Recommendations for surveillance of pulmonary dysfunction among childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group
=======================================================================================================================================================================================================================
* Maria Otth
* Rahel Kasteler
* Renée L. Mulder
* Jennifer Agrusa
* Saro H. Armenian
* Dana Barnea
* Anne Bergeron
* Neel S. Bhatt
* Stephen J. Bourke
* Louis S. Constine
* Myrofora Goutaki
* Daniel M. Green
* Ulrike Hennewig
* Veronique Houdouin
* Melissa M. Hudson
* Leontien Kremer
* Philipp Latzin
* Antony Ng
* Kevin C. Oeffinger
* Christina Schindera
* Roderick Skinner
* Grit Sommer
* Saumini Srinivasan
* Dennis C. Stokes
* Birgitta Versluys
* Nicolas Waespe
* Daniel J. Weiner
* Andrew C. Dietz
* Claudia E. Kuehni
## ABSTRACT
Childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors are at risk of pulmonary dysfunction. Current follow-up care guidelines are discordant. Therefore, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group established and convened a panel of 33 experts to develop evidence-based surveillance guidelines. We critically reviewed available evidence regarding risk factors for pulmonary dysfunction, types of pulmonary function testing, and timings of surveillance, then we formulated our recommendations. We recommend that CAYA cancer survivors and healthcare providers are aware of reduced pulmonary function risks and pay vigilant attention to potential symptoms of pulmonary dysfunction, especially among survivors treated with allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, thoracic radiotherapy, and thoracic surgery. Based on existing limited evidence, our panel currently recommends pulmonary function testing only for symptomatic survivors. Since scarce existing evidence informs our recommendation, we highlight the need for prospective collaborative studies to address pulmonary function knowledge gaps among CAYA cancer survivors.
Keywords
* Children
* Adolescents
* Young adults
* Survivors
* Childhood cancer/malignancy
* Late effects
* Pulmonary dysfunction
* Lung disease
* Respiratory
* Surveillance
* Lung Function
## INTRODUCTION
Children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) diagnosed with cancer are at risk for pulmonary dysfunction and death from pulmonary conditions years to decades after completing treatment (1–5). Treatment modalities previously defined as lung-toxic include chemotherapeutic agents, such as busulfan, bleomycin, carmustine, and lomustine, and thoracic radiotherapy, thoracic surgery, and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (6, 7). Pathophysiological mechanisms of pulmonary damage include oxidative stress from lung-toxic chemotherapeutics, free radical formation during radiotherapy, and transplant-specific pulmonary complications, such as idiopathic pneumonia syndrome or bronchiolitis obliterans (7–9). Free radicals injure type II pneumocytes, resulting in decreased proliferative capacity, less surfactant production, and ultimately reduced lung compliance (10). Activations of an inflammatory cascade and changes in endothelial cells of surrounding vasculature result in leakage of proteins and inflammatory cells into alveoli (10). Such inflammation is commonly the final path of different pathophysiological mechanisms which can either resolve or progress to fibrotic changes in alveolar septa, causing restrictive impairments. Surgical removal of parts of the lung or chest wall as part of cancer therapy reduces lung volumes and causes restrictive changes.
Symptomatic pulmonary dysfunction presents with chronic cough or dyspnea, especially on exertion. With large pulmonary functional reserve, dyspnea may not be noticed until a substantial decline in pulmonary function has occurred. Pulmonary function testing (PFT) detects pulmonary dysfunction before symptoms arise. Commonly used PFT include spirometry, body plethysmography, and measurement of diffusion capacity for carbon-monoxide (DLCO). Spirometry and body plethysmography mainly assess changes in larger airways. Examinations detecting changes in lung periphery or inhomogeneous ventilation, such as washout tests, are used to answer research questions, yet remain unintroduced into routine clinical care (11). Among CAYA cancer survivors exposed to lung-toxic treatments, obstructive changes have been reported in up to 4%, restrictive disease 24%, and diffusion capacity impairment 49% (1, 2). Proportions are even higher among certain sub-groups of CAYA cancer survivors, such as following HSCT (12).
Since long-term CAYA cancer survivor numbers constantly increase from diagnostic, risk stratification, and treatment strategy advances, long-term CAYA cancer survivor surveillance is a high priority (13). Awareness of the risk of late effects from cancers or treatments led to the development of different long-term follow-up (LTFU) guidelines, such as those from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG), and from the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (UKCCLG) (14–16). Although COG, DCOG, and UKCCLG guidelines recommend screening for pulmonary dysfunction, they are discordant regarding indication, timing of initiation, frequency, and screening method. The International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group (IGHG) surveillance guidelines develop internationally harmonised and implementable recommendations based on evidence from existing literature and international expert consensus when evidence is unavailable (17). In this current IGHG initiative, we specifically define which CAYA cancer survivors likely benefit from screening for pulmonary dysfunction and when and how screening should be performed. We also further highlight limitations of the current evidence informing surveillance recommendations for pulmonary dysfunction and knowledge gaps to address in future research.
## METHODS
### Methodology of International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group (IGHG) and formulating key questions
Information about methods used to formulate IGHG recommendations was published previously (18). For our current recommendation, we organised a guideline panel of 33 members—representing COG, DCOG, UKCCLG, the Pan-European Network for Care of Survivors after Childhood and Adolescent Cancer (PanCare)—and pulmonary health and late effects experts from various medical specialties: paediatric oncology and haematology; paediatric and adult pulmonology; radiation oncology; epidemiology; and guideline experts (Appendix A) (19–21).
IGHG’s approach to formulating recommendations involves answering five key questions: 1) "Who needs surveillance?" 2) "What surveillance modality should be used?" 3) "At what frequency should surveillance be performed?" 4) “When should surveillance be initiated?” and 5) "What should be done when abnormalities are found?" Based on our preliminary literature search and a resulting absence of data, we performed the systematic literature search for only question 1) “Who needs surveillance?” and used expert opinions from paediatric and adult pulmonologists for questions 2–5. We did not use guidelines for surveillance of other pulmonary diseases, such as idiopathic interstitial pneumonitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, due to different underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Notably, guidelines for other diseases start with symptomatic patients diagnosed with specific pulmonary diseases, which differs from our population of interest—asymptomatic CAYA cancer survivors at risk of developing pulmonary problems.
