What are the most effective interventions to support children and young people bereaved by suicide in the family: a rapid review

1.1 Who is this review for?

This Rapid Review was conducted as part of the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre Work Programme. The question for this review was suggested by the Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention team in the NHS Wales Executive to support the Welsh Government’s suicide prevention strategy objectives to provide information and support to those bereaved or affected by suicide and self-harm; to build on the recent consultation on draft guidance on how we respond to people affected or bereaved by suicide; and to inform the development of the new Suicide and Self-harm Prevention Strategy. The findings will guide the Government’s work with agencies and charities that support children and young people following the suicide of a close family member.

1.2 Background and purpose of this review

In 2021, there were 5,583 suicide deaths in England and Wales (Office for National Statistics, 2022). Many of these deaths would have been parents or siblings, leaving behind bereaved children and young people.

Bereavement by suicide is different from other forms of bereavement, and the need for specialised support is indicated (Braiden et al, 2009; Pfeffer et al, 2002). Children who lost loved ones to suicide are more likely to experience a complicated or complex bereavement process and have poorer mental health outcomes (Andriessen et al, 2016; Braiden et al, 2009; Pitman et al, 2014). Compared to others, children and young people bereaved by family suicide are at higher risk of dying by suicide (Calderaro et al, 2021; Del Carpio et al, 2021; Hua et al. 2019) and experiencing a range of other negative outcomes, such as attempting suicide (Calderaro et al, 2021; Del Carpio et al, 2021) and self-harm (Del Carpio et al, 2021).

Prior to this review, an initial search for secondary evidence (systematic reviews, rapid reviews and scoping reviews) revealed a number of relevant reviews (Andriessen et al, 2019; Bergman et al, 2017; Chen and Panebianco, 2018; Hua et al, 2020; Journot-Reverbel et al; 2017, Kaspersen et al, 2022; Ridley and Frache, 2020). However, only one review (Journot-Reverbel et al. 2017) was specific to the inclusion criteria. The other reviews included adults as well as children and adolescents, or children and adolescents bereaved by causes other than suicide. The primary studies reported in the Journot-Reverbel et al. (2017) review (Daigle and Labelle, 2012; Pfeffer et al, 2002) were included in this work, as well as an additional study. The search conducted for this review also covered a more recent period up to March 2023.

2.1 Included studies

A search for primary studies identified 348 records, of which 3 studies met the inclusion criteria (Section 5.1) and were included in this review. Those were two studies with a pre-post design and one non-randomised controlled study. See Section 6.2 for a detailed summary of the included studies.

2.2 Effectiveness of group interventions for mental health outcomes

All three studies included in this review measured children’s mental health outcomes, although specific outcomes varied by study. Anxiety and depression were measured in two studies (Daigle and Labelle, 2012; Pfeffer et al, 2002). Other mental health outcomes, such as internalising symptoms, general mood, posttraumatic stress, and grief, were each measured in one study.

2.3 Effectiveness of group interventions for social and behavioural outcomes

All three studies examined at least one social or behavioural outcome of participating children, such as anger, disruptive behaviour, stress management, adaptability. Each of the outcomes reported below was only reported in one study.

3.1 Summary of the findings

Limited evidence is available on support interventions for children and young people bereaved by suicide. Only three comparative studies examining such interventions were located. Overall, the interventions reviewed in this report showed promising results, but the methodological limitations preclude any definitive conclusions. No evidence was found on support interventions for very young children below the age of 6 or young people older that 15, but below 24.

All three included studies (Daigle and Labelle, 2012; Pfeffer et al, 2002; Veale, 2014) reported on group interventions. The most common outcomes examined by the studies included in this review were related to the symptoms of anxiety and depression, with two studies (Daigle and Labelle, 2012; Pfeffer et al, 2002) examining changes specifically in anxiety and depression, and one more study (Veale, 2014) reporting on internalising symptoms. All three studies observed improvements, however, the absence of a control group in the pre-post studies makes it impossible to determine that the changes were attributable to the interventions. Other types of outcomes (such as anger and disruptive behaviour, self-esteem, social adjustment) were only examined in one study each.

Though the non-randomised controlled study (Pfeffer et al, 2002) provided stronger evidence for the efficacy of a group intervention for reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms, several methodological problems were identified, including alternating (rather than random) assignment, differences between groups, and major dropout among non-intervention families (75% vs 18% among families who received the intervention). The two pre-post studies (Daigle and Labelle, 2012; Veale, 2014) observed positive changes in the participating children in terms of change percentage and the number of children in the clinical range for various outcomes, however, the lack of statistical analysis due to the small sample size and the lack of a control group were key limitations.

