Genotypes and associations with symptoms in primary ciliary dyskinesia
======================================================================

* Eva SL Pedersen
* Myrofora Goutaki
* Leonie D Schreck
* Bernhard Rindlisbacher
* Lucy Dixon
* COVID-PCD patient advisory group
* Jane S Lucas
* Claudia E Kuehni

## Abstract

**Background** Knowledge about genotype-phenotype associations is crucial for understanding the clinical variability of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). We studied how feasible it is to collect information about causative genes directly from people with PCD through questionnaires, and investigated associations between clinical characteristics, symptoms, and genotype.

**Methods** We used data from the anonymous international participatory cohort COVID-PCD, set up in 2020 to follow people with PCD during the COVID-19 pandemic. A baseline questionnaire asked genetic test results, clinical characteristics, and current symptoms. We grouped reported causative genes into categories based on associated defects and studied differences between groups.

**Results** Among the 759 COVID-PCD study participants, 444 (58%) reported genetic testing, and of these, 289 (65%) reported that a gene was identified. We included 206 who knew and reported a causative gene. The most common genes were *DNAH5* (n=71; 34%), *DNAH11* (n=27; 13%), *CCDC40* (n=21; 10%), *DNAI1* (n=18; 9%), *CCDC39* (n=13; 6%), and RSPH1 (n=8; 4%). The dynein structure (DS) group was the largest (n=127) followed by the nexin-dynein regulatory complex (ND-RC) group (n=38), dynein assembly (DA) group (n=21), and radial spoke and central complex (RS-CC, n=20) Current age and sex were similar across groups; but median age at diagnosis was markedly higher in the RS-CC group (11 years) compared to 4–7 years in the other groups (p=0.035). Laterality defects were reported by one person (5%) in RS-CC group, compared with 37%-60% in other groups (p=0.001). Overall, symptoms were frequently reported by participants in all 4 groups with little difference between groups.

**Conclusion** Our results confirmed known differences in laterality defects and congenital heart disease between genotypes and showed frequent upper and lower respiratory symptoms in all groups regardless of reported gene.

## Manuscript

Knowledge about genotype-phenotype associations is crucial for understanding the clinical variability of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) [1]. More than 50 known disease-causing genes lead to different ciliary structural defects resulting in differing phenotypical characteristics [2]. For example, laterality defects are not associated with mutations in genes related with the central pair apparatus, nexin link, or radial spoke complex (e.g. *HYDIN* and *RSPH9*), while they are seen in approximately 50% of individuals with mutations in most other genes [3, 4]. Similarly, congenital heart disease is less frequent in patients with these genes as congenital heart disease is associated with laterality defects [5, 6]. Several studies investigated associations of lung function with genotype and reported steeper decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) for people with mutations affecting the nexin-dynein regulatory complex (e.g. *CCDC39* and *CCDC40*) compared to mutations in other genes [7-9].

Few studies investigated differences in symptoms between genotypes with inconsistent results. Data from 118 children from North America showed little difference in prevalence of chronic cough, chronic nasal congestion, and neonatal respiratory distress between groups of different genotypes [10]. Data from 199 patients from the United Kingdom (UK) in contrast showed lower prevalence of neonatal respiratory distress among patients with causative genes affecting the dynein structure compared to other genotypes [9].

Large studies including both detailed patient-reported symptom data and genetic data from medical records can be difficult to design. We therefore studied first how feasible it is to collect information about causative genes directly from people with PCD through questionnaires, and second, investigated associations between clinical characteristics, symptoms, and genotype.

We used data from the anonymous international participatory cohort COVID-PCD—a study set up in 2020 to follow people with PCD during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond (clinicaltrials.gov: [NCT04602481](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT04602481&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F28%2F2023.11.28.23299010.atom)) [11, 12]. The study is online and includes people of any age worldwide. Study participants registered through the study website ([www.covid19pcd.ispm.ch](http://www.covid19pcd.ispm.ch)) and provided online consent (ethical approval from the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Bern, Switzerland, Study ID: 2020-00830). The baseline questionnaire asked about diagnostic tests including genetic analysis, whether participants knew results, and if yes, which causative gene was found. We also asked about age at diagnosis, laterality defects, and congenital heart disease, and detailed questions about symptoms during the past 3 months [13].