### Comparing existing guidelines and formulating clinical questions
First, we separately compared COG, DCOG, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, and UKCCLG recommendations for each of the five key questions (15, 16, 19, 22). For the key question, “What should be done when abnormalities are found?” we also included vaccination and lifestyle factors. For the key question “Who needs surveillance?” we subsequently formulated 11 clinical questions and sub-questions to strengthen concordant recommendations and find consensus for discordant recommendations (Appendix B).
We used the PICO-framework to formulate clinical questions (23). Our *population* of interest included CAYA cancer survivors—defined by at least 50% of survivors diagnosed before age 30—who completed cancer treatment at least two years previously. We included potentially lung-toxic treatment modalities (selected chemotherapeutic agents, thoracic radiotherapy, thoracic surgery, and allogeneic HSCT) and tobacco exposure as *interventions*. We also included all chemotherapeutic agents mentioned in current LTFU guidelines as risk factors for pulmonary dysfunction (bleomycin, busulfan, and nitrosoureas [lomustine and carmustine]). Based on expert opinion, we additionally included treatment with cyclophosphamide, gemcitabine, and methotrexate. *Comparators* were considered during data extraction and differed between studies according to study design, such as non-exposed survivors, survivors exposed to lower chemotherapeutic doses, or community controls. Our *outcome* of interest was pulmonary dysfunction assessed by PFT. We focused on this single outcome because our preliminary literature search showed that other commonly reported clinical endpoints—in particular survivor-reported symptoms or clinician-reported diagnoses—had been assessed and reported heterogeneously and had the risk of subjectivity, such as different definitions of chronic cough or dyspnea (24–28). We categorised pulmonary dysfunction into four groups: obstruction (by FEV1, FEV1/FVC, MEF25–75%); restriction (by TLC, FVC); hyperinflation (by RV, RV/TLC); and diffusion capacity impairment (by DLCO). Although clinically relevant hyperinflation should be interpreted together with obstruction, we defined hyperinflation as a separate pulmonary outcome since it was defined as such in included studies.
### Systematic literature search on "Who needs surveillance?"
We conducted our first systematic literature search in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines restricted to PubMed and Ovid in November 2016 with updates in June 2019; December 2020; June 2022; and April 2023 (29). We developed our search strategy based on 11 clinical questions and five concepts: cancer diagnosis, population of CAYA cancer survivors, potential lung-toxic treatment modalities, pulmonary outcomes, and late effects (Appendix C). The inclusion criteria were given through the PICO-framework. We also excluded studies with fewer than 20 participants and studies only assessing prevalence of pulmonary dysfunction without measuring effect sizes of associations between exposures and pulmonary dysfunction (Appendix D).
Guideline panel members screened titles, abstracts, and full-texts. Two authors independently screened each study. Coordinators (MO, RK) resolved discrepancies. We extracted data from each study and entered it into evidence summary tables (Appendix E); separately performed risk of bias assessments for each study (Appendix F); and completed overall quality assessments of available evidence for each clinical question, according to the GRADE criteria (Appendix G) (18, 30). Each eligible study could contribute to answering more than one clinical question. For our overall conclusion of evidence, we summarised findings by type of pulmonary dysfunction (Appendix H).
### Expert consensus on surveillance modality, start and frequency of screening, and procedures in case of pulmonary dysfunction
For questions about surveillance modality, start and frequency of screening, and procedures in cases of pulmonary dysfunction (key questions 2ℒ5), we held numerous meetings with paediatric and adult pulmonologists and guideline development experts. We formulated suggestions based on initial meetings, which we then discussed with guideline panel members until reaching consensus through an iterative approach with successive revisions and implementing suggestions from all panel members.
### Translating evidence into recommendations
We assessed evidence and information we gathered from our systematic literature search and expert consensus within the evidence-to-decision framework—it weighs the impact of screening by estimating benefits and harms, resources and costs, impact on health inequities, acceptability, and feasibility. Through panel discussions, we achieved consensus for final recommendations, which we subsequently discussed with additional experts, including oncologists and survivors (Appendix A).
## RESULTS
### Comparison with existing guidelines
Comparing existing guidelines revealed relevant discordance (Appendix I). Since the Scottish guideline omitted recommendations for pulmonary dysfunction, we excluded it (22). The remaining three guidelines considered CAYA cancer survivors at risk for pulmonary dysfunction after exposure to bleomycin, busulfan, nitrosoureas, thoracic radiotherapy, or thoracic surgery. Practical details revealed discordances, including cut-off doses for chemotherapeutic agents or thoracic radiotherapy; radiation volume; age at treatment; and additional risk factors, such as renal dysfunction and pulmonary infection. All three guidelines recommended PFT, yet did not specify tests. We found no concordance for screening frequency and starting screening with five and ten years after diagnosis in the Dutch guideline; two years after completion of treatment in the COG guideline; and end of treatment in the UK guideline. Guidelines agreed about referring CAYA cancer survivors to pulmonologists in cases of pulmonary dysfunction; alerting anaesthetists about previous bleomycin treatment; advising survivors not to smoke; and considering pneumococcal and influenza immunisation (Appendix I).
### General results from systematic literature search
Our systematic literature search identified 9284 studies. We assessed 704 full-texts for eligibility; 26 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria (Figure 1, Table 1) (1–3, 31–53). Reasons for excluding full-texts mainly included 1) assessing outcomes other than pulmonary function by PFT (n=186); 2) including non-CAYA cancer survivors (n=164); and 3) assessing outcomes fewer than two years after completing treatment (n=91). Most studies (n=12) included CAYA survivors of different cancer types; followed by studies on leukaemia (n=7), lymphoma (n=4), and brain tumors, neuroblastoma, and osteosarcoma with one study each. Appendix J contains key characteristics and our summary of evidence for each included study; Appendix K presents our evidence assessment summary and quality of data contributing to recommendations per clinical question. Quality of evidence was very low or low for most clinical questions (Table 2). We summarise primary reasons for downgrading the quality of evidence in Table 3 and provide more detail in Appendix K.
[Figure 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/31/2023.08.28.23294741/F1)
Figure 1: Flow diagram for selection of studies
(Studies could be included in more than one category)
View this table:
[Table 1:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/31/2023.08.28.23294741/T1)
Table 1: Key characteristics of included studies used for recommendation (n=26).
Detailed information available in Appendix K.
