Abstract
Background Healthcare and long-term care are crucial to the well-being of people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. This study investigates the clustering patterns of healthcare and long-term care use in people with MCI or dementia and the relationships between changes in cognitive functioning and transitions of care.
Methods The study used longitudinal data from three recent waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS 2014-2018, N=10,152). MCI and dementia were measured based on the Langa-Weir Classifications. The outcome measures included five types of healthcare and three types of long-term care services. Latent transition analyses were conducted to identify the clustering patterns of care use and map out the transition pathways between different care classes over time. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted to investigate the relationships between changes in cognitive functioning and care transitions.
Results We identified three user groups: medium healthcare and low long-term care (MM-LC, 56%, n=5,653), high healthcare and high long-term care (HM-HC, 37%, n=3,743), and low healthcare and low long-term care (LM-LC, 7%, n=736). The progression of cognitive impairment was associated with a higher probability of transitioning from MM-LC to HM-HC class (β=0.070; p<0.001). An improvement in cognitive functioning was associated with a higher probability of transitioning from HM-HC to MM-LC class (β=0.039, p<0.05).
Conclusions Our findings underscore the importance of integration between healthcare and long-term care. Changes in cognitive functioning are useful indicators for care planning, resource allocation, and care coordination from diverse care providers.
Three classes of healthcare and long-term care services were identified in the latent transition analyses.
The progression of cognitive impairment was associated with transitioning to a class characterized by more use of healthcare and long-term care services,
An improvement in cognitive functioning was associated with transitioning to a class characterized by less use of care in both sectors.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used ONLY openly available human data that were originally located at: https://www.rand.org/well-being/social-and-behavioral-policy/centers/aging/dataprod.html and https://hrsdata.isr.umich.edu/
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have made the following changes in the new version: 1. We have added a flowchart to illustrate our data cleaning and analysis process. 2. We have added a brief explanation of how MCI and dementia were defined based on the HRS sample. We described the validation sample, the cutoff points for MCI and dementia, and the prediction accuracy of the Langa-Weir classification algorithm (first paragraph on page 6) 3. We have added a table in the appendix reporting the number of people in the three cognitive groups in the base line and follow up surveys (eTable 2). Data on mortality and loss to follow-up were included in the table.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript All data produced are available online at Health and Retirement Study (HRS)
https://www.rand.org/well-being/social-and-behavioral-policy/centers/aging/dataprod.html
