Mendelian Randomization Study of Whole Blood Viscosity and Cardiovascular Diseases
==================================================================================
* Youngjune Bhak
* Albert Tenesa
## Abstract
**Aims** Association between whole blood viscosity (WBV) and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been reported. However, the causal relationship between WBV and CVD remains not thoroughly investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the causal relation between WBV and CVD.
**Methods** Mendelian randomization was employed to investigate the casual relationship between WBV and CVD. Calculated WBV, derived polygenic risk score (PRS) for WBV, and medical records from 378,210 individuals participating in the UK biobank study were analyzed.
**Results** The means of calculated WBVs were 16.9 (standard deviation: 0.8) and 55.1 (standard deviation: 17.2) for high shear rate (HSR) and low shear rate (LSR), respectively. 37,859 (10.0%) major cardiovascular event (MACE) consisted of 23,894 (6.3%) cases of myocardial infarction (MI), 9,245 (2.4%) cases of ischemic stroke, 10,377 (2.7%) cases of revascularization, and 5,703 (1.5%) cases of Coronary heart disease-related death. WBVs of individuals with PRS above median were significantly higher than the group that were below median for both low shear rate (P<0.001) and high shear rate (P<0.001). The odd ratios (95% confidence intervals) for MACE in the higher WBV group were 1.22 (1.19 - 1.25) and 1.14 (1.12 - 1.16), for HSR and LSR, respectively. The higher PRS group was insignificant with all outcomes, for both HSR and LSR.
**Conclusions** The Mendelian randomization analysis conducted in this study does not support a causal relationship between calculated WBV and CVD.
Keywords
* Whole blood viscosity
* cardiovascular disease
* Mendelian Randomization
## Introduction
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including heart attack and stroke, are one of leading causes of morbidity and mortality globally [1]. Association between the risk of CVD and Whole blood viscosity (WBV), a measure of the thickness and flow resistance of bulk blood, have been reported [2-5]. However, establishing a causal relationship between WBV and CVD remains challenging due to the potential biases from confounding factors in traditional studies lacking randomized trial designs.
Mendelian randomization (MR), an epidemiological method, utilizes genetic variants robustly associated with an exposure of interest as instrumental variables (IVs) to investigate the causal effects of risk factors on specific outcomes [6]. The advantage of MR lies in the random assignment of these genetic variants at conception, rendering MR studies less susceptible to confounding factors compared to traditional observational studies [7]. Furthermore, MR is robust against reverse causality since the development of diseases does not alter individuals’ genotypes. MR have been utilized to investigate casual relationships of risk factors such as blood pressure [8, 9], obesity [10], type 2 diabetes mellitus [11] and, profile of blood lipids [12-14] in and CVD.
The objective of this study was to use MR to examine the causal relationship between WBV and CVD. WBV of individuals was calculated by applying the formula previously reported [15]. Polygenic risk score (PRS), a quantitative genetic risk score, representing the cumulative impact of genetic variants, was derived and used as the instrumental variable in MR. Causal relationship of WBV on risk of CVDs were assessed by comparing individuals stratified by their derived PRS.
## Methods
### Participants
The UK Biobank (UKB) is a prospective research resource of population-based cohort study that include comprehensive phenotype and genotype data from approximately 500,000 participants recruited in 2006 - 2010 residing in England, Scotland, and Wales ([www.ukbiobank.ac.uk](http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk)). This an open-access resource was established to support investigations into the factors influencing various health outcomes [16].
### Ethics Statement
The UK Biobank project was approved by the National Research Ethics Service Committee North West-Haydock (REC reference: 11/NW/0382). Participants provided written informed consent to participate in the UK Biobank. An electronic signed consent was obtained from the participants. This research was conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under project 44986.
### Extrapolation of Whole Blood Viscosity
WBV was calculated for both low shear rate (LSR) (0.5 sec-1) and high shear rate (HSR) (208 sec-1) from hematocrit (HCT) and total plasma protein concentration (TP) using the validated formulation [15]. HCT was calculated by multiplying red blood cell count by the mean corpuscular volume.
HSR: WBV (208 sec-1) = (0.12 × HCT) + (0.17 TP) - 2.07
LSR: WBV (0.5 sec-1) = (1.89 × HCT) + (3.76 TP) - 78.42
### Study outcomes
The data pertaining to each component of the participants’ outcomes in the present study was accessible through the UK Biobank study [16]. The primary outcome of the study was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which encompassed a composite outcome involving the occurrence of non-fatal MI, coronary revascularization (defined as “percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, PTCA” or “coronary artery bypass grafting, CABG”), ischemic stroke, or death due to coronary heart disease (CHD).