View this table:
[Table 2:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/31/2023.08.28.23294741/T2)
Table 2: Conclusions and quality of the evidence for the risk and risk factors for pulmonary function impairment among childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors diagnosed up to age 30.
View this table:
[Table 3:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/31/2023.08.28.23294741/T3)
Table 3: Main reasons for downgrading the quality of evidence
### Evidence on risk factors for pulmonary dysfunction among CAYA cancer survivors
We identified seven studies examining allogeneic HSCT as a risk factor for pulmonary dysfunction (31–37); 13 studies for thoracic radiotherapy (1–3, 31, 38, 40, 45–48, 50–52); five studies for thoracic surgery (1, 31, 38–40); between one and eight studies for selected chemotherapeutic agents (bleomycin, busulfan, nitrosoureas, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate); no studies for gemcitabine; and six studies for tobacco exposure (2, 40, 41, 43–45) (Table 2, Appendix K). For busulfan and nitrosoureas, only one study of very low quality was available; it provided insufficient evidence to decide whether these agents significantly impact pulmonary function (2). Four studies of low to very low quality of evidence assessed pulmonary function after cyclophosphamide-containing treatment (1, 42, 46, 47). Studies examining effects from active tobacco smoking showed contradictory results (2, 41, 43–45). No studies examined impact from passive tobacco smoking or cannabis use. Our clinical questions and sub-questions aimed to investigate impact from exposure versus non-exposure and also impact from different dose levels; age at exposure; chronic graft versus host disease; infections; and total body irradiation among individuals treated with HSCT (Appendix B). Between one and four studies examined impact from different cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and bleomycin doses; yet no studies were available for different doses of nitrosoureas and busulfan. Seven studies examined the impact of age at treatment with HSCT and radiotherapy.
Overall, we identified several potential sources of bias and methodological issues in most studies (Table 3). Study design was retrospective in more than half (n=14), increasing risks of bias and non-standardised measurements. Half of the studies did not describe original population sizes from where they selected participants at risk. This makes it uncertain if results are internally and externally representative and can be extrapolated for the entire population of CAYA cancer survivors. Only half of the studies described how they performed pulmonary function testing, such as by implementing the joint European Respiratory Society (ERS)-American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommendations. Even though most studies (74%) reported reference values used to standardize CAYA cancer survivor PFT results, studies used 22 different sources of reference values—with up to ten different sources in one study (47). Only two studies used internationally recommended all-age reference values from the Global Lung Initiative (GLI) (3, 52). Cut-off value definitions, such as for restrictive disease, were inconsistent, which made PFT results difficult to interpret and impossible to compare between studies and age groups. Additionally, findings from different studies on the same exposure were frequently inconsistent or contradictory, such as with bleomycin (31, 38, 39). Inconsistent and contradictory aspects precluded analysing quantitatively and interpreting findings, such as a meta-analysis; prevented formulation of recommendations for specific pulmonary function abnormalities, such as obstructive, restrictive, and diffusion impairment; confounded analysis of effects of specific chemotherapeutic agents on pulmonary function; or prevented definition of cut-off doses for chemotherapeutics or radiotherapy. However, studies we examined provided some evidence CAYA cancer survivors treated with allogeneic HSCT, thoracic radiotherapy, and thoracic surgery are at risk for pulmonary dysfunction as measured by PFT.
### Translating evidence and expert consensus into recommendations
#### Asymptomatic CAYA cancer survivors
Our panel concluded evidence was insufficient for recommending routine PFT for asymptomatic CAYA cancer survivors at present (Appendix L, Table 4). The current evidence is low quality with risks of participation bias and cannot be translated to represent the wider general situation in asymptomatic CAYA cancer survivors. Such factors are essential for formulating clear recommendations. For exposures with evidence of impacting pulmonary function, there is currently no effective intervention that reverses or delays pulmonary disease progression among asymptomatic survivors. Therefore, risk-benefit-assessments do not favour screening now. However, since extensive evidence shows smoking presents harmful effects on pulmonary health among the general population, our panel agreed about counselling CAYA cancer survivors not to smoke. The panel further recommended vaccinations for CAYA cancer survivors at risk for pulmonary-related pathogens, as appropriate for other vulnerable populations (Table 4). Influenza vaccination is recommended based on concordance between existing guidelines. Based on local or national recommendations for populations with increased vulnerability of pulmonary disease, such as pneumococcus and SARS-CoV-2, the panel recommended considering additional vaccinations against bacteria or viruses. All three LTFU care guidelines mentioned informing anaesthetists about previous bleomycin treatment, yet without further information or support from included studies; our additional search showed contradictory findings (54, 55).
View this table:
[Table 4:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/31/2023.08.28.23294741/T4)
Table 4: Harmonised recommendations for surveillance of pulmonary dysfunction for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors.
#### Symptomatic CAYA cancer survivors
For symptomatic CAYA cancer survivors—especially among those treated with allogeneic HSCT, thoracic radiotherapy, and thoracic surgery—our panel agreed upon readily performing PFT with results evaluated by pulmonologists experienced with CAYA cancer populations. Health care professionals and CAYA cancer survivors should heed symptoms, such as chronic cough, chest tightness, dyspnoea, wheezing, or exercise intolerance. Consideration of differential diagnoses, such as cardiac dysfunction, should guide selection of appropriate investigations. Pulmonologists from our guideline panel recommended spirometry, body plethysmography, and DLCO measurements wherever possible. Breath washout tests can additionally be performed if available. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide, bronchodilator reversibility tests, or other specific investigations should be used for differential diagnoses of other pulmonary dysfunction causes, which—even among vulnerable populations—are arguably more frequent reasons for pathological findings than previous cancer treatment, such as asthma in cases of obstructive disease. Managing cases of abnormal findings and frequency of further PFT depends on local institutions and guidance from local pulmonologists; it is not part of our recommendations.
## DISCUSSION
Our review summarises existing guidelines, evidence from systematic literature searches, and harmonised recommendations for pulmonary dysfunction screening among CAYA cancer survivors diagnosed before age 30 with exposure to potentially lung-toxic cancer treatment modalities. Because current evidence is scarce with quality limitations and because there are no effective treatments for asymptomatic pulmonary dysfunction, our panel limited recommendations for PFT to symptomatic CAYA cancer survivors only. We recommend health care providers to be aware of increased risks for possible pulmonary dysfunction—especially among survivors treated with allogeneic HSCT, thoracic radiotherapy, and thoracic surgery; be vigilant for early clinical symptoms of pulmonary dysfunction; and refer symptomatic CAYA cancer survivors to pulmonologists experienced with the population. We also recommend counselling all CAYA cancer survivors about lifestyle factors relevant for pulmonary and general health.
