Abstract
Background Electrical stimulation therapy for epilepsy patients is applied either to the epileptogenic region or to a larger network (e.g. with deep brain stimulation).
Objective/hypothesis Responses to single pulse electrical stimuli (SPES) reveal potential stimulation sites that target the epileptogenic region for cortical network stimulation therapy.
Methods We applied SPES to ten epilepsy patients who underwent intracranial electrocorticography recordings for pre-surgical evaluation. We detected cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) in response electrodes after stimulating other pairs of electrodes, revealing effective connections. We calculated event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) plots in all response electrodes after stimulating other electrode pairs. We detected interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) before and after each single pulse and calculated the logarithmic IED ratio.
We analyzed whether power suppression in the ERSP occurred in a response electrode when connected with the stimulus pair. We analyzed whether a larger change in IED ratio was accompanied by power suppression in the response electrode or when this electrode was connected with the stimulus pair.
Results We found that SPES has a neuromodulatory effect measured as: 1) the relationship of a CCEP and power suppression, 2) a larger change in IED rate when a CCEP was present, 3) a decrease in IED rate when power suppression was observed.
Conclusion(s) Results suggest that stimulation in an area connected to the epileptogenic region can modulate IEDs in this region. SPES might provide a template for localizing a stimulation site outside the epileptogenic region for electrical stimulation treatment of epilepsy.
Highlights
Stimulation of an electrode pair can suppress power in an electrode on connected tissue.
Stimulation of an electrode pair changes IED rate in an electrode on connected tissue.
A decrease in IED rate was accompanied by power suppression.
SPES indicates potential stimulation sites for neurostimulation therapy in epilepsy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the Dutch Epilepsy Fund (NEF 17-07).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of University Medical Center Utrecht gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Declaration of interest Declarations of interest: none
Data Availability
All code is available at https://github.com/dvanblooijs/CCEP_suppressionPower_Spikes. Data will be available at openneuro.org when the study is published in a peer-reviewed journal.
