Effects of Six Weeks of Supervised Telerehabilitation on Pulmonary Function, Functional Capacity, and Dyspnoea among individuals with Long COVID

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the outbreak of the acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a global pandemic and has led to an unprecedented public health crisis. [1] According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 1,038,228 cases of COVID-19 have been observed in United Arab Emirates (UAE). [2] The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 varies from asymptomatic infection to severe outcomes including respiratory illness, multiorgan failure, and fatal cases. [3,4] Clinical manifestations have been categorized into three phases by the joint guidelines proposed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), and the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP): ‘Acute COVID-19’ (signs and symptoms of COVID-19 infection up to 4 weeks), ‘ongoing symptomatic COVID-19’ (from 4 weeks up to 12 weeks), and ‘post-COVID-19 syndrome’ (when signs and symptoms continue beyond 12 weeks).[5]

The majority (∼ 80%) symptomatic individuals recover without hospitalization. Approximately15% become seriously ill and require oxygen, while the remaining 5% become critically ill and need intensive care. [6] While most individuals recover from COVID-19, survivors have reported persistent symptoms that remain unresolved for months after being discharged from the hospital. [7] Various terms, such as “long haulers,” “Chronic COVID syndrome,” “post-COVID-19 syndrome,” “post-acute COVID-19,” or “Long-COVID,” have been used interchangeably to describe the lingering effects of COVID-19. Among these, “Long COVID” is widely accepted globally. [8]

While a specific definition is yet to be universally agreed upon, Long COVID is generally described as a cluster of new symptoms that emerge around 12 weeks after a confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19, in the absence of no other clinical diagnosis. [9] Individuals experiencing Long COVID commonly report impaired lung functions, post-exertional fatigue, and dyspnea. Additionally, other symptoms include neurocognitive impairment, autonomic dysfunction, and mental health issues like anxiety and depression, among others. [10]

Long COVID can manifest regardless of the severity of the initial infection, hospitalization status, or age. [11] Long COVID can lead to decreased physical activity levels and have a significant impact on the overall quality of life. [12,13].

Research has shown that dedicated efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19, including the implementation of prevention methods, development of treatments, and distribution of vaccines, have been instrumental in reducing the initial stage of infections. [14] Shifting the perspective on the pandemic and giving significant attention to Long COVID is crucial. Various professional organizations have emphasized the importance of early detection and rehabilitation for individuals experiencing Long COVID symptoms. [10] Despite ongoing research, the mechanisms behind Long COVID remain incompletely understood, and there is currently limited evidence for effective pharmacological management. As a result, exercise training has emerged as a viable alternative for effectively controlling the symptoms associated with Long COVID.

A large body of research has established exercise training as the cornerstone for addressing dyspnea and fatigue in various respiratory conditions in hospital setup (in or patient rehabilitation [15,16] However, training in a hospital setup is challenged by factors including but not limited to low participant uptake, insufficient attendance by the individual, and high dropout rates, accessing hospital-based training are transportation issues, acute exacerbation of the conditions, disruption of daily routine, and symptom severity. As an alternative approach the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) now recommends telerehabilitation (TR) to extend the benefits of hospital set up. [16,17]

TR is a method of providing rehabilitation services to individuals remotely, utilizing information and communication technologies. [18] Unlike hospital-based rehabilitation, exercising at home may enhance effectiveness, facilitate long-term integration of exercise routines into daily life, and improve compliance. The beneficial impact of exercise training through TR on exertional tolerance and dyspnea in conditions such as COPD has been extensively documented.[18] Nevertheless, there is limited literature available regarding the impact of telerehabilitation training on exertional tolerance and dyspnea in individuals with Long COVID. [19-26] Apart from the challenges faced in hospital-based training, the ongoing pandemic necessitates clinical and public measures to minimize the risk of viral transmission. TR programs present a practical alternative in such situations. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of six weeks of telerehabilitation on pulmonary function, functional capacity and dyspnea in individuals with Long COVID.

