Mental health and burnout during medical school: Longitudinal evolution and covariates
======================================================================================

* Valerie Carrard
* Sylvie Berney
* Céline Bourquin
* Setareh Ranjbar
* Enrique Castelao
* Katja Schlegel
* Jacques Gaume
* Pierre-Alexandre Bart
* Marianne Schmid Mast
* Martin Preisig
* Alexandre Berney

## Abstract

**Background** Medical students’ rate of depression, suicidal ideation, anxiety, and burnout have been shown to be higher than those of the same-age general population. However, longitudinal studies spanning the whole course of medical school are scarce and present contradictory findings. This study aims to analyze the longitudinal evolution of mental health and burnout from the first to the last year of medical school using a wide range of indicators. Moreover, biopsychosocial covariates that can influence this evolution are explored.

**Method** In an open cohort study design, 3066 annual questionnaires were filled in by 1595 different students from the first to the sixth year of the Lausanne Medical School (Switzerland). Depression symptoms, suicidal ideation, anxiety symptoms, stress, and burnout were measured along with biopsychosocial covariates. The longitudinal evolution of mental health and burnout and the impact of covariates were modelled with linear mixed models.

**Results** Comparison to a same-aged general population sample shows that medical students reported significantly more depression symptoms and anxiety symptoms. Medical students’ mental health improved during the course of the studies in terms of depression symptoms, suicidal ideation, and stress, although suicidal ideation increased again in the last year and anxiety symptoms remained stable. Conversely, the results regarding burnout globally showed a significant worsening from beginning to end of medical school. The covariates most strongly related to better mental health and less burnout were less emotion-focused coping, more social support, and more satisfaction with health.

**Conclusion** Both improvement of mental health and worsening of burnout were observed during the course of medical school. This underlines that the beginning and the end of medical school bring specific challenges with the first years’ stressors negatively impacting mental health and the last year’s difficulties negatively impacting burnout.

Keywords
*   Mental health
*   Burnout
*   Medical students
*   Longitudinal study

## Introduction

Medical students have been shown to present more depression [1], anxiety [2], and burnout [3] than same-aged general population individuals. Meta-analyses have indeed reported a pooled prevalence of 28.0% of the medical students for depression [1,4], 11.1% for suicidal ideation [1], 33.8% for anxiety [2], and 44.2% for burnout [5]. Moreover, a study has shown that before actually starting medical school, medical students present less depression and less burnout than same-aged general population; suggesting that the course of the medical school itself may trigger mental health issues and burnout [6].

Despite the wealth of literature on the subject, longitudinal studies analyzing the evolution of mental health and burnout from beginning to end of medical school are still scarce and present inconsistent findings. For depression symptoms, a meta-analysis estimated a median increase of 13.5% each curriculum year [1], but another meta-analysis reported a gradual decrease until the last year of medical school [4]. For anxiety, both increase and decrease trends have been reported [7] and for suicidal ideation and burnout, longitudinal studies are too scarce to provide a reliable understanding of their evolution during medical school [1,8]. Consequently, the patterns of evolution of mental health and burnout during medical school are still unknown.

Medical students’ mental health issues and burnout have been attributed to different factors. Entering medical school represent a significant source of stress as it often marks a transition of moving away from home towards a new social environment with new ways of studying that demands an important adjustment from students [4]. Then, academic factors of stress are numerous such as the volume of information to learn, time constraints, examinations, competition, ethical challenges, and exposure to human suffering [9]. On the other hand, protective factors have been identified as well: a systematic review reports that the factors most often related to less mental health issues and burnout in medical students are low neuroticism, less emotion-focused coping strategies, more physical activity, lower study-related stress, and higher satisfaction with studies [10].

The present study aims to add to the existing literature by analyzing the temporal evolution of mental health and burnout throughout the course of medical school [1,8]. The few studies using prospective data focused mostly on the first year of medical school or on the two first years [1,8]. Yet, it seems essential to understand the temporal evolution of medical students’ mental health and burnout throughout the entire medical school curriculum in order to identify the curriculum years that are most challenging. Moreover, there is a need for more studies analyzing conjointly a wide range of biopsychosocial covariates of medical students’ mental health and burnout in order to identify the most influential protective and aggravating factors. The objectives of the present study are thus to (1) compare the mental health and coping strategies of medical students to same-age general population, (2) describe the evolution of mental health and burnout from beginning to end of medical school using a wide range of indicators (depression symptoms, suicidal ideation, anxiety symptoms, stress, emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic efficacy), and (3) identify biopsychosocial covariates influencing the evolutions of medical students’ mental health and burnout.