We grouped reported genes into categories based on associated defects: 1) dynein structure (DS), including *DNAH5, DNAH11, DNAI1, DNAI2, ODAD2, DNAH9, ODAD4, ODAD1 (CCDC114)*; 2) dynein assembly (DA), including *CCDC103, DNAAF4, LRRC6 (DNAAF11), DNAAF3, SPAG1 (DNAAF13), ZYMND10 (DNAAF7), DNAAF5, CFAP300 (DNAAF17)*; 3) microtubular stabilization/nexin-dynein regulatory complex (ND-RC), including *CCDC39, CCDC40, CCDC65 (DRC2), DRC1*; 4) radial spoke and central complex (RS-CC), including *RSPH4A, RSPH1, HYDIN, RSPH9, RSPH3*; 5) and other function (*RPGR, CCNO, MCIDAS*) [9]. We also compared differences for single causative genes reported by more than 5 people.

Our study included 759 people with suspected or confirmed PCD with median age of 28 years (interquartile range 13–44, range 1–86), 452 (60%) were females. Participants came from 49 countries; most from the United States (n=132), England (n=128), Germany (n=111), Italy (n=52), and Switzerland (n=50).

In total, 444 (58%) reported genetic testing; 52 (11%) reported no mutation found; 103 (24%) either did not know or awaited results; and 289 (65%) reported a gene was identified. Among these, 229 (79%) participants knew and reported the causative gene. We excluded 23 participants with heterozygous mutations in different genes leaving 206 in our analysis. The most common genes were *DNAH5* (n=71; 34%), *DNAH11* (n=27; 13%), *CCDC40* (n=21; 10%), *DNAI1* (n=18; 9%), *CCDC39* (n=13; 6%), and RSPH1 (n=8; 4%).

The dynein structure (DS) group was the largest (n=127) followed by the nexin-dynein regulatory complex (ND-RC) group (n=38), dynein assembly (DA) group (n=21), and radial spoke and central complex (RS-CC, n=20) (Table 1). Current age and sex were similar across groups; but median age at diagnosis was markedly higher in the RS-CC group (11 years) compared to 4–7 years in the other groups (p=0.035). Laterality defects were reported by one person (5%) in RS-CC group, compared with 37%-60% in other groups (p=0.001). Overall, symptoms were frequently reported by participants in all 4 groups with little difference between groups (Table 1). Prevalence of cough (reported either daily, often, or sometimes during the past 3 months) ranged from 84 to 92% (p=0.474); ear pain between 33 and 43% (p=0.772); and shortness of breath between 45 and 62% (p=0.589) across genotype groups. The biggest difference was seen for chronic nose symptoms which was reported by 62% in the DA group and 86% in the DS group (p=0.064).

View this table:
[Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/28/2023.11.28.23299010/T1)

Table 1: 
Clinical characteristics and symptoms by genotype groups including dynein structure (DS), dynein assembly (DA), nexin-dynein regulatory complex (ND-RC), and radial spoke and central complex (RS-CC) (n=206), and by single genes including *DNAH5, DNAH11 (ODAD1), CCDC40, DNAI1, CCDC39*, and *RSPH1* (n=158).

Our analysis comparing single genes similarly showed difference in age at diagnosis with lowest age in participants with *CCDC39* (1 year) and highest age of diagnosis in participants with *RSPH1* (12 years) (p-value = 0.019). Laterality defect was reported in one person with *RSPH1* (13%) and between 33% and 54% in all other groups (p-value = 0.408). Congenital heart defect ranged from 0% in *RSPH1* to 31% in *CCDC39* (p=0.055). Again, symptoms were frequent across single genes.

This study using data contributed directly by people with PCD demonstrates that it is feasible to collect genetic information at the gene level by questionnaire. Among participants where a genetic cause was found, four out of five participants were able to report their causative gene. In line with predicted causative gene prevalence worldwide, we found that *DNAH5, DNAH11, and CCDC40* were most frequent [14]. Our findings reinforce previously shown genotypic differences. Laterality defect was not associated with RS-CC group in line with other studies [4, 15]. This may explain that age at diagnosis was highest for the RS-CC group, as people without laterality defects are often diagnosed later [16]. We found a higher prevalence of congenital heart disease for *CCDC39* and *CCDC40* than previously reported for PCD [4, 5, 9], there is however no mechanism to explain this finding. We found that study participants reported frequent symptoms independent of genotype or single gene suggesting that from a patient perspective, no phenotype without frequent symptoms exists, although some genotypes such as *DNAH11*, are considered milder and associated with preserved lung function [9].

