A Qualitative Exploration of Patients’ Experiences of Living with Chronic Respiratory Diseases before and after Participating in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program at a Tertiary Hospital in Malawi, and Their Suggestions to Improve a Future Program ========================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================= * Fanuel M. Bickton * Talumba Mankhokwe * Beatrice Chavula * Emily Chitedze * Martha Manda * Cashon Fombe * Martha Mitengo * Langsfield Mwahimba * Moses Isiagi * Richard N. van Zyl-Smit * Susan Hanekom * Martin Heine * Harriet Shannon * Jamie Rylance * Enock Chisati * Stephen B. Gordon * Felix Limbani ## Abstract **Background** Community-based surveys suggest a substantial burden of chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) in the Malawian population, causing significant morbidity and loss of economic productivity. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective non-pharmacological intervention for people with CRDs, but there is limited data on its feasibility and acceptability in Malawi. **Objectives** To explore the experiences of patients with CRDs before and after participating in a PR program at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Blantyre, Malawi, and their suggestions to improve a future program. **Methods** Fourteen adult patients (eight females and six males) presenting with functionally limiting CRDs to QECH were invited to participate in a six-week PR program. Following program completion, face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews with the participants were conducted. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were anonymised and thematically analysed using a deductive approach. **Results** Ten adults (five females and five males) participated in the PR program. Their documented CRD diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, post-tuberculosis lung disease, and bronchiectasis. Five key themes emerged: (1) experiences of living with a CRD before PR, (2) experiences of living with a CRD after PR, (3) feedback on the conduct of the completed PR program, (4) suggestions to improve a future PR program, and (5) program continuation/maintenance at home. Participants reported experiencing improvements in physical, psychological, and social health associated with PR program participation. The provision of transport was considered a key facilitator for PR program completion. Realising the gained PR benefits, participants were willing to continue exercising at their homes, albeit with potential barriers including a lack of equipment. **Conclusion** The PR program improved the participants’ perceived health status and was well-accepted. Addressing barriers related to transport facilitated immediate implementation while providing a challenge for the scaling and sustainability of PR beyond the project duration. These findings support the drive for shifting chronic care, including rehabilitation, towards primary care and community. **Trial Registration** Prospective; 27/08/2021; ISRCTN13836793 Keywords * Chronic respiratory disease * pulmonary rehabilitation * Malawi ## Introduction For people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is supported by high-quality evidence of improvement in symptoms (dyspnoea, fatigue, anxiety, depression), exercise tolerance, and overall health-related quality of life (1). There is also evidence supporting PR for other chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) including interstitial lung disease (2), pulmonary hypertension (3), asthma (4), cystic fibrosis (5), bronchiectasis (6), lung cancer (7), lung transplant (8), post-TB lung disease (9), and post-COVID-19 (10). Evidence from high-income countries (HICs) suggests that PR significantly reduces the direct costs of COPD by decreasing healthcare system usage, particularly unplanned hospital admissions (11). A systematic review of PR in Southern Africa, however, found few trials, and generally low-quality evidence for efficacy, with no published data from Malawi (12). Therefore, we conducted a trial of a PR program among patients with functionally limiting CRDs at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Blantyre, Malawi. This paper reports the results of the post-PR qualitative study which aimed to explore patients’ experiences of living with CRDs before and after participating in PR the program, and their suggestions to improve a future program. ## Methods Our published protocol, available elsewhere (13), includes detailed information about study design, participants’ sample size, recruitment process, eligibility criteria, and data collection. A summary is presented here. ### Trial setting Healthcare facilities in Malawi are organised into primary, secondary, and tertiary levels, linked through a referral system. The primary level includes community health centres, the secondary level includes district hospitals, and the tertiary level includes four central hospitals two of which are in the Southern Region including QECH in Blantyre. QECH is Malawi’s largest tertiary hospital catering for all primary- and secondary-level facilities for the Southern Region. The hospital includes a Chest Clinic which serves outpatients with chronic cardiac and respiratory conditions (such as chronic heart failure and asthma, respectively) every Wednesday. ### Trial participants A total of fourteen protocol-eligible (13) patients (eight females and six males, aged ≥18 years) presenting with functionally limiting CRD symptoms to the Chest Clinic at QECH were consecutively identified, invited, and consented (by TM, BC, MMi, MMa, and BC) to participate in a PR program at the QECH’s Physiotherapy Department. However, four did not participate: one male patient died of a cardiovascular complication, one female patient relocated to another city, and two patients (one male and one female) became unreachable. The remaining ten patients (six females and four males) participated in the PR program to completion and were all interviewed post-PR. Their socio-demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in