High prevalence and risk of malaria among asymptomatic individuals from villages with high rates of artemisinin partial resistance in Kyerwa district, North-western Tanzania ============================================================================================================================================================================= * Salehe S. Mandai * Filbert Francis * Daniel P. Challe * Misago D. Seth * Rashid A. Madebe * Daniel A. Petro * Rule Budodo * Angelina J. Kisambale * Gervas A. Chacha * Ramadhan Moshi * Ruth B. Mbwambo * Dativa Pereus * Catherine Bakari * Sijenunu Aaron * Daniel Mbwambo * Abdallah Lusasi * Stella Kajange * Samuel Lazaro * Ntuli Kapologwe * Celine I. Mandara * Deus S. Ishengoma ## Abstract **Background** Tanzania adopted and has been implementing the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended interventions to control and eventually eliminate malaria. However, malaria is still a leading public health problem and the country experiences heterogeneous transmission; but the drivers of these patterns are not clearly known. This study assessed the prevalence and risk of malaria infections among asymptomatic individuals living in a hyperendemic area which has high prevalence of artemisinin partial resistant parasites in Kyerwa District of Kagera region, North-western Tanzania. **Methods** This was a community-based cross-sectional survey that recruited participants from five villages of Kyerwa district in Kagera region. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical, parasitological, types of houses inhabited and socio-economic status (SES) data were collected using electronic capture tools running on Open Data Kit (ODK). Risk factors associated with malaria infections were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression and the results were presented as crude (cOR) and adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). **Results** A total of 4,454 individuals were tested using malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and 1,979 (44.4%) had a positive test. The prevalence of malaria varied from 14.4% to 68.5% with significant differences among the villages (p<0.001). The prevalence and risk of malaria infections were significantly higher in males (aOR =1.25, 95% CI: 1.06 - 1.48, p=0.04), school children ((aged 5 – 10 years, aOR =4.09, 95% CI: 3.39 – 5.10, p<0.001) and (10-15 years, aOR=4.40, 95% CI: 3.46 – 5.59, p<0.001)) and among individuals who were not using bed nets (aOR =1.29, 95% CI: 1.10 – 1.42, p=0.002). Other risks of malaria infections included lower SES (aOR=1.27, 95% CI:1.04 – 1.55, p<0.001) and living in houses with open windows (aOR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.03 −1.54, p=0.024). **Conclusion** This study showed high prevalence of malaria infections and high heterogeneity at micro-geographic levels. The risk of malaria infections was higher in school children, males, individuals who did not use bed nets, and among participants with low SES or living in poorly constructed houses. These findings provide important baseline data in an area with a high prevalence of artemisinin partial-resistant parasites and will be utilized in future studies to monitor the trends and potential spread of such parasites. Keywords * Malaria * asymptomatic infections * risk factors * partial artemisinin resistance * Tanzania ## Background In the past two decades, there have been enhanced malaria control efforts which resulted in a significant decline of the disease burden globally, but progress has stalled since 2015 [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were an estimated 247 million malaria cases and 619,000 deaths in 2021 [2]. The WHO African Region (WHO-Afro), is the leading region with the highest malaria cases and deaths and accounted for 95% of the cases and 96% of malaria deaths in 2021, with an estimated 234 million cases and 593,000 deaths [2]. Although the global scale-up of effective malaria interventions has saved millions of lives globally and cut malaria mortality by 36% from 2010 to 2020, the resulting optimism leading to hopes and plans to eliminate and ultimately eradicate malaria are facing imminent threats. In Tanzania, over 93% of the population lives in areas where transmission occurs [3]. The country has recently transitioned from very high and stable to areas with varying transmission intensities [4,5]. Like in many malaria-endemic countries in the WHO-Afro region, *Plasmodium falciparum* is the cause of most of the infections in Tanzania, with other species being *Plasmodium ovale* spp and *Plasmodium malariae* [6–8]. Although *Plasmodium vivax* has been reported in a few studies in Tanzania [6,8], its public health significance remains unknown. The biggest contemporary challenges to malaria elimination include insecticide resistance by malaria vectors [9,10], emergence and spread of drug resistance [11,12], emergence of parasites that cannot be detected by the rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) due to deletions of the histidine-rich protein 2/3 (hrp2/3) gene [13,14] and emergence as well as spread of invasive *Anopheles stephensi* vectors [15,16]. There are also non-biological threats such as reduced funding for malaria control and political will at global and local/country levels [17,18]. To accelerate progress towards its elimination targets by 2030, Tanzania adopted WHO’s recommendations and has been implementing effective interventions over the past two decades to control and eventually eliminate malaria. The Tanzanian National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) has endeavoured to ensure high coverage and use of such interventions, focusing on vector control, case management and preventive therapy. Vector control interventions include the use of insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and/or long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), indoor residual spraying (IRS) and larval source management (LSM) while for effective case management, NMCP uses RDTs and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). To prevent malaria in pregnancy, NMCP deployed and strives to increase the proportion of women receiving two or more doses of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) of malaria during pregnancy [19]. These intervention yielded positive results and a declining trend of malaria burden was reported as shown by the