The major strengths of our study include the sample size with 206 people and the combination of standardised patient-reported symptoms and genetics data, which allowed investigating novel genotype-phenotype associations. Our study is limited by our use of self-reported genetic data, which cannot be validated through linkage with clinical records from our anonymous study design. Without detailed clinical data on the mutation level, which patients usually do not have, we cannot be certain that all reported variants were pathogenic and that no single heterozygous variants or variants of unknown significance were reported as pathogenic. However, our data led to similar associations as previous studies which had used genetic information from clinics, suggesting patient-reported genetic information as reliable for epidemiological studies. Our results confirmed known differences in laterality defects and congenital heart disease between genotypes and showed frequent upper and lower respiratory symptoms in all groups regardless of reported gene.

## Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

## Funding

Our research was funded by the Swiss National Foundation (SNF 320030B_192804/1), Switzerland, the Swiss Lung Association, Switzerland (2021-08_Pedersen), and received support from the PCD Foundation, United States; the Verein Kartagener Syndrom und Primäre Ciliäre Dyskinesie, Germany; the PCD Support UK; and PCD Australia, Australia. M. Goutaki receives funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PZ00P3_185923). Study authors participate in the BEAT-PCD Clinical Research Collaboration, supported by the European Respiratory Society.

## Acknowledgements

We thank all participants and their families, and we thank the PCD support groups and physicians who advertised the study. We thank our collaborators who helped set up the COVID-PCD study: Cristina Ardura, Yin Ting Lam, Christina Mallet, Helena Koppe, Lara Pissini Goncalves from the University of Bern, and Amanda Harris from the University Hospital Southampton. We thank Kristin Bivens from the University of Bern for editing this research letter.

## Footnotes

*   **Take-home message:** Collecting genetic information by questionnaire from people with PCD is feasible. We confirmed typical differences in laterality defects and congenital heart disease between genotypes but found that symptoms were equally common across genotypes.

*   Received November 28, 2023.
*   Revision received November 28, 2023.
*   Accepted November 28, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), CC BY-NC 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.Goutaki M, Pedersen ESL. Phenotype-genotype associations in primary ciliary dyskinesia: where do we stand? Eur Respir J. 2021;58(2).
    
    

2.  2.Wallmeier J, Nielsen KG, Kuehni CE, Lucas JS, Leigh MW, Zariwala MA, Omran H. Motile ciliopathies. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):77.
    
    

3.  3.Castleman VH, Romio L, Chodhari R, Hirst RA, de Castro SC, Parker KA, Ybot-Gonzalez P, Emes RD, Wilson SW, Wallis C, Johnson CA, Herrera RJ, Rutman A, Dixon M, Shoemark A, Bush A, Hogg C, Gardiner RM, Reish O, Greene ND, O’Callaghan C, Purton S, Chung EM, Mitchison HM. Mutations in radial spoke head protein genes RSPH9 and RSPH4A cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central-microtubular-pair abnormalities. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(2):197–209.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.011&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19200523&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F28%2F2023.11.28.23299010.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000263799700010&link_type=ISI) 

4.  4.Barber AT, Shapiro AJ, Davis SD, Ferkol TW, Atkinson JJ, Sagel SD, Dell SD, Olivier KN, Milla CE, Rosenfeld M, Li L, Lin FC, Sullivan KM, Capps NA, Zariwala MA, Knowles MR, Leigh MW. Laterality Defects in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Relationship to Ultrastructural Defect or Genotype. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023;20(3):397–405.
    
    

5.  5.Best S, Shoemark A, Rubbo B, Patel MP, Fassad MR, Dixon M, Rogers AV, Hirst RA, Rutman A, Ollosson S, Jackson CL, Goggin P, Thomas S, Pengelly R, Cullup T, Pissaridou E, Hayward J, Onoufriadis A, O’Callaghan C, Loebinger MR, Wilson R, Chung EM, Kenia P, Doughty VL, Carvalho JS, Lucas JS, Mitchison HM, Hogg C. Risk factors for situs defects and congenital heart disease in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Thorax. 2019;74(2):203–5.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToidGhvcmF4am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6Ijc0LzIvMjAzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTEvMjgvMjAyMy4xMS4yOC4yMzI5OTAxMC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

6.  6.Kennedy MP, Omran H, Leigh MW, Dell S, Morgan L, Molina PL, Robinson BV, Minnix SL, Olbrich H, Severin T, Ahrens P, Lange L, Morillas HN, Noone PG, Zariwala MA, Knowles MR. Congenital heart disease and other heterotaxic defects in a large cohort of patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Circulation. 2007;115(22):2814–21.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjExOiIxMTUvMjIvMjgxNCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzExLzI4LzIwMjMuMTEuMjguMjMyOTkwMTAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

7.  7.Halbeisen FS, Pedersen ESL, Goutaki M, Spycher BD, Amirav I, Boon M, Cohen-Cymberknoh M, Crowley S, Emiralioglu N, Haarman EG, Karadag B, Koerner-Rettberg C, Latzin P, Loebinger MR, Lucas JS, Mazurek H, Morgan L, Marthin J, Pohunek P, Santamaria F, Schwerk N, Thouvenin G, Yiallouros P, Nielsen KG, Kuehni CE. Lung function from school age to adulthood in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(4).
    
