ABSTRACT
Background Technological devices such as smartphones, wearables, sensors, or virtual assistants allow to collect data on health and disease processes and are thus increasingly considered a useful digital alternative to conventional biomarkers. We aimed to provide a systematic overview of the emerging literature on “digital biomarkers” with their definitions, features, and citations in biomedical research.
Methods We analyzed all articles in PubMed that used the term “digital biomarker(s)” in title or abstract, considering any study involving humans and any review, editorial, perspective, or other opinion-based article up to 8 March 2023. We systematically extracted characteristics of publications and research studies, and any definitions and features of “digital biomarkers” mentioned. We described the most influential literature on digital biomarkers and their definitions using thematic categorizations of definitions considering the FDA BEST framework (i.e., data type, data collection method, purpose of biomarker), analysing the structural similarity of definitions by performing text analyses (hierarchical clustering on the distance-matrix) and citation analyses (based on citation metrics obtained from OpenAlex via Local Citation Network; last search 26 June 2023).
Findings We identified 415 articles prominently using the term “digital biomarker”. They were published between 2014 and 2023 (median 2021), mostly describing primary research (283 articles; 68%). Most articles did not provide a definition of a digital biomarker (n=287; 69%). The 128 articles providing a definition of a digital biomarker reported 127 different definitions. Of these 127 definitions, 78 considered data collection, 56 data type, 50 the purpose, and 23 were based on all three key components. The 128 articles with a definition were cited a median of 6 times (interquartile range 2-20) with up to 517 citations. Of the ten most frequently cited articles using a definition, all used a different one.
Interpretation The most frequently used definitions for digital biomarkers are highly different and there is no consensus about what this emerging term means. Our overview highlights key defining characteristics of digital biomarkers which can inform the development of a harmonized and more widely accepted definition.
Funding No specific funding.
Competing Interest Statement
Competing interests: RC2NB (Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel) is supported by Foundation Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel. One of the main projects of RC2NB is the development and evaluation of a digital biomarkers which is supported by grants from Novartis, Roche, and Innosuisse (Swiss Innovation Agency). All authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
No specific funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Authors’ email
Ana Karen Macias Alonso: ana.karen.alonso{at}stud.th-luebeck.de
Julian Hirt: julian.hirt{at}usb.ch
Tim Woelfle: tim.woelfle{at}usb.ch
Perrine Janiaud: perrine.janiaud{at}usb.ch
We updated the competing interests and added a paragraph to the discussion and a sentence to the conclusions.
Data Availability
All data that has been analyzed is provided in the supplementary material S2.
