Ketamine treatment modulates habenular and nucleus accumbens static and dynamic functional connectivity in major depression
===========================================================================================================================

* Brandon Taraku
* Joana R. Loureiro
* Ashish K. Sahib
* Artemis Zavaliangos-Petropulu
* Noor Al-Sharif
* Amber Leaver
* Benjamin Wade
* Shantanu Joshi
* Roger P. Woods
* Randall Espinoza
* Katherine L. Narr

## Abstract

Dysfunctional reward processing in major depressive disorder (MDD) involves functional circuitry of the habenula (Hb) and nucleus accumbens (NAc). Ketamine elicits rapid antidepressant and alleviates anhedonia in MDD. To clarify how ketamine perturbs reward circuitry in MDD, we examined how serial ketamine infusions (SKI) modulate static and dynamic functional connectivity (FC) in Hb and NAc networks. MDD participants (n=58, mean age=40.7 years, female=28) received four ketamine infusions (0.5mg/kg) 2-3 times weekly. Resting-state fMRI scans and clinical assessments were collected at baseline and 24 hours post-SKI completion. Static FC (sFC) and dynamic FC variability (dFCv) were calculated from left and right Hb and NAc seeds to all other brain regions. Paired t-tests examined changes in FC pre-to-post SKI, and correlations were used to determine relationships between FC changes with mood and anhedonia. Following SKI, significant increases in left Hb-bilateral visual cortex FC, decreases in left Hb-left inferior parietal cortex FC, and decreases in left NAc-right cerebellum FC occurred. Decreased dFCv between left Hb and right precuneus and visual cortex, and decreased dFCv between right NAc and right visual cortex both significantly correlated with improvements in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Decreased FC between left Hb and bilateral visual/parietal cortices as well as increased FC between left NAc and right visual/parietal cortices both significantly correlated with improvements in anhedonia. Subanesthetic ketamine modulates functional pathways linking the Hb and NAc with visual, parietal, and cerebellar regions. Overlapping effects between Hb and NAc functional systems were associated with ketamine’s therapeutic response.

## Introduction

Major depression, characterized by low mood and a loss of pleasure and interest in activities (anhedonia) amongst other symptoms, affects at least 5% of adults worldwide1. Though treatable, only one third of patients remit after receiving first-line antidepressants that take weeks to months to induce clinical benefits. About 30-40% of patients still fail to remit2,3 after multiple treatment trials and are characterized as having treatment resistant depression (TRD). Anhedonia, a core symptom of depression, has been linked with deficits in reward processing regions of the brain4,5. Even amongst patients who remit or respond to standard antidepressants, anhedonic symptoms often persist6,7. Anhedonia and reward processing deficits are shown to predict treatment resistance8,9, risk of suicide10–12 and negatively impact quality of life in people with depression13,14.

Ketamine acts as a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (glutamate) receptor (NMDAR) antagonist that is widely used as an anesthetic in medicine. More recently, subanesthetic ketamine has been shown to rapidly reduce depressive and suicidal symptoms in patients with TRD, though treatment response is typically transient (∼1 week)15–18. In contrast to monoaminergic antidepressants, ketamine also effectively reduces symptoms of anhedonia where benefits appear to outlast and be independent of overall antidepressant outcomes19–22. Moreover, ketamine treatment is shown to result in improvements in anticipatory, consummatory, and motivation-related reward processes that are considered dimensions of anhedonia in humans and in animal models19.

Though the molecular mechanisms of ketamine’s antidepressant action are not yet resolved, available data supports that NMDAR blockade and potentially NMDA independent mechanisms lead to the subsequent activation of downstream signaling pathways to induce rapid dendritic and synaptic remodeling16,17,23. These processes of neural plasticity are assumed to then evolve to higher brain systems-level reorganization to influence behavior, including modulation of downstream monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems targeted by standard antidepressants24–28.

Preclinical studies suggest that ketamine’s therapeutic effects are at least partially mediated by molecular/cellular changes within the mesolimbic system29. The mesolimbic pathway, connecting the midbrain and ventral tegmental area (VTA) with the ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens (NAc) and other limbic and cortical areas, is repeatedly shown to drive reward-related behavior4,5,30,31. The NAc, a key node of dopaminergic reward circuitry, is widely implicated in the pathophysiology of depression32,33 and mediates positive valence-related emotional response and reward processing4,31,34–39. Furthermore, functional connectivity (FC) between the NAc and prefrontal cortex is shown to relate to anhedonia in depression35,38 and antidepressant response40.

Another key region involved in reward behavior that may be relevant to the therapeutic mechanisms of ketamine is the habenula (Hb) located near the posterior and medial region of the thalamus41. The lateral component of the habenula (LHb) projects to dopaminergic VTA and serotonergic raphe nucleus, where it inhibits monoaminergic activity, therefore regulating reward behavior42,43 and is often referred to as the ‘anti-reward’ system42,44. Preclinical and human studies strongly implicate LHb dysfunction as contributing to depression and anhedonia, and suggest its involvement in antidepressant response42,43,45–47. Furthermore, the blockade of LHb NMDAR bursting activity is specifically linked with the rapid antidepressant action of ketamine in preclinical models48,49, supporting the hypothesis that ketamine’s therapeutic effects involve modulation of reward-related networks. In humans, a recent resting state fMRI study (rsfMRI) reported that increased FC between the Hb and frontal pole, occipital pole/cortex, temporal pole and parahippocampal gyrus associated with antidepressant response following single-dose ketamine50.

The literature supports the role of the NAc and Hb in reward dysfunction in MDD and suggests that ketamine may target these deficits. To further understand how ketamine modulates antidepressant and reward-related brain circuitry, the current investigation addressed how FC of the NAc and Hb to other brain regions are modulated by ketamine at the brain systems level. Although a majority of rsfMRI studies have looked at FC by investigating a fixed relationship between brain regions over multiple minutes, FC is not necessarily static. Rather, the connectivity between brain regions experience fluctuations over short time periods, which has motivated the investigation of dynamic FC51–53. Dynamic FC investigations can be used to measure temporal variations of connectivity strength, and disruptions in dynamic FC have been implicated in various psychiatric disorders including MDD54–57. Therefore, in addition to examining changes in static FC (sFC), dynamic FC was investigated by measuring dynamic FC variability (dFCv), defined as the standard deviation of FC across a series of windowed timeseries throughout fMRI acquisition. To accomplish this goal, advanced rsfMRI acquisition and computational analysis methods were combined to determine whether Hb or NAc to whole brain FC change over time and associate with improvements in mood and anhedonia in TRD participants receiving serial ketamine infusion (SKI) treatment. Based on the limited prior literature50,58, we hypothesized that changes in NAc and Hb FC with frontal, temporal and occipital regions would change over time and associate with improved mood or anhedonia.

