Abstract
Introduction Occupations vary with respect to workplace factors that influence exposure to COVID-19, such as ventilation, social contacts and protective equipment. Variations between women and men may arise because they have different occupational roles or behavioural responses. We estimate occupational differences in COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality risks by sex.
Methods We combined individual-level data from 2011 Census with (i) health records and (ii) household-level information from residential identifiers. We used data for a cohort of 1.7 million Scottish adults aged 40-64 years between 1 March 2020 and 31 January 2021. We estimated age-standardised COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality rates, stratified by sex and occupation. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated COVID-19 hospital admission and death risks, adjusting for relevant factors.
Results Generally, women had lower age-standardised COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality rates compared to men. Among women, adjusted death risks were lower for health professionals, and those in associate professional and technical occupations (paramedics and medical technicians). Among men, elevated adjusted admission and death risks were observed for large vehicle and taxi drivers. Additionally, admission risks remained high among men working in caring personal services, including home and care workers, while elevated risks were observed among women working in customer service occupations (call centre operators) and as process, plant and machine operatives (assemblers/sorters).
Conclusion Occupational differences in COVID-19 hospital admission and mortality risks between women and men highlight the need to account for sex differences when developing interventions to reduce infections among vulnerable occupational groups.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by UK Research Innovation Economic and Social Research Council (Grant numbers ES/W010321/1, ES/S007407/1 and ES/R005729/1). The study used data assets made available by National Safe Haven as part of the Data and Connectivity National Core Study, led by Health Data Research UK in partnership with the Office for National Statistics and funded by UK Research Innovation (Grant numbers MC_PC_20029 and MC_PC_20058).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The College of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee of University of Glasgow gave ethical approval (400200099). The Scottish Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social Care and the Statistics Benefit and Privacy Panel gave approval for data linkage (2021-0119).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data used in this study are highly sensitive and will not be made publicly available.