decline of prevalence from 18% in 2008 to 7.3% in 2017 [20]. Based on recent reports, malaria remains a major public health problem and the country still experiences persistent transmission in some regions [2], but the drivers of these patterns are not clearly known. Malaria transmission in Tanzania has become heterogenous with high burden in north-western, southern and western regions while the central corridor, north-eastern and south-western parts of the country have low to very low transmission intensities [21,22]. The recent epidemiological transition and trends of malaria have raised critical questions which need to be addressed to allow the country to progress to its elimination targets by 2030. In addition, Tanzania faces emerging and endemic challenges such as low coverage of existing interventions, emergency and spread of drug and insecticide resistance and weakness of the public health system [23]. Most of these challenges are particularly context specific and require innovative and multi-faced approaches to ensure high impacts are attained and sustained. The interventions should also target and aim to eliminate the remaining pockets in low transmission areas as well as reducing the disease burden in high transmission areas and dealing with populations at higher risk [24]. Thus, NMCP needs to strategically and innovatively continue to implement the WHO recommended interventions including upgrading and making malaria surveillance a core intervention to facilitate the ongoing elimination efforts in all areas based on the local burden and level of transmission [25]. Tanzania faces biological and other threats which may compromise its progress and prospects to eliminate malaria by 2030 [26]. Of the biological threats, Tanzania has reported high prevalence of mosquitoes with resistance to multiple insecticides [10] and it is at high risk of the invasive *Anopheles stephensi* vectors which have been reported in Kenya and the Horn of Africa [27]. In addition, artemisinin partial resistance has been reported in some parts of Kagera region near the border with Rwanda and these parasites can potentially spread to other regions if not curtailed (Giesbretch D and Ishengoma D, Unpublished data). Although recent studies have reported low prevalence of parasites with *hrp2/3 gene* deletions associated with failure of HRP2-based RDTs [14], these threats are still imminent and the country needs to increase its vigilance through a strong surveillance system. It is also critical to urgently adopt the WHO strategy for dealing with artemisinin partial resistance [28] to prevent spread of resistant parasites from Kagera to other regions. This study assessed the prevalence and risk of malaria infections among asymptomatic individuals living in an area with high prevalence of parasites with artemisinin partial resistance in Kyerwa District, North-western Tanzania. Kyerwa is one of the districts of Kagera region with high malaria burden [29] and is located in an area which was recently reported to have high prevalence of artemisinin partial resistant parasites (Giesbretch D and Ishengoma D, Unpublished data). However, there is paucity of data regarding the magnitude and prevalence of infections in asymptomatic individuals, which serves a potential role in the transmission and risk of malaria infections, and potential spread of resistant parasites. Therefore, this study aimed at generating important data which will support the understanding of the burden and risk of malaria infections as well as the epidemiology of artemisinin partial resistant parasites. The findings will potentially help the government and other stakeholders in planning and implementing strategies for malaria prevention and control as well as mitigating artemisinin partial resistance in Kagera region. ## Methods ### Study design and sites This was a community-based cross-sectional survey (CSS) which was conducted after the peak of transmission season from July to August 2023. It was part of the main project on molecular surveillance of malaria in Tanzania (MSMT) which has been running in 13 regions of Mainland Tanzania from 2021 and was recently extended to cover all 26 regions (Ishengoma – unpublished data). The study covered five villages (Kitoma, Kitwechenkura, Nyakabwera, Rubuga and Ruko) which are part of the longitudinal component of the MSMT that was initiated in 2022 to monitor the trends and patterns of malaria in areas with special features as described elsewhere (Ishengoma, unpublished data). The study villages are located in Kyerwa district which is one of the eight districts of Kagera region (Figure 1). Kyerwa district covers an area of 3,086 Km² and borders Uganda to the North, Rwanda to the West and Karagwe district to the South. The study villages are located near the Kagera river basin, which forms the boundary between Kyerwa and Rwanda (West) and Uganda (North). According to the 2022 national census, Kyerwa district had a population of 412,910 people, including 211,685 females and 201,225 males, with average household size of 4.3, and sex ratio of 95. ![Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/05/2023.10.05.23296564/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/05/2023.10.05.23296564/F1) Figure 1: Maps show the study area; A: The 26 regions of Tanzania including Kagera (light blue) and Kyerwa district (green), B: Study villages in Kyerwa district (red). ### Study population and recruitment of participants This CSS included individuals aged ≥6 months living in the five villages which are part of the longitudinal component of the MSMT project and provided consent to participate in the study. The survey targeted about 30% of all individuals from each village who were registered during a census survey that was conducted in February 2023. All community members meeting the inclusion criteria were invited to participant in the study. The inclusion criteria included age from 6 months and above, residence in one of the five villages and providing an informed consent. Individuals who wanted to participate but were residents of other villages or declined to give an informed consent were excluded from the CSS. A call for and information about the CSS was passed to all household members by a community organizer who broadcasted using a loudspeaker and walked through all parts of the village. Each of the study village had 3-5 hamlets and members from 1-3 hamlets were invited to