These specific outcomes were defined and categorized as follow: non-fatal MI defined algorithmically by UK Biobank (ICD9: 410.X, 411.0.X, 412.X, 429.79; ICD10: I21.X, I22.X, I23.X, I24.1, I25.2; self-report 20002: 1075), PTCA or CABG (self-report 20004: 1070, 1095, 1523; Procedures (OPCS): K50.1, K40.X, K41.X, K42.X, K43.X, K44.X), ischemic stroke (ICD9: 434.X, 436.X; ICD10: I63.X, I64.X; self-report 20002: 1583), and death due to CHD (Death 40001, 40002: I21.X, I22.X, I23.X, I24.X, I25.1, I25.2, I25.3, I25.5, I25.6, I25.8, I25.9) [14].
### Genetic instrument
We conducted a split-sample genome wide association study (GWAS) and MR using the UK Biobank dataset. The dataset was randomly split into two halves, and for each half, GWASs for WBVs was performed. The resulting summary statistics from each half were then used to derive the PRS of WBV (WBV-PRS) for the other half to avoid sample overlap [17]. To ensure homogeneity, we limited our analyses to unrelated individuals of White British ancestry. Additionally, individuals with more than 10% missing genotypes or those with discrepancies between recorded sex and genetically determined sex were excluded. Following these exclusions, the final dataset consisted of 378,213 participants (Table 1).
GWASs were conducted using genotypes of the unrelated White British individuals. White British individuals are inferred from UK Biobank records. The unrelated individuals were identified using the KING software with following options: --unrelated --degree 2 (version 2.2.8) [18]. Autosomal genotypes of unrelated White British were further filtered using PLINK software (version 1.90p) with the following options; --geno 0.01, --hwe 1e-15, --maf 0.01, and --mind 0.1 [19]. For the GWASs of WBVs, REGENIE software (version 3.2.2) was utilized with the following option; --apply-rint [20]. Covariates considered in the GWAS included age, age square, genetic principal components 1 to 20, sex, and genotyping array.
View this table:
[Table 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/30/2023.10.30.23297662/T1)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
To select independent instrumental variants for Mendelian randomization, summary statistics were clumped to extract index variants using PLINK software with the following options; -- clump, --clump-p1 0.00000005, --clump-r2 0.001, and --clump-kb 10000 [19]. To avoid the risk of weak instrument bias, variants with F-statistics > 10 were selected [21]. The variants were filtered out if a variant had a reported association with CVD and or factors related with blood viscosity or CVD. The associations were investigated by utilizing PhenoScanner database with the following options; catalogue: diseases & traits, p-value: 5×10−8, proxies -EUR, r2: 0.8, and build: 37 [22, 23]. Such factors include obesity [10, 24-26], blood pressure [8, 9, 27], lipid traits [12-14, 28-32], type 2 diabetes mellitus [11, 33, 34], smoking and alcohol intake [35-37]. For HSR, 53 variant from one half split and 50 variants from the other half split passed the filters, respectively. For LSR, 58 variant from one half split and 52 variants from the other half split passed the filters, respectively (Table S1-S4). The filter passed variants were used to derive WBV-PRS. The WBV-PRS was derived using PRSice-2 software (version 2.3.3) by using the summary statistics of variants that passed our filters [38].
## Statistical analyses
Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages, continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviations (SD). Odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were analysed using logistic regression. The analysis with WBV-PRS was accompanied by adjustments for the split halves, considering them as a batch effect. All significance tests were two-tailed, and statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed using the R version 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
## Results
A total of 378,210 individuals were included in the study (Table 1). The mean age ± SD was 57.0 ± 7.9 years. 53.7% of participants were women. The mean ± SD of calculated WBV were 55.1 ± 17.2 and 16.9 ± 0.8 for LSR and HSR, respectively. 37,859 (10.0%) of major cardiovascular events, including 23,893 (6.3%) myocardial infarction, 9,245 (2.4%) ischemic stroke, 10,376 (2.7%) revascularization, and 5,703 (1.5%) death due to CHD were recorded. A group of individuals with a WBV-PRS above the median (High WBV-PRS) have higher WBV compared to those with a WBV-PRS equal to or below the median for both HSR (mean difference: 0.11, P<0.001) and LSR (2.58, P<0.001).
Associations of the WBV and WBV-PRS groups with the risk of CVDs have exhibited differences. Compared to a group of individual with HSR equal to or below the median, a group of individuals with HSR above the median showed significant association with the increased risk of CVDs including MACE (Odd ratio: 1.22, 95% Confidence interval: 1.19 - 1.25, P<0.001), MI (1.23, 1.20 - 1.27, P<0.001), stroke (1.08, 1.03 - 1.12, P<0.001), revascularization (1.29, 1.23 - 1.34, P<0.001), and death by CVD (1.30, 1.122 - 1.37, P<0.001). High HSR-PRS was not significant in all CVD categories for both unadjusted and adjusted study (Fig. 1A).
