Abstract
Background Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive weakening of the muscles. While the two types of FSHD (FSHD1 and FSHD2) have distinct genetic causes, they share similarities in their clinical presentations. Both result in muscle weakness, particularly in the face, shoulders, and upper arms. Genetic testing is essential for accurately diagnosing the specific type of FSHD and guiding treatment and management.
Method We acquired bulk and single-cell gene expression data for FSHD2 from the NIH portal website. Our analysis involved an extensive array of differentially expressed genes, and pathway and gene ontology analysis. Using statistical tests, we identified the top up- and down-regulated genes, and the pathways and gene ontology terms characterizing those genes that exhibited substantial changes across both bulk and single-cell transcriptomes.
Results The top 10 up-regulated genes identified in the bulk gene expression analysis represent a diverse range of biological functions, but all are associated with FSHD. In contrast to the bulk down-regulated genes, the single-cell top 10 down-regulated genes are primarily linked to muscle-related functions. These genes, such as ACTC1, ACTA1, MYL11, MYH3, MYL6B, MYBPH, TPM2, MYL2, MYL1, and TNNI1 are integral to muscle contraction and skeletal muscle function. Moreover, all the top 10 single-cell down-regulated pathways are implicated in the pathogenesis of muscle dystrophy. Finally, the top 10 down-regulated gene ontology terms are all relevant to the pathogenesis of muscular dystrophy.
Conclusions This study unequivocally demonstrates that single-cell transcriptomics surpasses bulk transcriptomics in elucidating the genes, pathways, biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components associated with FSHD2. While bulk transcriptomics offers a broader perspective on gene expression, single-cell transcriptomics shines in its capacity to unveil cell-specific gene regulation, especially in the realm of muscle-related functions.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
mark{at}bioada.com
hazem{at}bioada.com
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE143452 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE143453
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE143452
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE143452