Our recommendations are supported by two additional studies specific for children following HSCT (56, 57). Both studies were not considered in our final recommendation as they formulated follow-up recommendations independent of underlying diagnosis, including HSCT for malignant diseases, immune deficiencies, inherited bone marrow failure syndromes, and haemoglobinopathies. However, after two years of follow-up, neither study recommended regular PFT for asymptomatic children and adolescents; rather they advised considering follow-up PFT based on symptoms and past measurements (56, 57).
### Gaps in knowledge and future directions for research
With currently available evidence, we only answered a few of our original clinical questions and often to only a limited extent, such as any exposure to radiotherapy without differentiation for doses or volumes. To improve evidence on pulmonary dysfunction among CAYA cancer survivors, we outlined gaps in knowledge and methodological approaches for future research (Table 5).
View this table:
[Table 5:](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/31/2023.08.28.23294741/T5)
Table 5: Gaps in knowledge and future directions for research
We identified existing knowledge gaps for dose-response relationships of all studied exposures; newer chemotherapeutic or immunotherapeutic agents; other medical conditions, such as pulmonary complications during treatment, co-morbidities; impact of treatments on physiological processes affecting pulmonary function, such as lung growth and physiologic ageing; and also approaches for early assessment of pulmonary dysfunction and effects from preventive or curative interventions.
Most studies focused on well-established risk factors such as HSCT (31–37), thoracic radiotherapy (1–3, 31, 38, 40, 45–48, 50–52), and thoracic surgery (1, 31, 38–40). For chemotherapeutic agents—even those with previously reported pulmonary toxicity, such as bleomycin— we found clinical evidence for CAYA cancer survivors insufficient. Future studies evaluating other classical chemotherapeutic agents, targeted or immunotherapeutic agents, or pharmacovigilance data might identify new aspects of pulmonary dysfunction among CAYA cancer survivors. It is similar for radiotherapy, including a lack of data comparing photon and proton therapy where toxicity of protons might be lower from smaller irradiated volume compared with photons, possibly resulting in less lung-toxicity. For all exposures, we lack knowledge on how they interact with each other or how age at treatment or additional medical conditions modify impact from exposures; we also have little information about dose-response relationships.
Peak lung function attained in early adulthood and the trajectory of lung function decline with ageing are important for lung health across the life span. The impact of cancer itself, pulmonary complications during treatment, pulmonary co-morbidities, such as asthma, or impaired somatic growth, such as scoliosis, on peak attained lung function has not been examined. No studies examined whether CAYA cancer survivors start at a lower peak attained lung function or whether physiological ageing and decline in pulmonary function is faster and steeper than among the general population. Frailty and accelerated ageing were previously described for childhood cancer survivors (58–60). The definition of frailty is met when fulfilling three or more of five criteria: reduced lean muscle mass, weakness, slow walking speed, low energy expenditure, and fatigue (61). Ness et al. showed that components of frailty—reduced strength, walking speed, and increased fatigue—were as frequent among childhood cancer survivors from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort at a median age of 33 years as among people age 65 years and older in the general population (62). By calculating the deficit accumulation index score, Williams et al. showed childhood cancer survivors acquire more damage and disease than community controls (60). Both studies suggest accelerated ageing among childhood cancer survivors. Factors contributing to accelerated ageing and frailty include more rapid cellular senescence, telomere length reduction, epigenetic modifications, somatic mutations, and mitochondrial DNA damage (58). These factors may also affect lung growth and function among children and adolescents or result in faster pulmonary ageing, but their potential impact among CAYA cancer survivors is unknown.
Another gap in knowledge concerns measuring early stages of pulmonary dysfunction. Prior studies primarily utilized spirometry, body plethysmography, or DLCO measurement. More sensitive tests, such as multiple breath washout tests, may identify pulmonary disease earlier and eventually contribute to better understanding of pulmonary dysfunction development among CAYA cancer survivors. Parisi et al. and Schindera et al. investigated pulmonary function of childhood cancer survivors using multiple breath washout tests (63, 64). Parisi et al. investigated 57 survivors with median follow-up time of 6.2 years from end of treatment; they did not show differences in ventilation homogeneity compared with controls (64). The 46 survivors evaluated by Schindera et al. were median 20 years from cancer diagnosis (63). Survivors defined as high risk (bleomycin, busulfan, nitrosoureas, HSCT, thoracic radiotherapy, or surgery) tended to have more ventilation inhomogeneity than those at standard risk (other cancer therapies), yet not significantly (63). In both studies, more survivors had abnormal washout tests than abnormal spirometry.
Available data made it impossible to reach conclusions about the longitudinal course of pulmonary function as survivors progress through childhood, puberty, and adulthood in their growth and development followed by a trajectory of ageing. Eight studies with repeated PFT results suffered from attrition bias, small sample sizes, and included sub-groups of CAYA cancer survivors, such as HSCT (2, 32, 33, 35, 37, 47, 52, 53). Ideally with baseline PFT before starting treatment, longitudinal data— ascertained at regular intervals from diagnosis—will be available improve knowledge about the onset of pulmonary dysfunction and its evolution.
PFT provides one way of assessing pulmonary health. Clinical symptoms or imaging are other possible modalities. Clinical symptoms lack objectivity and vary with age, which limits precise measurement. In addition, questions about clinical symptoms are worded differently between studies, which makes comparisons difficult. Louie et al validated selected self-reported complications from HSCT survivors (65). No data exist for other CAYA cancer survivor populations or for other questions about pulmonary dysfunction.
We suggest future studies take weaknesses and methodological problems we identified from the literature we reviewed into account and avoid them whenever possible (Table 5). Collaboration between paediatric oncologists and pulmonologists helps avoid shortcomings when conducting PFT and reporting results. Collaborative studies with harmonised protocols could maximise statistical power with larger numbers of CAYA cancer survivors and allow stratifying analyses into sub-groups defined by therapeutic exposures, age at treatment, cumulative doses, or genotype. Prospective rather than retrospective studies allow for standardising assessments, such as PFT at predefined time points, and minimise selection and attrition biases. Assessing patient-reported outcomes, such as symptoms, functional limitations, and quality of life, together with PFT, helps determine the clinical significance of findings and their impact on lives of patients and their families.