## Method

### Design and data collection

This is a longitudinal analysis of data from the ETMED-L project [11] collected with an open cohort study design. An online questionnaire investigating mental health and interpersonal competence was sent to all medical students (curriculum years 1 to 6) matriculated at the University of Lausanne (Switzerland), except for the students who are at the university as part of an academic exchange. It took approximately one hour to fully complete the online questionnaire and the students received 50CHF (∼50USD) for each completed questionnaire. The present study used the data of the three first waves of the ETMED-L project collected during the months of March 2021, November 2021, and November 2022.

To compare the mental health of medical students to same-aged general population individuals, data collected as part of the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus were retrieved. Initiated in 2003, CoLaus|PsyCoLaus is a population-based cohort study that follows a representative sample of the residents of Lausanne (Switzerland). The study has been designed to investigates psychiatric disorders and cardiovascular risk factors as well as their association using structured interviews and questionnaires [12]. For the present study, the data of the offspring of the participants of CoLaus|PsyCoLaus collected from the 26th of March 2008 to the 16th of November 2022 were used.

The Research Ethics Committee of the Canton de Vaud approved both the ETMED-L (project number 2020-02474) and CoLaus|PsyCoLaus (project number PB_2018–00038, reference 239/09) projects. All participants gave written informed consent.

### Measures

#### Mental health and burnout

The instruments used in the ETMED-L project are detailed in its published protocol [11]. For the present paper, four measures of ***mental health*** were used. *Depression symptoms* were assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression [CES-D; 13] with the validated cut-offs scores of 16 for males, 20 for females, and 19 overall [14]. *Suicidal ideation* was measured with two questions of the Beck Depression Inventory [BDI; 15]. *Anxiety symptoms* were assessed with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [STAI; 16] and stress was measured with a single generic item (“Globally, how would you evaluate your current stress level on a scale from 1 ‘none’ to 10 ‘extreme’?”). For ***burnout***, the Maslach Burnout Inventory Student-Survey [MBI-SS; 17] was used to measure its three dimensions: *Emotional Exhaustion*, *Cynicism*, and *Academic Efficacy* (reversed dimension). Except for the single item measuring stress, all instruments are well established and have a French validated version that has been used in the present study.

#### Biopsychosocial covariates

Four ***sociological covariates*** were analyzed: identifying as male (gender identity recoded into 1=male and 2=female or non-binary), paid job (hours per week), parents’ education (number of parents with college or university degree), having a partner (1=yes, 0=no), and social support. Social support was measured as the average score of two questions: “If necessary, in your opinion, to what extent can someone provide you with practical help, this means concrete help or useful advice, if 0 means “not at all” and 10 “a great deal“?” for practical support and “To what extent can someone be available in case of need and show understanding, by talking with you for example, if 0 means “not at all” and 10 “a great deal“?” for emotional support.

Regarding ***psychological covariates***, having consulted a psychotherapist during the past year (1=yes, 0=no) and coping strategies were assessed. Coping strategies were measured with the French version of the coping section of the Euronet questionnaire [18,19]. Confirmatory factor analysis [20] supported three factors including the dimensions of *emotion-focused*, *help-seeking*, and *problem-focused coping strategies*.

Finally, three ***biological covariates*** were included: Body Mass Index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared),), physical activity (number of hours per week), and satisfaction with health (“Are you satisfied with your health?” rated on a scale from 1=very unsatisfied to 5=very satisfied).

### Statistical analysis

Medical students were compared to same-age general population individuals using linear regression with sample (medical students vs general population) as independent variable, being male as a control variable, and depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and coping strategies (the only indicators measured similarly in both the ETMED-L and CoLaus|PsyCoLaus projects) separately as dependent variables. Cohen’s *d* was computed for effect size estimation with *d*s of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 respectively considered as small, medium, and large effect sizes [21]. For a more clinically relevant appreciation of the results, a test of proportion was additionally used to compare the two samples in terms of risk of clinical depression according to the CES-D cutoff. Note that for all these comparison analyses, medical students’ data at first participation were used.