table 1. View this table: [Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299953/T1) Table 1: Participants’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics No participant had previously participated in PR. Each participant was given transport money to attend each PR session, covering their travel costs for both to and from the PR centre. The amount of the transport money differed from participant to participant due to their different locations or distance to travel and was equivalent to the total amount of transport money each participant would have to pay for public transport (e.g., minibus and/or motorcycle) to and from the PR centre. Each participant was also given an additional one thousand Malawian Kwacha as remuneration for their time. Refreshments such as drinking water were provided to participants at the PR sessions. ### Trial intervention The PR program trial was conducted between February and May 2023. To make it locally appropriate, the PR program’s design incorporated the perspectives of participants of a formative qualitative study (14), some of whom also participated in the actual program. The PR program ran for six weeks, twice weekly, at QECH’s Physiotherapy Department. A team of six physiotherapists (TM, BC, MMi, CF, MMa, LM) and a nurse (EC) delivered the PR sessions, coordinated by the principal investigator (FMB). Due to limited physiotherapy gymnasium space and busier physiotherapists in the morning, all PR sessions were scheduled in the afternoon (from around 13:00). They were delivered in a group format and consisted of an hour of individualized circuit exercise training, with its intensity progression according to individual participant’s improvement over time. The circuit included exercises for both upper and lower limbs designed to improve aerobic endurance and muscle strength such as dumbbell lifting, stair climbing, treadmill walking, stationery cycling, and sit-to-stand. Participants were encouraged to also exercise at their homes. ### Data collection For an overview of quantitative measures included pre- and post-PR, we refer the reader to our published protocol (13). Post-PR semi-structured in-depth interviews with individual participants were conducted by TM and MMi (both had prior qualitative research experience) using a topic guide (Table 2) which was informed by a literature review and received expert input from a Malawian social scientist (FL). It was not pilot tested but no significant areas for its quality or content improvement were identified as the interviews progressed. The interviews were conducted in the Head of Physiotherapy Department’s office, which was a quiet and private room within the Physiotherapy Department building at QECH, and their durations ranged from 10 to 38 minutes (22 minutes on average). All interviews were conducted in Chichewa (most spoken native language) and audio recorded. View this table: [Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299953/T2) Table 2: Semi-structured topic guide for the post-PR in-depth interviews ### Data management The interview audio files were stored on a password-encrypted computer, and transcribed verbatim (by FMB) in their original language (Chichewa) to minimize loss of meaning with English translation (15); only participant’s quotes included in this paper were translated in English at the time of results reporting. The interview data were anonymized at the time of translation and transcription by replacing participants’ names with a number (e.g., “participant 1”, “participant 2”, etc.). ### Data analysis FMB and TM analyzed the qualitative data independently but collaboratively using a deductive thematic approach (16). Initially, the researchers collaborated to develop a preliminary coding framework. Data coding was performed manually by the researchers separately, using an iterative approach across all qualitative data (16). The researchers followed the steps outlined by Braun and Clarke (16), including independently going through a process of familiarization with the data by reading and re-reading transcripts while making reflective notes on the literal content, looking closely at words used by participants, interpreting what the data meant by assigning initial codes or classifications to segments of text, and exploring relationships between these classifications and developing core themes. The two researchers discussed their separate themes and merged them collaboratively. ### Ethics Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (COMREC), protocol number P.07/19/2752. Participants signed consent forms after willingly agreeing to participate in the study based on study information provided by the investigators. ## Results From the analysis, five key themes emerged: (1) experiences of living with a CRD before PR, (2) experiences of living with a CRD after PR, (3) feedback on the conduct of the completed PR program, (4) suggestions to improve a future PR program, and (5) program continuation/maintenance at home. We now describe these five themes and include their sub-themes and select illustrative participants’ quotes in tables 3–7, e.g., P1F40s is participant 1, female, in her 40s, etc. ### Theme 1: Experiences of living with a CRD before PR Participants described various symptoms of their CRDs, which they said were more severe before they participated in the PR program. These symptoms included breathlessness, (productive) cough, wheeze, chest tightness, chest pain, dizziness, leg pain, a feeling of body heaviness, and body weakness. Before PR, these symptoms affected participants’ physical, psychological, and social health negatively as well as disturbed their sleep. The symptoms were a reason for some participants’ frequent use of inhaler, hospital visits and hospitalisations, although they felt that these were less helpful. View this table: [Table 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299953/T3) Table 3: Illustrative quotes about living with a CRD before PR ### Theme 2: Experiences of living with a CRD after PR Participants reported positive