[Figure 1.](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/30/2023.10.30.23297662/F1)
Figure 1. Association of the WBV and WBV-PRS with the risk of cardiovascular events.
Panel A shows the associations between high HSR and high HSR-PRS with the risk of cardiovascular events, and panel B shows the associations between high LSR and high LSR-PRS with the risk of cardiovascular events. The boxes represent point odd ratio estimates of the effect, and the lines represent 95% confidence intervals. MACE denotes major cardiovascular event, MI myocardial infarction, WBV whole blood viscosity, WBV-PRS polygenic risk score for whole blood viscosity.
Compared to a group with LSR equal to or below the median, The group with LSR above the median showed a significant association with the increased risk of CVDs including MACE (1.15, 1.13 - 1.18, P<0.001), MI (1.15, 1.12 - 1.18, P<0.001), revascularization (1.18, 1.13 - 1.23, P<0.001), and death by CVD (1.25, 1.18 – 1.32, P<0.001). Effect of High LSR-PRS was insignificant in all CVD for both unadjusted and adjusted study (Fig. 1B).
## Discussion
This study used MR to investigate the potential causal association between WBV and CVD. The result from this study indicated insufficient evidence to substantiate a causal link between WBV and the risk of CVD.
WBV is susceptible to various influencing factors. Notably, WBV demonstrate non-Newtonian fluid behaviour. Under conditions of low shear rates, blood cells tend to aggregate, leading to an elevation in viscosity. Conversely at HSR, the opposite phenomenon occurs [39-41]. WBV has been noted to exhibit association with CVD and cardiovascular risk factors in previous studies [3, 42, 43]. However, upon adjustments for these risk factors, the association between WBV and CVD was found to be statistically non-significant in the subsequent study [44]. The not significant association following adjustments remained consistently evident in this study using MR.
However, the study result should be interpreted and considered carefully since we have not utilized directly measured WBV. While the formula employed in our study has undergone validation and has been applied in previous researches [15, 45, 46], it does not considered factors for WBV such as blood cell aggregability and deformability [47]. To establish a robust causal link between WBV and both CVD and CVD-related factors, future studies should incorporate measured WBV values, taking into account these critical variables.
## Data Availability
Our data is available as a part of the UK Biobank project. Details of procedures for accessing the UK Biobank data can be found here: [https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access](https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access)
[https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access](https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access)
## Declarations
### Availability of data and materials
Our data is available as a part of the UK Biobank project. Details of procedures for accessing the UK Biobank data can be found here: [https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access](https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access)
### Competing interests
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
### Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Artificial Intelligence and Multimorbidity: Clustering in Individuals, Space and Clinical Context (AIM-CISC) grant NIHR202639. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
## Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization: Y.B.
Data curation: Y.B.
Formal analysis: Y.B.
Funding Acquisition: A.T.
Investigation: Y.B.
Methodology: Y.B.
Project Administration: Y.B., A.T.
Resources: Y.B.
Software: Y.B.
Supervision: A.T.
Visualization: Y.B.
Writing – original draft: Y.B.
Writing – review & editing: Y.B., A.T.
## Acknowledgments
This work used the Edinburgh Compute and Data Facility (ECDF) ([http://www.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/](http://www.ecdf.ed.ac.uk/)).
This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource project 44986. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
* Received October 30, 2023.
* Revision received October 30, 2023.
* Accepted October 30, 2023.
* © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
## Reference
1. 1.Lozano, R., et al., Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The lancet, 2012. 380(9859): p. 2095–2128.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
2. 2.Lowe, G., et al., Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study. British journal of haematology, 1997. 96(1): p. 168–173.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.8532481.x&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9012704&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1997WD85900024&link_type=ISI)
3. 3.Woodward, M., et al., Does sticky blood predict a sticky end? Associations of blood viscosity, haematocrit and fibrinogen with mortality in the West of Scotland. British journal of haematology, 2003. 122(4): p. 645–650.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04475.x&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12899720&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000184573300013&link_type=ISI)
4. 4.Gori, T., et al., The distribution of whole blood viscosity, its determinants and relationship with arterial blood pressure in the community: cross-sectional analysis from the Gutenberg Health Study. Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, 2015. 9(6): p. 354–365.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/1753944715589887&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26082340&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
5. 5.Cetin, E.H.O., et al., Prognostic significance of whole blood viscosity estimated by de Simone’s formula in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Biomarkers in Medicine, 2016. 10(5): p. 495–511.
