Abstract
Background Given the escalating challenges for UK-based physiotherapists in workload pressures, budget constraints, staff shortages and patient wait times, the profession (of 65,000 registered physiotherapists) requires immediate care and review of therapist health. This pioneering study aims to examine perfectionism, moral injury, and burnout among UK-based physiotherapists across the NHS, private practice, sports, and academia.
Method This cross-sectional study utilised an online survey and implementation of Structure Equation Modelling (SEM) to assess the interplay of Perfectionism (Multidimension Perfectionism Scale-Short Form), Moral Injury (Moral Injury Symptoms Scale-Healthcare Professionals) and Burnout (Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire). Our sample size calculation shows representation of the UK physiotherapy profession via utilisation of 95% confidence interval with a 5% margin of error.
Findings Our analysis conducted on (n=402) UK-based physiotherapists reveals significant burnout levels – 96% are categorised as moderate to high. Furthermore, associations and SEM of Perfectionism and Moral Injury collectively account for a substantial proportion of burnout variability (r2.62), highlighting their sequential impact on burnout manifestation.
Interpretation With such high levels of burnout, urgent intervention is paramount. Elevated burnout presents challenges for the physiotherapy profession as staff retention, accurate and effective patient care, and overall health are severely impacted due to burnout. Recognising and addressing perfectionism and moral injury becomes pivotal to mitigate its impact on individual and collective health.
Funding No funding was acquired for this research project.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Glasgow Caledonian University's, The School of Health and Life Sciences - Ethics Committee. Ethics approval number HLS/PSWAHS/22/017. HLS – Health and Life Sciences PSWAHS – Psychology, Social Work and Allied Health Sciences
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of confidentiality and anonymity reasons and complying with the remit of ethical approval. Data are available from the Glasgow Caledonian University Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee (contact via the primary author – Dr Sivaramkumar Shanmugam) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
