Abstract
Background Food service operations in universities and colleges, such as cafeterias and canteens, may support healthy and sustainable diets among students and staff and contribute to a transformation of the wider food system. Multiple studies on interventions to promote health and sustainability in this setting have been conducted, but no up-to-date, comprehensive review exists. This study aims to fill this gap.
Methods We used state-of-the-art scoping review methodology. We included any study examining interventions in university or college food service settings aimed at, or potentially suitable for: 1), supporting healthy and/or sustainable diets, 2) reducing food waste, or 3) otherwise increasing the sustainability of the food service operation (e.g. by improving energy efficiency). We considered studies using any study design published in any language without publication date restrictions. We comprehensively searched six academic databases and conducted forward and backward citation searches. We extracted and charted data on key study characteristics, including the reported direction of effects/associations.
Results We identified 206 studies reporting on 273 interventions. Most studies (71%) used quasi- experimental study designs, were conducted in North America (53%) or Europe (34%), and were implemented in cafeterias or canteens (76%). The most common intervention types were labelling interventions (26%), improved or increased offerings of healthy and/or sustainable food and beverage options (24%), and information and awareness-raising interventions (18%). The most commonly assessed outcomes were implementation-related (e.g. costs, feasibility, acceptability), diet-related (e.g. sales or consumption of specific foods), and sustainability-related (e.g. carbon footprint). Most, but not all, studies reported mostly effects in the desired direction (e.g. increased vegetable consumption, or decreased food waste).
Discussion Multiple approaches for promoting health and sustainability in university and college food service settings exist. The findings of this review suggest that such interventions can be effective, feasible, cost-effective, and aligned with customer and stakeholder expectations. We therefore suggest that they are considered for implementation more widely. Implementation should be accompanied by monitoring and methodologically robust evaluations to allow for evidence-informed tailoring and adjustments and to improve the existing evidence base.
Competing Interest Statement
PvP reports receiving research funding from Germany's Federal Ministries of Food and Agriculture (BMEL), Education and Research (BMBF) and the Environment and Consumer Protection (BMUV), as well as travel costs and speaker and manuscript fees from the German and Austrian Nutrition Societies (DGE and OEGE), the German Diabetes Society (DDG), the German Obesity Society (DAG), the Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (Germany's main consumer organization), the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Germany and the Dr.-Rainer-Wild Foundation. SK reports a secondary employment as student research assistant for the German Alliance Climate Change and Health (KLUG e.V.). All other authors state that they have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Clinical Protocols
Funding Statement
Work on this scoping review was funded through staff positions at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen (LMU Munich) and the University of Bonn, as well as through a grant from Germany's Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), grant number 01EL2313. The funder had no involvement in and gave no restrictions regarding the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or submission of the report for publication. Interpretations of the study results do not necessarily reflect those of the funder or future policy in this area.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data described in the manuscript is published alongside the article as supplementary material or is available on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/ykv3n.