6. 6.Davey Smith, G. and G. Hemani, Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human molecular genetics, 2014. 23(R1): p. R89–R98.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/hmg/ddu328&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25064373&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000349825700013&link_type=ISI)
7. 7.Davies, N.M., M.V. Holmes, and G.D. Smith, Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. bmj, 2018. 362.
8. 8.Chan, I.I., M.K. Kwok, and C.M. Schooling, The total and direct effects of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on cardiovascular disease and longevity using Mendelian randomisation. Scientific Reports, 2021. 11(1): p. 21799.
9. 9.Malik, R., et al., Relationship between blood pressure and incident cardiovascular disease: linear and nonlinear mendelian randomization analyses. Hypertension, 2021. 77(6): p. 2004–2013.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16534&link_type=DOI)
10. 10.Sun, Y.-Q., et al., Body mass index and all cause mortality in HUNT and UK Biobank studies: linear and non-linear mendelian randomisation analyses. bmj, 2019. 364.
11. 11.Peters, T.M., et al., Sex differences in the risk of coronary heart disease associated with type 2 diabetes: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Diabetes Care, 2021. 44(2): p. 556–562.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiZGlhY2FyZSI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo4OiI0NC8yLzU1NiI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzEwLzMwLzIwMjMuMTAuMzAuMjMyOTc2NjIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)
12. 12.Voight, B.F., et al., Plasma HDL cholesterol and risk of myocardial infarction: a mendelian randomisation study. The Lancet, 2012. 380(9841): p. 572–580.
13. 13.Ference, B.A., et al., Variation in PCSK9 and HMGCR and risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine, 2016. 375(22): p. 2144–2153.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa1604304&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27959767&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
14. 14.Ference, B.A., et al., Mendelian randomization study of ACLY and cardiovascular disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 2019. 380(11): p. 1033–1042.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1056/NEJMoa1806747&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
15. 15.de Simone, G., et al., Relation of blood viscosity to demographic and physiologic variables and to cardiovascular risk factors in apparently normal adults. Circulation, 1990. 81(1): p. 107–117.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjgxLzEvMTA3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTAvMzAvMjAyMy4xMC4zMC4yMzI5NzY2Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=)
16. 16.Sudlow, C., et al., UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS medicine, 2015. 12(3): p. e1001779.
17. 17.Burgess, S., N.M. Davies, and S.G. Thompson, Bias due to participant overlap in two -sample Mendelian randomization. Genetic epidemiology, 2016. 40(7): p. 597–608.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/gepi.21998&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27625185&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
18. 18.Manichaikul, A., et al., Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics, 2010. 26(22): p. 2867–2873.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/bioinformatics/btq559&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20926424&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000283919800010&link_type=ISI)
19. 19.Purcell, S., et al., PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and populationbased linkage analyses. The American journal of human genetics, 2007. 81(3): p. 559–575.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1086/519795&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17701901&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
20. 20.Mbatchou, J., et al., Computationally efficient whole-genome regression for quantitative and binary traits. Nature genetics, 2021. 53(7): p. 1097–1103.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/S41588-021-00870-7&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
21. 21.Pierce, B.L., H. Ahsan, and T.J. VanderWeele, Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants. International journal of epidemiology, 2011. 40(3): p. 740–752.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ije/dyq151&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20813862&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000293618300025&link_type=ISI)
22. 22.Staley, J.R., et al., PhenoScanner: a database of human genotype–phenotype associations. Bioinformatics, 2016. 32(20): p. 3207–3209.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/bioinformatics/btw373&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27318201&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
23. 23.Kamat, M.A., et al., PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype–phenotype associations. Bioinformatics, 2019. 35(22): p. 4851–4853.
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
24. 24.Elagizi, A., et al., An overview and update on obesity and the obesity paradox in cardiovascular diseases. Progress in cardiovascular diseases, 2018. 61(2): p. 142–150.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.pcad.2018.07.003&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
25. 25.Khan, S.S., et al., Association of body mass index with lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease and compression of morbidity. JAMA cardiology, 2018. 3(4): p. 280–287.