impact of the PR program on various aspects of their lives including improving their CRD symptoms. For example, they reported reductions in the magnitude and frequency of the symptoms, accompanied by improvements in their physical, psychological, social, and sleep health. In addition, participants reported acquisition of new and/or improved knowledge, including knowledge about exercise benefits. This knowledge helped them have a positive attitude towards exercises and/or physical activities, including removing their fear of engaging in them. Finally, due to PR, some participants reported using inhalers less frequently, the inhalers became more effective/responsive, and that they were visiting the hospital less frequently. View this table: [Table 4:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299953/T4) Table 4: Illustrative quotes about living with a CRD after PR ### Theme 3: Feedback on the conduct of the completed PR program When asked about what went well and what did not, participants said the program went well generally. They attributed this to several reasons, including the afore-mentioned gained PR benefits, good personal attributes of the PR delivery team (such as welcoming, heartwarming/warmful, cheerful, kind, polite, hardworking, and participatory or engaging and interactive), transport money provision, and good exercise design (such as the group delivery format, exercise individualization, and the right choice of the exercises). View this table: [Table 5:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299953/T5) Table 5: Illustrative quotes of feedback on the conduct of the completed PR program ### Theme 4: Suggestions to improve a Future PR program Participants suggested that, for more people with CRD to benefit from the PR program, the program should continue beyond the study, more patients should be recruited, and the program should be widely implemented in Malawi. Some participants suggested that this would be possible with further funding and government support for the program. In addition, participants suggested the need to raise awareness about the intervention, with themselves even willing to be champions of that awareness. Regarding timing of the PR sessions, some participants were okay with the afternoon sessions while some participants suggested shifting them from afternoon to morning hours for their convenience. Some participants’ suggestions were about adjusting the exercise design of the PR program which included increasing the intensity, diversity/variety, number, and duration of the exercise stations. They said these adjustments could help them benefit more from the program. Some participants suggested delivering comprehensive/structured education sessions within the PR program including education on safe home-based exercises and self-management skills. View this table: [Table 6:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299953/T6) Table 6: Illustrative quotes of suggestions to improve a future PR program ### Theme 5: Program continuation/maintenance at home Motivated by PR benefits, participants were willing to continue exercising and/or being physically active at their homes, and some reported already doing so and even teaching others with similar lung conditions. However, most participants mentioned lack of equipment at home as a potential barrier to home-based exercises. On the other hand, potential enablers to home-based exercises and/or physical activities included using locally available equipment for the exercises or doing exercises that don’t require any equipment like walking or taking advantage of any available opportunities to stay physically active. View this table: [Table 7:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/15/2023.12.14.23299953/T7) Table 7: Illustrative quotes of perspectives on home-based PR program ## Discussion Participants in this study reported negative experiences of living with CRD before participating in a PR program. Those negative experiences included poor physical health (including limitations in performing ADLs), poor psychological health (including anxiety), poor social health (including social exclusion and discrimination), poor sleep health (including sleep disturbance), and frequent inhaler use, hospital visits and admissions. Similar experiences were reported by people with CRDs in Sudan and Tanzania (17). After participating in the PR program, participants reported improved experiences of CRD in all the areas above, like those in Uganda (18). CRDs pose an economic burden on patient and their households in Malawi. For example, chronic cough was found to be associated with unaffordable health-seeking costs among 608 people with CRDs (including post-TB lung disease, asthma, COPD, and bronchiectasis) in a cross-sectional community-based survey conducted in rural Malawi (19). These costs were mainly influenced by costs of transport and drugs. Therefore, the improvements in our participants’ physical activity performance and return to work, plus their reduced frequency of inhaler or medication use and hospital visits, may suggest a potentially positive economic impact of PR in Malawi for both patients and healthcare system. However, economic evaluation of PR in Malawi is yet to be conducted. In HICs, PR has proven to reduce patient and health system costs owing to reductions in exacerbations, medical visits, hospitalisation rates, and length of stay (20, 21). The participants’ positive experiences of the PR program and some participants’ suggestion to include self-management education in the program to improve it suggest that PR improvements in CRD symptoms (e.g., breathlessness, cough, and body weakness), physical issues (e.g., a sense of physical wellbeing such as body relaxation and strength, performance of activities of daily living, and return to work), social issues (e.g., ability to interact with others and participate in social or group events), psychological issues (a sense of peace of mind, and reduction in anxiety), sleep quality, health literacy, medicine use, hospital visits and hospitalisation, might be