## Methods and Materials

### Participants

Fifty-eight depressed participants (average age=40.7 years, 28 female) participated in this naturalistic clinical trial ([NCT02165449](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT02165449&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom)) ([https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02165449](https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02165449)). Participants received four serial intravenous ketamine infusions over the course of 2 weeks. MRI scanning and clinical and behavioral data were acquired 1) prior to treatment (baseline), occurring <1 week before the first ketamine infusion, and 2) 24 hours after the last ketamine infusion **(**Figure 1**)**.

![Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F1)

Figure 1. 
Overview of study design. Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) patients received MRI scans (T1w, T2w, resting-state fMRI) at baseline, and 24 to 72 hours after receiving 4 intravenous ketamine infusions, over a 2 week period.

Participants were included if they met criteria for TRD, which was defined as nonresponse to ≥2 adequate antidepressant trials of adequate dosage and duration, and being continuously depressed for ≥6 months. Additional eligibility criteria for participants included DSM-V-defined major depression59, moderate to severe depressive symptoms as per the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) 17-item (scores ≥ 17)60, no prior psychotic reactions to medications, alcoholic or illicit substances in the past, or other physical or clinical contraindications to ketamine. Exclusion criteria included any unstable medical or neurological condition, current substance abuse or dependence (measured by laboratory testing) or substance abuse history within the preceding 3-months, current or past history of psychosis, schizophrenia, intellectual disability or other developmental disorder, diagnosis of dementia and any contraindication to scanning (e.g., metal implants or claustrophobia). Subjects were recruited from the Los Angeles area through advertisements, clinician referral or clinicaltrials.gov. All subjects provided written informed consent following procedures approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board (IRB).

### Ketamine Treatment

Ketamine treatment was administered 2-3 times a week and included intravenous pump delivery of a sub-anesthetic dose (0.5 mg/kg) of racemic ketamine diluted in 60cc normal saline. Participants were permitted to remain on approved monoaminergic antidepressant therapy if dosage was unchanged in the preceding 6-weeks. Benzodiazepines were discontinued >72 hours prior to all study visits including scanning sessions.

### Clinical Assessments

At each time point, depression severity was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)60, and anhedonia was measured with the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)61. Remitters were defined as Participants with a HDRS score of ≤7 post-SKI treatment.

### Image Acquisition

Imaging was performed on a Siemens 3T Prisma MRI system at the UCLA Brain Mapping Center using a 32-channel head coil. Imaging sequences were identical to those used by the Human Connectome Project (HCP) Lifespan studies for Aging and Development62. Structural sequences included T1-weighted (voxel size (VS)=0.8mm isotropic; repetition time (TR)=2500ms; echo time (TE)=1.81:1.79:7.18ms; inversion time (TI)=1000ms; flip angle (34)=8.0°; acquisition time (TA)=8:22min), and T2-weighted acquisitions (VS=0.8mm isotropic; TR=3200ms; TE=564ms; TA=6:35min), both with real-time motion correction63. Resting state fMRI used a multi-band EPI sequence with opposite phase encoding directions over two runs (VS=2mm isotropic; TR=800ms; TE=37ms, FA=52°, MB accl. factor=8; phase enc. direction=AP(run1)/PA (run2); TA=13:22 min), along with two sets of spin echo images used for distortion correction64,65. During rsfMRI, subjects viewed a fixation cross.

### Image Processing and Denoising

Imaging data was preprocessed using the HCP minimal processing pipelines66. Processing of rsfMRI data included ICA-based denoising using FSL’s multi-run FIX ([https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FIX](https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FIX)), and alignment using MSMAll67. Further denoising was performed using the CONN Toolbox68, which included component-based noise correction (CompCor) and band-pass filtering. A band-pass filter of [0.015 -0.1] Hz was used to remove high-frequency noise and low-frequency activity with a period exceeding the duration of sliding windows while still preserving relevant low frequency signal, as done in prior studies51,54,69. Specific frequency ranges were used since prior research suggests that the window length for sliding window analyses should be no less than 1/*fmin* (the minimum frequency in the timeseries, defined by the band-pass filter) to prevent spurious correlations51. Images were then converted to CIFTI space with 4mm smoothing using the grayordinates-based approach70. The quality of the functional data was assessed using relative and absolute motion plots. All subjects moved less than 3mm, therefore, no subjects were excluded.

### Hb and NAc Seed Generation

For each subject and timepoint, the right and left habenula were segmented using validated methods71,72. To generate more reliable segmentations and to obtain a single segmentation mask for each subject per hemisphere, the high-resolution segmented Hb maps were averaged across timepoints for each subject. Signals from 3mm spheres located in adjacent thalamic nuclei were regressed out from each Hb seed to prevent signal contamination71. The Harvard-Oxford atlas ([https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Atlases](https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Atlases)) was used to obtain left and right NAc masks in standard space. Using the segmented and atlas defined Hb and NAc masks, the average timeseries was extracted from the denoised images for all subjects and timepoints to generate Hb and NAc seeds.

### Resting-State Connectivity Maps

The average Hb and NAc timeseries were used to generate seed-based sFC and dFCv maps in CIFTI space. Seed-based sFC maps were generated using HCP workbench commands73 ([https://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command](https://www.humanconnectome.org/software/workbench-command)) to calculate the correlation between the timeseries from the seeds and every other vertex and voxel in the brain, followed by fisher-z transformation.

Seed-based dFCv maps were calculated using the sliding-windows analysis approach51,74,75, implemented using in-house code developed in Python ([https://github.com/btaraku/SeedBased\_dynamic_FC](https://github.com/btaraku/SeedBased_dynamic_FC)). Window length is an important parameter, since sliding windows should be short enough to identify resting-state fMRI fluctuations, while also being long enough to avoid detecting spurious correlations. We opted to follow similar temporal filtering and window lengths to another study using high resolution HCP fMRI data69. The higher temporal resolution fMRI used in this study enables us to sample a larger number of TRs within a shorter window of time compared to prior dFCv studies55,56,76, since more data points decrease the influence of noise on the correlation estimates51. Here, we used a window length of 84 TRs (approximately 67 seconds) since this is no less than 1/*fmin*51. Additionally, we used a Hamming window, since tapered window functions may limit detecting outlier points near window boundaries51,53,56, and used a step size of 1 TR (0.8 seconds). Correlations were computed across all vertices and voxels within each window and were followed by fisher-z transformation. Once correlations were generated for all windows, the sample standard deviation was calculated across windows to calculate dFCv, which were then converted back to CIFTI grayordinate space. dFCv results were validated by trying different window lengths (125 TRs (100 seconds) and 63 TRs (50s)). Figure 2 provides a flow chart of the imaging processing and fMRI analysis steps used to generate seed-based sFC and dFCv maps in CIFTI space.

![Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F2)

Figure 2. 
Overview of fMRI processing. Resting-state fMRI was preprocessed using HCP protocols, which includes motion correction, correcting for EPI induced distortions and the conversion to CIFTI grayordinate space, and was followed by further denoising in the CONN toolbox. Habenula masks were acquired for each subject following an automated segmentation protocol using T1w and T2w images, while the Nucleus Accumbens masks were obtained from the Harvard-Oxford atlas in standard space and were used for all subjects. The average fMRI timeseries was extracted from each seed mask and used to generate whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) maps. Static FC was computed directly from the extracted timeseries, whereas dynamic FC variability was computed after running a sliding window analysis.

### Statistical Analyses

To examine ketamine’s effect on our clinical measures of interest, paired t-tests were performed to determine whether HDRS or SHAPS scores significantly changed in participants following SKI.

Voxelwise group level analyses were conducted in PALM77 ([https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/PALM](https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/PALM)) and designed to test two primary hypotheses: 1) effects over time pre-to-post SKI in participants, and 2) associations between change in FC and change in mood and anhedonia. All analyses were run using 5000 randomly generated permutations, using Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement (TFCE) and Family-wise error rate correction (FWER). Age and sex were included as covariates of no interest in all analyses.

To test for longitudinal changes following SKI, the baseline sFC and dFCv maps were subtracted from the post-treatment sFC and dFCv maps to compute change across time for each subject, which were then used to run a 1-sample t-test in PALM.

To test whether sFC or dFCv changes were significantly associated with improvements in depressive symptoms and anhedonia, correlations between change in sFC and dFCv and percent change in each clinical score (HDRS, SHAPS) was calculated at every vertex/voxel using PALM. To prevent spurious correlations, outliers with extreme values (+/-3 standard deviations from the mean) were removed prior to running PALM. As a result, one subject was removed from the HDRS correlation analysis and one subject was removed from the SHAPS correlation analysis. One additional subject was removed from both analyses due to missing clinical data. For visualization of effects, the average change was extracted from significantly correlated brain regions (TFCE/FWER corrected) and used to map associations with changes in mood on a scatter plot. Post-hoc correlations were calculated in MATLAB using partial correlations controlling for age and sex.

## Results

### Demographic and Clinical Results

Participants with TRD showed significant improvements in both HDRS (t=-13.496, p=4.3e-19), and SHAPS (t=7.64, p=3.27e-10) scores following SKI treatment. Of the 58 participants that completed SKI, 29 reached remission status. **Table 1** shows an overview of participant demographics and symptom changes over time following SKI.

View this table:
[Table 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/T1)

Table 1 Demographics and clinical values by group and time point.

### Effect of treatment on Hb and NAc FC

Significant increases in sFC were found between the left Hb and bilateral visual cortex, as well as significant decreases in sFC between the left Hb and left inferior parietal cortex. Significant decreases in sFC were found between the left NAc and right cerebellum (all p<0.05, TFCE/FWER corrected) (Figure 3). No significant changes in dFCv were observed over time.

![Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F3)

Figure 3. 
Longitudinal effects of ketamine treatment on functional connectivity. Paired t-tests comparing FC change before and after ketamine treatment revealed **(A)** significant increases in static FC between the left Habenula (Hb) and bilateral visual cortex, **(B)** significant decreases in static FC between the HbL and left inferior parietal cortex, and **(C)** significant decreases in static FC between the left Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) and right cerebellum (all p<0.05, FWER and TFCE corrected). Boxplots show average static FC before and after ketamine treatment averaged within significant regions across all treatment resistant depression (TRD) participants. Brain images include results in surface and voxel space, and display corrected p-values overlaid on top of uncorrected p-values, in order to show trends. *Acronyms: (sFC: static Functional Connectivity, Hb: Habenula, NAc: Nucleus Accumbens, SKI: Serial Ketamine Infusions, TFCE: Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement, FWER: Family-wise error rate)*

### Associations between changes in FC and changes in clinical symptoms

Decreases in dFCv between the left Hb, right precuneus and right visual cortex, as well as between the right NAc and right visual cortex were both significantly correlated with improvements in HDRS following SKI (Figure 4). Results of this analysis using different window lengths can be seen in **Supplemental Figure 1**. Decreases in sFC between the left Hb and bilateral visual and parietal cortex, right precuneus, right angular gyrus, right fusiform gyrus and right somatomotor cortex were significantly correlated with improvements in SHAPS following SKI. Increases in sFC between the left NAc and left visual cortex, left parietal cortex, and right fusiform gyrus were significantly correlated with improvements in SHAPS following SKI (Figure 5) (all p<0.05, TFCE/FWER corrected).

![Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F4.medium.gif)

[Figure 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F4)

Figure 4. 
Associations between changes in dynamic functional connectivity variability (dFCv) and improvements in depressive symptoms following ketamine treatment. Whole brain correlations were performed to investigate how FC changes were associated with improvements in HDRS scores. Results revealed that decreases in dFCv between **(A)** the left Habenula (Hb) and right precuneus and visual cortex, as well as decreases in dFCv between the **(B)** right Nucleus Accumbens (NAc) and right visual cortex were significantly associated with improvements in HDRS (all p<0.05, FWER and TFCE corrected). Overlapping effects between the Hb and NAc were observed within a region of the right visual cortex. Average dFCv change was calculated within significant regions to create scatter plots between dFCv and HDRS change, in order to visualize the overall effects within these regions. R and P values are shown on each scatter plot, and brain images show corrected p-values overlaid on top of uncorrected p-values to display trending effects. *Acronyms: (FC: functional connectivity dFCv: dynamic FC variability, Hb: Habenula, NAc: Nucleus Accumbens, TFCE: Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement, FWER: Family-wise error rate)*

![Figure 5.](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F5.medium.gif)

[Figure 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/12/04/2023.12.01.23299282/F5)

