Abstract
Mental illnesses significantly affect patients, families, and their communities. The different pathways to care, both formal and informal, influenced the timing and appropriate care. This literature review identifies pathways to access mental health services and suggests a collaborative model for mental health care across sub-Saharan Africa. We systematically searched multiple databases for studies reporting on primary qualitative and quantitative studies on pathways to mental healthcare services across Sub-Saharan Africa. Descriptive analysis of pathway stages was done according to Goldberg and Huxley’s ’model of Levels and Filters’. Overall, twenty-nine We included 29 studies in the final review. Biomedical services were the preferred treatment option. The majority (70%) used traditional and religious healers as the first point of mental health care. The median duration for the delay in seeking treatment in a health facility was six and fifty-four months. Patients who sought care from traditional and faith healers were found to have experienced the most prolonged delay without treatment. This study emphasizes that the call for collaboration between the two care systems can no longer be ignored. A proposed new model for collaboration between biomedical and traditional /faith healers that focuses on education and adopting a new referral framework.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023459738