meet the study team on specific days during the surveys. The study team was stationed at a central location that was set-up in each village. Any member who missed out was allowed to visit the survey location on a different day in the same or the next village. ### Data collection procedures Data collected included demographic, anthropometric, clinical and parasitological data as shown in figure 2. Initially, basic demographic data were collected during the census survey that covered all households and individuals in each family. Every member of the community was enumerated during the census and given a unique identification number (IDs) and a database of all community members was set up at the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) in Dar es Salaam. During the CSS, each participant was identified using their IDs which are linked to the main database containing all members of the community. After confirming the identity of the prospective participants, they were provided with study identification numbers which were generated specifically for this CSS. Thereafter, participants were interviewed to obtain demographic information on top of those collected during the census. Each study participant was asked to report about malaria prevention practices through a series of questions, including how often they slept under a bed net (ITN or LLIN), how frequently other family members used bed nets, their habit of checking and repairing mosquito nets, and the regularity of using anti-mosquito spray/repellent or other methods within their household. They were later sent to designated areas for collection of anthropometric measurements (weight, height and body temperature) and then proceeded to the laboratory for testing for malaria and collection of blood samples. For detection of malaria parasites, participants were screened using RDTs (Abbott Bioline Malaria Ag Pf/Pan, Abbott Diagnostics Korea Inc., Korea, and Smart Malaria Pf/Pan Ag Rapid Test, Zhejiang Orient Gene Biotech Co. Ltd, China); and donated dried blood samples on filter paper (DBS) for laboratory analyses which will be reported elsewhere. Blood slides for detection of malaria parasites by microscopy were also collected for reading in the laboratory but the results are not included in this paper. The final step involved clinical assessment and collection of data on history of any illness as well as use of antimalarials and other medications (Fig. 2). Additional information including demographics, place of residence and presence of breeding sites were collected during the census survey from each household and all residents. ![Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/10/05/2023.10.05.23296564/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/05/2023.10.05.23296564/F2) Figure 2: Schematic drawing showing the flow of study participants during the CSS Bed net use and other control interventions against malaria This is the first CSS to be conducted in these villages based on the methods that have been used in previous studies conducted in selected communities of Tanga region from 1992 as described previously [30,31]. All asymptomatic (and some few symptomatic) participants were tested with RDTs and those with positive results were treated with Artemether-Lumefantrine and any other medicines according to the national guidelines [32]. Assessment of vector control methods was done by asking each participant to report about ownership of bed nets and their use as well as any information about the use of other methods. Through interviews with the district malaria focal person (DMIFP) and during the census survey, information about sources of ITNs/LLINs, use of other vector control interventions such IRS and LSM was collected. It was reported that Kyerwa receives bed-nets from NMCP through the different campaigns such as mass distribution, antenatal care (ANC) clinics and school net programme [33,34], together with private distributors. According to the NMCP reports of 2022, bed-net ownership in Kyerwa was at 89% and use was >80% (NMCP Unpublished data). The study villages and other parts of Kyerwa district and the entire region of Kagera were covered by the IRS programme funded by the US President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) from 2008 to 2013 (Zilyahuramu G, Personal communication). The villages were also involved in LSM operations using biolarvicides produced in Tanzania but these activities could not be sustained because of lack of funding (Zilyahuramu G, Personal communication). Additional information about surveys of malaria vectors was explored from the DMIFP and other sources; indicating that the villages took part in entomological surveillance in the past. ### Data management and analysis The data was collected with structured questionnaires created using ODK software, and installed and running on the tablets. The data was directly transmitted to a central server located at NIMR in Dar es Salaam. Data cleaning begun with exported the data to excel and daily cleaning which was done concurrently with field activities. Thereafter, the data were transferred to STATA version 13 (STATA Corp Inc., TX, USA) for further cleaning and analysis. Descriptive and statistical methods were used to describe the study population and generate baseline characteristics. The summary of results was presented in tables, figures, and text. Binary logistic regression was used to assess statistical association between malaria prevalence and different independent variables, before and after adjustments for covariates such as sex, age, age group and use of bed nets. The analysis also included other variables such as presence of breeding sites, types of houses and social economic status (SES) of the household. The household SES was calculated using assets owned by each household based on the data which were collected during the census survey in February 2023. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to calculate SES quantiles using the data of household’s assets as previously described [35]. The items included in the PCA were ownership of a house, number of rooms, source of energy for lighting and cooking, source of drinking water, number of acres of land which was cultivated by the family, type of toilet, and possession of domestic animals and devices such as mobile phones, radio, television, bicycle, and motorcycle. Variables which were statistically significant (p-value