Figure 5. 
Associations between changes in static functional connectivity (sFC) and improvements in anhedonia following ketamine treatment. Whole brain correlations were performed to investigate how FC changes were associated with improvements in anhedonic symptoms using the SHAPS. Results revealed that decreases in sFC between **(A)** the left habenula (Hb) and bilateral visual and parietal cortex as well as the right precuneus, right temporoparietal junction, right fusiform gyrus and right somatomotor cortex were significantly associated with improvements in SHAPS. Additionally, increases in sFC between **(B)** the left nucleus accumbens (NAc) and left visual and parietal cortex, as well as the right fusiform gyrus were significantly associated with improvements in SHAPS (all p<0.05, FWER and TFCE corrected). Overlapping effects between the Hb and NAc were observed within regions of the left visual and parietal cortex, as well as the right fusiform gyrus. Average sFC change was calculated within significant regions to create scatter plots between sFC and SHAPS change to visualize the pattern of effects within these regions. R and P values are shown on each scatter plot, and brain images show corrected p-values overlaid on top of uncorrected p-values to display trending effects. *Acronyms: (FC: functional connectivity sFC: static FC, Hb: Habenula, NAc: Nucleus Accumbens, TFCE: Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement, FWER: Family-wise error rate)*

## Discussion

Recent evidence suggests that sub-anesthetic ketamine may modulate the brain’s reward systems to reduce depressive symptoms and anhedonia19–22. In this study, we used advanced image analysis methods to study how functional connectivity of brain networks involving the Hb and NAc, key nodes of reward circuitry previously implicated in the neurobiology of depression45,48,78, are perturbed after SKI treatment in participants with TRD, and to investigate whether FC changes relate to improvements in mood and anhedonia. To address these questions, we acquired high resolution HCP resting-state fMRI data and used state-of-the-art preprocessing pipelines, followed by seed-to-whole brain analyses to examine static and dynamic functional connectivity.

We observed significant changes in sFC following SKI that included increases between left Hb and bilateral visual cortex, decreases between left Hb and left posterior parietal cortex, as well as decreases in sFC between the left NAc and right cerebellum. Furthermore, reduced dFCv between the left Hb and contralateral precuneus and visual cortex and reduced dFCv between right NAc and visual cortex were found to be significantly associated with antidepressant response. In addition, increases in sFC between the left Hb and bilateral parietal and visual regions, and reductions in sFC between left NAc and left parietal and visual regions were found to be significantly associated with improvements in anhedonia specifically. Together these findings suggest ketamine’s therapeutic effects occur via overlap in the functional circuitry of the Hb and NAc.

### Effect of treatment on Hb and NAc FC

Significant increases in sFC between the Hb and the visual cortex were observed over the course of SKI treatment in TRD participants. To date, the majority of published FC studies of depression have focused on examining differences in large-scale functional networks such as the DMN, salience (SN) and fronto-parietal/central executive (FPN/CEN) and limbic networks. However, alterations in visual networks have also been associated with depression79,80. Further, three studies from our own group employing different imaging modalities and including an overlapping TRD sample have reported ketamine-related modulation of visual areas, including changes in BOLD activation during a response inhibition task81, increases in cerebral blood flow82, and changes in white matter microstructure within occipital white matter pathways83. Notably, one of the few published studies investigating the effects of ketamine on habenula FC found that increases in sFC between the habenula and occipital pole and lateral visual cortex following a single ketamine infusion significantly correlated with improvements in subjectively rated depressive symptoms50. Another prior study found that MDD participants exhibited decreased long range functional connectivity density in several regions of the visual cortex compared to controls, highlighting that the visual cortex may be an important network hub for MDD treatment84. These findings combined with those of the current study suggest that changes in subcortical and visual networks contribute to ketamine’s antidepressant effects.

We also observed decreases in sFC between Hb and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) following ketamine treatment in TRD participants. The IPL is contained within the posterior parietal cortex (PPC)85, which forms a key node within the frontoparietal network (FPN). The FPN is involved in the top-down regulation of attention and emotion and nodes within the FPN generally show hypoconnectivity in depression86. Thus, perturbation of Hb-FPN circuitry by ketamine may contribute to its antidepressant effects.

Decreases in sFC between the nucleus accumbens and cerebellum were also observed pre-to-post ketamine in TRD participants. Although the cerebellum is classically viewed as involved in motor coordination, much evidence shows the cerebellum also contributes to cognitive and emotional function87,88. fMRI studies suggest the cerebellum and basal ganglia are strongly interconnected, forming a network involved in reward and learning89. Several studies have found functional abnormalities in cerebellar circuitry in depressed participants90–92. In addition, we have previously found that ketamine treatment induces functional changes in the cerebellum during a response inhibition task-fMRI93. The current findings thus further implicate cerebellar-striatal circuitry as a target for antidepressant treatments.

### Associations with clinical response

Since longitudinal changes may be the consequence of biological effects independent of antidepressant effects, we examined whether changes in Hb and NAc circuitry associated with improvements in depressive symptoms and anhedonia. We found that changes in both sFC and dFCv were associated with improvements in overall mood and anhedonia. While sFC measures temporal correlations and can determine whether there is a strong or weak excitatory or inhibitory relationship between brain regions, dFCv determines the degree of fluctuations in connectivity strength between brain regions, which are also reported as relevant to psychiatric disease states54–56,94–97. Prior studies have reported differences in dynamic FC from the Hb95 and striatum56,57 in depressed participants when compared to healthy controls, further highlighting dynamic alterations in reward circuitry as a potential biomarker for MDD.

Our findings show that greater decreases in dFCv between Hb, precuneus and visual cortex, as well as between NAc and visual cortex, are associated with greater treatment response to ketamine. Although we also found that ketamine treatment significantly increases sFC between Hb and visual cortex, these findings together do not necessarily conflict. Rather, decreases in dFCv implies less temporal variability in connectivity strength, which suggests a convergence towards a stable connectivity value within these networks as depressive symptoms improve. Furthermore, these two findings could be considered complementary, since we observed a small overlap between these two regions, and it is possible that the observed increases in Hb-visual cortex FC could lead to downstream effects that result in reductions of FC variability across broader regions of the visual cortex.

Although several previous studies have investigated dynamic FC alterations in MDD within reward circuitry, no previous studies to our knowledge have investigated how dynamic FC is altered in Hb or NAc networks in MDD following ketamine treatment. One study investigating ketamine’s effect on dynamic FC in non-depressed healthy controls using whole brain atlases found that ketamine produces an overall negative effect on dynamic FC within visual networks98, which complement our results. Since we observed associations in overlapping regions of the left visual cortex for both Hb and NAc seeds, this suggests dynamic visual cortex activity may contribute to reward circuitry, and ketamine’s antidepressant effects could stabilize activity between these visual and reward networks. Further research is necessary to understand the precise biological mechanism driving the interplay between visual and reward systems that may underlie ketamine’s antidepressant effects.