To obtain accurate measurements, PFT must be performed to high standards, by trained personnel explicitly applying published guidelines and standards, including ERS/ATS guidelines. Reporting, interpreting, and applying results in clinical practice are equally important. It is essential that future studies use GLI reference equations to standardise PFT results and make them comparable between age groups and regions (66, 67). Binary cut-offs—describing results as either normal or abnormal— reduce statistical power and introduce interpretations based on pre-defined threshold values. Since cut-off values differ between studies, such dichotomisation hampers comparisons of results, leading to conflicting and potentially misleading proportions of CAYA cancer survivors with pulmonary dysfunction. Reporting results as raw data and z-scores based on internationally agreed, age-adjusted reference values is preferred and allows comparing and pooling data.
We suggest studies investigating pulmonary function among CAYA cancer survivors be conducted in the knowledge that at present no curative treatments exist for suspected progressive inflammatory and fibrotic changes underlying pulmonary dysfunction. Therefore, we advise careful study of benefits and harms from repeat testing. However, awareness of impaired pulmonary function possibly leads to earlier treatment of bacterial infections with antibiotics, especially because excess pulmonary mortality and hospitalisations among CAYA cancer survivors are mainly from infection (68, 69). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approved two anti-fibrotic drugs—pirfenidone and nintedanib—for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; patients with progressive-fibrosing unclassifiable interstitial lung disease possibly also benefit (70). Therefore, in the future the possible benefit from anti-fibrotic drugs could be an area for investigation among CAYA cancer survivors.
### Strengths and limitations
Strengths of our recommendation are multidisciplinary and international collaboration, which included perspectives from paediatric and adult specialists in CAYA cancer care and survivors; broad inclusion criteria; our thorough review process paired with in-depth quality assessment of included studies; and resulting evidence. Limitations mainly reflect lack of available evidence: studies with small sample sizes, heterogeneous PFT result reporting, use of different reference values; and scarce longitudinal data.
## Conclusion
CAYA cancer survivors treated with allogeneic HSCT, thoracic radiotherapy, and thoracic surgery were reported at risk for pulmonary dysfunction. However, our extensive literature search highlights the absence of robust evidence linking these exposures and pulmonary dysfunction because of small study sizes, high risks of bias, inconsistently assessing and reporting PFT results, and a lack of effective interventions to prevent the deterioration of asymptomatic pulmonary dysfunction. Therefore, our panel could not currently recommend routine PFT for asymptomatic CAYA cancer survivors. Yet, it is important for health care professionals and CAYA cancer survivors to be aware of possibly impaired pulmonary health and act vigilantly about appropriately investigating and following up when symptoms develop. We also recommend routine vaccinations recommended for people with pulmonary diseases and careful counselling relating to avoidance of tobacco products. Our results highlighted the current paucity of evidence, revealed relevant knowledge gaps, and emphasised that clearly defined, well-planned, harmonised, and collaborative studies and reports of pulmonary function outcomes are urgently needed to improve the body of evidence about pulmonary function among CAYA cancer survivors in the future.
## Supporting information
Online Appendix [[supplements/294741_file04.docx]](pending:yes)
## Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
## Author contributions
Concept and design: CEK, ACD, RLM, SHA, MMH, LK, RK
Literature search: CEK, RLM, RK, MO
Title and abstract screening: all authors
Full text screening: all authors
Data extraction: all authors
Risk of bias assessment: CEK, RLM, RK, MO, CS, MG, NW
Quality of evidence assessment: CEK, RLM, RK, MO, CS, MG, NW
Manuscript writing: all authors
Manuscript review: all authors
MO and RK have directly accessed and verified all underlying data reported in the manuscript.
All authors had full access to all the data in the study and accept responsibility for the submission for publication.
## Declaration of interest
* - AC Dietz is employed by and has equity in Shape Therapeutics, Inc. and was employed by and has equity in bluebird bio, Inc., neither of which provided financial support or oversight of this work.
* - AB received fees for lectures and/or boards from Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, Enanta paid to her institution as well as travel grants from Boehringer and Astra-Zeneca.
* - CEK received grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation
* - DJW received grants/contracts from Vertex pharmaceuticals, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation,
* - Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutic Development Network, payment or honoraria for lectures/ presentations by Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and American Board of Pediatrics
* - GS and RK received support for the present manuscript by Bernische Krebsliga and Lungenliga Bern
* - LSC received support from University of Alabama for COG Survivorship guidelines, royalties or licenses from Springer and Wolters Kluwer, payment or honoraria for lectures/ presentations from the American Society for Hematology and the University of Miami, travel support from the First International Pediatric Cardio-oncology meeting, and participates on the Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of the NCI PDQ
* - MG received a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation, support for attending meetings and/or travel from the European Respiratory Society, has a leadership role in the BEAT-PCD ERS clinical research collaboration
* - NW received general research support from CANSEARCH Research Foundation, payment/honoraria and support to attend an international meeting from Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (SOBI), participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from SOBI
* - PL received grants/contracts from Vertex and OM Pharma, payments or honoraria for lectures/ presentations by Vertex, Vifor and OM Pharma, participates on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Polyphor, Santhera, Vertex, OM Pharma, Vifor, Sanofi Aventis
* - UH received a grant and support for attending meetings from the German Childhood Cancer Foundation,
## Funding
Swiss Cancer Research (grant no: KFS-4157-02-2017, KLS/KFS-4825-01-2019 and KFS-5302-02- 2021), Cancer League Bern, Kinderkrebshilfe Schweiz, and Lung League Bern provided support for our study. Funders played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
## Acknowledgment
We thank Elio Castagnola and Cecile Ronckers for their contribution to the title and abstract and full text screening; Prof Thorsten Langer (Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Lübeck, Germany) and Daniel Mulrooney (St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA) for critically appraising the recommendations and manuscript as external reviewers; and Anna Apel (CEO of Saving Kids with Cancer Foundation, Poland; PanCare Board Member) and Katie Weyer as survivor representatives. Lastly, we thank Kristin Marie Bivens (Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern) for her editorial assistance.
## Footnotes
* * shared first authors
* ° shared last authors
* **Source of support:** Swiss Cancer Research (grant no: KFS-4157-02-2017, KLS/KFS-4825-01-2019 and KFS-5302-02-2021), Cancer League Bern, Kinderkrebshilfe Schweiz and Lung League Bern supported our study.
