Geneva 2009. 248 p.
    
    

12. 12.Hessling M, Haag R, Sieber N, Vatter P. The impact of far-UVC radiation (200-230 nm) on pathogens, cells, skin, and eyes - a collection and analysis of a hundred years of data. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2021;16:Doc07.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3205/dgkh000378&link_type=DOI) 

13. 13.Narita K, Asano K, Naito K, Ohashi H, Sasaki M, Morimoto Y, et al. 222-nm UVC inactivates a wide spectrum of microbial pathogens. J Hosp Infect. 2020.
    
    

14. 14.Buonanno M, Welch D, Shuryak I, Brenner DJ. Far-UVC light (222 nm) efficiently and safely inactivates airborne human coronaviruses. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10285.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-020-67211-2&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=32581288&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 

15. 15.Welch D, Buonanno M, Grilj V, Shuryak I, Crickmore C, Bigelow AW, et al. Far-UVC light: A new tool to control the spread of airborne-mediated microbial diseases. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2752.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-018-21058-w&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29426899&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 

16. 16.Buonanno M, Ponnaiya B, Welch D, Stanislauskas M, Randers-Pehrson G, Smilenov L, et al. Germicidal Efficacy and Mammalian Skin Safety of 222-nm UV Light. Radiat Res. 2017;187(4):483–91.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1667/RR0010CC.1&link_type=DOI) 

17. 17.Hickerson RP, Conneely MJ, Hirata Tsutsumi SK, Wood K, Jackson DN, Ibbotson SH, et al. Minimal, superficial DNA damage in human skin from filtered far-ultraviolet C. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(6):1197–9.
    
    

18. 18.Yamano N, Kunisada M, Kaidzu S, Sugihara K, Nishiaki-Sawada A, Ohashi H, et al. Long-term Effects of 222-nm ultraviolet radiation C Sterilizing Lamps on Mice Susceptible to Ultraviolet Radiation. Photochem Photobiol. 2020;96(4):853–62.
    
    

19. 19.Cadet J. Harmless Effects of Sterilizing 222-nm far-UV Radiation on Mouse Skin and Eye Tissues. Photochem Photobiol. 2020;96(4):949–50.
    
    

20. 20.Welch D, Kleiman NJ, Arden PC, Kuryla CL, Buonanno M, Ponnaiya B, et al. No Evidence of Induced Skin Cancer or Other Skin Abnormalities after Long-Term (66 week) Chronic Exposure to 222-nm Far-UVC Radiation. Photochem Photobiol. 2022.
    
    

21. 21.Eadie E, Barnard IMR, Ibbotson SH, Wood K. Extreme Exposure to Filtered Far-UVC: A Case Study(†). Photochem Photobiol. 2021;97(3):527–31.
    
    

22. 22.Fukui T, Niikura T, Oda T, Kumabe Y, Ohashi H, Sasaki M, et al. Exploratory clinical trial on the safety and bactericidal effect of 222-nm ultraviolet C irradiation in healthy humans. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0235948.
    
    

23. 23.Narita K, Asano K, Morimoto Y, Igarashi T, Nakane A. Chronic irradiation with 222-nm UVC light induces neither DNA damage nor epidermal lesions in mouse skin, even at high doses. PLoS One. 2018;13(7):e0201259.
    
    

24. 24.Kaidzu S, Sugihara K, Sasaki M, Nishiaki A, Ohashi H, Igarashi T, et al. Re-Evaluation of Rat Corneal Damage by Short-Wavelength UV Revealed Extremely Less Hazardous Property of Far-UV-C(†). Photochem Photobiol. 2021;97(3):505–16.
    
    

25. 25.Sugihara K, Kaidzu S, Sasaki M, Ichioka S, Takayanagi Y, Shimizu H, et al. One-year Ocular Safety Observation of Workers and Estimations of Microorganism Inactivation Efficacy in the Room Irradiated with 222-nm Far Ultraviolet-C Lamps. Photochem Photobiol. 2022.
    
    

26. 26.Schleusener J, Lohan SB, Busch L, Ghoreschi K, Ploch NL, May S, et al. Treatment of the Candida subspecies Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis with two far-UVC sources to minimise mycoses in clinical practice. Mycoses. 2023;66(1):25–8.
    
    

27. 27.Clauß M. Higher effectiveness of photoinactivation of bacterial spores, UV resistant vegetative bacteria and mold spores with 222 nm compared to 254 nm wavelength. Acta hydrochimica et hydrobiologica. 2006;34(6):525–32.
    
    

28. 28.Milonova S, Rudnick S, McDevitt J, Nardell E. Occupant UV exposure measurements for upper-room ultraviolet germicidal irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2016;159:88–92.
    
    

29. 29.Gunnbjörnsdóttir MI, Franklin KA, Norbäck D, Björnsson E, Gislason D, Lindberg E, et al. Prevalence and incidence of respiratory symptoms in relation to indoor dampness: the RHINE study. Thorax. 2006;61(3):221–5.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToidGhvcmF4am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjYxLzMvMjIxIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjQvMDIvMTMvMjAyNC4wMi4xMi4yNDMwMjcyNy5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

30. 30.Mudarri D, Fisk WJ. Public health and economic impact of dampness and mold. Indoor Air. 2007;17(3):226–35.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00474.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17542835&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000247600500006&link_type=ISI) 

31. 31.Dailly S, Boatswain E, Brooks J, Campbell G, Dallow K, Dushianthan A, et al. Aspergillus in COVID-19 intensive care unit; what is lurking above your head? J Infect Prev. 2022;23(6):278–84.
    
    

32. 32.Kanamori H, Rutala WA, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Weber DJ. Review of fungal outbreaks and infection prevention in healthcare settings during construction and renovation. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(3):433–44.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cid/civ297&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25870328&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2024%2F02%2F13%2F2024.02.12.24302727.atom)