Article Information
History
- October 21, 2024.
Article Versions
- Version 1 (February 4, 2024 - 00:03).
- You are viewing Version 2, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Author Information
- Vera Komeyer1,2,3,*,
- Prof. Dr. Simon B. Eickhoff1,2,
- Prof. Dr. Christian Grefkes4,5,6,
- Dr. Kaustubh R. Patil1,2 and
- Dr. Federico Raimondo1,2,*
- 1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- 2Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- 3Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- 4Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt (Main), Germany
- 5Department of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne and Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- 6Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience (INM-3), Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- ↵*Correspondence to Vera Komeyer (v.komeyer{at}fz-juelich.de) and Federico Raimondo (f.raimondo{at}fz-juelich.de)
Posted October 21, 2024.
Confounder control in biomedicine necessitates conceptual considerations beyond statistical evaluations