To model the longitudinal evolution of mental health and burnout during the course of the medical school, Linear Mixed Models (LMMs) were fitted to account for the clustering in the data due to the repeated measures for each medical students, considering the student specific effects as random intercepts. Due to funding constraints, the students could not be followed during the entire six-year of medical school. However, LMMs provides a powerful framework for modeling the longitudinal evolution of mental health and burnout across the entire six-year duration of medical school, even when the medical students have been assessed at a maximum of three time points. This approach indeed effectively accounts for limited and unevenly spaced data points, facilitating robust insights into trajectories over the entire course of medical school. Note that different temporal variance-covariance structure such as autoregressive process of order 1 and autoregressive moving average process were compared versus unstructured parameterization using likelihood ratio test, then only the most plausible structure was estimated and presented using Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML). REML method was used to produce unbiased estimates of variance and covariance parameters [22,23]. The linear and non-linear evolution of mental health and burnout were then tested by including the time as linear, quadratic, and cubic. The best model was chosen and presented using likelihood ratio tests. The biopsychosocial covariates described in the Measure section were included in all LMMs. Standardized β are presented for effect sizes estimation. Standardized βs between 0.10–0.29 are considered as small, between 0.30–0.49 as medium, and 0.50 or greater as large effect sizes [21].

Missing data at the item level were replaced by mean scores if less than 20% of the items were missing. If 20% or if more items were missing, the total score was considered missing. Missing data at the score level were then handled with full information maximum likelihood in the LMMs. Stata version 17 [24] and R version 4.2.2 [25] were used for the analyses and p values <.05 were considered significant.

## Results

### Samples

The eligible students who agreed to participate were 906, 1059, and 1101 for each data collection wave, resulting in a total of 3066 questionnaires (see participation flow chart in Supplementary information). From those, 74 questionnaires were excluded because students gave a wrong answer to at least one of the two attention questions placed in the questionnaire (e.g., “In order to check your attention, please answer ‘Slightly agree’ to this question.”) and 6 questionnaires were excluded due to technical issues. Thus, each data collection wave included respectively 886, 1034, and 1066 answered questionnaire, which represent 49.41%, 49.33%, and 54.92% of each wave’s eligible students. Then, 168 students who repeated a year had to be excluded to have only linear curriculum trajectories. The final sample thus included 2601 questionnaires form 1595 different students with 909 students who participated in only one wave, 366 who participated in two waves, and 320 who participated in three waves of data collection.

The same-age CoLaus|PsyCoLaus offspring comparison group, included 91 participants who completed at least one of the questionnaires of interest and gave consent for the reuse of their individual data. They were between 18 and 35 years old with a mean age of 22.99 (SD = 4.31) and 60.92% were women.

### Descriptive statistics

The medical student sample descriptive is displayed in Table 1. Medical students were between 17 and 49 years old with a mean age of 21.78 (SD = 3.14) and most of them self-identified as females (67.90%), which corresponds to the gender proportions generally observed in the Lausanne Medical School. Observed means and standard deviation of medical students’ mental health and burnout for each curriculum year are detailed in Table 2.

View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/17/2023.11.15.23298610/T1)

Table 1. Sample statistics as indicated at first participation (N=1595)

View this table:
[Table 2.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/17/2023.11.15.23298610/T2)

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of students’ mental health and burnout

### Comparison to same-age general population

Results of linear regressions testing the difference between medical students and same-age general population individuals with respect to depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and coping strategies are displayed in Table 3. Results indicated that medical students presented significatively more depression symptoms and anxiety symptoms than the same-age general population. A test of proportion further showed that the proportion of individuals who were likely to be affected with clinical depression according to the CES-D cutoffs were significantly higher in the medical student sample (46.88%) than in the same-age general population sample (21.69%), Z = 4.49, p < .001. Regarding coping, medical students reported using significantly less help-seeking strategies than same-age general population but did not differ in terms of emotion-focused nor problem-focused coping strategies. Cohen’s *d*s show that the difference in depression symptoms was of medium effect size and that it was small for anxiety symptoms and help-seeking coping strategies.