important patient-reported outcomes for PR in the Malawian population but need further investigation such as through a core outcome set (COS) study. Noteworthy, the PR delivery team in this study focused on delivering exercise training to participants during the PR sessions. Some participants’ suggestion in the current study that self-management education would have been included in the completed PR program echoes that suggests that health literacy or knowledge about their disease (including self-management) might be an important PR outcome in patients with CRDs in this setting. Self-management education is particularly recommended in the World Health Organisation’s package of essential rehabilitation interventions for patients with COPD (22). Our primary focus on delivering the exercise training component was based on evidence (largely from HICs) which presents exercise training as a cornerstone of PR that must prioritized (22) and, more recently, as one of the “essential” components of PR as it is underpinned by strong evidence (23). On the other hand, structured education, self-management training and smoking cessation support were found to be “desirable” (not essential) components of PR because strong evidence of their individual impacts is not yet available (23). Empirical investigation of the ideal PR composition in African settings such as Malawi is needed. Barriers to PR commonly reported in LMICs and HICs include travel and transport difficulties (24, 25). Therefore, transport money provision was unsurprisingly mentioned by participants of the current study as one of the PR program’s success factors, facilitating their attendance and completion of the program. However, providing transport money to patients in Malawi is currently not a sustainable strategy to ensure long-term PR uptake at a hospital due to high economic challenges in the country (the current study was funded to provide participants with transport money, which is not the case in the routine clinical practice). Therefore, our finding reinforces the growing call for alternative models of PR delivery to be investigated, including home- and community-based PR, to address the travel and transport barrier, especially in Africa (24). Encouragingly, participants of the current study expressed enthusiasm for home-based PR, and some were already continuing to exercise at home. Participants suggested that a safe and effective home-based PR program would be possible with a therapist-prescribed home exercise program, education on self-management skills, and use of locally available exercise equipment. In a randomised, controlled equivalence trial in Australia, a home-based PR program, using minimal resources (including readily available equipment in the patients’ home environment such as sit to stand from a dining chair and water bottles or bags of rice for upper limb weights) and little direct supervision, delivered short-term improvements in clinical outcomes (functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life) that were equal to or greater than those seen in a conventional centre-based PR program in people with COPD (26). However, the effectiveness and participants’ experiences of a home-based PR model in LMICs, including Malawi, need to be empirically investigated as they may differ from HICs’. Participants also mentioned good personal attributes of the PR delivery team (such as welcoming, heartwarming/warmful, cheerful, kind, polite, hardworking, and engaging or interactive) as one of the PR program’s success factors. These therapist attributes are likely to contribute to a strong therapeutic alliance, which is essential for increased patient compliance to treatment and subsequent improved patient outcomes (27, 28). However, the therapeutic alliance concept is yet to be extensively explored in the field of PR; few available PR studies have focused on patients’ (not therapists’) personality traits or characteristics (29, 30). The inconvenient timing of PR sessions is a known barrier to attending PR (25). However, some participants’ suggestion to shift PR sessions from afternoon to morning hours for their convenience in this study highlights the current challenge of providing PR that meet individual patients’ needs in Malawi. The demand for rehabilitation services in the country is high. Yet, the rehabilitation centres (including at QECH, the study setting) are currently under-staffed, under-equipped, and less spacious to serve many patients efficiently. We chose afternoon hours for the PR sessions due to some of these reasons. We, therefore, join the participants’ call for further funding and government support towards rehabilitation services (including PR) if patients’ rehabilitation needs are to be met. This aligns with the World Health Organization “Rehabilitation 2030: a Call for Action” initiative (31). ### Study strengths and limitations This qualitative study is part of the first feasibility and acceptability trial of PR in Malawi (32) and responds to other researchers’ calls for PR in Malawi (33, 34). But the theoretical transferability (35) of our findings is limited by the heterogeneity of study participants (for example, various CRDs, and comorbidities among participants including HIV infection) as well as the study having been conducted at a single site with a relatively small sample of patients. In addition, in the context of no provision of transport money, attendance and completion rates might differ. The translated participants’ quotes from Chichewa to English might have lost the original meaning (15). The interviews were conducted by TM and MMi who were also involved in the delivery of PR sessions; this might have influenced participants’ responses during the interviews. However, interview transcription and data analysis were led by the principal investigator (FMB) who had not been involved in both the delivery of the PR sessions and interviews. ## Conclusion The PR program alleviated the participants’ perceived negative impacts of CRD on their physical, social, psychological and sleep health, associated with frequent