Abstract
Background We have recently encountered several cases of tetralogy of Fallot with an abnormally oriented S-shaped ascending aorta. In this retrospective study, we sought to clarify the morphology of this unusual under-recognized variant of tetralogy of Fallot.
Methods We reviewed our databases to identify all patients with tetralogy of Fallot having an S-shaped ascending aorta. We then used computed tomographic angiography to make a detailed assessment of the cardiac morphology.
Results Out of the 21 patients we identified, 18 (86%) had a right aortic arch, 2 (9%) had a left aortic arch, and the remaining patient (5%) had a double aortic arch. Patients with right aortic arch, compared to those with the normally oriented ascending aorta, had lesser aortic override (29.3±14% vs 54.8±13.2%; p=0.0001) and a wider ascending aorta (2.52±0.7 cm vs 1.80±0.32; p=0.0003). Overall, compared to normal cases, the ascending aorta was located posteriorly, with a higher sterno-aortic distance (2.55±0.8 cm vs 0.99±0.45 cm; p=0.0001). The ascending aorta was longer (4.12±1.7 vs 3.07±0.82, p=0.03) although the tortuosity index (1.22±0.19 vs 1.15±0.17, p=0.23) was not different. Of the cases with right aortic arch and S-shaped ascending aorta, 16 (89%) had extrinsic compression of the right pulmonary artery (p = 0.0001), while 7 (39%) had crossed pulmonary arteries (p = 0.008), with no such findings in those with normally oriented ascending aorta or those with left aortic arch and S-shaped ascending aorta.
Conclusion Tetralogy of Fallot with an S-shaped ascending aorta is a variant with lesser aortic override and a more posterior location of the aorta. Compression of the right pulmonary artery and crossed pulmonary arteries are frequent when the arrangement is associated with a right-sided aortic arch. These findings may have important implications for surgical management.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Not applicable
Funding Statement
No funding was recevied for conduct of the study or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institute Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India - 110029
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data would be made available on request.