While this review captured only those studies where the outcomes of interventions for bereaved children were measured quantitatively, it is helpful to turn to studies employing qualitative design to understand why such interventions may be effective. In addition to the content of the intervention, the context in which it takes place is important. For example, bereaved children who participated in group interventions stated that such programmes helped them to feel less alone as they had the opportunity to meet others who shared the same experience and could therefore understand what they were going through (Braiden et al, 2009; Hagstrom, 2021; McClatchey and Wimmer, 2012). Being able to meet others who had been bereaved by suicide and openly talk about a loved one’s death helped some participants destigmatise their understanding of suicide (Hagstrom, 2021). They were also able to see how other children and young people were dealing with the suicide (McClatchey and Wimmer, 2012). This suggest that the group aspect is an important part of the intervention. Even though these qualitative studies do not fit the eligibility criteria for this review, the summary of their results is provided in Appendix 3.

3.2 Strengths and limitations of the available evidence

The evidence presented in this review has a number of limitations. Two of the three included studies (Daigle and Labelle, 2012; Veale, 2014) used a pre-post design with no control group and had small sample sizes (8 and 5 children respectively), meaning that their findings may not be generalisable to other contexts. Only one controlled study of an intervention for suicide-bereaved children was found (Pfeffer et al, 2002), however, the children were not randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups and the study saw a large dropout rate, particularly in the control group. While all three studies observed improvements in children’s outcomes, their findings should be treated with caution due to the methodological limitations of these studies.

3.3 Strengths and limitations of this Rapid Review

Although this review was conducted rapidly to inform policy and decision makers, comprehensive search strategies were designed to identify relevant evidence in the bibliographic databases. Database searches were supplemented by searching a range of websites known to review team and the stakeholders as being potentially relevant.

In conducting this rapid review, two reviewers independently carried out study selection. However, quality appraisal and data extraction extraction were carried out by single reviewers and independently checked for accuracy. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion. The review consists of 3 primary studies conducted in Ireland, Canada and the USA. All included studies had significant limitations. The primary weakness is the sample size and lack of a control group. Due to the paucity of evidence, we were unable to undertake any assessment of the outcomes using GRADE.

This review highlights that there is a lack of research in this area and the need for further research into the development and evaluation of interventions.

3.4 Implications for policy and practice

Given the limited evidence available on support interventions for children and young people bereaved by suicide, it will be important to develop guidance and standards of practice for these services based on best available evidence. All services developed will need to have measurable validated outcomes as part of an integral evaluation process set up from service initiation.

These findings will be presented and discussed at the National Advisory Group to Welsh Government for Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention and will inform the development of guidance setting out a systems response to children and young people affected or bereaved by suicide.

3.5 Implications for future research

There is a need for high quality primary studies examining the effectiveness of bereavement support interventions for children and young people bereaved through the suicide of a family member. These studies should aim for rapid translation of evidence into practice to ensure service improvement and involvement of children and young people, highlighting important aspects of an intervention as well as its delivery.

3.6 Economic considerations*

• An estimated 300-350 people die by suicide in Wales each year (Samaritans 2017). Inflated to July 2023 prices, these suicides cost the Welsh economy between £760million and £880million per annum. Approximately 70% of these costs are attributed to emotional impacts on family and on society (Public Health England, 2020; Bank of England 2023).

• Suicide risks increase during period of economic recession. Economic downturns categorised by rising unemployment further exacerbate this risk. The lag in macroeconomic conditions improving after recession can lead to these suicide risks persisting for several years, especially if personal circumstances have not improved (Samaritans, 2017).

• The attempted suicide or loss of a parent to suicide are categorised as Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs). An evidence base exists around economic impacts of ACEs more generally (Hughes et al., 2021).

• Early parental death (before the age of 21) was found to be consistently associated with higher risk of hospitalisation and higher medication use for mental health disorders as well as increased work absenteeism due to illness in adulthood (Böckerman, Haapanen and Jepsen, 2023). These risk factors in turn can incur additional costs to society through additional resource use cost and productivity losses. Early parental death was also linked to a significant reduction in years of school attendance, employment and earnings in adulthood. Although the detrimental impacts were observed for both males and females, the negative consequences for parental death were greater for males (Böckerman et al., 2023).

*This section has been completed by the Centre for Health Economics & Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), Bangor University