inhaler use, hospital visits and admissions. In thinking about scaling PR within the Malawian context, key challenges need to be considered including PR financing, access to care in terms of transport and timing, task-shifting to primary care and community, and balancing equipment to optimize intervention quality with sustainability beyond the current PR program. ## Authors’ contributions FMB, JR, and EC conceived and designed the study in 2018. FMB coordinated all activities of the study as the principal investigator, supervised by JR, EC, SBG, and FL. TM, BC, MMi, MMa, and BC screened and recruited patients with CRDs into the PR program. TM, BC, EC, MMi, CF, Mma, and LM delivered the PR sessions. TM and MMi interviewed the participants using a topic guide that benefited from the social science expertise of FL. FMB transcribed the interviews verbatim. FMB and TM analysed the data. FMB drafted the initial manuscript. MI, RNvZ-S, SH, MH, HS, EC, SBG, and FL critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content and its overall preparation for publication. FMB revised the manuscript accordingly. All authors read and approved the final revised draft manuscript for journal submission and are all accountable for all aspects of the work. ## Funding This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (using the UK’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) Funding) and Wellcome [221465/Z/20/Z] under the NIHR-Wellcome Partnership for Global Health Research. ## Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. ## Data Availability Raw data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. * Received December 14, 2023. * Revision received December 14, 2023. * Accepted December 15, 2023. * © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ## References 1. 1.Bolton CE, Bevan-Smith EF, Blakey JD, Crowe P, Elkin SL, Garrod R, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults. Thorax. 2013;68 Suppl 2:ii1-30. 2. 2.Dowman L, Hill CJ, May A, Holland AE. Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;2(2):Cd006322. 3. 3.Morris NR, Kermeen FD, Jones AW, Lee JY, Holland AE. Exercise-based rehabilitation programmes for pulmonary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;3(3):Cd011285. 4. 4.Osadnik CR, Gleeson C, McDonald VM, Holland AE. Pulmonary rehabilitation versus usual care for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;8(8):Cd013485. 5. 5.Radtke T, Nevitt SJ, Hebestreit H, Kriemler S. Physical exercise training for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):Cd002768. 6. 6.Lee AL, Gordon CS, Osadnik CR. Exercise training for bronchiectasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;4(4):Cd013110. 7. 7.Granger CL, McDonald CF, Berney S, Chao C, Denehy L. Exercise intervention to improve exercise capacity and health related quality of life for patients with Non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2011;72(2):139–53. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.006&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21316790&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000290194300001&link_type=ISI) 8. 8.Langer D. Rehabilitation in Patients before and after Lung Transplantation. Respiration. 2015;89(5):353–62. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000430451&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 9. 9.Ando M, Mori A, Esaki H, Shiraki T, Uemura H, Okazawa M, et al. The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with post-tuberculosis lung disorder. Chest. 2003;123(6):1988–95. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1378/chest.123.6.1988&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12796179&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000183519000035&link_type=ISI) 10. 10.Vieira A, Pinto A, Garcia B, Eid RAC, Mól CG, Nawa RK. Telerehabilitation improves physical function and reduces dyspnoea in people with COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 conditions: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2022;68(2):90–8. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 11. 11.Johnston K, Grimmer-Somers K. Pulmonary rehabilitation: overwhelming evidence but lost in translation? Physiother Can. 2010;62(4):368–73. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21886377&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 12. 12.Bickton FM, Fombe C, Chisati E, Rylance J. Evidence for pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic respiratory diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020;24(10):991–9. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5588/ijtld.19.0526&link_type=DOI) 13. 13.Bickton FM, Mankhokwe T, Nightingale R, Fombe C, Mitengo M, Mwahimba L, et al. Protocol for a single-centre mixed-method pre-post single-arm feasibility trial of a culturally appropriate 6-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme among adults with functionally limiting chronic respiratory diseases in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e057538. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYm1qb3BlbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTIvMS9lMDU3NTM4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTIvMTUvMjAyMy4xMi4xNC4yMzI5OTk1My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 14. 14. BICKTON F, Mankhokwe T, Mitengo M, Limbani F, Shannon H, Rylance J, et al.?My life is not going to be the same, my health is going to improve?: a cross-sectional qualitative study of patients? experiences of living with chronic respiratory symptoms and their views on a proposed pulmonary rehabilitation program at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi [version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]. Wellcome Open Research. 2022;7(70). 15. 15.van Nes F, Abma T, Jonsson H, Deeg D. Language differences in qualitative research: is meaning lost in translation? Eur J Ageing. 2010;7(4):313–6. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21212820&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 16. 16.