Abstract
Malaria elimination interventions in low-transmission settings aim to extinguish hot spots and prevent transmission to nearby areas. In malaria elimination settings, the World Health Organization recommends reactive, focal interventions targeted to the area near malaria cases shortly after they are detected. A key question is whether these interventions reduce transmission to nearby uninfected or asymptomatic individuals who did not receive interventions. Here, we measured direct effects (among intervention recipients) and spillover effects (among non-recipients) of reactive, focal interventions delivered within 500m of confirmed malaria index cases in a cluster-randomized trial in Namibia. The trial delivered malaria chemoprevention (artemether lumefantrine) and vector control (indoor residual spraying with Actellic) separately and in combination using a factorial design. We compared incidence, infection prevalence, and seroprevalence between study arms among intervention recipients (direct effects) and non-recipients (spillover effects) up to 3 km away from index cases. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios accounting for spillover effects. The combined chemoprevention and vector control intervention produced direct effects and spillover effects. In the primary analysis among non-recipients within 1 km from index cases, the combined intervention reduced malaria incidence by 43% (95% CI 20%, 59%). In secondary analyses among non-recipients 500m-3 km from interventions, the combined intervention reduced infection by 79% (6%, 95%) and seroprevalence 34% (20%, 45%). Accounting for spillover effects increased the cost-effectiveness of the combined intervention by 37%. Our findings provide the first evidence that targeting hot spots with combined chemoprevention and vector control interventions can indirectly benefit non-recipients up to 3 km away.
Significance Statement In settings where malaria transmission is declining and approaching elimination, new malaria cases are clustered in space and time. Prior studies have found that targeting prophylactic antimalarial drugs and vector control in the area around newly detected malaria cases reduced community-wide malaria. Here, we found that when antimalarials and vector control were delivered as a combined strategy in the area near recent cases, malaria incidence was reduced up to 3 kilometers away among individuals who did not receive interventions. Accounting for these benefits to non-recipients increased cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Overall, our findings suggest that combined, targeted malaria interventions can reduce local transmission and support their use for malaria elimination.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02610400
Funding Statement
The original trial was supported by Novartis Foundation (A122666), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1160129), and the Horchow Family Fund (5300375400). Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers K01AI141616 (PI: Benjamin-Chung) and the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32HL151323 (Nguyen) and Novartis Foundation Supplement to A122666 (PIs: Gosling, Hsiang). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Jade Benjamin-Chung and Michelle Hsiang are Chan Zuckerberg Biohub Investigators.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The trial protocol was approved by the Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services (17/3/3) and the Institutional Review Boards at the University of California San Francisco (15-17422) and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (10411). The secondary analysis protocol was approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (60708).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We added Jennifer L Smith as co-author. She was accidentally omitted from the prior preprint.
Data and Code Availability
Data from the original trial is available at https://clinepidb.org/ce/app/workspace/analyses/DS_f559aee789. Replication scripts are available at https://github.com/jadebc/malaria-focal-spillover-public.