View this table:
[Table 3.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/17/2023.11.15.23298610/T3)

Table 3. Comparison between medical students and same-age general population of mental health and coping at first participation

### Longitudinal evolution of mental health and burnout

Results of the LMMs modelling the longitudinal evolution of mental health during medical school are displayed in Table 4. They showed a significant linear decrease of depression symptoms and stress from the first to the sixth year of medical school. For suicidal ideation, the quadratic function of curriculum years was significant, indicating that evolution was convex (U shape), with a decrease in suicidal ideation until the third year of medical school followed by an increase until the end of the curriculum. No significant change over curriculum years was found for anxiety symptoms.

View this table:
[Table 4.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/17/2023.11.15.23298610/T4)

Table 4. Linear mixed models of the evolution of mental health including biopsychosocial covariates

The results for burnout’s longitudinal evolution during medical school are displayed in Table 5. They show that academic efficacy (reversed dimension of burnout) significantly decreased linearly from the first to the last year of medical school. For cynicism, we observed a slow increase in the two first years of medical school followed by a gradually steeper increase in the last years (i.e., a significant convex course following a sort of J shape). Finally, a curvilinear evolution was observed (∼ shape) for the emotional exhaustion dimension with an increase in emotional exhaustion until the second year of medical school, followed by a decrease until the fifth year, and finally another increase until the sixth year.

View this table:
[Table 5.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/17/2023.11.15.23298610/T5)

Table 5. Linear mixed models of the evolution of burnout including biopsychosocial covariates

### Influence of biopsychosocial covariates

The results for the covariates’ influence are displayed in Tables 4 and 5. The biopsychosocial factors that were significantly related to all outcome variables were gender identification, social support, having consulted a psychotherapist during the last year, emotion-focused coping, and satisfaction with health. Social support and satisfaction with health were consistently related to *less* mental health issues and burnout, whereas having consulted a psychotherapist during the last year and emotion-focused coping were consistently related to *more* mental issues and burnout. For gender, identifying as male was significantly associated with less depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, stress, and emotional exhaustion, but it was related to more suicidal ideation, more cynicism, and less academic efficacy (reversed dimension of burnout).

Other covariates were related to fewer mental health or burnout variables. Help-seeking coping was associated to less mental health issues (on all mental health variables), but unrelated to burnout. Physical activity was related to less depression symptoms, stress, and emotional exhaustion. Higher parent education was related to less stress, but more cynicism. Having a partner was related to less stress and emotional exhaustion. And finally, problem-focused coping was related to more academic efficacy. Having a paid job and BMI were the only tested covariates that showed no significant influence.

According to effect size indicators, the strongest predictors of students’ mental health and burnout were emotion-focused coping (average absolute β = .33), followed by satisfaction with health (average absolute β = .14) and social support (average absolute β = .11). The effect sizes are considered medium for emotion-focused coping and small for all other significant covariates. Overall, the models tested explained between 52% (for suicidal ideation) and 73% (for anxiety symptoms) of the outcome variables’ total variance (fixed effect plus random structure; “Conditional R2”).

## Discussion

The results of the present study show that medical students’ mental health gradually improves in terms of depression symptoms, suicidal ideation, and stress, although suicidal ideation increases again during the last year of medical school and anxiety symptoms remain stable throughout the curriculum. For burnout, it is another picture: it worsens with medical students experiencing gradually more cynicism and less academic efficacy, whereas we observe a worsening of emotional exhaustion until the end of the second year, followed by an improvement, and then another surge during the last year.

Our results are in line with past findings regarding the comparison between medical students and general population in terms of mental health [1,2]. This study indeed indicates that medical students report significantly more depression symptoms and anxiety symptoms compared to same-age general population individuals. In fact, according to the CES-D cutoffs, twice as much medical students are at risk of clinical depression compared to same-age general population individuals. Moreover, a specificity/sensitivity check of the CES-D cutoffs using data collected as part of the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus project showed that one third of the individuals who scored above the CES-D cutoffs presented a clinical depression diagnosed with the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (a clinical interview assessing major mood and psychotic disorders [27]). Based on these analyses, it can be assumed that around 15% of our participating medical students and up to 20% of the first-year students presented a clinical depression.

