Abstract
Background The increasing need for diagnostic echocardiography (echo) tests presents challenges in preserving the quality and promptness of reports. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have proven effective in summarizing clinical texts, their application in echo remains underexplored.
Aims To evaluate open-source LLMs in echo report summarization.
Methods Adult echo studies conducted at the Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, were categorized into two groups: development (all Mayo locations except Arizona) and Arizona validation sets. We adapted open-source LLMs (Llama-2, MedAlpaca, Zephyr, and Flan-T5) using In-Context Learning (ICL) and Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) fine-tuning for echo report summarization from “Findings” to “Impressions.” Against cardiologist-generated Impressions, the models’ performance was assessed both quantitatively with automatic metrics and qualitatively by cardiologists.
Results The development dataset included 97,506 reports from 71,717 unique patients, predominantly male (55.4%), with an average age of 64.3±15.8 years. EchoGPT, a QLoRA fine-tuned Llama-2 model, outperformed other LLMs with win rates ranging from 87% to 99% in various automatic metrics, and produced reports comparable to cardiologists in qualitative review (significantly preferred in conciseness (p< 0.001), with no significant preference in completeness, correctness, and clinical utility). Correlations between automatic and human metrics were fair to modest, with the best being RadGraph F1 scores versus clinical utility (r=0.42) and automatic metrics showed insensitivity (0-5% drop) to changes in measurement numbers.
Conclusions EchoGPT can generate draft reports for human review and approval, helping to streamline the workflow. However, scalable evaluation approaches dedicated to echo reports remains necessary.
Clinical Perspectives 1. What is new?
This study evaluated multiple open-source LLMs and different model adaptation methods in echocardiography report summarization.
The resulting system, EchoGPT, can generate echo reports comparable in quality to cardiologists.
Future metrics for echo report quality should emphasize factual correctness, especially on numerical measurements.
2. What are the clinical implications?
EchoGPT system demonstrated the potential of introducing LLMs into echocardiography practice to generate draft reports for human review and approval.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB of the Mayo Clinic gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵† Chieh-Ju Chao and Ehsan Adeli are co-corresponding authors for this manuscript.
Disclosure: The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Revised manuscript content to discuss the challenges in evaluating echo reports, especially the limitations on automatic metrics, and the limited scalability of human expert review.
Abbreviations
- 4C metrics
- qualitative review metrics including completeness, correctness, conciseness, and clinical utility.
- AI
- Artificial Intelligence
- DL
- Deep Learning
- Echo
- Echocardiography
- FT
- Fine-Tuning
- GPT
- Generative Pre-trained Transformer
- ICL
- In-Context Learning
- NLP
- Natural Language Processing
- Seq2seq
- Sequence-to-sequence
- TTE
- Transthoracic Echocardiography
- TEE
- Transesophageal Echocardiography
- LLM
- Large Language Model
- NLP
- Natural Language Processing
- QLoRA
- Quantized Low-Rank Adaption