METHOD

RESULTS

A total of 50 participants were contacted by phone after being identified through the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department’s discharge register at Al Ain Hospital. Twenty-four of the 27 participants who consented to participate in current study, presented for further evaluation of eligibility requirements. All of the selection criteria were met by 20 participants and same completed six weeks aerobic training through telerehabilitation. (Figure 1) The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. The mean age of all the participants was 49.30 ± 15.46 years. Average height and weight of the participants in the study were 163.80 ± 9.76 cm and 78.70 ± 15.58 kg, respectively. The study participants were predominantly female (n=12) and nine were with comorbidity of obesity

Table 2 presents the outcomes of the 6MWT, PFT, and mMRC scale scores before and after the telerehabilitation intervention. Overall, the telerehabilitation program demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the 6MWT and PFT results after a 6-week duration. The 6MWT showed a noteworthy improvement of 21%, while the PFT values exhibited improvements in forced vital capacity (FVC) by 4%, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) by 8%, FEV1/FVC ratio by 1%, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) by 11 units. Moreover, the post-rehabilitation scores of mMRC indicated a significant decrease when compared to the pre-rehabilitation scores.

Table 3 provides a comprehensive overview of the statistical significance of changes in the 6MWT, PFT and mMRC scale of the study participants. These results help evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention and provide insights into the impact on functional capacity, pulmonary function and dyspnea in participant The physical activity levels of the participants at baseline were determined using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire. The findings revealed that 35% (n=7) of the participants were identified as physically active (> 600 MET-min/week), while 65% (n=13) were classified as physically inactive (<600 MET-min/week) at baseline

DISCUSSION

Telerehabilitation has gained significant popularity and widely promoted during COVID-19 pandemic to assure rehabilitation continuity. However, there is a paucity of published reports in UAE to support the usefulness of telerehabilitation among Long COVID individuals. The current study is the first study in the UAE, conducted with rigorous methodology and ensure safety among UAE individuals with Long COVID.[32]

The findings from current study demonstrated that the telerehabilitation is effective in significantly improving functional capacity, pulmonary function and reducing dyspnea among long COVID individuals. The literature evidenced, exercise delivered via telerehabilitation has led to increase in functional capacity as assessed by the 6 MWT [22–24,26] with low level of certainty. However, its effects on dyspnea [22–24] and pulmonary functions [22,26] were inconclusive.

The current study demonstrated that aerobic training through remote monitoring appears to be same with no incidence of adverse events. One trial has reported adverse events such as chest tightness, weakness, dizziness, sputum discharge, dizziness, chest pain and back pain.[22]

During the pandemic telerehabilitation has been promoted across the globe for health care delivery for various conditions. However, there is a lack of strong scientific evidence on effectiveness of aerobic training on main symptoms of Long COVID specifically with no evidence in UAE. Existing trails presented heterogeneity in terms of participant’s demography, stage of COVID-19 and method adopted in telerehabilitation [22–24,26]

Furthermore, telerehabilitation offers the advantage of delivering therapy wherever is most convenient for the individual, while allowing therapists to prescribe various interventions and receive feedback through modern digital technology. Additionally, individuals can participate in telerehabilitation sessions from the comfort of their own homes or care centers, reducing the burden and involvement of healthcare providers compared to traditional face-to-face setups.

The study demonstrates notable strengths. Firstly, during the implementation of exercises through telerehabilitation, no adverse events were reported, indicating a high level of safety. Secondly, the study observed an impressive adherence rate of over 90% among participants, indicating a strong commitment to attending the exercise sessions. These findings underscore the study’s robustness and highlight the safe implementation and high acceptance of telerehabilitation for delivering exercise interventions.

The current study has few drawbacks. Due to time constraints, participants recruitment was confined to a single center. Furthermore, the lack control group, small sample size, overrepresentation of female and lack of participant’s knowledge on web and technology literacy were also few factors. Hence while generalizing the results of the current study, one must exercise caution. Additionally, these considerations also make determining the intervention’s effectiveness in compared to spontaneous recovery difficult.

The clinical implications of the study are promising. According to preliminary findings from the study, telerehabilitation appears to be a beneficial and convenient method in assisting the recovery of individuals with long COVID. Increasing the number and duration of supervised sessions may reduce the risk of complications associated with long COVID thereby facilitating the improvement in the overall quality of life.

Future research endeavors should place emphasis on implementing a comprehensive monitoring system that accurately tracks the dosage, adherence, and precision of each exercise component. Additionally, it is crucial to consider the long-term effect of the telerehabilitation on Long COVID, an aspect that was not addressed in the present study.

CONCLUSION

A six-week of aerobic exercise training delivered through telerehabilitation can effectively improve functional capacity, pulmonary function and reduce dyspnea among long COVID individuals. Telerehabilitation, with its high adherence rate and little side effects, makes aerobic delivery possible and well tolerated by individuals with Long COVID. Large scale research is warranted to explore the long-term benefits and optimal implementation strategies of telerehabilitation among Long COVID individuals.