26. 26.Guiraudou, M., et al., Obesity-related increase in whole blood viscosity includes different profiles according to fat localization. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 2013. 55(1): p. 63–73.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToiaW9zY2giO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6NzoiNTUvMS82MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzEwLzMwLzIwMjMuMTAuMzAuMjMyOTc2NjIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)
27. 27.Letcher, R.L., et al., Direct relationship between blood pressure and blood viscosity in normal and hypertensive subjects: role of fibrinogen and concentration. The American journal of medicine, 1981. 70(6): p. 1195–1202.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0002-9343(81)90827-5&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7234890&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1981LT92200010&link_type=ISI)
28. 28.Ference, B.A., et al., Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. European heart journal, 2017. 38(32): p. 2459–2472.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28444290&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
29. 29.Jeong, S.M., et al., Effect of change in total cholesterol levels on cardiovascular disease among young adults. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. 7(12): p. e008819.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToiYWhhb2EiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6MTI6IjcvMTIvZTAwODgxOSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzEwLzMwLzIwMjMuMTAuMzAuMjMyOTc2NjIuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)
30. 30.Laufs, U., et al., Clinical review on triglycerides. European heart journal, 2020. 41(1): p. 99–109c.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/eurheartj/ehz785&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
31. 31.Kosmas, C.E., et al., High-density lipoprotein (HDL) functionality and its relevance to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Drugs in context, 2018. 7.
32. 32.Irace, C., et al., Influence of blood lipids on plasma and blood viscosity. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 2014. 57(3): p. 267–274.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToiaW9zY2giO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6ODoiNTcvMy8yNjciO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8xMC8zMC8yMDIzLjEwLjMwLjIzMjk3NjYyLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)
33. 33.Liu, B., et al., Genetically predicted type 2 diabetes mellitus liability, glycated hemoglobin and cardiovascular diseases: a wide-angled Mendelian randomization study. Genes, 2021. 12(10): p. 1644.
34. 34.Andrea, V. and I. Timan. Relationship between diabetes mellitus and blood viscosity as measured by the digital microcapillary® system. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. IOP Publishing.
35. 35.Rosoff, D.B., et al., Evaluating the relationship between alcohol consumption, tobacco use, and cardiovascular disease: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study. PLoS medicine, 2020. 17(12): p. e1003410.
36. 36.Lowe, G., et al., The effects of age and cigarette-smoking on blood and plasma viscosity in men. Scottish medical journal, 1980. 25(1): p. 13–17.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/003693308002500103&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7209492&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
37. 37.Hamazaki, T. and H. Shishido, Increase in blood viscosity due to alcohol drinking. Thrombosis Research, 1983. 30(6): p. 587–594.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0049-3848(83)90267-0&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6612686&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1983QY41000006&link_type=ISI)
38. 38.Choi, S.W. and P.F. O’Reilly, PRSice-2: Polygenic Risk Score software for biobankscale data. Gigascience, 2019. 8(7): p. giz082.
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
39. 39.Pop, G., et al., The clinical significance of whole blood viscosity in (cardio) vascular medicine. Netherlands heart journal, 2002. 10(12): p. 512.
40. 40.Naghedi-Baghdar, H., et al., Effect of diet on blood viscosity in healthy humans: a systematic review. Electronic physician, 2018. 10(3): p. 6563.
41. 41.Nwose, E.U., Cardiovascular risk assessment and support techniques: whole blood viscosity assessment issues I: extrapolation chart and reference values. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 2010. 2(4): p. 165.
42. 42.Lowe, G., et al., Cardiovascular risk and haemorheology–results from the Scottish Heart Health Study and the MONICA Project, Glasgow. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, 1988. 8(3-4): p. 517–524.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NToiaW9zY2giO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiOC8zLTQvNTE3IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMTAvMzAvMjAyMy4xMC4zMC4yMzI5NzY2Mi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=)
43. 43.Woodward, M., et al., Associations of blood rheology and interleukin-6 with cardiovascular risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular disease. British journal of haematology, 1999. 104(2): p. 246–257.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01158.x&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10050704&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000078676100007&link_type=ISI)
44. 44.Peters, S.A., et al., Plasma and blood viscosity in the prediction of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort Study. European journal of preventive cardiology, 2017. 24(2): p. 161–167.
45. 45.Høieggen, A., et al., Whole-blood viscosity and the insulin-resistance syndrome. Journal of hypertension, 1998. 16(2): p. 203–210.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/00004872-199816020-00011&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9535148&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000073154600012&link_type=ISI)
46. 46.Moan, A., et al., Relationship between hemorrheologic factors and insulin sensitivity in healthy young men. Metabolism, 1994. 43(4): p. 423–427.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/0026-0495(94)90070-1&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8159097&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994NE55300005&link_type=ISI)
47. 47.Lowe, G., 1 Blood rheology in vitro and in vivo. Bailliere’s clinical haematology, 1987. 1(3): p. 597–636.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0950-3536(87)80018-5&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3327559&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F10%2F30%2F2023.10.30.23297662.atom)