ABSTRACT
Introduction Fractures over venous sinuses (FOVS) are associated with difficulties in diagnosis, and treatment resulting in a high level of morbidity, and mortality. Despite its importance, there is limited aggregate data to guide the management of these fractures ultimately inflicting a major challenge to neurosurgeons. This protocol describes the methodology of a scoping review that aims to synthesise contemporary evidence on the management and outcomes of FOVS.
Methods and analysis The proposed study will be conducted in accordance with the Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for scoping reviews. The research question, eligibility criteria and search strategy were developed based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome strategy. The following electronic bibliographic databases will be searched without restrictions on language, and date of publication: PubMed, WHO Global Index Medicus, African Journals Online, SCOPUS, Embase. All peer-reviewed studies of primary data reporting on the management and outcomes of FOVS will be included. The data extracted from included articles will be presented through descriptive statistics, pooled statistics, and a narrative description.
Ethics and dissemination Because this study did not directly involve human individuals, ethical approval was not necessary. Dissemination strategies will include publication in a peer-reviewed journal, oral and poster presentations at local, regional, national and international conferences and promotion over social media.
Strengths and limitations of this study
To our knowledge this is the first scoping review focusing on the management and outcomes of fractures over the venous sinuses
This protocol will ensure transparency in the methodology of the proposed review, thus will reduce the likelihood of reviewing bias.
The search strategy will be conducted in five electronic databases commonly used across both high- and low-income countries.
There will be no restrictions on language, location, or publication date during the screening process.
Unpublished studies will not be sought.
There will be no formal assessment on the quality of the included studies.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Berjo D. Takoutsing; takoutsingberjo{at}gmail.com;
Ubraine Wunde Njineck; ubrainewunde{at}gmail.com;
Praise Senyuy Wah; Wsenyuy2{at}gmail.com;
Lorraine Sebopelo; sebopelolorraine{at}gmail.com;
Josiane Ngouanfo Tchoffo; josianengouanfo{at}gmail.com;
Ella Shiynyuy Bah; bahellashiynyuy{at}gmail.com;
Ignatius Esene; ignatiusesene{at}yahoo.co.uk;
There was an error in the name of one of the authors. We changed the name Senju to Senyuy.