Improvements in depressive symptoms were also correlated with changes in dFCv between the Hb and precuneus. The precuneus is a key node of the DMN, which has been widely implicated in major depression99–101, and is often associated with self-referential thinking and ruminative symptoms of depression102,103. Dynamic FC disruptions in the DMN have been reported in MDD, including studies that have found decreases in dFCv within core DMN components54,104, and increases in dFCv between DMN and other brain regions including dlPFC and insula, which also correlated with symptom severity54 in depressed individuals compared with controls. However, another study reported increased dFCv within the core DMN components in depressed participants compared to controls105. Of relevance to this study, greater dFCv between the habenula and right precuneus was found in depressed participants with suicide ideation compared to healthy controls, although opposite trends were found for the contralateral precuneus95. Interestingly, the precuneus is also suggested to be involved in the dissociative effects induced by ketamine, where reductions in oscillations measured by electroencephalography in the precuneus are associated with dissociation106,107. Thus, it may be the case that ketamine’s antidepressant effects and dissociative effects are driven by similar neural mechanisms. In conjunction with prior findings, our results suggest that ketamine’s antidepressant effects may modulate dynamic FC disruptions between the Hb and precuneus.

Decreases in sFC between Hb and posterior parietal and visual cortex, angular gyrus, precuneus, motor cortex, and fusiform gyrus, as well as increases in sFC between NAc and overlapping regions in the visual cortex, parietal cortex and fusiform gyrus were associated with improvements in anhedonia. The NAc forms an integral part of the brain’s reward circuitry and shows hypoactivity in depression, whereas the Hb is part of the antireward system and shows hyperactivity in depression. Our results suggest the anti-anhedonic effects of ketamine are driven by perturbations of aberrant reward circuitry; increasing NAc and subsequently decreasing Hb connectivity in broadly distributed overlapping and distinct brain regions. The overlapping regions occurred primarily in the visual cortex, posterior parietal cortex and fusiform gyrus. Relevant to our findings, a prior study found reduced FC between NAc and IPL in participants with depression and also found a significant interaction between anhedonia and diagnosis on FC between NAc and IPL35, highlighting that parietal regions may contribute to anhedonic symptoms.

In addition to visuo-parietal regions, significant decreases in FC between Hb and the precuneus and angular gyrus, key nodes of the DMN, were correlated with improvements in anhedonia. Of relevance to this finding, a prior study reported hyperconnectivity between the habenula and precuneus which was associated with suicidality in TRD47. Thus, our results suggest ketamine normalizes hyperconnectivity between Hb and DMN. Decreases in Hb and somatomotor cortex FC were also found to be significantly associated with improvements in anhedonia. Prior imaging studies have reported altered FC of somatosensory and somatomotor networks correlate with depressive symptoms, including suicidality108,109. Preclinical studies also suggest Hb inhibition of dopamine neurons leads to suppression of body movements and to lowered motivation110.

### Limitations

We acknowledge that there are several limitations associated with the current investigation. Firstly, the Hb is a small structure, and the spatial resolution of imaging protocols may still be inadequate for fully capturing structural and functional changes in this region even when using advanced acquisition and preprocessing methods. We also note that the current study was not a randomized clinical trial and did not include an active control condition. However, we note that this was designed as a mechanistic clinical trial focused on imaging outcomes rather than on the efficacy of SKI. Also, participants were allowed to continue concurrent stable antidepressant medication, which may have impacted findings although we note that participants serve as their own controls in longitudinal analyses and did not change medication throughout the trial.

### Conclusion

Serial ketamine treatment in TRD modulates static and dynamic FC in both overlapping and distinct Hb and NAc functional networks. SKI produces distinct static FC changes from Hb and NAc seeds in TRD participants, whereas static and dynamic FC changes associated with clinical response occurred in broader overlapping regions from Hb and NAc seeds, suggesting that antidepressant response to SKI involves reward, sensory and self-referential networks.

## Supporting information

Suuplemental Figure 1 [[supplements/299282_file07.docx]](pending:yes)

## Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are publicly available in the NIMH Data Archive in collection 2844

[https://nda.nih.gov/edit\_collection.html?id=2844](https://nda.nih.gov/edit_collection.html?id=2844) 

## Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (Grant Nos. MH110008 [to KLN and RE], and MH102743 [to KLN]). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

*   Received December 1, 2023.
*   Revision received December 1, 2023.
*   Accepted December 4, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.GBD Results. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation [https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/](https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/).
    
    

2.  2.Gaynes, B. N., M. D...M.., et al. What did STAR*D teach us? Results from a large-scale, practical, clinical trial for patients with depression. Psychiatr. Serv. 60, 1439–1445 (2009).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/appi.ps.60.11.1439&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19880458&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000271393200006&link_type=ISI) 

3.  3.Warden, D., Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Fava, M. & Wisniewski, S. R. The STAR*D Project results: a comprehensive review of findings. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 9, 449–459 (2007).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11920-007-0061-3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18221624&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

4.  4.Gorwood, P. Neurobiological mechanisms of anhedonia. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 10, 291–299 (2008).
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18979942&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

5.  5.Nestler, E. J. Role of the Brain’s Reward Circuitry in Depression: Transcriptional Mechanisms. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 124, 151–170 (2015).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/bs.irn.2015.07.003&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26472529&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

6.  6.Treadway, M. T. & Zald, D. H. Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 537–555 (2011).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20603146&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000286639900014&link_type=ISI) 

7.  7.Cao, B. et al. Pharmacological interventions targeting anhedonia in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 92, 109–117 (2019).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.01.002&link_type=DOI) 

8.  8.Uher, R. et al. Depression symptom dimensions as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome: replicable evidence for interest-activity symptoms. Psychol. Med. 42, 967–980 (2012).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1017/S0033291711001905&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21929846&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

9.  9.Morris, B. H., Bylsma, L. M. & Rottenberg, J. Does emotion predict the course of major depressive disorder? A review of prospective studies. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 48, 255–273 (2009).
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19187578&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

10. 10.Fawcett, J. et al. Time-related predictors of suicide in major affective disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 147, 1189–1194 (1990).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/ajp.147.9.1189&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=2104515&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1990DX05500013&link_type=ISI) 

11. 11.Winer, E. S. et al. Anhedonia predicts suicidal ideation in a large psychiatric inpatient sample. Psychiatry Res. 218, 124–128 (2014).
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24774075&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

12. 12.Ducasse, D. et al. Anhedonia is associated with suicidal ideation independently of depression: A meta-analysis. Depress. Anxiety 35, 382–392 (2018).
    