    

8.  8.Kinghorn B, Rosenfeld M, Sullivan E, Onchiri F, Ferkol TW, Sagel SD, Dell SD, Milla C, Shapiro AJ, Sullivan KM, Zariwala MA, Pittman JE, Mollica F, Tiddens H, Kemner-van de Corput M, Knowles MR, Davis SD, Leigh MW. Airway Disease in Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Impact of Ciliary Ultrastructure Defect and Genotype. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023;20(4):539–47.
    
    

9.  9.Shoemark A, Rubbo B, Legendre M, Fassad MR, Haarman EG, Best S, Bon ICM, Brandsma J, Burgel PR, Carlsson G, Carr SB, Carroll M, Edwards M, Escudier E, Honoré I, Hunt D, Jouvion G, Loebinger MR, Maitre B, Morris-Rosendahl D, Papon JF, Parsons CM, Patel MP, Thomas NS, Thouvenin G, Walker WT, Wilson R, Hogg C, Mitchison HM, Lucas JS. Topological data analysis reveals genotype-phenotype relationships in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur Respir J. 2021;58(2).
    
    

10. 10.Davis SD, Ferkol TW, Rosenfeld M, Lee HS, Dell SD, Sagel SD, Milla C, Zariwala MA, Pittman JE, Shapiro AJ, Carson JL, Krischer JP, Hazucha MJ, Cooper ML, Knowles MR, Leigh MW. Clinical features of childhood primary ciliary dyskinesia by genotype and ultrastructural phenotype. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(3):316–24.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1164/rccm.201409-1672OC&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25493340&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F28%2F2023.11.28.23299010.atom) 

11. 11.Pedersen ESL, Collaud ENR, Mozun R, Ardura-Garcia C, Lam YT, Harris A, Lucas JS, Copeland F, Manion M, Rindlisbacher B, Silberschmidt H, Goutaki M, Kuehni CE. COVID-PCD: a participatory research study on the impact of COVID-19 in people with primary ciliary dyskinesia. ERJ Open Res. 2021;7(1).
    
    

12. 12.Pedersen ESL, Goutaki M, Harris AL, Dixon L, Manion M, Rindlisbacher B, Patient Advisory Group CP, Lucas JS, Kuehni CE. SARS-CoV-2 infections in people with primary ciliary dyskinesia: neither frequent, nor particularly severe. Eur Respir J. 2021;58(2).
    
    

13. 13.Goutaki M, Papon JF, Boon M, Casaulta C, Eber E, Escudier E, Halbeisen FS, Harris A, Hogg C, Honore I, Jung A, Karadag B, Koerner-Rettberg C, Legendre M, Maitre B, Nielsen KG, Rubbo B, Rumman N, Schofield L, Shoemark A, Thouvenin G, Willkins H, Lucas JS, Kuehni CE. Standardised clinical data from patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia: FOLLOW-PCD. ERJ Open Res. 2020;6(1).
    
    

14. 14.Hannah WB, Seifert BA, Truty R, Zariwala MA, Ameel K, Zhao Y, Nykamp K, Gaston B. The global prevalence and ethnic heterogeneity of primary ciliary dyskinesia gene variants: a genetic database analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(5):459–68.
    
    

15. 15.Olbrich H, Schmidts M, Werner C, Onoufriadis A, Loges NT, Raidt J, Banki NF, Shoemark A, Burgoyne T, Al Turki S, Hurles ME, Köhler G, Schroeder J, Nürnberg G, Nürnberg P, Chung EM, Reinhardt R, Marthin JK, Nielsen KG, Mitchison HM, Omran H. Recessive HYDIN mutations cause primary ciliary dyskinesia without randomization of left-right body asymmetry. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91(4):672–84.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.016&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23022101&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F28%2F2023.11.28.23299010.atom) 

16. 16.Kuehni CE, Frischer T, Strippoli MP, Maurer E, Bush A, Nielsen KG, Escribano A, Lucas JS, Yiallouros P, Omran H, Eber E, O’Callaghan C, Snijders D, Barbato A. Factors influencing age at diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia in European children. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(6):1248–58.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiZXJqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjM2LzYvMTI0OCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzExLzI4LzIwMjMuMTEuMjguMjMyOTkwMTAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)