## Abbreviations
ATS
: American Thoracic Society
CAYA
: Childhood Adolescent and Young Adult
COG
: Childrens’ Oncology Group
DCOG
: Dutch Childrens’ Oncology Group
DLCO
: Diffusion capacity for carbon-monoxide
ERS
: European Respiratory Society
FEV1
: Forced expiratory volume in the first second
FVC
: Forced vital capacity
GLI
: Global Lung Initiative
GRADE
: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation
GvHD
: Graft versus Host Disease
HSCT
: Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
IGHG
: International Guideline Harmonization Group
LTFU
: Long-term follow-up
MEF25-75%
: Maximal expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of the FVC
PFT
: Pulmonary function testing
PRISMA
: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
RV
: Residual volume
TBI
: Total Body Irradiation
TLC
: Total lung capacity
UKCCLG
: United Kingdom Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group
* Received August 28, 2023.
* Revision received August 28, 2023.
* Accepted August 31, 2023.
* © 2023, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
## References
1. 1.Mulder RL, Thonissen NM, van der Pal HJ, Bresser P, Hanselaar W, Koning CC, et al. Pulmonary function impairment measured by pulmonary function tests in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Thorax. 2011;66(12):1065–71.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToidGhvcmF4am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiI2Ni8xMi8xMDY1IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDgvMzEvMjAyMy4wOC4yOC4yMzI5NDc0MS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=)
2. 2.Armenian SH, Landier W, Francisco L, Herrera C, Mills G, Siyahian A, et al. Long-term pulmonary function in survivors of childhood cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33(14):1592–600.
3. 3.Green DM, Zhu L, Wang M, Ness KK, Krasin MJ, Bhakta NH, et al. Pulmonary function after treatment for childhood cancer. A report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE). Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;13(9):1575–85.
4. 4.Reulen RC, Winter DL, Frobisher C, Lancashire ER, Stiller CA, Jenney ME, et al. Long-term cause-specific mortality among survivors of childhood cancer. Jama. 2010;304(2):172–9.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/jama.2010.923&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20628130&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000279811000023&link_type=ISI)
5. 5.Schindler M, Spycher BD, Ammann RA, Ansari M, Michel G, Kuehni CE, et al. Cause-specific long-term mortality in survivors of childhood cancer in Switzerland: A population-based study. International journal of cancer. 2016;139(2):322–33.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/ijc.30080&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=26950898&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
6. 6.Huang TT, Hudson MM, Stokes DC, Krasin MJ, Spunt SL, Ness KK. Pulmonary outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review. Chest. 2011;140(4):881–901.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1378/chest.10-2133&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21415131&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
7. 7.Skinner R, Kaplan R, Nathan PC. Renal and pulmonary late effects of cancer therapy. Seminars in oncology. 2013;40(6):757–73.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.009&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24331195&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
8. 8.Hildebrandt GC, Fazekas T, Lawitschka A, Bertz H, Greinix H, Halter J, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary chronic GVHD: report from the consensus conference on clinical practice in chronic GVHD. Bone marrow transplantation. 2011;46:1283.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/bmt.2011.35&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21441964&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000296279000001&link_type=ISI)
9. 9.Saglio F, Zecca M, Pagliara D, Giorgiani G, Balduzzi A, Calore E, et al. Occurrence of long- term effects after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children affected by acute leukemia receiving either busulfan or total body irradiation: results of an AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica) retrospective study. Bone marrow transplantation. 2020;55(10):1918–27.
10. 10.Straub JM, New J, Hamilton CD, Lominska C, Shnayder Y, Thomas SM. Radiation-induced fibrosis: mechanisms and implications for therapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(11):1985–94.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00432-015-1974-6&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25910988&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
11. 11.Robinson PD, Latzin P, Verbanck S, Hall GL, Horsley A, Gappa M, et al. Consensus statement for inert gas washout measurement using multiple- and single- breath tests. The European respiratory journal. 2013;41(3):507–22.
12. 12.Stenehjem JS, Smeland KB, Murbraech K, Holte H, Kvaløy S, Wethal T, et al. Diffusing capacity impairment is prevalent in long-term lymphoma survivors after high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone marrow transplantation. 2016;52:646.
13. 13.Botta L, Gatta G, Capocaccia R, Stiller C, Cañete A, Dal Maso L, et al. Long-term survival and cure fraction estimates for childhood cancer in Europe (EUROCARE-6): results from a population-based study. The Lancet Oncology. 2022;23(12):1525–36.
14. 14.Children’s Oncology Group Long Term Follow-Up guidelines Version 5.0 2018 [cited 2019 05.04.2019]. Available from: [http://www.survivorshipguidelines.org/pdf/2018/COG\_LTFU\_Guidelines\_v5.pdf](http://www.survivorshipguidelines.org/pdf/2018/COG_LTFU_Guidelines_v5.pdf).
15. 15.15. Dutch Children’s Oncology Group SKION. Guidelines for follow-up in survivors of childhood cancer 5 years after diagnosis. 2010 [cited 08.05.2018]. Available from: [https://www.skion.nl/voor-patienten-en-ouders/late-effecten/533/richtlijn-follow-up-na-kinderkanker/](https://www.skion.nl/voor-patienten-en-ouders/late-effecten/533/richtlijn-follow-up-na-kinderkanker/).
16. 16.United Kindgdom Chilren’s Cancer Study Group. Therapy based long term follow-up - Practice Statement 2005. [cited 08.05.2018]. Available from: [https://www.cclg.org.uk/write/MediaUploads/Member%20area/Treatment%20guidelines/LTFU-full.pdf](https://www.cclg.org.uk/write/MediaUploads/Member%20area/Treatment%20guidelines/LTFU-full.pdf).
17. 17.International Guideline Harmonization Group (IGHG). [cited 04.11.2020]. Available from: [https://www.ighg.org/](https://www.ighg.org/).
18. 18.Kremer LC, Mulder RL, Oeffinger KC, Bhatia S, Landier W, Levitt G, et al. A worldwide collaboration to harmonize guidelines for the long-term follow-up of childhood and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2013;60(4):543–9.
19. 19.Children’s Oncology Group Long Term Follow-Up guidelines Version 4.0 2013 [cited 0.05.2018]. Available from: [https://www.childrensoncologygroup.org/](https://www.childrensoncologygroup.org/).
