Abstract
Background Cord-clamping strategies may modify blood pressure (BP) and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rStO2) immediately after birth.
Methods We conducted a sub-study nested within the Baby-Directed Umbilical Cord-Clamping trial. Infants ≥32+0 weeks’ gestation assessed as requiring resuscitation were randomly allocated to either physiologically-based cord clamping (PBCC), where resuscitation commenced prior to umbilical cord clamping, or standard care where cord clamping occurred early (ECC). In this single-site sub-study, we obtained additional measurements of pre-ductal BP and rStO2. In a separate observational arm, non-randomised vigorous infants received 2 minutes of deferred cord clamping (DCC) and contributed data for reference percentiles.
Results Among 161 included infants, n=55 were randomly allocated to PBCC (n= 30) or ECC (n= 25). The mean (SD) BP at 3-4 minutes after birth (primary outcome) in the PBCC group was 64 (10) mmHg compared to 62 (10) mmHg in the ECC group, mean difference 2 mmHg (95% confidence interval −3 – 8 mmHg, p= 0.42). BP and rStO2 were similar across both randomised arms and the observational arm (n=106).
Conclusion We found no difference in BP or rStO2 with the different cord clamping strategies. We report reference ranges for BP and rStO2 for late-preterm and full-term infants receiving DCC.
Impact
Among late-preterm and full-term infants receiving resuscitation at birth, blood pressure (BP, at 3-4 minutes and 6-7 minutes) and cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (rStO2) are not influenced by timing of cord clamping in relation to establishment of ventilation.
Infants in this study did not require advanced resuscitation, where different cord clamping strategies may yet influence BP and rStO2.
The reference ranges for BP and rStO2 represent the first, to our knowledge, for vigorous late-preterm and full-term infants receiving deferred cord clamping.
rStO2 >90% (∼90th percentile) may be used to define cerebral hyperoxia, for instance when studying oxygen supplementation after birth.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ACTRN12619000277145
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) through the Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine (GNT 1153176), Programme Grant (606789) and Fellowships (SBH: APP545921, GRP: APP1105526, PGD: APP1059111, CTR: 1175634). SB was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. A Near-Infrared Spectroscopy device was provided on loan by Nonin, USA. The funders had no role in the in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵9# Joint senior authors
Data availability
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