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1191/1478088706qp063oa&link_type=DOI) 17. 17.Egere U, Shayo EH, Chinouya M, Taegtmeyer M, Ardrey J, Mpagama S, et al. “Honestly, this problem has affected me a lot”: a qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of people with chronic respiratory disease in Sudan and Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):485. 18. 18.Jones R, Muyinda H, Nyakoojo G, Kirenga B, Katagira W, Pooler J. Does pulmonary rehabilitation alter patients’ experiences of living with chronic respiratory disease? A qualitative study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:2375–85. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2147/COPD.S165623&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 19. 19.Sichali JM, Khan JAK, Gama EM, Banda HT, Namakhoma I, Bongololo G, et al. Direct costs of illness of patients with chronic cough in rural Malawi—Experiences from Dowa and Ntchisi districts. PLoS One. 2020;14(12):e0225712. 20. 20.Atsou K, Crequit P, Chouaid C, Hejblum G. Simulation-Based Estimates of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in France. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0156514. 21. 21.Mosher CL, Nanna MG, Jawitz OK, Raman V, Farrow NE, Aleem S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Among US Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2218189. 22. 22. World Health O. Package of interventions for rehabilitation: module 4: cardiopulmonary conditions: web annex: literature reviews and evidence tables. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 2023. 23. 23.Holland AE, Cox NS, Houchen-Wolloff L, Rochester CL, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, et al. Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(5):e12–e29. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 24. 24.Bickton FM, Shannon H. Barriers and Enablers to Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Professionals. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022;17:141–53. [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 25. 25.Keating A, Lee A, Holland AE. What prevents people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from attending pulmonary rehabilitation? A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2011;8(2):89–99. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1479972310393756&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21596892&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 26. 26.Anne EH, Ajay M, Catherine JH, Annemarie LL, Angela TB, Narelle SC, et al. Home-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: a randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2017;72(1):57. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToidGhvcmF4am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjcyLzEvNTciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8xMi8xNS8yMDIzLjEyLjE0LjIzMjk5OTUzLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 27. 27.Leach MJ. Rapport: a key to treatment success. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005;11(4):262–5. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.05.005&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16290897&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 28. 28.Ackerman SJ, Hilsenroth MJ. A review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review. 2003;23(1):1–33. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0272-7358(02)00146-0&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12559992&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000180683600001&link_type=ISI) 29. 29.Caille P, Alexandre F, Molinier V, Heraud N. The role of personality traits in inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation response in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2021;190:106680. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106680&link_type=DOI) 30. 30.Hayton C, Clark A, Olive S, Browne P, Galey P, Knights E, et al. Barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation: Characteristics that predict patient attendance and adherence. Respir Med. 2013;107(3):401–7. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.rmed.2012.11.016&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23261311&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 31. 31.Gimigliano F, Negrini S. The World Health Organization “Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action”. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(2):155–68. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04746-3&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom) 32. 32. Fanuel Meckson B, Talumba M, Rebecca N, Cashon F, Martha M, Langsfield M, et al. Protocol for a single-centre mixed-method pre–post single-arm feasibility trial of a culturally appropriate 6-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme among adults with functionally limiting chronic respiratory diseases in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e057538. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYm1qb3BlbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTIvMS9lMDU3NTM4IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTIvMTUvMjAyMy4xMi4xNC4yMzI5OTk1My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 33. 33.Rebecca N, Beatrice C, Maia L, Sarah JR, Bright M, Ndaziona Peter Kwanjo B, et al. Respiratory symptoms and lung function in patients treated for pulmonary tuberculosis in Malawi: a prospective cohort study. Thorax. 2022;77(11):1131. 34. 34.Jamilah M, Maia L, Elizabeth J, Peter B, Jamie R, Stephen G, et al. Patient outcomes associated with post-tuberculosis lung damage in Malawi: a prospective cohort study. Thorax. 2020;75(3):269. [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToidGhvcmF4am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6Ijc1LzMvMjY5IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTIvMTUvMjAyMy4xMi4xNC4yMzI5OTk1My5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 35. 35.Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–4. [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F15%2F2023.12.14.23299953.atom)