ABSTRACT
Background Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the gold-standard method to quantify cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), is not always feasible due to cost, access, and burden. The usual-paced 400m long-distance corridor walk (LDCW), a measure of mobility among older adults, may provide an alternate method to assess CRF among populations unable to complete maximal intensity testing. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an estimating equation to estimate VO2peak from average 400m walking speed (WS) among participants in the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA).
Methods At baseline, participants (N=820, 76.2±4.9 years, 58% Women, 86% Non-Hispanic White) completed a 400m LDCW (400m WS=400m/completion time in seconds) and symptom-limited maximal CPET (Modified Balke Protocol). VO2peak (mL/kg/min) was considered the highest 30-second average oxygen consumption during CPET. Other covariates included: age, sex, race, physical activity (7-day wrist-worn accelerometer), physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery, range 0-12), perceived physical fatigability (Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale, range 0-50), and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE, range 6-20) at completion of the 400m LDCW. Stepwise linear regression was used. Internal validation was completed using data-splitting method (70%; 30%).
Results Mean VO2peak was 20.2±4.8 mL/kg/min and mean 400m WS was 1.06±0.2 m/s. Each 0.05 m/s increment in 400m WS was associated with a 0.40 mL/kg/min higher VO2peak after adjustment for covariates. An estimating equation including 400m WS, age, sex, race, and RPE was developed. Internal validation showed low overall bias (-0.26) and strong correlation (r = 0.71) between predicted and measured VO2peak values. Bland-Altman plot and regression analyses indicated predicted VO2peak was an acceptable alternative, despite mean underestimation of 4.53 mL/kg/min among those with CPET VO2peak ≥25 mL/kg/min.
Conclusions Usual-paced 400m LDCW strongly correlates with direct measures of cardiorespiratory fitness during CPET in older adults with lower fitness and can be used to test both fitness and function.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging is supported by funding from the National Institute on Aging (AG 059416). Study infrastructure support was funded in part by NIA Claude D. Pepper Older American Independence Centers at University of Pittsburgh (P30 AG024827) and Wake Forest University (P30 AG021332) and the Clinical and Translational Science Institutes, funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, at Wake Forest University (UL1 0TR001420). Additionally, the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Research Registry and Developmental Pilot Grant (NIH P30 AG024827), and the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging supported N.W.G to develop the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Participants gave written informed consent, and the WIRB-Copernicus Group (WCG) Institutional Review Board (WCGIRB, study number 20180764) approved SOMMA as a single IRB.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding Information: The Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging is supported by funding from the National Institute on Aging (AG 059416). Study infrastructure support was funded in part by NIA Claude D. Pepper Older American Independence Centers at University of Pittsburgh (P30 AG024827) and Wake Forest University (P30 AG021332) and the Clinical and Translational Science Institutes, funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, at Wake Forest University (UL1 0TR001420). Additionally, the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Research Registry and Developmental Pilot Grant (NIH P30 AG024827), and the Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging supported N.W.G to develop the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