    

13. 13.Barthel, A. L. et al. Anhedonia is central for the association between quality of life, metacognition, sleep, and affective symptoms in generalized anxiety disorder: A complex network analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 277, 1013–1021 (2020).
    
    

14. 14.Ritsner, M. S., Arbitman, M. & Lisker, A. Anhedonia is an important factor of health-related quality-of-life deficit in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 199, 845–853 (2011).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182349ce6&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22048136&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

15. 15.Zarate, C. A., Jr. et al. A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63, 856–864 (2006).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16894061&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000239573200003&link_type=ISI) 

16. 16.Duman, R. S. Ketamine and rapid-acting antidepressants: a new era in the battle against depression and suicide. F1000Res. 7, (2018).
    
    

17. 17.Kraus, C. et al. The influence of ketamine on drug discovery in depression. Drug Discov. Today 24, 2033–2043 (2019).
    
    

18. 18.McIntyre, R. S. et al. Synthesizing the evidence for ketamine and esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: An international expert opinion on the available evidence and implementation. Am. J. Psychiatry 178, 383–399 (2021).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20081251&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=33726522&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

19. 19.Nogo, D. et al. The effect of ketamine on anhedonia: improvements in dimensions of anticipatory, consummatory, and motivation-related reward deficits. Psychopharmacology 239, 2011–2039 (2022).
    
    

20. 20.Wilkowska, A., Wiglusz, M. S., Gałuszko-Wegielnik, M., Włodarczyk, A. & Cubała, W. J. Antianhedonic effect of repeated ketamine infusions in patients with treatment resistant depression. Front. Psychiatry 12, 704330 (2021).
    
    

21. 21.Lally, N. et al. Anti-anhedonic effect of ketamine and its neural correlates in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Transl. Psychiatry 4, e469 (2014).
    
    

22. 22.Pulcu, E., Guinea, C., Cowen, P. J., Murphy, S. E. & Harmer, C. J. A translational perspective on the anti-anhedonic effect of ketamine and its neural underpinnings. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 81–87 (2022).
    
    

23. 23.Duman, R. S., Shinohara, R., Fogaça, M. V. & Hare, B. Neurobiology of rapid-acting antidepressants: convergent effects on GluA1-synaptic function. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 1816– 1832 (2019).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41380-019-0400-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30894661&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

24. 24.Li, Y. et al. Dopamine D2/D3 but not dopamine D1 receptors are involved in the rapid antidepressant-like effects of ketamine in the forced swim test. Behav. Brain Res. 279, 100–105 (2015).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.016&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25449845&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

25. 25.Witkin, J. M. et al. The rapidly acting antidepressant ketamine and the mGlu2/3 receptor antagonist LY341495 rapidly engage dopaminergic mood circuits. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 358, 71–82 (2016).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoianBldCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiIzNTgvMS83MSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzEyLzA0LzIwMjMuMTIuMDEuMjMyOTkyODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

26. 26.Kokkinou, M., Ashok, A. H. & Howes, O. D. The effects of ketamine on dopaminergic function: meta-analysis and review of the implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 59–69 (2018).
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28972576&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

27. 27.Can, A. et al. Effects of ketamine and ketamine metabolites on evoked striatal dopamine release, dopamine receptors, and monoamine transporters. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 359, 159–170 (2016).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoianBldCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIzNTkvMS8xNTkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8xMi8wNC8yMDIzLjEyLjAxLjIzMjk5MjgyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

28. 28.Gigliucci, V. et al. Ketamine elicits sustained antidepressant-like activity via a serotonin-dependent mechanism. Psychopharmacology 228, 157–166 (2013).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00213-013-3024-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23455595&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

29. 29.Cardona-Acosta, A. M. & Bolaños-Guzmán, C. A. Role of the mesolimbic dopamine pathway in the antidepressant effects of ketamine. Neuropharmacology 225, 109374 (2023).
    
    

30. 30.Berridge, K. C. & Kringelbach, M. L. Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron 86, 646–664 (2015).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25950633&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

31. 31.Pool, E. R. et al. Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of reward. J. Neurosci. 42, 2716–2728 (2022).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Njoiam5ldXJvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI0Mi8xMy8yNzE2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTIvMDQvMjAyMy4xMi4wMS4yMzI5OTI4Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

32. 32.Shirayama, Y. & Chaki, S. Neurochemistry of the nucleus accumbens and its relevance to depression and antidepressant action in rodents. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 4, 277–291 (2006).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2174/157015906778520773&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18654637&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

33. 33.Xu, L., Nan, J. & Lan, Y. The nucleus accumbens: A common target in the comorbidity of depression and addiction. Front. Neural Circuits 14, 37 (2020).
    
    

34. 34.Salgado, S. & Kaplitt, M. G. The Nucleus Accumbens: A Comprehensive Review. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 93, 75–93 (2015).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1159/000368279&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25720819&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

35. 35.Liu, R. et al. Anhedonia correlates with functional connectivity of the nucleus accumbens subregions in patients with major depressive disorder. Neuroimage Clin 30, 102599 (2021).
    
    

36. 36.Keedwell, P. A., Andrew, C., Williams, S. C. R., Brammer, M. J. & Phillips, M. L. The neural correlates of anhedonia in major depressive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 58, 843–853 (2005).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.05.019&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16043128&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000234035900001&link_type=ISI) 

37. 37.Epstein, J. et al. Lack of ventral striatal response to positive stimuli in depressed versus normal subjects. Am. J. Psychiatry 163, 1784–1790 (2006).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/appi.ajp.163.10.1784&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17012690&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000240906800023&link_type=ISI) 

38. 38.Heller, A. S. et al. Reduced capacity to sustain positive emotion in major depression reflects diminished maintenance of fronto-striatal brain activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 22445–22450 (2009).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMjoiMTA2LzUyLzIyNDQ1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTIvMDQvMjAyMy4xMi4wMS4yMzI5OTI4Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

39. 39.Pizzagalli, D. A. et al. Reduced caudate and nucleus accumbens response to rewards in unmedicated individuals with major depressive disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 702–710 (2009).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08081201&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19411368&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000266539300013&link_type=ISI) 

40. 40.Heller, A. S. et al. Relationships between changes in sustained fronto-striatal connectivity and positive affect in major depression resulting from antidepressant treatment. Am. J. Psychiatry 170, 197–206 (2013).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23223803&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000314201500012&link_type=ISI) 

41. 41.Hikosaka, O., Sesack, S. R., Lecourtier, L. & Shepard, P. D. Habenula: crossroad between the basal ganglia and the limbic system. J. Neurosci. 28, 11825–11829 (2008).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6Njoiam5ldXJvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIyOC80Ni8xMTgyNSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzEyLzA0LzIwMjMuMTIuMDEuMjMyOTkyODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

