Abstract
Introduction The rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHR) across the globe by the healthcare industry is an indication of the rising digitalization of healthcare functions. Despite the potential benefits of EHR, achieving a fit between physician workflow and EHR has posed a major challenge, with negative effects on physician wellbeing and patient outcomes. To this effect, organizations have attempted to align the EHR with physician workflow in various ways. It is important to understand the strategies and tools that have been employed and, where possible, the outcome of these engagements as a fundamental insight to resolving this issue.
Methodology The study will employ a methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley to strategically identify articles that use any type of concept for the alignment of physician workflow and EHR from Embase (OVID), MEDLINE (OVID), PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. It will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist to report findings. The articles will be extracted into the Covidence software, screened, and relevant data will be extracted from the selected articles. A qualitative thematic approach will be used to analyze the data. No ethical approval was sought because the data were collected from sources in the public domain.
Result The scoping review is scheduled to be completed by April 2024. The results will be presented in tabular and narrative form and published in a reputable journal and through conference presentations.
Conclusion The outcome of the review aims to provide a systematic toolkit of activities and strategies and, where possible, the corresponding effectiveness that organizations can use to optimize EHR-to-physician workflow alignment. The outcome would also help make appropriate recommendations for alignment. Subsequently, it can improve patient outcomes such as the reduction of medication errors and improvement of patient-centered, improve physician well-being and reduce burnout.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data will be provided as supplemental material when findings of the scoping review is published.