20. 20.Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group. [cited 29.05.2022]. Available from: [https://www.cclg.org.uk/](https://www.cclg.org.uk/).
21. 21.PanCare - Pan-European Network for Care of Survivors after Childhood and Adolescent Cancer. [cited 29.05.2022]. Available from: [www.pancare.eu](http://www.pancare.eu).
22. 22.Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer - A national clinical guideline 2013. [cited 16.11.2021]. Available from: [https://www.sign.ac.uk/media/1070/sign132.pdf](https://www.sign.ac.uk/media/1070/sign132.pdf).
23. 23.Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM). Asking focused questions: University of Oxford, Oxford UK. [cited 29.05.2022]. Available from: [https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/asking-focused-questions](https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/asking-focused-questions).
24. 24.Otth M, Schindera C, Güngör T, Ansari M, Scheinemann K, Belle FN, et al. Transplant characteristics and self-reported pulmonary outcomes in Swiss childhood cancer survivors after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-a cohort study. Bone marrow transplantation. 2021; 56(5):1065–1076.
25. 25.Kasteler R, Weiss A, Schindler M, Sommer G, Latzin P, von der Weid NX, et al. Long-term pulmonary disease among Swiss childhood cancer survivors. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2018;65(1).
26. 26.Dietz AC, Chen Y, Yasui Y, Ness KK, Hagood JS, Chow EJ, et al. Risk and impact of pulmonary complications in survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer. 2016;122(23):3687–96.
27. 27.Mertens AC, Yasui Y, Liu Y, Stovall M, Hutchinson R, Ginsberg J, et al. Pulmonary complications in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer. A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer. 2002;95(11):2431–41.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/cncr.10978&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12436452&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000179371400024&link_type=ISI)
28. 28.Huang TT, Chen Y, Dietz AC, Yasui Y, Donaldson SS, Stokes DC, et al. Pulmonary outcomes in survivors of childhood central nervous system malignancies: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2014;61(2):319–25.
29. 29.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20171303&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
30. 30.Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiYm1qIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEzOiIzMjgvNzQ1NC8xNDkwIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDgvMzEvMjAyMy4wOC4yOC4yMzI5NDc0MS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=)
31. 31.Record E, Williamson R, Wasilewski-Masker K, Mertens AC, Meacham LR, Popler J. Analysis of risk factors for abnormal pulmonary function in pediatric cancer survivors. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2016;63(7):1264–71.
32. 32.Inaba H, Yang J, Pan J, Stokes DC, Krasin MJ, Srinivasan A, et al. Pulmonary dysfunction in survivors of childhood hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cancer. 2010;116(8):2020–30.
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20186702&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
33. 33.Ginsberg JP, Aplenc R, McDonough J, Bethel J, Doyle J, Weiner DJ. Pre-transplant lung function is predictive of survival following pediatric bone marrow transplantation. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2010;54(3):454–60.
34. 34.Leung W, Ahn H, Rose SR, Phipps S, Smith T, Gan K, et al. A prospective cohort study of late sequelae of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Medicine. 2007;86(4):215–24.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1097/MD.0b013e31812f864d&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=17632263&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
35. 35.Madanat-Harjuoja LM, Valjento S, Vettenranta K, Kajosaari M, Dyba T, Taskinen M. Pulmonary function following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in childhood: a retrospective cohort study of 51 patients. Pediatric transplantation. 2014;18(6):617–24.
36. 36.Hoffmeister PA, Madtes DK, Storer BE, Sanders JE. Pulmonary function in long-term survivors of pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2006;47(5):594–606.
37. 37.Wieringa J, van Kralingen KW, Sont JK, Bresters D. Pulmonary function impairment in children following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2005;45(3):318–23.
38. 38.De A, Kamath S, Wong K, Olch AJ, Malvar J, Sposto R, et al. Correlation of pulmonary function abnormalities with dose volume histograms in children treated with lung irradiation. Pediatric pulmonology. 2015;50(6):596–603.
39. 39.Denbo JW, Zhu L, Srivastava D, Stokes DC, Srinivasan S, Hudson MM, et al. Long-term pulmonary function after metastasectomy for childhood osteosarcoma: a report from the St Jude lifetime cohort study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014;219(2):265–71.
40. 40.Stone A, Friedman DN, Kushner BH, Wolden S, Modak S, LaQuaglia MP, et al. Assessment of pulmonary outcomes, exercise capacity, and longitudinal changes in lung function in pediatric survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2019;66(11):e27960.
41. 41.Nysom K, Holm K, Hertz H, Hesse B. Risk factors for reduced pulmonary function after malignant lymphoma in childhood. Medical and pediatric oncology. 1998;30(4):240–8.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(199804)30:4<240::AID-MPO6>3.0.CO;2-G&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9473759&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
42. 42.Nysom K, Holm K, Olsen JH, Hertz H, Hesse B. Pulmonary function after treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood. British journal of cancer. 1998;78(1):21–7.
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9662245&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000074294400004&link_type=ISI)
43. 43.Oancea SC, Gurney JG, Ness KK, Ojha RP, Tyc VL, Klosky JL, et al. Cigarette smoking and pulmonary function in adult survivors of childhood cancer exposed to pulmonary-toxic therapy: results from the St. Jude lifetime cohort study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention. 2014;23(9):1938–43.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiY2VicCI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo5OiIyMy85LzE5MzgiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czo1MDoiL21lZHJ4aXYvZWFybHkvMjAyMy8wOC8zMS8yMDIzLjA4LjI4LjIzMjk0NzQxLmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==)
44. 44.Myrdal OH, Kanellopoulos A, Christensen JR, Ruud E, Edvardsen E, Kongerud J, et al. Risk factors for impaired pulmonary function and cardiorespiratory fitness in very long-term adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia after treatment with chemotherapy only. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 2018;57(5):658–64.
45. 45.Zorzi AP, Yang CL, Dell S, Nathan PC. Bleomycin-associated Lung Toxicity in Childhood Cancer Survivors. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2015;37(8):e447–52.
46. 46.Jenney ME, Faragher EB, Jones PH, Woodcock A. Lung function and exercise capacity in survivors of childhood leukaemia. Medical and pediatric oncology. 1995;24(4):222–30.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/mpo.2950240403&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7700166&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QJ91000002&link_type=ISI)
47. 47.Green DM, Merchant TE, Billups CA, Stokes DC, Broniscer A, Bartels U, et al. Pulmonary function after treatment for embryonal brain tumors on SJMB03 that included craniospinal irradiation. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2015;93(1):47–53.