42. 42.Lecca, S., Meye, F. J. & Mameli, M. The lateral habenula in addiction and depression: an anatomical, synaptic and behavioral overview. Eur. J. Neurosci. 39, 1170–1178 (2014).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/ejn.12480&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24712996&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

43. 43.Thompson, S. M. Plasticity of synapses and reward circuit function in the genesis and treatment of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 48, 90–103 (2023).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41386-022-01422-1&link_type=DOI) 

44. 44.Matsumoto, M. & Hikosaka, O. Lateral habenula as a source of negative reward signals in dopamine neurons. Nature 447, 1111–1115 (2007).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nature05860&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17522629&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000247564600037&link_type=ISI) 

45. 45.Gold, P. W. & Kadriu, B. A major role for the lateral habenula in depressive illness: Physiologic and molecular mechanisms. Front. Psychiatry 10, 320 (2019).
    
    

46. 46.Browne, C. A., Hammack, R. & Lucki, I. Dysregulation of the lateral habenula in major depressive disorder. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 10, 46 (2018).
    
    

47. 47.Barreiros, A. R. et al. Abnormal habenula functional connectivity characterizes treatment-resistant depression. Neuroimage Clin 34, 102990 (2022).
    
    

48. 48.Yang, Y., Wang, H., Hu, J. & Hu, H. Lateral habenula in the pathophysiology of depression. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 48, 90–96 (2018).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.024&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29175713&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

49. 49.Yang, Y. et al. Ketamine blocks bursting in the lateral habenula to rapidly relieve depression. Nature 554, 317–322 (2018).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nature25509&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29446381&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

50. 50.Rivas-Grajales, A. M. et al. Habenula Connectivity and Intravenous Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 24, 383–391 (2021).
    
    

51. 51.Leonardi, N. & Van De Ville, D. On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest. NeuroImage vol. 104 430–436 Preprint at doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.007 (2015).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.007&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25234118&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

52. 52.Liu, X. & Duyn, J. H. Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110, 4392–4397 (2013).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiMTEwLzExLzQzOTIiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8xMi8wNC8yMDIzLjEyLjAxLjIzMjk5MjgyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

53. 53.Preti, M. G., Bolton, T. A. & Van De Ville, D. The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives. Neuroimage 160, 41–54 (2017).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10/gcj5q7&link_type=DOI) 

54. 54.Kaiser, R. H. et al. Dynamic Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 1822–1830 (2016).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/npp.2015.352&link_type=DOI) 

55. 55.Zhou, W. et al. Differential patterns of dynamic functional connectivity variability in major depressive disorder treated with cognitive behavioral therapy. J. Affect. Disord. 291, 322– 328 (2021).
    
    

56. 56.Chen, G. et al. Shared and specific patterns of dynamic functional connectivity variability of striato-cortical circuitry in unmedicated bipolar and major depressive disorders. Psychol. Med. 52, 747–756 (2022).
    
    

57. 57.Zhou, B. et al. Alterations of Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivity of the Nucleus Accumbens in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Front. Psychiatry 13, 877417 (2022).
    
    

58. 58.Abdallah, C. G. et al. The nucleus accumbens and ketamine treatment in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 42, 1739–1746 (2017).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/npp.2017.49&link_type=DOI) 

59. 59.First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S. & Spitzer, R. L. SCID-5-CV: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders, Clinician Version. (American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2015).
    
    

60. 60.Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 23, 56–62 (1960).
    
    [FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czo0OiJqbm5wIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjIzLzEvNTYiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8xMi8wNC8yMDIzLjEyLjAxLjIzMjk5MjgyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

61. 61.Snaith, R. P. et al. A Scale for the Assessment of Hedonic Tone the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 167, 99–103 (1995).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6ImJqcHJjcHN5Y2giO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiMTY3LzEvOTkiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8xMi8wNC8yMDIzLjEyLjAxLjIzMjk5MjgyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 

62. 62.Harms, M. P. et al. Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects. Neuroimage 183, 972–984 (2018).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.060&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30261308&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

63. 63.Tisdall, M. D. et al. Prospective motion correction with volumetric navigators (vNavs) reduces the bias and variance in brain morphometry induced by subject motion. Neuroimage 127, 11–22 (2016).
    
    

64. 64.Andersson, J. L. R., Skare, S. & Ashburner, J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 20, 870–888 (2003).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14568458&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000186260700020&link_type=ISI) 

65. 65.Smith, S. M. et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23 **Suppl 1**, S208–19 (2004).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15501092&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000225374100020&link_type=ISI) 

66. 66.Glasser, M. F. et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage 80, 105–124 (2013).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23668970&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000322416000011&link_type=ISI) 

67. 67.Robinson, E. C. et al. Multimodal surface matching with higher-order smoothness constraints. Neuroimage 167, 453–465 (2018).
    
    

68. 68.Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. & Nieto-Castanon, A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2, 125–141 (2012).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1089/brain.2012.0073&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22642651&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

69. 69.Menon, S. S. & Krishnamurthy, K. A Comparison of Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivities for Identifying Subjects and Biological Sex Using Intrinsic Individual Brain Connectivity. Sci. Rep. 9, 5729 (2019).
    
    

70. 70.Marcus, D. S. et al. Human Connectome Project informatics: quality control, database services, and data visualization. Neuroimage 80, 202–219 (2013).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.077&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23707591&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

71. 71.Ely, B. A., Stern, E. R., Kim, J.-W., Gabbay, V. & Xu, J. Detailed mapping of human habenula resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage 200, 621–634 (2019).
    
    

72. 72.Kim, J.-W. et al. Human habenula segmentation using myelin content. Neuroimage 130, 145–156 (2016).
    
    

73. 73.Van Essen, D. C. et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23684880&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000322416000009&link_type=ISI) 

74. 74.Hutchison, R. M. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 80, 360–378 (2013).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23707587&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000322416000030&link_type=ISI) 

75. 75.Allen, E. A. et al. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb. Cortex 24, 663–676 (2014).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/cercor/bhs352&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23146964&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000331845700010&link_type=ISI) 

76. 76.Li, R. et al. Differential patterns of dynamic functional connectivity variability of striato-cortical circuitry in children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes. Hum. Brain Mapp. 39, 1207–1217 (2018).
    
