Abstract
Objective To identify barriers and facilitators to women GPs’ career progression.
Design Systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.
Setting Studies conducted in the UK NHS general practice setting.
Participants General practitioners.
Main outcome measures Barriers and facilitators mapped thematically to the COM-B model, including Capability, Opportunity and Motivation as influencers of Behaviour.
Results 21 articles were included in this review, with varied study designs. No relevant intervention studies were identified. There was a lack of recent research evidence; over half were conducted over 20 years ago. Most studies met quality criteria, though there were some problems with reporting and adjustment for potential confounders. Barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels were found that inhibit women GPs’ career progression. While some positive changes have been documented across studies that span some thirty years, many challenges remain.
Conclusion Despite general practice being one of the more female-dominated medical specialties, barriers at personal, socio-cultural and system levels continue to inhibit women GPs’ careers. The COM-B model of behaviour change was used to group thematic findings according to the barriers women may face in terms of their capabilities, opportunities and motivations and identify potential policies that could be evaluated as options to support women GPs’ career progression.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Partnership for Responsive Policy Analysis and Research (PREPARE york.ac.uk/prepare) is a collaboration between the University of York and the Kings Fund, producing fast-response analysis to inform developing policy. The research programme is funded by the NIHR Policy Research Programme (grant number NIHR200702). This research article is independent research commissioned by the Department of Health and Social Care as part of the PREPARE programme. The views expressed in this publication are those of the participants and the authors and not necessarily those of NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