Like other studies in the field [4], our results confirm that students present high mental health issues in the first two years of medical school. On the bright side, medical students’ mental health mostly improved along the curriculum years. Nevertheless, the present study indicates that the students presented a surge in suicidal ideation and burnout in the last year of medical school. Given that few longitudinal studies span over the whole medical curriculum, the difficulties met in the last year of medical school has seldomly been described in the past. The stressors faced at the end of medical school are manifestly different from the ones medical students face in the first years of their studies. Indeed, the beginning of medical school is characterized by difficulties that might be faced by any new university students, such as change of social environment, adaptation to a new learning style, high study workload, strong competition, and stressful examinations. The impact of these stressors is likely to lessen along the curriculum years as students adapt to what has become their new lifestyle and progress along their curriculum. However, the end of medical school can bring new types of stressors that might be more specific to medical students. Indeed, through clerkships, medical students are gradually exposed to their potential future practice. They experience the relationship with patients, but also with co-workers and their hierarchy and might face difficult situations where they are confronted with the complexity, feeling of powerlessness, and lack of control that can characterize medical practice. As they enter clinical practice, the students face their shortcomings and the need to lean on their elders, yet asking for help is a coping mechanism they employ to a limited degree compared to the general population, as our results show. Moreover, the perspective of the transition to the upcoming internship phase can be an important preoccupation for medical students. The end of studies, anticipated as the long-awaited start of professional practice also corresponds to the start of postgraduate training. This period of transition brings forth both choices to make and challenges to overcome. The results of the present study indicate that these stressors faced at the end of medical school impact mental health and burnout differently than the ones faced in the beginning of medical school. In the past decade, there has been a debate on whether burnout and mental health indicators such as depression and anxiety are the same or different constructs [28]. This study indicates that mental health indicators and burnout are related but distinct. Indeed, it shows that mental health is more impacted by the generic stressors of the beginning of medical training, whereas burnout is more impacted by the specific stressors of the end of medical school, which might be characterized by occupational problematics. On the other hand, suicidal ideation and the emotional exhaustion dimension of burnout were influenced by both the stressors of the beginning and the end of medical school, which is in line with previous findings showing that suicidal ideation correlates with both depression and burnout [29] and that emotional exhaustion is the burnout dimension most strongly correlated to depression [30].

This study further shows that the most influential protective factors against medical students’ mental health issues and burnout are less emotion-focused coping, more social support, and more satisfaction with health. These covariates were already known to contribute to medical students’ mental health and burnout [10] and can be the target of specific student support services. For instance, increasing the use of help-seeking coping strategies has the potential to bring at the same time more adapted coping strategies and more social support. Our results show relatively low help-seeking coping strategies among the medical students compared to same-age general population and past studies report on medical students’ reluctance to seek help for mental health issues or burnout because they felt a pressure to be seen as a competent, feared stigmatization, and had insufficient knowledge of existing support services [31]. In our university, numerous extra-curricular activities are proposed by different associations to bring students together and thus increase their social support resources. Also, accessible on campus psychiatric consultations are available to medical students.

### Strengths and limitations

The present study’s strength lies in its longitudinal design covering the sixth years of Medical School as well as a large sample. Additionally, the wide array of mental health and burnout validated indicators as well as the large coverage of biopsychosocial potential covariates ensures a more comprehensive picture of the topic. Nevertheless, some limitation needs to be acknowledged. First, a yearly measurement might fail to capture short-term changes in mental health and burnout. Second, the results for stress are to be interpreted with caution given that it was measured with a single item that has not been validated. Third, each student participated to a maximum of three time points and most of them participated only in one or two time points. Further studies with less incomplete data across time points are warranted to confirm the accuracy of the full trajectories’ estimation, ascertain the precision of parameter estimates, and avoid false-negative results. Finally, the study was run in one single Swiss university, which limits the generalizability of the findings. It also made it impossible to evaluate the impact of university-specific factors such as the pedagogical approach or the study program. Replication in other universities and countries is needed to corroborate this study’s results and explore university-related covariates of medical students’ mental health and burnout.