    

77. 77.Winkler, A. M., Ridgway, G. R., Webster, M. A., Smith, S. M. & Nichols, T. E. Permutation inference for the general linear model. Neuroimage 92, 381–397 (2014).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.060&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24530839&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000335713000035&link_type=ISI) 

78. 78.Proulx, C. D., Hikosaka, O. & Malinow, R. Reward processing by the lateral habenula in normal and depressive behaviors. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1146–1152 (2014).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nn.3779&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25157511&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

79. 79.Lu, F. et al. Anomalous intrinsic connectivity within and between visual and auditory networks in major depressive disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 100, 109889 (2020).
    
    

80. 80.Zeng, L.-L. et al. Identifying major depression using whole-brain functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis. Brain 135, 1498–1507 (2012).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/brain/aws059&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22418737&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000303654000016&link_type=ISI) 

81. 81.Sahib, A. K. et al. Modulation of inhibitory control networks relate to clinical response following ketamine therapy in major depression. Transl. Psychiatry 10, 260 (2020).
    
    

82. 82.Sahib, A. K. et al. Single and repeated ketamine treatment induces perfusion changes in sensory and limbic networks in major depressive disorder. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 33, 89–100 (2020).
    
    

83. 83.Taraku, B. et al. Changes in white matter microstructure following serial ketamine infusions in treatment resistant depression. Hum. Brain Mapp. 44, 2395–2406 (2023).
    
    

84. 84.Zou, K. et al. Abnormal functional connectivity density in first-episode, drug-naive adult patients with major depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 194, 153–158 (2016).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.081&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26826535&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

85. 85.Whitlock, J. R. Posterior parietal cortex. Curr. Biol. 27, R691–R695 (2017).
    
    

86. 86.Kaiser, R. H., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Wager, T. D. & Pizzagalli, D. A. Large-Scale Network Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity. JAMA Psychiatry 72, 603–611 (2015).
    
    

87. 87.Adamaszek, M. et al. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Emotion. Cerebellum 16, 552– 576 (2017).
    
    

88. 88.Wagner, M. J. & Luo, L. Neocortex–Cerebellum Circuits for Cognitive Processing. Trends Neurosci. 43, 42–54 (2020).
    
    

89. 89.Bostan, A. C. & Strick, P. L. The basal ganglia and the cerebellum: nodes in an integrated network. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 338–350 (2018).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41583-018-0002-7&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29643480&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

90. 90.Minichino, A. et al. The role of cerebellum in unipolar and bipolar depression: a review of the main neurobiological findings. Riv. Psichiatr. 49, 124–131 (2014).
    
    

91. 91.Liu, Z. et al. Decreased regional homogeneity in insula and cerebellum: a resting-state fMRI study in patients with major depression and subjects at high risk for major depression. Psychiatry Res. 182, 211–215 (2010).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.03.004&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20493670&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000279521300004&link_type=ISI) 

92. 92.Dai, P. et al. Altered Effective Connectivity Among the Cerebellum and Cerebrum in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Using Multisite Resting-State fMRI. Cerebellum (2022) doi:10.1007/s12311-022-01454-9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s12311-022-01454-9&link_type=DOI) 

93. 93.Loureiro, J. R. A. et al. Ketamine’s modulation of cerebro-cerebellar circuitry during response inhibition in major depression. Neuroimage Clin 32, 102792 (2021).
    
    

94. 94.Gao, Y. et al. Altered resting state dynamic functional connectivity of amygdala subregions in patients with autism spectrum disorder: A multi-site fMRI study. J. Affect. Disord. 312, 69–77 (2022).
    
    

95. 95.Qiao, D. et al. Altered Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivity of Habenula Associated With Suicidal Ideation in First-Episode, Drug-Naïve Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Front. Psychiatry 11, (2020).
    
    

96. 96.He, C. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals decreased variability of the default-mode network in developing autistic brain. Autism Res. 11, 1479–1493 (2018).
    
    

97. 97.Rolls, E. T., Cheng, W. & Feng, J. Brain dynamics: the temporal variability of connectivity, and differences in schizophrenia and ADHD. Transl. Psychiatry 11, 70 (2021).
    
    

98. 98.Spies, M. et al. Association between dynamic resting-state functional connectivity and ketamine plasma levels in visual processing networks. Sci. Rep. 9, 11484 (2019).
    
    

99. 99.Sheline, Y. I. et al. The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 1942–1947 (2009).
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoicG5hcyI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMDoiMTA2LzYvMTk0MiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzEyLzA0LzIwMjMuMTIuMDEuMjMyOTkyODIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

100.100.Marchetti, I., Koster, E. H. W., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. & De Raedt, R. The default mode network and recurrent depression: a neurobiological model of cognitive risk factors. Neuropsychol. Rev. 22, 229–251 (2012).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s11065-012-9199-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22569771&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

101.101.Liston, C. et al. Default mode network mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Biol. Psychiatry 76, 517–526 (2014).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.023&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24629537&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000343094000005&link_type=ISI) 

102.102.Zhou, H.-X. et al. Rumination and the default mode network: Meta-analysis of brain imaging studies and implications for depression. Neuroimage 206, 116287 (2020).
    
    

103.103.Hamilton, J. P., Farmer, M., Fogelman, P. & Gotlib, I. H. Depressive Rumination, the Default-Mode Network, and the Dark Matter of Clinical Neuroscience. Biol. Psychiatry 78, 224–230 (2015).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.020&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25861700&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom) 

104.104.Demirtaş, M. et al. Dynamic functional connectivity reveals altered variability in functional connectivity among patients with major depressive disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 2918– 2930 (2016).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=doi:10.1002/hbm.23215&link_type=DOI) 

105.105.Wise, T. et al. Instability of default mode network connectivity in major depression: a two-sample confirmation study. Transl. Psychiatry 7, e1105 (2017).
    
    

106.106.Tian, F. et al. Characterizing brain dynamics during ketamine-induced dissociation and subsequent interactions with propofol using human intracranial neurophysiology. Nat. Commun. 14, 1748 (2023).
    
    

107.107.Vlisides, P. E. et al. Subanaesthetic ketamine and altered states of consciousness in humans. Br. J. Anaesth. 121, 249–259 (2018).
    
    

108.108.Fan, D. et al. Altered resting-state cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity mediate suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 42, 1603–1615 (2022).
    
    

109.109.Kang, L. et al. Functional connectivity between the thalamus and the primary somatosensory cortex in major depressive disorder: a resting-state fMRI study. BMC Psychiatry 18, 339 (2018).
    
    

110.110.Hikosaka, O. The habenula: from stress evasion to value-based decision-making. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 503–513 (2010).
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/nrn2866&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20559337&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F12%2F04%2F2023.12.01.23299282.atom)