ABSTRACT
Background Mental disorders and discrimination share common risk factors. The association between having a mental disorder and experiencing discrimination is well-known, but the extent to which familial factors, such as genetic and shared environmental factors, might confound this association, including gender differences in familial confounding, remains unexplored.
Aims We investigated potential unmeasured familial confounding in the relationship between mental disorders and discrimination.
Method We examined 2,044 same-sex twin pairs aged 16–25 years from the German population-based study ’TwinLife’. We used a matched design and random-effects regression applied to within-individual and within-and-between pair models for the association between mental disorder and discrimination, and used likelihood ratio tests (LRTs) to compare these models. Multivariable models were adjusted for body-mass-index, educational attainment, and global life satisfaction.
Results Mental disorder and discrimination were associated in the adjusted within-individual model (adjusted odds ratio=2.19, 95% Confidence Interval:1.42–3.39, P<0.001). However, the within-and-between pair model showed that this association was explained by the within-pair mean (aOR=4.24, 95%CI:2.17–8.29, P<0.001) and not the within-pair difference (aOR=1.26, 95%CI:0.70–2.28, P=0.4) of mental disorder. Therefore, this association was mostly explained by familial confounding, which is also supported by the LRTs for the unadjusted and adjusted models (P<0.001 and P=0.03, respectively). This familial confounding was more prominent for males than females.
Conclusions Our findings show that the association between mental disorder and discrimination is almost fully explained by unmeasured familial factors. Incorporating family members in interventions targeted at ameliorating mental ill-health and experiences of discrimination among adolescents may improve efficacy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The TwinLife Project is funded by the German Research Foundation (grant number 220286500). LCF is funded by a Suicide Prevention Australia Postdoctoral Fellowship. JTY receives salary and research support from a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (GNT1178027).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the University of Melbourne's Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC ref#:21305). Ethics approval for the original TwinLife study has been obtained through the German Psychological Association (protocol numbers: RR 11.2009 and RR 09.2013). Written or verbal informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available from the data custodian (Gesis - gesis.org) upon reasonable request.