## Conclusion

This paper presents one of the rare longitudinal studies of mental health and burnout spanning from the first to the last year of medical school. Results indicate that the beginning and the end of medical school bring specific stressors that impact differently medical students’ mental health and burnout. Specifically, medical students face more mental health issues in the beginning of their studies that lessen along their curriculum but experience more burnout issues in the last year of medical school. Mental health issues and burnout not only negatively impacts students’ life, but might also affect the students’ future medical practice as they can hinder their professionalism [9,32]. Many medical schools have implemented protectionist measures to alleviate the mental burden of medical students. The present study indicates coping strategies, social support, and satisfaction with health as the most influential covariates that should be primarily targeted by interventions aiming to lessen medical students’ mental health issues and burnout.

## Data Availability

The data that support the main findings of this study are openly available in zenodo at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8405764. For the comparison analyses, the data of CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study used in this article cannot be fully shared as they contain potentially sensitive personal information on participants. According to the Ethics Committee for Research of the Canton of Vaud, sharing these data would be a violation of the Swiss legislation with respect to privacy protection. However, coded individual-level data that do not allow researchers to identify participants are available upon request to researchers who meet the criteria for data sharing of the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus Datacenter (CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland). Any researcher affiliated to a public or private research institution who complies with the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus standards can submit a research application to research.colaus@chuv.ch or research.psycolaus@chuv.ch. Proposals requiring baseline data only, will be evaluated by the baseline (local) Scientific Committee (SC) of the CoLaus and PsyCoLaus studies. Proposals requiring follow-up data will be evaluated by the follow-up (multicentric) SC of the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus cohort study. Detailed instructions for gaining access to the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus data used in this study are available at www.colaus-psycolaus.ch/professionals/how-to-collaborate.

[http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8405764](http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8405764) 

## Supporting information

**S1. Participation flow chart**

**S2. Correlations between the variables of interest (N = 1595)**

## Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Sylvie Felix and Fabienne Thévenaz for their help in the ETMED-L project’s data collection.

*   Received November 15, 2023.
*   Revision received November 15, 2023.
*   Accepted November 16, 2023.


*   © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

## References

1.  1.Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Segal JB, Peluso MJ, Guille C, et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2016;316:2214–36.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2016.17324&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27923088&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

2.  2. Tian-Ci Quek T,  Wai-San Tam W,  X. Tran B, Zhang M, Zhang Z, Su-Hui Ho C, et al. The global prevalence of anxiety among medical students: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2019;16:2735.
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

3.  3.Erschens R, Keifenheim KE, Herrmann-Werner A, Loda T, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Bugaj TJ, et al. Professional burnout among medical students: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Med. Teach. 2019;41:172–83.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/0142159X.2018.1457213&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

4.  4.Puthran R, Zhang MWB, Tam WW, Ho RC. Prevalence of depression amongst medical students: A meta-analysis. Med. Educ. 2016;50:456–68.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/medu.12962&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

5.  5.Frajerman A, Morvan Y, Krebs MO, Gorwood P, Chaumette B. Burnout in medical students before residency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Psychiatry 2019;55:36–42.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.08.006&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30384110&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

6.  6.Brazeau CMLR, Shanafelt T, Durning SJ, Massie FS, Eacker A, Moutier C, et al. Distress among matriculating medical students relative to the general population. Acad. Med. 2014;89:1520.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/ACM.0000000000000482&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25250752&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

7.  7.Hope V, Henderson M. Medical student depression, anxiety and distress outside North America: A systematic review. Med. Educ. 2014;48:963–79.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/medu.12512&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

8.  8.Dyrbye L, Shanafelt T. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med. Educ. 2016;50:132–49.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/medu.12927&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26695473&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

9.  9.Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Shanafelt TD. Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Acad. Med. 2006;81:354–73.
    
    

10. 10.Kötter T, Fuchs S, Heise M, Riemenschneider H, Sanftenberg L, Vajda C, et al. What keeps medical students healthy and well? A systematic review of observational studies on protective factors for health and well-being during medical education. BMC Med. Educ. 2019;19:94.
    
