Abstract
Background Cardiomyopathy (CMP) is the leading cause of death in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Characterization of disease trajectory can be challenging, especially in the early stage of CMP where onset and clinical progression may vary. Traditional metrics from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging such as LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) and LGE (late gadolinium enhancement) are often insufficient for assessing disease trajectory. We hypothesized that strain patterns from a novel 4D (3D+time) CMR regional strain analysis method can be used to predict the rate of DMD CMP progression.
Methods We compiled 115 short-axis cine CMR image stacks for n=40 pediatric DMD patients (13.6±4.2 years) imaged yearly for 3 consecutive visits and computed regional strain metrics using custom-built feature tracking software. We measured regional strain parameters by determining the relative change in the localized 4D endocardial surface mesh using end diastole as the initial reference frame.
Results We first separated patients into two cohorts based on their initial CMR: LVEF≥55% (n=28, normal cohort) and LVEF<55% (n=12, abnormal cohort). Using LVEF decrease measured two years following the initial scan, we further subclassified these cohorts into slow (ΔLVEF%≤5) or fast (ΔLVEF%>5) progression groups for both the normal cohort (n=12, slow; n=15, fast) and the abnormal cohort (n=8, slow; n=4, fast). There was no statistical difference between the slow and fast progression groups in standard biomarkers such as LVEF, age, or LGE status. However, basal circumferential strain (Ecc) late diastolic strain rate and basal surface area strain (Ea) late diastolic strain rate magnitude were significantly decreased in fast progressors in both normal and abnormal cohorts (p<0.01, p=0.04 and p<0.01, p=0.02, respectively). Peak Ea and Ecc magnitudes were also decreased in fast progressors, though these only reached statistical significance in the normal cohort (p<0.01, p=0.24 and p<0.01, p=0.18, respectively).
Conclusion Regional strain metrics from 4D CMR can be used to differentiate between slow or fast CMP progression in a longitudinal DMD cohort. These results demonstrate that 4D CMR strain is useful for early identification of CMP progression in patients with DMD.
Clinical Perspective Cardiomyopathy is the number one cause of death in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, but the onset and progression of the disease are variable and heterogeneous. In this study, we used a novel 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance regional strain analysis method to evaluate 40 pediatric Duchenne patients over three consecutive annual visits. From our analysis, we found that peak systolic strain and late diastolic strain rate were early indicators of cardiomyopathy progression. This method offers promise for early detection and monitoring, potentially improving patient outcomes through timely intervention and management.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Ackerman/Nicholoff Family (L. Markham), Fighting Duchenne Foundation and the Fight DMD/Jonah & Emory Discovery Grant (J. Soslow), the Food and Drug Administration Orphan Products Grant R01FD006649 (J. Soslow), the National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1 RR024975-01, and is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant 2 UL1 TR000445-06 (G. Bernard), and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number F30HL162452 (C. Earl), K23HL123938 (J. Soslow), and R56HL141248 (J. Soslow). This publication was also made possible with support from Grant Number, UL1TR002529 (S. Moe and S. Wiehe, co-PIs) from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award (C. Earl), and the Leslie A. Geddes Endowment at Purdue University (C. Goergen). Engineering in Medicine Pilot Fund between Purdue University College of Engineering and Indiana University School of Medicine (L. Markham, C. Goergen, C. Earl). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This manuscript contains patient data from an observational study approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board. All participants adhered to approved protocols and provided their consent or assent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data referred to in the manuscript is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