48. 48.Khan F, Williams AM, Weiner DJ, Constine LS. Impact of Respiratory Developmental Stage on Sensitivity to Late Effects of Radiation in Pediatric Cancer Survivors. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020;5(3):426–33.
49. 49.Mittal A, Bhethanabhotla S, Ganguly S, Vishnubhatla S, Khadgawat R, Patel C, et al. Late effects in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma survivors after uniform treatment with ABVD with or without radiotherapy. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2021;68(11):e29293.
50. 50.Weiner DJ, Maity A, Carlson CA, Ginsberg JP. Pulmonary function abnormalities in children treated with whole lung irradiation. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2006;46(2):222–7.
51. 51.Oguz A, Tayfun T, Citak EC, Karadeniz C, Tatlicioglu T, Boyunaga O, et al. Long-term pulmonary function in survivors of childhood Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Pediatric blood & cancer. 2007;49(5):699–703.
52. 52.Otth M, Yammine S, Usemann J, Latzin P, Mader L, Spycher B, et al. Longitudinal lung function in childhood cancer survivors after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone marrow transplantation. 2022;57(2):207–14.
53. 53.Marina NM, Greenwald CA, Fairclough DL, Thompson EI, Wilimas JA, Mackert PW, et al. Serial pulmonary function studies in children treated for newly diagnosed Hodgkin’s disease with mantle radiotherapy plus cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and procarbazine alternating with cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine. Cancer. 1995;75(7):1706–11.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/1097-0142(19950401)75:7<1706::AID-CNCR2820750723>3.0.CO;2-T&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8826931&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
54. 54.Donat SM, Levy DA. Bleomycin associated pulmonary toxicity: is perioperative oxygen restriction necessary? The Journal of urology. 1998;160(4):1347–52.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62533-3&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9751352&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000075986600034&link_type=ISI)
55. 55.LaMantia KR, Glick JH, Marshall BE. Supplemental oxygen does not cause respiratory failure in bleomycin-treated surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 1984;60(1):65–7.
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=6197912&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1984SA07900014&link_type=ISI)
56. 56.Chow EJ, Anderson L, Baker KS, Bhatia S, Guilcher GMT, Huang JT, et al. Late Effects Surveillance Recommendations among Survivors of Childhood Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Children’s Oncology Group Report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2016;22(5):782–95.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.01.023&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
57. 57.Dietz AC, Duncan CN, Alter BP, Bresters D, Cowan MJ, Notarangelo L, et al. The Second Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium International Consensus Conference on Late Effects after Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Defining the Unique Late Effects of Children Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Immune Deficiencies, Inherited Marrow Failure Disorders, and Hemoglobinopathies. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2017;23(1):24–9.
58. 58.Ness KK, Kirkland JL, Gramatges MM, Wang Z, Kundu M, McCastlain K, et al. Premature Physiologic Aging as a Paradigm for Understanding Increased Risk of Adverse Health Across the Lifespan of Survivors of Childhood Cancer. Journal of clinical oncology. 2018;36(21):2206–15.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1200/JCO.2017.76.7467&link_type=DOI)
59. 59.Armenian SH, Gibson CJ, Rockne RC, Ness KK. Premature Aging in Young Cancer Survivors. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2019;111(3):226–32.
60. 60.Williams AM, Mandelblatt J, Wang M, Armstrong GT, Bhakta N, Brinkman TM, et al. Premature aging as an accumulation of deficits in young adult survivors of pediatric cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2023;115(2):200–7.
61. 61.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11253156&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000167294000010&link_type=ISI)
62. 62.Ness KK, Krull KR, Jones KE, Mulrooney DA, Armstrong GT, Green DM, et al. Physiologic frailty as a sign of accelerated aging among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St Jude Lifetime cohort study. Journal of clinical oncology. 2013;31(36):4496–503.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MzoiamNvIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjEwOiIzMS8zNi80NDk2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6NTA6Ii9tZWRyeGl2L2Vhcmx5LzIwMjMvMDgvMzEvMjAyMy4wOC4yOC4yMzI5NDc0MS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=)
63. 63.Schindera C, Usemann J, Zuercher SJ, Jung R, Kasteler R, Frauchiger B, et al. Pulmonary Dysfunction after Treatment for Childhood Cancer. Comparing Multiple-Breath Washout with Spirometry. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2021;18(2):281–9.
64. 64.Parisi GF, Cannata E, Manti S, Papale M, Meli M, Russo G, et al. Lung clearance index: A new measure of late lung complications of cancer therapy in children. Pediatric pulmonology. 2020;55(12):3450–6.
65. 65.Louie AD, Robison LL, Bogue M, Hyde S, Forman SJ, Bhatia S. Validation of self-reported complications by bone marrow transplantation survivors. Bone marrow transplantation. 2000;25(11):1191–6.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.bmt.1702419&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10849532&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
[Web of Science](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000087483600011&link_type=ISI)
66. 66.Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3-95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. The European respiratory journal. 2012;40(6):1324–43.
67. 67.Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, et al. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2019;200(8):e70–e88.
[CrossRef](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST&link_type=DOI)
[PubMed](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fmedrxiv%2Fearly%2F2023%2F08%2F31%2F2023.08.28.23294741.atom)
68. 68.Fidler MM, Reulen RC, Bright CJ, Henson KE, Kelly JS, Jenney M, et al. Respiratory mortality of childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Thorax. 2018;73(10):959–68.
[Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://medrxiv.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToidGhvcmF4am5sIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjczLzEwLzk1OSI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjUwOiIvbWVkcnhpdi9lYXJseS8yMDIzLzA4LzMxLzIwMjMuMDguMjguMjMyOTQ3NDEuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9)
69. 69.Smith L, Glaser AW, Peckham D, Greenwood DC, Feltbower RG. Respiratory morbidity in young people surviving cancer: Population-based study of hospital admissions, treatment- related risk factors and subsequent mortality. International journal of cancer. 2018;145(1):20–8.
70. 70.Maher TM, Corte TJ, Fischer A, Kreuter M, Lederer DJ, Molina-Molina M, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with unclassifiable progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Respiratory medicine. 2020;8(2):147–57.