    

11. 11.Berney A, Carrard V, Berney S, Schlegel K, Gaume J, Gholam M, et al. Study protocol for the ETMED-L project: longitudinal study of mental health and interpersonal competence of medical students in a Swiss university using a comprehensive framework of empathy. BMJ Open 2021;11:e053070.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYm1qb3BlbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMzoiMTEvMTIvZTA1MzA3MCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzExLzE3LzIwMjMuMTEuMTUuMjMyOTg2MTAuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 

12. 12.Preisig M, Waeber G, Vollenweider P, Bovet P, Rothen S, Vandeleur C, et al. The PsyCoLaus study: Methodology and characteristics of the sample of a population-based survey on psychiatric disorders and their association with genetic and cardiovascular risk factors. BMC Psychiatry 2009;9:9.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/1471-244X-9-9&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19292899&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

13. 13.Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1977;1:385–401.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/014662167700100306&link_type=DOI) 

14. 14.Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychol. Aging 1997;12:277–87.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.277&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9189988&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1997XD03100009&link_type=ISI) 

15. 15.Beck AT. Depression inventory. Philadelphia, PA: Center for cognitive therapy; 1978.
    
    

16. 16.Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
    
    

17. 17.Schaufeli WB, Martínez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2002;464–81.
    
    

18. 18.Grob A, Bodmer NM, Flammer A. Living conditions in Europe: The case of Switzerland. University of Bern, Institute of Psychology, Bern; 1993.
    
    

19. 19.Bodmer NM, Grob A. Well-being and constraints of adolescents: A comparison of adolescents from single-parent and two-parent families [Bien-être et contraintes d’adolescents: Une comparaison entre adolescents de familles monoparentales et de familles biparentales]. Int. J. Psychol. 1996;31:39–48.
    
    

20. 20.Perrin M, Vandeleur CL, Castelao E, Rothen S, Glaus J, Vollenweider P, et al. Determinants of the development of post-traumatic stress disorder, in the general population. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2014;49:447–57.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00127-013-0762-3&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24022753&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

21. 21.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
    
    

22. 22.Pinheiro J, Bates D. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
    
    

23. 23.Gałecki A, Burzykowski T. Linear Mixed-Effects Model [Internet]. In: Gałecki A, Burzykowski T, editors. Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using R: A Step-by-Step Approach. New York, NY: Springer; 2013 [cited 2023 Jun 6]. page 245–73.Available from: doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3900-4_13
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/978-1-4614-3900-4_13&link_type=DOI) 

24. 24.StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. StataCorp LLC. College Station, TX: 2021.
    
    

25. 25. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: 2022.
    
    

26. 26.Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2013;38:52–4.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23495371&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

27. 27. Nurnberger JI Jr, Blehar MC, Kaufmann CA, York-Cooler C, Simpson SG, Harkavy-Friedman J, et al. Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: Rationale, Unique Features, and Training. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1994;51:849–59.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7944874&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994PQ61200001&link_type=ISI) 

28. 28.Koutsimani P, Montgomery A, Georganta K. The relationship between burnout, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. [Internet] 2019 [cited 2023 Jul 26];10. Available from: [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00284](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00284)
    
    

29. 29.Ryan E, Hore K, Power J, Jackson T. The relationship between physician burnout and depression, anxiety, suicidality and substance abuse: A mixed methods systematic review. Front. Public Health [Internet] 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 26];11. Available from: [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1133484](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1133484)
    
    

30. 30.Bianchi R, Schonfeld IS, Laurent E. Burnout–depression overlap: A review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2015;36:28–41.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.004&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25638755&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 

31. 31.Chew-Graham CA, Rogers A, Yassin N. ‘I wouldn’t want it on my CV or their records’: medical students’ experiences of help-seeking for mental health problems. Med. Educ. 2003;37:873–80.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01627.x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12974841&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000185349600008&link_type=ISI) 

32. 32.Dyrbye LN, Massie FS, Eacker A, Harper W, Power D, Durning SJ, et al. Relationship between burnout and professional conduct and attitudes among US medical students. JAMA 2010;304:1173–80.
    
    [CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2010.1318&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20841530&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F11%2F17%2F2023.11.15.23298610.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000281770600009&link_type=ISI)